• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

draft horse/dressage

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Phyxius View Post
    Yup! A mutt. And I have NOT problem with mutts. I have a problem with people thinking that because their mutt has a fancy name and six figure price tag that it's automatically better than someone elses mutt.

    I love mutts, too.

    Can you believe that dog mutt people even come up with NAMES for their mutts? Like a cock-a-poo or a swheat-n-poo. Or Labradoodle. But, you can't breed a lab to a poodle and still call it a poodle right? So, why can you with horses?
    Now your inexperience is really showing. This "argument" has been hashed out many times but the "reinventors of the wheel" never "get it".

    The Warmbloods have been developed by breeding the correct (and very similar) types to each other, not extremely different types in the hope of getting "something in between". It isn't rocket science but it is carefully thought out and planned. Not all Warmbloods are perfect, no one is saying they are. But the odds are better IF the UL are your goal. Thats all we are saying.

    As far as cost. A horse capable of getting to the UL or already there isn't going to be "cheap" no matter the breed.
    Patty
    www.rivervalefarm.com
    Follow us on facebook - https://www.facebook.com/pages/River...ref=ts&fref=ts

    Comment


    • get out of the wheat field, nodq, you're runnin' against the grain. you have to remember that 'breed prejudice' is ONLY ok here if it's against warmbloods!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by slc2 View Post
        get out of the wheat field, nodq, you're runnin' against the grain. you have to remember that 'breed prejudice' is ONLY ok here if it's against warmbloods!
        Oh that is SO true. I've restrained my fingers at some of the sneering and unkind comments about WBs. It doesn't really bother me though. As they say, the proof is in the pudding.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by slc2 View Post
          get out of the wheat field, nodq, you're runnin' against the grain. you have to remember that 'breed prejudice' is ONLY ok here if it's against warmbloods!
          Having a preference for one breed over another is not prejudice, it's preference. The breed prejudice and elitism people are talking about is looking down on others because their breed preference isn't the same as yours.

          "I'd rather have a draft cross than a warmblood" is preference.
          "People who like draft crosses are idiots" is elitist.

          So buy what you want to buy, and let others do the same.

          Funny, I don't see a lot of posts on WB threads saying "OMG, don't even buy that, get a draft cross instead." I don't recall looking at my trainers thinking "sheesh, why would she want to ride THAT?" Luckily my trainers are all nice, and they like my horse, but I see some comments that make me think I'd be very uncomfortable working with some people.

          Comment


          • "Breed prejudice"....Good. God.

            What is this world coming to? Why can't we all just get along? We all bleed red...there are no problem horses. Hasn't humanity rose above this behavior yet?



            *rolls eyes*

            Comment


            • Draft Cross Declared for Olympics - a PMU

              Just saw this other post about a pmu - thought it was relevant to this thread.

              http://www.chronicleforums.com/Forum...d.php?t=143415

              Who says draft crosses can't do dressage.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by prodomus View Post
                Just saw this other post about a pmu - thought it was relevant to this thread.

                http://www.chronicleforums.com/Forum...d.php?t=143415

                Who says draft crosses can't do dressage.
                Aw, Prodomus, nobody's saying draft crosses can't do dressage- they are just saying OUR draft crosses can't do dressage

                Comment


                • Originally posted by prodomus View Post
                  Just saw this other post about a pmu - thought it was relevant to this thread.

                  http://www.chronicleforums.com/Forum...d.php?t=143415

                  Who says draft crosses can't do dressage.
                  I saw that. He's a very nice mover. I don't think anyone has said they can't do dressage. Most have acknowledged that there are exceptions who do get to the upper levels. This horse is a beautiful example of that. He's well put together and has an experienced, lovely rider on board, what's to stop him from successfully advancing?

                  Comment


                  • I don't have breed prejudice; I like WBs and I ride one occasionally in my lessons. I used to ride a Trak and a Hano, too. Oh, and a OTTB -- can't forget him, he's a saint. They're all good horses, but not something I wanted.

                    It just seems like people think WBs are the *must have* for dressage. WB, WB, WB! Argh!

                    "Oh, you're buying a dressage horse? I know several WBs for sale!"
                    "Oh, thanks, but I'm not looking for a WB."
                    "I thought you said you wanted a dressage horse?"

                    ARGH!

                    Eileen
                    Mad Mare™ Studio
                    Custom Swarovski®, Czech glass and gemstone browbands in Circlet, Diadem and Tiara styles. Matching stock pins, bracelets and belts.
                    http://MadMare.com

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      As the original poster, and someone that has a horse all her life but new to dressage, relatively speaking, I had no idea what passion this thread would evoke. It's kind of cool that there are so many people like me that are not particularly "married" to a certain breed or type. I just know what touches my heart and for some reason, the second I saw the shire, that was it for me. It's like men. If we all wanted the same guy, he would be one exhausted dude. I know dressage seems to be life and death to some people, let's face it, every horse is beautiful {like people} in their way and a draft doing grand prix{which I'm not convinced is impossible} may simply do it with a different style than a wb. Break dancing and ballet appeal to different audiences. It doesn't mean one style is superior when they are both performed by a true artist. I hope this rant makes sense to at least one other person. If not, I will take my lumps and with a "Please Sir, may I have another?"

                      Comment


                      • if i recall, the nastiest comments on warmbloods came from the people selling lusitanos but they were the same substance as stated here many many times, they're stupid, clumsy, heavy, can't piaffe, can't collect, have to be ridden hard, they are not a traditional dressage horse breed, lipizanners and andalusians are (which is not breed prejudice, because it's directed at warmbloods), and the biggest one, everyone likes them irrationally because they are a status symbol and a fad, they only win because judges are stupid and don't really understand what dressage is about. however, andalusians, friesians and lusitanos AREN'T fads, they're the REAL DRESSAGE BREEDS. But it's ALSO CHEATING to ride a warmblood, because they are 'easier', and the presence of warmbloods at shows makes the show results all unfair, because the judges score them higher, even if a horse of another breed is much better.

                        i think the one i find the MOST irrational is that warmbloods are not the traditional dressage breeds, and that's why they're so bad at it. but that's not breed prejudice, and we should encourage anyone who wants to compete in dressage on anything other than a warmblood, but if they're riding a warmblood, that is cheating.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by slc2 View Post
                          if i recall, the nastiest comments on warmbloods came from the people selling lusitanos but they were the same substance as stated here many many times, they're stupid, clumsy, heavy, can't piaffe, can't collect, have to be ridden hard, they are not a traditional dressage horse breed, lipizanners and andalusians are (which is not breed prejudice, because it's directed at warmbloods), and the biggest one, everyone likes them irrationally because they are a status symbol and a fad, they only win because judges are stupid and don't really understand what dressage is about. however, andalusians, friesians and lusitanos AREN'T fads, they're the REAL DRESSAGE BREEDS. But it's ALSO CHEATING to ride a warmblood, because they are 'easier', and the presence of warmbloods at shows makes the show results all unfair, because the judges score them higher, even if a horse of another breed is much better.

                          i think the one i find the MOST irrational is that warmbloods are not the traditional dressage breeds, and that's why they're so bad at it. but that's not breed prejudice, and we should encourage anyone who wants to compete in dressage on anything other than a warmblood, but if they're riding a warmblood, that is cheating.
                          Which Lusitano breeder said that? I suspect that you are just making things up, as usual. The only statement which is remotely close to being true is that WBs are not traditional dressage horses. But there is nothing wrong with that! Dressage is for all horses, traditional or not! WBs are a success story of how horses can benefit from dressage even though they were introduced to it only recently.

                          I don't think it is irrational to like WBs, or any breed of horse. But I do think it is irrational to have contempt for people who do not share your feelings. That is when your preference has turned into fanaticism.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by canticle View Post
                            I don't think it is irrational to like WBs, or any breed of horse. But I do think it is irrational to have contempt for people who do not share your feelings. That is when your preference has turned into fanaticism.
                            Well, call me crazy, but I can't figure why anyone would have contempt for someone else for just doing their own thing, if what they are doing isn't hurting anyone.

                            Comment


                            • Every breed is bred to do a certain job. WB's are bred to do dressage and jumping. Therefore they are the breed of choice for dressage and jumping. I still have problem imagining them in eventing, but I am told I should change my mind.

                              Lusitanos are bred to do dressage (and bull fight). Spanish are bred to do dressage. Therefore they are also the breed of choice for dressage, but not jumping.

                              I have no problem some breeds are proven better in a job than others. Why shouldn't they? You need to recognize the work these breeders have been doing. (People might recall I have a certain certain real prejudice against AQHA that get me into trouble. But boy I cry for those funny looking AQHA registered QH you see in auctions and sold for not even 800 a piece!) Is there some snobbery involved? Of course. But it doesn't change my opinion about what horse is suitable for me.

                              Specialization naturally requires more skill to operate... and naturally a higher price tag. This is true for all commodities in the world, from cars to tv to cell phone. Breeder, horse seller and buyer alike, beware of what kind of market you are in. You need to reconcile that space you should be in, and be perfectly happy about it. If you are a breed specific kind of person, and want a little dressage machine, why on earth do you want to think outside of the breeds of choice, unless there are specific lines of other breeds that are proven to go all the way to the top. For the rest of us, we look for a decent looking, good size, uncomplicated hybrid, most cross breed will fit the bill, including a draft cross, and there is certainly lots of space there for the breeders there.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by flashykatt View Post
                                I have a book about Hanoverians with pictures of the type of horse that was being bred during WWII. They look heavier than today's drafties, and were bred for pulling cannons!
                                They were and are a coaching breed and as such as agile and with good knee action and gaits. They're also used as military horses and in teams of 8 or 12 ridden postillion with a gun.

                                Don't imagine a great heavy medieval cannon.... not that at all

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by polarbear View Post
                                  I can't help myself, you totally set me up for this. I have no dog in this fight, but here's my Clyde/tb gelding (Clyde stallion, tb mare).. He sure can jump..He was a preliminary eventer, going intermediate when I bought him (and yes, he did make the xc time)..
                                  That's hardly surprising. It was this cross as a 2nd cross that was used as part of the British Hunter Improvement Programme about 150 years ago and its provided some very high-class competition horses.

                                  The pure bred Clydesdale moves with great energy with feet well lifted from the ground and to give the appearance of strength, power AND activity.

                                  To this day you can still get grant funding from the Hunter Improvement Programme for this cross.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by MyReality View Post
                                    Every breed is bred to do a certain job. WB's are bred to do dressage and jumping. Therefore they are the breed of choice for dressage and jumping. I still have problem imagining them in eventing, but I am told I should change my mind.

                                    Lusitanos are bred to do dressage (and bull fight). Spanish are bred to do dressage. Therefore they are also the breed of choice for dressage, but not jumping.
                                    If they are THE breed of choice, why have SO many people chosen to ride SO MANY other breeds? There has to be something else going on, like maybe different preferences?
                                    I have no problem some breeds are proven better in a job than others. Why shouldn't they? You need to recognize the work these breeders have been doing. (People might recall I have a certain certain real prejudice against AQHA that get me into trouble. But boy I cry for those funny looking AQHA registered QH you see in auctions and sold for not even 800 a piece!) Is there some snobbery involved? Of course. But it doesn't change my opinion about what horse is suitable for me.
                                    So that's what this is about? You're upset because you think that breeders do so much work and people STILL prefer other breeds! Honestly I don't care how much work breeders do. I care about the end result.

                                    Comment


                                    • canticle, of course there is the factor of preference. But what is your preference based on? You like the hair, or it looks like Black Beauty or Flicker kind of preference? Or you prefer them because it is easier to move up the levels, or it has FEI potential kind of preference? Or it is somewhere in between?

                                      Breed of choice means, the breed fulfills a very specific function. It means it has the best chance to excel in that function... it could be just the ability to stand in a certain way and look good.

                                      You make it sound like, just because people breed for a specific function, that others are deprived of their choices, or we are not accepting people have choices. It is too far from the truth. The fact is, many breeders, produce great horses and thrive, because they understand the choices. The definition of 'great', is up to the buyers you're aiming for. If you aim at the ammie market, what is great... you aim at professional market, what is great... and the two are very different. There will always be breeders who specialize in a discipline, or a breed with a specific function, some even to the extreme, and there will always be many more breeders who choose to breed somewhere in the middle.

                                      All breeders who understand their buyers and their market, and produce horses with the right form and function for that business space, should be recognized for their success.

                                      canticle, I think you still have some work to do to understand where you stand.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by MyReality View Post
                                        canticle, of course there is the factor of preference. But what is your preference based on? You like the hair, or it looks like Black Beauty or Flicker kind of preference? Or you prefer them because it is easier to move up the levels, or it has FEI potential kind of preference? Or it is somewhere in between?
                                        Did you read the thread? About temperment and willingness? This whole "because you like the hair" thing really chaps my hide. If someone doesn't choose a warmblood, it's because they like HAIR?

                                        And who the heck is Flicker?

                                        How much does it cost to buy a warmblood capable of moving up the levels to FEI and get it there? Sure, I can get a WB for $10k... a weanling. Then I have to board it for 3 years before I can even start it. Then I have to pay someone to start it. Then I have to pay for lessons/training up through the levels. How many adult amateurs are ever going to get there?

                                        So why would I go out and buy a horse for the purpose of getting to FEI? Why not buy a horse for the purpose of riding and enjoying him, then do the best I can? And if I like horses that look a certain way, and I can get what I want from that, what is wrong with that?

                                        A horse isn't a cordless drill. We have to love it and spend time with it- it's more like choosing someone to date. Do you choose your dates based on how well they perform or based on how much you'll enjoy spending time with them?

                                        I'm not saying that WBs aren't enjoyable- but not everyone wants to date the same man, and not everyone wants to own the same horse. There's a lot of personal preference there that goes way beyond Black Beauty and hair. There's chemistry and perception and how the horse makes you feel when you are around him. Maybe to you, your discipline comes first, but for me it is secondary. If I'd bought my horse and he hated dressage, I would have changed disciplines, not horses.

                                        Comment


                                        • Why do you stop reading after one sentence? I said, "Or it is somewhere in between?"... if you would please read the whole paragraph, it means people sometimes buy a horse for very competitive reason, or people buy a horse for personal reason, but there are many shades in between, and there is a horse for everyone.

                                          I personally am very partial to a dapple gray, and I don't like tall horses.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X