Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You're responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it--details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums' policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it's understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users' profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses -- Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it's related to a horse for sale, regardless of who's selling it, it doesn't belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions -- Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services -- Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products -- While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements -- Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be "bumped" excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues -- Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators' discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you'd rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user's membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

WOW! New Info in Barisone-Kanarek Saga

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    WOW! New Info in Barisone-Kanarek Saga

    http://nancyjaffer.com/barisone-is-back-in-court/

    #2
    I literally could not be less surprised that LK has been lying out her ass.

    Comment


      #3
      The only surprise to me is that the attorney would say so much publicly, especially since they are asking for a jury trial.

      Comment

        Original Poster

        #4
        Originally posted by skydy View Post
        The only surprise to me is that the attorney would say so much publicly, especially since they are asking for a jury trial.
        He is supposed to be a master in this type of case so I would think he knows what he is doing. My question is why was Kirby Kanarek listening outside the door? How did she even know about it?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by eggbutt View Post

          He is supposed to be a master in this type of case so I would think he knows what he is doing. My question is why was Kirby Kanarek listening outside the door? How did she even know about it?
          I read it as the journalist was interviewing the attorney in the hallway and the woman was in the hall as well.

          Jeeze, 19,000 pages of social media.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by skydy View Post
            The only surprise to me is that the attorney would say so much publicly, especially since they are asking for a jury trial.
            It is an interesting strategy. Perhaps showboating in hopes charges are dropped or lessened?
            Maybe these magical tapes which no one except her sycophants have heard will be the nail in her coffin?

            *I am going to go ahead and inform everyone I had back surgery three weeks ago and I’m still quite medicated. If I start posting nonsensical words just throw water at me and tell me to go to bed.

            **ETA for those of you who don't seem to comprehend: I am asking you to excuse me if I post something that is not a word or is horribly misspelled. I am not saying I will delete former posts that may have been just too cruel for someone's fragile ego and claim the drugs made me do it.
            Last edited by Omgitsme; Mar. 5, 2020, 01:44 PM.

            Comment


              #7
              Oh this is just beautiful. (I mean, not that she got shot. I’m going to go ahead and say it again: he shouldn’t have shot her)
              Looks like the real LK is being revealed . Wonder how her supposed TWO BNTs in Wellington are feeling right now. (Let’s be real, they probably only exist in her head.)

              Comment

                Original Poster

                #8
                https://www.chronofhorse.com/article...upcoming-trial

                Comment


                  #9

                  I understand the moderators required “new developments” in the case to reopen discussion on Barisone/Kanarek.

                  As far as “new developments”, the article states that Barisone has not been offered a plea deal, and the defense attorney wants to delay the trial (yawn), citing lots of material in discovery. The fact that Barisone has not been offered a plea deal is actually the absence of a new development; defense attorneys almost always want to delay.

                  So what in the article did you regard as “new developments”?

                  Comment

                    Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by YankeeDuchess View Post


                    I understand the moderators required “new developments” in the case to reopen discussion on Barisone/Kanarek.

                    As far as “new developments”, the article states that Barisone has not been offered a plea deal, and the defense attorney wants to delay the trial (yawn), citing lots of material in discovery. The fact that Barisone has not been offered a plea deal is actually the absence of a new development; defense attorneys almost always want to delay.

                    So what in the article did you regard as “new developments”?
                    How about all the discovery? How about his mention of the illegal recordings? 19,000 pages of evidence from LK's social media alone! Holy cow!!!!! The mention of LK and RG contacting SS? The mention that the CPS accusations were unfounded? The thought the attorney expects an acquittal (or did I misread that)? Gosh, all that sounds new to me!!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Omgitsme View Post

                      It is an interesting strategy. Perhaps showboating in hopes charges are dropped or lessened?
                      Maybe these magical tapes which no one except her sycophants have heard will be the nail in her coffin?

                      *I am going to go ahead and inform everyone I had back surgery three weeks ago and I’m still quite medicated. If I start posting nonsensical words just throw water at me and tell me to go to bed.
                      I suggest you don't rely on other people to police your postings. If you are heavily medicated to the extent you post "nonsensical words" it would behoove you to not post until you are yourself again. Your words do live on, on the internet...

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by eggbutt View Post

                        How about all the discovery? How about his mention of the illegal recordings? 19,000 pages of evidence from LK's social media alone! Holy cow!!!!! The mention of LK and RG contacting SS? The mention that the CPS accusations were unfounded? The thought the attorney expects an acquittal (or did I misread that)? Gosh, all that sounds new to me!!
                        You find a report that a high priced defense attorney states that he expects his client to be found “not guilty” as “news”? Really? REALLY? Even an incompetent defense attorney would know enough to say he expects his clients to be acquitted.

                        We’ve known forever about the recordings. Said to be illegal/inadmissible by the defense, because the defense doesn’t want them admitted, duh. We’ve known forever that LK contacted SafeSport. We’ve known forever that CPS declined to intervene after its visit.

                        So no, I don’t see anything new here.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by YankeeDuchess View Post

                          You find a report that a high priced defense attorney states that he expects his client to be found “not guilty” as “news”? Really? REALLY? Even an incompetent defense attorney would know enough to say he expects his clients to be acquitted.

                          We’ve known forever about the recordings. Said to be illegal/inadmissible by the defense, because the defense doesn’t want them admitted, duh. We’ve known forever that LK contacted SafeSport. We’ve known forever that CPS declined to intervene after its visit.

                          So no, I don’t see anything new here.
                          None of us would expect you to see anything new here. Please tell us something we don’t know.
                          "You can't fix stupid"- Ron White

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by skydy View Post

                            I suggest you don't rely on other people to police your postings. If you are heavily medicated to the extent you post "nonsensical words" it would behoove you to not post until you are yourself again. Your words do live on, on the internet...
                            100% agree. If you’re too medicated to take responsibility for what you write, don’t post. It’s obnoxious to give yourself a license to post irresponsibly, then say “well, I’m on drugs, so don’t hold me responsible for what I say”.

                            Also, it is difficult to throw water on someone via the cyber sphere.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by YankeeDuchess View Post
                              So no, I don’t see anything new here.
                              Um, there was a NEW court appearance. NEW. A lot of new info in both the Chronicle report and the OP-posted report. Doesn't matter if it's expected info. It's still a NEW development. If you don't think it's new, you can ignore this thread.

                              Comment


                                #16
                                Originally posted by cutter99 View Post

                                None of us would expect you to see anything new here. Please tell us something we don’t know.
                                “None of us”? You are speaking on behalf of yourself and who else?

                                Comment


                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by YankeeDuchess View Post

                                  “None of us”? You are speaking on behalf of yourself and who else?
                                  Those of us who have seen your posts and understand what you are all about. Before you decide there is some huge plot against you, there is not.

                                  But this is not a forum of stupid people. We are not blind. You go right ahead and knock yourself out! Bless your heart!
                                  "You can't fix stupid"- Ron White

                                  Comment


                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by YankeeDuchess View Post


                                    I understand the moderators required “new developments” in the case to reopen discussion on Barisone/Kanarek.

                                    As far as “new developments”, the article states that Barisone has not been offered a plea deal, and the defense attorney wants to delay the trial (yawn), citing lots of material in discovery. The fact that Barisone has not been offered a plea deal is actually the absence of a new development; defense attorneys almost always want to delay.

                                    So what in the article did you regard as “new developments”?
                                    Yet here you are commenting on it. Obviously it interests you. And since the Chronicle of the Horse saw fit to do an article after the newest trial I would guess that they felt it was newsworthy.
                                    Oh, well, clearly you're not thoroughly indoctrinated to COTH yet, because finger pointing and drawing conclusions are the cornerstones of this great online community. (Tidy Rabbit)

                                    Comment


                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by xQHDQ View Post

                                      Um, there was a NEW court appearance. NEW. A lot of new info in both the Chronicle report and the OP-posted report. Doesn't matter if it's expected info. It's still a NEW development. If you don't think it's new, you can ignore this thread.
                                      OK, you’re right. There was a new court appearance, in which it transpired that the defense attorney stated that he expects his client to be acquitted, and intends to ask for a delay of the trial. So what transpired in the court appearance was pretty much what you’d expect.

                                      I suppose it is something of a development to learn definitively that no plea deal has been offered, and that the judge doesn’t think the CPS declining to intervene is admissible. After the introductory “WOW” of OP, I was expecting something more explosive in the articles, and didn’t see much new.
                                      Last edited by YankeeDuchess; Mar. 4, 2020, 10:13 AM.

                                      Comment


                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by cutter99 View Post

                                        Those of us who have seen your posts and understand what you are all about. Before you decide there is some huge plot against you, there is not.

                                        But this is not a forum of stupid people. We are not blind. You go right ahead and knock yourself out! Bless your heart!
                                        So what am I “all about”?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X