• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

COTH Article: Spectator at the First CDI of the Season

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • COTH Article: Spectator at the First CDI of the Season

    I just read the article online and had a problem with it. Yeah, like that's a surprise.

    Anyway, the title suggests simply talking about spectating. Then, in the article, the author (Lauren) starts talking about her own horse's training and how it would not be out of place, and how she's going to train her horse to move more like other horses she saw.

    I'm not faulting that she has her own story to tell, it's just that it doesn't match the title. I mean, if I'm spectating, I'm going to talk about the riders at the show, not my own horse. If it was meant to be about the author's horse and training it for those classes, that's a different title.

    Just bugged me...
    Last edited by Velvet; Jan. 27, 2011, 03:32 PM. Reason: Fix title typo
    "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

  • #2
    Originally posted by Velvet View Post
    I just read the article online and had a problem with it. Yeah, like that's a surprise.

    Anyway, the title suggests simply talking about spectating. Then, in the article, the author (Lauren) starts talking about her own horse's training and how it would not be out of place, and how she's going to train her horse to move more like other horses she saw.

    I'm not faulting that she has her own story to tell, it's just that it doesn't match the title. I mean, if I'm spectating, I'm going to talk about the riders at the show, not my own horse. If it was meant to be about the author's horse and training it for those classes, that's a different title.

    Just bugged me...
    Me, myself and I agree with you.
    ~ Enjoying some guac and boxed wine at the Blue Saddle inn. ~

    Originally posted by LauraKY
    I'm sorry, but this has "eau de hoarder" smell all over it.
    HORSING mobile training app

    Comment


    • #3
      I did not see the article. But, often journalists have none or very little say over titles. That job is usually left to the editors.

      Comment


      • #4
        http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...rst-cdi-season

        Just wanted to add a link to the blog post for those who haven't seen it.

        Comment


        • #5
          If it was an actual ARTICLE written by a JOURNALIST, then maybe your complaint would be valid. However, it is a BLOG post, not an article. The blogs are about chronicling that person's journey with their horses/training/showing/etc.

          Comment


          • #6
            It's a BLOG, not an article. Therefore, most of Lauren's posts are, indeed, about her horses and their training. I wouldn't expect a "show report" from her; that's not the point of the blog.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Then I still have a problem with the title. I did not see it in a Blog page, but in the voices section. The title implies that you will be reading about what the author saw a show, not about what the author will be doing with their own horse.

              Like I said, I'm picking on the TITLE. All Lauren defenders need to reread that part.
              "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

              Comment


              • #8
                If you found the post in the "voices" section of the COTH site, you would have seen the heading marked "Blog Entry" right above the title of her post.
                http://www.chronofhorse.com/article_landing/voices

                You're welcome to have issues with Lauren, but honestly, this seems like a silly thing to be upset about. ALL Lauren's blog posts are about her horses and their training.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I read it and thought "I'm glad I'm not the only one who spectates that way!" It was exactly what a blog from me reflecting on a show would be like in tone, though better in quality.


                  I have a LOT to learn. Loads. Tons. And when I go to shows, I try to see what's working well (and what isn't) for other riders, and figure out what to try to work on myself. Even on the rare occasion someone seems to not be as good a rider as I am, I can still usually learn something from watching them.

                  Yep, I'm totally self-centered.
                  Originally posted by Silverbridge
                  If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Velvet View Post
                    Then I still have a problem with the title. I did not see it in a Blog page, but in the voices section. The title implies that you will be reading about what the author saw a show, not about what the author will be doing with their own horse.

                    Like I said, I'm picking on the TITLE. All Lauren defenders need to reread that part.
                    Oh for Christ's sake.

                    Lauren went to go WATCH a cdi and in so doing she thought about what she saw in relation to her current work with her horses, and then she BLOGGED about it. Just because you for whatever reason can't see the words "Blog Entry" right there above the link to it from the Voices section and "Blogger Lauren Sprieser" right there on the screen at the end of the piece does not mean Lauren is misleading you.
                    It means you don't look at your screen carefully enough and can't figure out what genre you are reading without outside help.

                    Or does it piss you off that personal essays like Michael Lewis's "Wading Towards Home" (author returns to New Orleans after Katrina) aren't actually JUST about wading around the flooded streets of New Orleans but ALSO digress into stories of his youth and some other people he encounters, etc etc, along the way?

                    Do you think Samuel Beckett ought to retitle "Waiting For Godot" because it might confuse people who expected a journalistic account of two people waiting?
                    May as well rewrite the whole thing:
                    They sat.
                    And sat.
                    And waited.
                    And sat.
                    And waited.
                    Occasionally, one twiddled his thumbs.

                    Or, if that isn't accurate journalism enough:
                    At 3:23pm on Sunday afternoon in Manning township, two area residents, white males in their early 30s, sat on the bench at the corner of Smith and Jenkins, and waited. When questioned by police about their loitering, they responded, "We're waiting for Godot." Officer Jim Nagy, a 25 year veteran of the Manning township police force shrugged when interviewed. "It seems they really want to sit on that bench," he said. "The best we can do is keep an eye on them and make sure they don't succumb to hypothermia as night sets in or, in the event of an extended stay, starvation. Officers on patrol are under instruction to check in on them every few hours, but for now that's all we can do. After all, it's not illegal to sit on a public bench."
                    The Parks and Recreation Department could not be reached for comment."

                    Yep, awesome play.
                    Anything else? Misleading!!! Bad journalism!

                    The written word, and whatever people title their works, is not restricted to straight journalism just because Velvet likes it so. Sometimes people write blogs, essays, short stories, plays...and it is up to the reader to figure out what genre they are reading without necessarily depending on a flashing neon sign on their computer screen.

                    But please feel free to treat everything like a newspaper article in complete disregard of its genre and go ahead and retitle both Lauren's piece and Mark Lewis's. The New Yorker clearly effed up on the Lewis situation and you should write them a note about it and set them straight.
                    Last edited by meupatdoes; Jan. 27, 2011, 03:14 PM.
                    The Noodlehttp://tiny.cc/NGKmT&http://tiny.cc/gioSA
                    Jinxyhttp://tiny.cc/PIC798&http://tiny.cc/jinx364
                    Boy Wonderhttp://tiny.cc/G9290
                    The Hana is nuts! NUTS!!http://tinyurl.com/SOCRAZY

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      In the spirit of your post, I have a problem with your title. Spectative isn't a word, nor was it used in Laruen's blog post, nor do I really understand what it's supposed to mean in this context?

                      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spectative

                      All in all, it seems really petty to nit-pick title words (both your concern about Laruen's post and my concerns about yours). Honestly, I don't really care that I can't understand your title, because I understand your post (even if I disagree). And blogs usually involve a certain amount of personal narrative. You can go to news sources if you want to read just about the show (dressage-news and dressage-daily are both reporting from FL. I think COTH's coverage is a little more intermittant?)

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        I don't know how that got up there. Point taken on the title. I'll fix it.

                        Still think her title doesn't fit the article, or blog, if you like. If you're going to title it as being a spectator, you're reporting on what the people in the ring are doing, not what you are planning on doing with your horse.
                        "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          So funny meuppatdoes.
                          Lauren is my favorite COTH blogger. She writes well, updates regularly and has interesting things to say.


                          This is the most bizarre thread ever. Perhaps I'll start one about how blue is my favorite color and how insensitive COTH is being by having a green background instead of blue. How dare they.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            COTH Article: Spectator at the First CDI of the Season

                            -------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            I just read this post and had a problem with it. I expected to read an article from COTH about a spectator at the first CDI of the season. Instead I got a whiny complaint from a person who seems to have no idea of something that is worth discussing on a forum versus something no one actually cares about.

                            The title suggests there might be something worth reading, but in fact the post is nothing more than someone moaning about something totally insignificant and basically incorect given the purpose of a blog (which is a person basically writing about their own life [events that transpire and the thoughts that they have] and alowing others to read it).

                            "You wasted 5 minutes of my life, and I want them back!" - Homer Simpson

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              Originally posted by swgarasu View Post
                              COTH Article: Spectator at the First CDI of the Season

                              -------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              I just read this post and had a problem with it. I expected to read an article from COTH about a spectator at the first CDI of the season. Instead I got a whiny complaint from a person who seems to have no idea of something that is worth discussing on a forum versus something no one actually cares about.

                              The title suggests there might be something worth reading, but in fact the post is nothing more than someone moaning about something totally insignificant and basically incorect given the purpose of a blog (which is a person basically writing about their own life [events that transpire and the thoughts that they have] and alowing others to read it).

                              "You wasted 5 minutes of my life, and I want them back!" - Homer Simpson

                              Good one.

                              It was only a musing. People out here are taking it much too seriously. It was just a stray thought after reading the title.
                              "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Velvet, it seems that the COTH planets and stars are aligned and aiming at your anus today

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  ITS A BLOG

                                  I love reading the blogs on COTH, especially this one. It is a blog which is a personal opinion of a personal experience. Very nicely written!
                                  Friesians Rule !!

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by caddym View Post
                                    Velvet, it seems that the COTH planets and stars are aligned and aiming at your anus today
                                    Just call me the COTH piñata!
                                    "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      And parties are so dull without pinata's

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        So true, Caddy.

                                        Must.find.baseball.bat!

                                        Smooches Velvet!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X