• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Since dressage is becoming such a big part of team Eventing...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Since dressage is becoming such a big part of team Eventing...

    Did you guys see Michael Jung's dressage? Letter perfect. Nearly invisible aids, lovely flying changes....


    I posed the following question on one of the eventing threads and got no response- probably because the forum feels like there are bigger problems at hand.

    But all the German riders had great dressage. There is great emphasis on finishing on the dressage.

    So my question is could the U.S. Eventing Team use a new dressage coach? No offense to Oded Shimoni, but I would love to see Debbie McDonald or Guenter Seidel be the U.S. Eventing team coach.

    Any thoughts?
    "I'm holding out for the $100,000 Crossrail Classic in 2012." --mem
    "With all due respect.. may I suggest you take up Croquet?" --belambi
    Proud Member of the Opinionated Redhead Club!

  • #2
    Crickets....
    "Shoot low Sheriff! She rides a fast pony!"

    Comment


    • #3
      YES, because we did not medal due to dressage
      www.hartetoharte.org
      Ask and allow, do not demand and force.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think this thread will ignite...

        ... the discussion of how much dressage is too much.

        To condition for that level of eventing there must be days of jumping, road miles for condition, cc schools etc. Just can't focus on pure dressage every day.

        There were lively discussions about multiple flying changes in the tests re. how much submission was fair to ask a horse who is to gallop for miles over 20+ huge natural obstacles the next day. You need a horse who thinks for himself somewhat otherwise when you have a bad distance the horse will not take the initiative to get himself out of it and just stop.

        There will be discussion on purpose bred upper level event horses vs. OTTB and how it will become a sport only lots of $$$ can support at the UL. (I think it is heading that way)

        There will be discussion on the loss of the long format and how that has led to the pressure on the dressage ramping up to the level of importance it has become. (I personally agree with that.)

        My take is that I watched both the GP dressage and the eventing dressage. Comparing the quality of the two is unfair. You should not expect an event horse to go like a pure UL dressage horse. Nevertheless, the aids should be quiet, invisible, the horses should be correct, supple and obedient and the scores should be good. Just don't expect an event horse to score in the high 70's low 80's.

        Could eventers do better? Of course they could. The question is really can they afford to in $$$ and time spent on it vs. schooling over fences. Mandiba was in the silver position and had a silly stop at a gate & a second knock down in SJ. Should KOC focus in her dressage or focus in going over more scary obstacles since that seems to be his biggest problem?

        If the Germans had one stop or rail down then it would have been different and we wouldn't be having this discussion. I have seen less than perfect rides take down Ingrid Klimke. If anyone should have perfect dressage, it should be her.

        There is an opening for a new Chef d'Equipe for Eventing after 2012. That is probably when there will be a new coach for dressage. As do many, I feel that there needs to be a more cohesive way of getting a team. One coach, one vision of getting it done. Not the fragmented way it is done now. It makes it hard to figure out a system of what works and what doesn't. Can you imagine riding one way at home and being told to do another at shows?
        "I am a sand dancer... just here for the jumps!" - Schrammo
        http://atoxcequestrian.com/
        https://www.facebook.com/groups/127749947563045/

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BetterOffRed View Post
          There is great emphasis on finishing on the dressage.
          You can't finish on your dressage score if you can't go double-clear cross-country and stadium. There were many lovely dressage tests at WEG and also many jumping and time penalties in the jumping phases. OVER-emphasizing the importance of the dressage phase is just as dangerous and under-estimating it.

          Does the US need a new dressage coach? Maybe. What it needs more than that, though, is a program with more direction, more emphasis on bringing up young horses and young riders, and more cohesion generally. That's no easy task, especially not in a country as (geographically) large as ours, where horse sports don't have the same popularity and funding as they do in many other countries.

          Of course, this is just my opinion, so take it for what it's worth (not much) -- I haven't evented past Intermediate (which I only did a handful of times) and haven't done the ULs or even sat on an UL horse since before the death of the long format due to a bad injury, long recovery, and well, life. My last event was >8 years ago - where, BTW, I was coached by a member of the 2010 WEG eventing team. Now I'm struggling with 3' jumpers and 1st level dressage, as I try to get my body to work the way it used to. So maybe my nostalgia has me a bit biased... but I also saw a lot of good from the US team at WEG, along with the ever-present room for improvement, the latter of which is currently at a very frustrating level.

          If we want to dominate the sport in international competition, though, we need a program overhaul - not just a new dressage coach.
          Last edited by Phaxxton; Oct. 6, 2010, 12:19 PM.


          Comment


          • #6
            eventing could definitely find a better dressage coach

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't know the current coach so I have no opinion there.

              What I would say is that the dressage expectations for eventing are a little different, and I'm not sure I'd choose the same coach that I'd choose for the GP squad.

              There are some practical considerations as well - I think Debbie McDonald could be lovely but with her base in Idaho she'd have to travel a lot which would take away from her own training and competing. And there are other people, perhaps less well known, who can fit the bill.

              I know I'm a heretic, but I actually prefer the eventing dressage to the GP. The horses are lighter and more horse-like IMHO. Also, because it's not such a high level (only about 4th), they are able to perfect the work perhaps a bit better than the GP horses, who are more at the height of what is possible for a horse.

              The eventing judges gave away plenty of 8's and several 9's, plus some 10's.
              If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by BetterOffRed View Post
                Did you guys see Michael Jung's dressage? Letter perfect. Nearly invisible aids, lovely flying changes....


                I posed the following question on one of the eventing threads and got no response- probably because the forum feels like there are bigger problems at hand.

                But all the German riders had great dressage. There is great emphasis on finishing on the dressage.

                So my question is could the U.S. Eventing Team use a new dressage coach? No offense to Oded Shimoni, but I would love to see Debbie McDonald or Guenter Seidel be the U.S. Eventing team coach.

                Any thoughts?
                Well, for starters the Germans fell apart in the cross-country phase... Jung was great, but there were also two German riders who didn't even finish X/C! Elsewhere, people have commented that the horses who did well on that X/C "flew over the ground" at the gallop, rather than pounding, and the German horses were in general "pounders."

                Next, look at the dressage performances of the three medaling teams, Great Britain, Canada, and New Zealand. Except for GB, you won't find superb dressage results -- but Canada and New Zealand made up for it in the jumping phases, especially X/C. The US was in 4th, arguably because of problems in the jumping phases.

                To our credit, Becky Holder and her OTTB Courageous Comet were in 5th place after dressage, and third place after X/C, but remember, they were not even on the Team! CC is a horse that a lot of dressage trainers would love to have in their barns, but he would be wasted simply because of how great he is X/C. It was just bad luck that he lost a shoe on X/C and was hurt badly enough that he could not pass the jog before show jumping, but even if that had not happened, he could not have helped the medal standings.

                (One of the things I love about Becky is that she's a big woman, and she is very open about how her struggles with her weight affect her riding. But she is not too ashamed to get out there and compete in the toughest competition, just because she is big.)

                There's a lot of discussion on the Eventing board of just what went wrong, and dressage is not being mentioned much.

                I do think that at the lower levels "finishing on your dressage score" is much more common, and to some degree that's built into the system, because at those levels the really hard questions aren't asked so much on cross-country, and show jumping courses are *relatively* easy -- but I did say relatively! So a lot of times, placings in dressage are good predictors of the ultimate placings. LL riders are also less likely to have good access to X/C schooling, and be more flatwork-focused for that reason.

                (Disclaimer: I am a total smurf at both eventing and dressage, and only evented once before I had to stop jumping because of an injury. But I've carried on with the eventing mindset that drilling and drilling in the arena is not the way to go, and bubble-wrapping horses might be good for the pocketbook, but not so fun for the horse. Trail riding is great, trailering to another farm and riding around there is great, big pastures are fun, etc.)
                Last edited by quietann; Oct. 6, 2010, 04:34 PM.
                You have to have experiences to gain experience.

                1998 Morgan mare Mythic Feronia "More Valley Girl Than Girl Scout!"

                Comment


                • #9
                  The junior rider we have doing well in eventing has an OTTB and did horribly in dressage. I made a passing mention she might get to the big name clinics when they came in and improve. She did take my advice and is doing much much better now. Each rider needs to address the strengths of their horses. If you need to work on your jumping then get to it. If its the cross country your horse needs work on then do so. You can't expect the team coach to be able to swoop in with a magic wand and fix your mistakes. (your being the team riders not individuals here.) If you think your horse is solid take it to a schooling event or a clinic and get told he/she sucks on x,y,z. Either way the riding is only as good as the horse/rider wants it to be. (Barring shoe throws and other issues.)
                  Adoring fan of A Fine Romance
                  Originally Posted by alicen:
                  What serious breeder would think that a horse at that performance level is push button? Even so, that's still a lot of buttons to push.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    While the gold medalist (Jung) won the dressage and finished on his dressage score, the silver medalist (Fox-Pitt) was 12th after dressage and the bronze medalist (Nicholson) was 14th after dressage.

                    The Germans were 1st, 3rd, 7th, 9th, 11th and 13th after dressage and 1st, E'd, 53rd, 30th, 4th, and E'd after cross country.

                    The winning British team was 8th, 12th, 26th, and 42nd after dressage (the GBR riders who were 21st and 24th after dressage were not part of the team)

                    So it was not exactly a dressage competition, as Jimmy Wofford pointed out both in his blog and during the course walk.

                    Links to results that include standings after each phase:
                    Individual: http://www.alltechfeigames.com/ftp-pdf/EVE_R_3.pdf
                    Team: http://www.alltechfeigames.com/ftp-pdf/EVE_RT_3.pdf

                    So, if you have a horse that can win the dressage and jump around clean and within the time you will win, but finding and nurturing that horse is what makes it hard.

                    Not saying that there isn't always room for improvement in any of the three phases.
                    The Evil Chem Prof

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X