Sport Horse Spotlight

Real Estate Spotlight

BB2

Sale Spotlight

  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Barisone Pleads Not Guilty

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by iridedressage View Post
    I work for DCS in another state. Records will be provided on a closed case under subpoena or court order. Sometimes a motion to quash will be submitted depending on the circumstances, which may or may not be granted. However, the referent is redacted on all submissions.
    Referent = person who called in the complaint? May well vary by state, of course.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by CanteringCarrot View Post

      Of course, but it was said that it wasn't by a party involved.
      Yes. It was a civil dispute - but not a landlord tenant dispute at its core. My father (when he said “landlord/tenant dispute” ) was way more concerned about the call hearing I was shot than using longer, alternate legal terminology.

      Mb makes about 9 totally different claims in his 911 calls. If you listen very carefully, you can hear him pause a few times to hear what the person coaching him was telling him to “add on.” I can’t hear what’s being said- only the pauses which result in extra, random & false accusations being made. If it were (at its core) a landlord ten dispute- why mention that we were at the barn at 9 pm? That’s what time we were supposed to be there. I can’t elaborate on that so asking more about it would be pointless. Sorry..... not being sarcastic- just saying honestly I can’t elaborate.

      ????????????????????

      Comment


      • For the love of God spend a minute learning how to use the quote function.
        Yes, I'm imploring you to change how you post... but seriously, it's an eye killer. At least learn to use color or bold or another font for your comments, if learning to quote is too hard.
        Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

        http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GreenWithEnvy View Post

          Yep. I wonder what she expected the outcome to be?
          Who knows, who cares? I’m guessing they each expected that the other party would either give in or compromise to some extent on whatever the issues at hand were. That’s what most people involved in a dispute would expect. None of this would be remotely interesting to anyone not personally involved if it hadn’t gone all pear-shaped and ended with attempted murder.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by GiveEmEl View Post
            I’m super confused about why people keep attributing so much vitriol to me. I’ve hardly spoken on this thread. I haven’t speculated on what “she did to get shot”. I literally said it didn’t matter what she did or said leading up to the event, it’s 100% his fault unless he was in imminent danger. (Which it seems he was not) I’ve said multiple times shooting her was wrong.
            Basically I’ve called her a bully and made a joke about how if MB isn’t a BNT then a BNT must be one who wouldn’t accept her as a client.

            You were the one who accused her of having been asked to leave another barn, and refusing to leave, which doesn’t take a lot of dot connecting to interpret as accusing her of having a pattern of being asked to leave barns and refusing. After a number of posts challenging whether you were making the statement based in information from the principals, you backed off and admitted that it was a third hand rumor, and apologized. But if
            ladyj79 had not challenged you, the rumor would still be out there as an “internet fact”.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by YankeeDuchess View Post

              Referent = person who called in the complaint? May well vary by state, of course.

              Yes. For the protection of that person and so that people with information regarding child abuse, neglect, etc. won’t be afraid to call in. In my state you can also report anonymously and the case is treated the same as when we have the identity of the referent.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                Yes. It was a civil dispute - but not a landlord tenant dispute at its core. My father (when he said “landlord/tenant dispute” ) was way more concerned about the call hearing I was shot than using longer, alternate legal terminology.

                Mb makes about 9 totally different claims in his 911 calls. If you listen very carefully, you can hear him pause a few times to hear what the person coaching him was telling him to “add on.” I can’t hear what’s being said- only the pauses which result in extra, random & false accusations being made. If it were (at its core) a landlord ten dispute- why mention that we were at the barn at 9 pm? That’s what time we were supposed to be there. I can’t elaborate on that so asking more about it would be pointless. Sorry..... not being sarcastic- just saying honestly I can’t elaborate.
                Because, guessing here, the local pd knew about your landlord/tenant, likely volatile dispute and had:

                - advised him to call 911, rather than deal with you directly.
                - allowed you to stay on the property but told you to respect the business hours of the barn, and to avoid MB during those off hours, as he now lived above said barn.
                Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                Comment


                • Originally posted by MHM View Post

                  That would be interesting!
                  They do! Unfortunately, planting audio devices inside a home really IS illegal wiretapping. But..... it maybe important for people to hear what WE were saying compared to what THEY were saying. WE were truly fearful. THEY thought what they were doing to us was hilarious..until they didn’t. Then they knew how much we knew. No more laughing after that! Nope! Only plotting to hurt us physically until that was no longer “good enough.”
                  ????????????????????

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                    Incorrect. Police, judges & DA’s can easily retrieve this information. Especially, in a court order which involves or pertains to circumstances in an attempted murder trial. But nice try on attempting to mislead.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by YankeeDuchess View Post


                      You were the one who accused her of having been asked to leave another barn, and refusing to leave, which doesn’t take a lot of dot connecting to interpret as accusing her of having a pattern of being asked to leave barns and refusing. After a number of posts challenging whether you were making the statement based in information from the principals, you backed off and admitted that it was a third hand rumor, and apologized. But if
                      ladyj79 had not challenged you, the rumor would still be out there as an “internet fact”.
                      Okay so a single post that I apologized for misrepresenting means...what? What’s so horrible about that? I genuinely don’t understand your obsession with that post.

                      What does that pattern mean to you? Do you think I was trying to say something other than she had been asked to leave a property? I don’t see how that has bearing on much of anything but please enlighten me on what about that was soooo horrible.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                        They do! Unfortunately, planting audio devices inside a home really IS illegal wiretapping. But..... it maybe important for people to hear what WE were saying compared to what THEY were saying. WE were truly fearful. THEY thought what they were doing to us was hilarious..until they didn’t. Then they knew how much we knew. No more laughing after that! Nope! Only plotting to hurt us physically until that was no longer “good enough.”
                        My bold

                        ETA but you still went to the barn at night, late, when you weren't welcome to be there... pushing limits... of people you say you were truly fearful of?
                        Made alot of noise, when you likely could know that would not be appreciated...
                        Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                        http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                          I wasn’t threatening in any of my words. What does “go wayyyyy back,” even mean? Just a gaslighting method so you don’t have to specifically point out your example of my alleged “threats.”
                          FTR- I don’t consider telling anyone to “leave me alone,” “find another hobby,” or anything along those lines to be “threatening.” Also- you seem to be implying YD’s story is meaningless, while making sure to embellish the importance of OTHER posters’ experiences. A bit one sided- don’t you think?
                          Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                          Youre entitled to your opinion. No matter how incorrect you are. You have no idea at all what happened. None. I do not “enjoy drama.” We did what we had to do- what we were advised to do & not one thing more or less. How dare you say I’ve “spun things.” You have no clue.

                          Also, FTR- a piece of info. We’re now fairly certain that even if we dropped everything & ran away from the big bad bully- he’d have had us killed anyway. He might have been successful had he done it elsewhere or paid a professional to do it. So please, take your crap elsewhere. You know NOTHING.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                            They do! Unfortunately, planting audio devices inside a home really IS illegal wiretapping. But..... it maybe important for people to hear what WE were saying compared to what THEY were saying. WE were truly fearful. THEY thought what they were doing to us was hilarious..until they didn’t. Then they knew how much we knew. No more laughing after that! Nope! Only plotting to hurt us physically until that was no longer “good enough.”

                            Comment


                            • [QUOTE=La-LaPopRider;n10558115]Originally posted by rothmpp View Post
                              I know this is going to get me tarred and feathered by several posters as victim shaming, but I just don't care at this point.

                              Lauren - no matter how much you try to spin it, you played a role in the events that preceded the shooting. You were not a completely benign, innocent bystander that got caught in the crossfire. You gloated prior to the shooting about collecting "career-ending" information on someone. Your actions, intended or not, got CPS involved. These are not the actions of someone who "does not enjoy drama". Someone who does not enjoy drama would say "This is no longer working for me. I am the paying client, and I am going to find a situation that will work better for me". And then do just that. Not spend weeks collecting information with the intention of destroying the careers of everyone at the barn.

                              While several of us have pointed out that someone who was the traveling alternate for an Olympic games and the trainer of a Olympic medalist is, in fact a BNT, there are plenty more BNTs out there that would have been happy to take on your string of fancy horses. Riders change trainers all the time. It is not career-ending.

                              If somewhere in these multiple long threads, you'd have just said "Yeah, maybe I could've handled some of the preceding events better" we'd still all think there was NO excuse for MB shooting you, but many of us might have more sympathy for you. Like it or not, you do carry some of the blame for the relationship having gone sour. Though certainly not for him having chosen to shoot you. You have NOT ONCE admitted that MAYBE you could've done SOME things differently, and MAYBE the outcome would have been different.

                              Youre entitled to your opinion. No matter how incorrect you are. You have no idea at all what happened. None. I do not “enjoy drama.” We did what we had to do- what we were advised to do & not one thing more or less. How dare you say I’ve “spun things.” You have no clue.

                              Also, FTR- a piece of info. We’re now fairly certain that even if we dropped everything & ran away from the big bad bully- he’d have had us killed anyway. He might have been successful had he done it elsewhere or paid a professional to do it. So please, take your crap elsewhere. You know NOTHING.
                              This last paragraph is one of the most ludicrous statements in ALL the threads. Absolutely ridiculous. Who has the "big bad bully" reputation? MB or LK? It sure seems from all the various posters that LK has caused a lot of drama and bullying in her life. Just sayin'.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by GreenWithEnvy View Post

                                Yep. I wonder what she expected the outcome to be?
                                My view, for what it’s worth...

                                LK clearly played a role in the unravelling of her relationship with MB. Whatever it was that a happened, both she and he bear some responsibility - and likely there are other people involved.

                                That still doesn’t mean she played a role in getting shot. Getting shot is not a reasonable or predictable outcome of an ongoing dispute with someone, even a nasty one.

                                The SHOOTING did come out of the blue. The dispute did not.
                                Last edited by BigMama1; Jan. 16, 2020, 05:53 PM.

                                You, GWE “wonder what I expected the outcome to be?” I expected the childish and also dangerous behaviors to STOP. I expected mb to honor his agreements despite what his gf instructed.
                                Again, the better question would be “what did Michael expect the outcome to be for killing us? What secret was more important to be kept than his own liberty?” Nah. You don’t WANT to have to ask THAT question. That would mean you’d have to start over with your “drawing board.” Easier to just go with what the crowd has already gifted you with compiling as a “perfectly reasonable scenario.” Think again. (Literally. Start your thinking again- from the very beginning.)
                                ????????????????????

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                                  My view, for what it’s worth...

                                  LK clearly played a role in the unravelling of her relationship with MB. Whatever it was that a happened, both she and he bear some responsibility - and likely there are other people involved.

                                  That still doesn’t mean she played a role in getting shot. Getting shot is not a reasonable or predictable outcome of an ongoing dispute with someone, even a nasty one.

                                  The SHOOTING did come out of the blue. The dispute did not.
                                  Last edited by BigMama1; Jan. 16, 2020, 05:53 PM.

                                  You, GWE “wonder what I expected the outcome to be?” I expected the childish and also dangerous behaviors to STOP. I expected mb to honor his agreements despite what his gf instructed.
                                  Again, the better question would be “what did Michael expect the outcome to be for killing us? What secret was more important to be kept than his own liberty?” Nah. You don’t WANT to have to ask THAT question. That would mean you’d have to start over with your “drawing board.” Easier to just go with what the crowd has already gifted you with compiling as a “perfectly reasonable scenario.” Think again. (Literally. Start your thinking again- from the very beginning.)
                                  That’s actually a question I was going to ask. What on earth did he have to gain from killing you? And you say even if you had left he was planning to kill you...is he just insane? I can’t imagine a secret worth that. Not to mention how he thought it would be helpful to shoot you in broad daylight. Did he ever believe he was going to get away with murder? The train of thought makes no sense.

                                  ETA: I don’t know if you can share the answer, I expect not. Just finding it very mind boggling.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post
                                    You, GWE “wonder what I expected the outcome to be?” I expected the childish and also dangerous behaviors to STOP. I expected mb to honor his agreements despite what his gf instructed.
                                    Again, the better question would be “what did Michael expect the outcome to be for killing us? What secret was more important to be kept than his own liberty?” Nah. You don’t WANT to have to ask THAT question. That would mean you’d have to start over with your “drawing board.” Easier to just go with what the crowd has already gifted you with compiling as a “perfectly reasonable scenario.” Think again. (Literally. Start your thinking again- from the very beginning.)

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by NEEDS A NAP View Post
                                      #17 here. After all that has been said and written on this forum, is the victim now saying that she believes there was a long planned plot to murder her in order for the perpetrator to obtain the victim's horses for the perpetrator's girlfriend to ride? So he decided one nice afternoon that the time had come?





                                      I have never once stated he “decided one nice afternoon the time had come.” I’ve repeatedly stated the exact opposite- as have you in your post here. Maybe he did decide to kill us on AN afternoon- but that decision was made far before THE afternoon of August 7th.
                                      ????????????????????

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by La-LaPopRider View Post

                                        My view, for what it’s worth...

                                        LK clearly played a role in the unravelling of her relationship with MB. Whatever it was that a happened, both she and he bear some responsibility - and likely there are other people involved.

                                        That still doesn’t mean she played a role in getting shot. Getting shot is not a reasonable or predictable outcome of an ongoing dispute with someone, even a nasty one.

                                        The SHOOTING did come out of the blue. The dispute did not.
                                        Last edited by BigMama1; Jan. 16, 2020, 05:53 PM.

                                        You, GWE “wonder what I expected the outcome to be?” I expected the childish and also dangerous behaviors to STOP. I expected mb to honor his agreements despite what his gf instructed.
                                        Again, the better question would be “what did Michael expect the outcome to be for killing us? What secret was more important to be kept than his own liberty?” Nah. You don’t WANT to have to ask THAT question. That would mean you’d have to start over with your “drawing board.” Easier to just go with what the crowd has already gifted you with compiling as a “perfectly reasonable scenario.” Think again. (Literally. Start your thinking again- from the very beginning.)
                                        No thanks....I'll wait for the trial. There are already too many twists and turns to keep straight. June is just around the corner. As someone said several posts ago, you will always now be known as "that woman" and he will always be known as the man who shot that woman (for now allegedly).

                                        Comment


                                        • To La-LaPopRider a serious question....and I promise it is coming from a good place. With all this notoriety, will you be able to move on and find trainers you can trust and more importantly can trust you? I would imagine many trainers are quite head-shy at this point to want to get involved with you for a variety of reasons.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X