• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Are FEI rules being broken ? Judge for yourself

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Are FEI rules being broken ? Judge for yourself

    These are still shots of Totilas :

    http://www.klubequus.org/totilas

    Don't kill the messenger. I put this up so people could come to their own conclusion.

  • #2
    Because obviously still photos on the internet count for so much more than FEI stewards who were present the entire time.

    Comment


    • #3
      Your still shots aren't opening. Since when do we judge dressage horses by still photos?

      Comment


      • #4
        oh god just shoot me now
        _\\]
        -- * > hoopoe
        Procrastinate NOW
        Introverted Since 1957

        Comment


        • #5
          Keep grinding that ax! Soon there will be none of it left.

          Comment


          • #6
            This-- both the article and the OP-- are some of the most ridiculously smug things I've ever read.
            Vancouver Equine
            www.vaneq.com

            Comment


            • #7


              I really don't get it. Why is this so important to people (trashing whoever ... Totilas/Gal today, someone else tomorrow)? So much effort, and I just don't understand why.

              Comment


              • #8
                I hear ya, Horsepoor!

                I've got a horse to ride. No time to trash the BNR's.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Given the pictures on that site, can we say DAP?

                  Most experts, Hilda Gurney included, see DAP as a desirable trait in dressage. It does not indicate a "four beat trot," whatever that is. Educate yourself and at least use the terms that show you have an education in dressage. It's one thing to argue that DAP isn't desirable. It's quite another to mislabel it as a "4 beat trot"--a term obviously meant to sensationalize.
                  2007 Welsh Cob C X TB GG Eragon
                  Our training journal.
                  1989-2008 French TB Shamus Fancy
                  I owned him for fifteen years, but he was his own horse.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I wonder if the top riders have some sort of pass the torch/drinking game for when they become the target of the witch hunt. Like the Germans thank Anky for the attention taken away from the "crank and spank". Anky has to thank Edward for proving LDR horses can halt, but can't extend. Edward has to thank Adelinda for proving LDR horses can extend the trot, but will bite their tongue at the halt. Then Imke is getting some flack for her horse swishing her tail and being out behind - puhleeze!! Because she uses LDR. So maybe they have to buy each other champagne. That poor Dutch team must all be alcoholics by now... And the judges get some booze too because they might as well because they don't know what they are looking at... And we all have a beer because the white horse was so much fun!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      That page is absolutely ridiculous. To whoever made that, I say get a life!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        AZ Native--You posted that on the thread I started, too. It STILL doesn't make any sense. Why are you posting it again?

                        Sister--You're becoming a favorite of mine. Facts! Can you imagine?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          To the OP: did you read the Dressage Today article that came out a couple of months ago that discussed this very issue by Dr. Hillary Clayton (Sorry I can't pinpoint the issue)? She took slow shot videos that showed these very same things as examples of what judges view as good gaits. Her conclusions were that good gaits are not what we have written down as good gaits and that it is the overall harmony that judges are seeing and scoring.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I guess it all boils down to this: When someone comes out and rides their version of a "correct" test (as opposed to Toto's oh so horrible test) and gets over 90% on it, then I'll listen to you. Until then, I'll just enjoy Toto and his oh so incorrect tests.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              Thanks for the input everyone. I see that the opinion here is :

                              That the photos taken from the video at the top of the linked page are examples of a well balanced horse with 3 good, naturally enhanced gaits and that the person commenting on the photos does not know what they are talking about and completely wrong in their observations. I have no idea who wrote the comments but i should be shot at sunrise for asking the question and posting the link and i'm smug which is a hoot, btw.
                              Too, apparently you all think the FEI rules are being followed and this is a good example of correct classical dressage and the judges are rewarding appropriately. Great !

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I don't understand why the website makes it sound like a bad thing that he is so rocked back and sitting down on his hocks in movements. That's something I strive to achieve it dressage. And Hillary Clayton has written nurmerous articles about the way dressage horses move. To me all the "inconsistancies" are positive. For instance my haflinger gets 4 beat-y in the canter when I really push him under but it's 4 beat like a gallop not like a "tranter". The judges love his canter.
                                If you are going to make arguements at least make intelligent ones.
                                Btw I like Totilas but he is not the end all be all dressage horse. But he is damn nice.
                                Brae Mont Farm
                                www.braemontfarm.weebly.com

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  What a nasty mean-spirited horrid website As someone said, why put so much time and effort into trashing others? As someone else said, get a life please!!!!

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Discobold View Post
                                    What a nasty mean-spirited horrid website As someone said, why put so much time and effort into trashing others? As someone else said, get a life please!!!!
                                    well said discobold

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      No expert at all

                                      But the anouncer at the Freestyle says the Dressage world considers him the horse of the century. ~Sigh~ I liked Ravel better. But truth be told, I did not see one test that was jaw dropping blow me away. Again, just an opinion.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I am no dressage expert, but sporadic stills do not prove anything about the horse's general gait. Not to mention a lot of the comments next to those photos are plain wrong, for example the still of the changes stating he is placing his back legs down together in the same spot is clearly wrong, both legs are in the air as he is in the middle of switching the lead. And some of the trotting ones showing his "one-leg" stand, upon closer inspection, do not show what the commentator says.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X