• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

confo critique for dressage

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • confo critique for dressage

    Please critique this 6 year old appendix mare. Plans include lower level dressage and some jumping. Thanks!


    http://good-times.webshots.com/photo...ost=good-times

  • #2
    Nice mare! I am definitely far from being an expert in the conformation department, but some of the things i noticed are that she has good muscling, a nice long neck, and good hind end. Her back is short and from my experience with short-backed horses and dressage is that they need lots of stetching and long and low warm-ups because they tend to get tight in the back. Not a bad thing, in fact short backs are good for jumping. She looks like she might be slightly downhill, but her front hooves look very short and small. maybe they are in the dirt? or maybe they need some growing out? i would think she will do very well for what you want to do with her.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'll bite.

      She looks nice enough. I'm sure she can DO a decent Training/First Level test with correct schooling... But I'm not sure she'll ever be great at it. I think she'd start to struggle at Second level when collected gaits kick in.

      She's got a lovely head and neck.
      While I don't know if I'd say she's technically "downhill", she sure looks likes shes leaning in that direction (although just a bit). Not a crime for lower level stuff, but not helpful either.

      She has nice overall balance, but with the slight downhill bent and a relatively straight shoulder, I expect that she's not the world's greatest mover. I'd expect to see a much shorter trot on this mare (but who knows until you see her move?)

      My biggest gripe is actually that I think her feet look smallish. Again, not a crime in and of itself, but something I'd want to look at really closely. I'd want her to have a history of proven soundness, and I'd consider getting feet x-rays if I were going to spend any money on her.

      As for jumping... based purely on her conformation, I'd expect she could get around at 3 feet, but probably not much above that.

      Comment


      • #4
        Plans include lower level dressage
        I see nothing in her conformation that would interfere with your plans!

        Pretty girl. How does she move?

        Comment


        • #5
          Nice overall impression, the neck comes out of the whithers nicely. She looks fairly strong in the hindquarters. Her neck is long and back is relatively short. The not-so-good points include the front legs being behind at the knee, heavy shoulder, and downhill impression. I'm not going to comment on suitability for dressage here, since I can't see her move. Some trainers and riders are better than others at compensating for conformation faults. Jumping will help her lift her shoulder and develop her back and hindquarters.

          She can "do" dressage but will she be able to score 70%??? It depends. She MIGHT be a frustrating project horse to ride in dressage. I rode one almost exactly like this and it was a long road. It was the one horse of all the various breeds that I eventually stopped riding in dressage. That said, I've seen some excellent QH dressage horses. you just have to start on the journey and see how it goes. I just don't want to paint a rosy picture that it will come smoothly with a downhill horse.

          Be especially aware of a trainer who can maximize the horse's abilities and give specific exercises that address the conformation faults. I have a non-traditional horse that shouldn't be doing dressage in some ways but she is really coming together because I have her in the right program. My trainer builds on things that she CAN do, not looking at what they can't do. Did I know this would take me 3 YEARS to do a decent training level test??? Nope. But it's real dressage.

          Taking lessons regularly and committing to the program help tremendously. I would say expect at least 1-3 years to do a good training-1st test with contact, impulsion, and the proper muscling...that is if the rider knows the basics of contact and a good seat.
          Last edited by cuatx55; Dec. 31, 2007, 02:15 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            She's lovely! I don't see anything in this photo that would stop her from doing lower level dressage and some jumping. She is a bit back at the knee, but that shouldn't interfere with dressage. And no she's not downhill at all; she's nicely balanced.

            Comment


            • #7
              I agree with most posters. Nice but not good enough for really athletic performance. I just don't like her shoulder. Verrrry straight, as are the pasterns. That, combined with her almost downhill-ness suggests a mediocre performance beyond training-first levels. Of course, training and first level benefit all horses tremendously, and she'll move her best with that kind of foundation. Need more pics and videos to say anymore.
              Airborne? Oh. Yes, he can take a joke. Once. After that, the joke's on you.

              Comment


              • #8
                I like her! Hope the PPE goes well...

                and Jupiter sounds like a great name

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think she is lovely and should have NO problem doing the job. Very well balanced, nice head/neck, nice hind end/hip, nice chest/heartgirth, nice short back. Very pretty girl.

                  Nice but not good enough for really athletic performance.
                  This is BS.
                  *** 4 More Years ***
                  *** 4 More Years ***

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I thought the comments on this thread to be bang on.

                    http://www.ultimatedressage.com/foru...c.php?t=121518

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I had an appendix gelding by Raise a Lady that looked a little like her. He wasn't as deep thru the front and he had a little more of a 'backside like a cook' than her.

                      The picture isn't ideal as she is standing with her head down, and is down a slope a little with her front end lower than her back end (possibly her front end close to the camera too), but she's 'functionally downhill' (looking at mass and proportions rather than looking myopically only at her top line or where the highest point of her hip is in relation to her wither) with a heavy chest, very deep base of neck, and a little bit of a long heavy ish looking neck, and a big hike down from her belly at the stifle to her chest.

                      It's hard to have a foot and lower leg that stays sound under hard work, with that sort of front end. There's a lot ot mass on that front end. But the question is, how hard are you going to work her? Are you going to really stress her with a lot of higher jumps and galloping on hard or poor footing? Are you really going to sting her legs alot? Also, let's face it...this horse is pretty fat. She might look a lot more balanced with some fitness and a little of that lard off of her. Horses like her usually give a much better impression when they're fit.

                      She doesn't have a world class back end, she has what at first looks like a nice long hip but like most quarter horse and quarter horse crosses, her stifle isn't quite positioned far forward enough and her hind quarters could be longer from back to front as the tail set is high and some of the apparent length is just the pins. There is a little hint of sickle hocks, just barely, and that may be the photo.

                      She isn't over at the knee. She's actually either cut in in front of the knee, calf kneed (back at the knee), or has an enlarged knee, I can't see clearly enough from the photo what exactly is going on with that, but it doesn't give the impression of being a perfect front leg. If she was back at the knee I'd be worried about a lot of galloping and jumping, if she has a cherry knee (enlarged from injury) i'd make sure a good sport horse vet saw the video and let me know what the risks are with the knee.

                      I can't really see her feet clearly. They might be a little small, the hind feet ARE small, but again, it's hard to have big enough feet under a 'well topped' horse ('well topped' being a little of a euphemism). When a horse has small feet, light small cannons (being cut in or tied in is the same as having light small cannons), small joints, it's good if they don't have a lot of mass in their body. A slim, narrow, light body is best on that sort of leg.

                      I can't see if there's something black behind her hind legs or if she has a capped hock on the left hind. Some horses with capped hocks get them from kicking and kickers have problems staying sound if they kick really badly and bang their legs up alot...or they might kick you, LOL. I wish I could see her legs and feet more clearly or that there were several photos with different poses.

                      But I made do with not perfect horses for a long time by conditioning and schooling them carefully.....and I don't know... there is just something about this horse....she just has a nice look to her face- ears listening to things, looking forward at her handler like she wants to do what the handler wants...I don't know what it is, but I like her style. You can pick and pick at things, and still have a horse that you just get along with, can train and enjoy being with, and .... that is just everything. If she moves clean and likes to jump, and the price is right and your vet likes her, how can you go wrong?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'd love to see a picture of her not standing over her front end like she is. I think she's got a bit better slope to her shoulder, more sloped pasterns, not quite so front-heavy as this picture makes her look.
                        ______________________________
                        The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If you put any top dressage horse on here (identity disguised), some people would write several detailed and nit picky paragraphs on what's wrong with them and why the horse will never hold up.

                          If you can find confo shots , you will see how very true that is! No kidding.

                          To the OP, I hope you take comments like " It's hard to have a foot and lower leg that stays sound under hard work, with that sort of front end." with a giant truckload of salt. I think that's an irresponsible comment to make based on that photo. To observe that the horse is a little heavy in the front end is one thing but to predict that it won't stay sound is quite another. The rest of that spiel seems to be part imagination, part I don't know what, to put it politely.

                          Remember that many people on bulletin boards believe that all (other peoples'} horses must be perfect and all (other)riders must be perfect and hold up to some ideal.

                          Ask your vet for a more realistic assessment and remember the old saw,

                          pretty is as pretty does

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            you took the remark out of context and twisted it, egon.

                            i said the horse is stood up poorly, is overweight, and also read the last sentence, 'you can pick and pick'......

                            this is one photo, and as another poster said, the horse is standing downhill. my comments are on ONE PHOTO, and i stated the limitations of doing so. no one can possibly get a realistic idea from 1 photo, i stated what i saw, and this IS a heavy topped horse on a small foot, and you will hear champ hough and anyone else evaluating conformation stating that that in principle isn't ideal and why.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It was a QUOTE and there were SIX paragraphs on everything that is 'wrong' with the horse in nit picky detail, so no, I didn't twist anything or take anything out of context..

                              Happy New Year, everyone!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I agree with *most* posters here but wanted to add my knee-jerk reaction. She's cresty. Without her standing in front of me so I could poke her in the shoulder with my finger to see what jiggles, I would be a little wary of that crest.

                                I would also want bloodwork done to see where her thyroid and ACTH levels were.

                                Could be she's just on the chubby side, but the bloodwork should clear that up.

                                I really like her pic!
                                "My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world." ~ Jack Layton

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Eggy; why so selective? I notice you don't take your comrade AR to task for this comment, but more than happy to take slc out of context, huh? This has to be one of THE dumbest comments I have read on here.

                                  Nice but not good enough for really athletic performance.
                                  *** 4 More Years ***
                                  *** 4 More Years ***

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by Dalfan View Post
                                    Eggy; why so selective? I notice you don't take your comrade AR to task for this comment, but more than happy to take slc out of context, huh? This has to be one of THE dumbest comments I have read on here.

                                    Sorry but the point of a forum is to put up each of our opinions. I will selectively pick up on one point of a post to either expand or disagree with it.There is no specific protocol to answer every point that is in another post and with SLC's posts the is just too much "core dumping" to make it feasible (but I have tried when I have the time and will to do so).

                                    Why don't you simply put up your own posts and not worry about what other people are doing,

                                    The comment on the UDBB pretty much reflects what is being said here so I hope the OP realizes that the main point of concern here is the smallish feet on a large bodied mare with a bit of a straight shoulder.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Why don't you simply put up your own posts and not worry about what other people are doing,
                                      Well, I could say the same for you.

                                      And I did comment on the inane comment. Just commenting on another poster's comment regarding another posters' post. Make sense? It's done all the time.
                                      *** 4 More Years ***
                                      *** 4 More Years ***

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Well, as a trimmer, I will say that her "smallish feet" don't concern me that much. If she is sound on them and they land flat, I would find something else to worry about. Big ole' honkin' platter feet are much more concerning to me.

                                        I think she is a nice mare. I would not be worried about her shoulder for dressage, who cares if she doesn't have a lot of reach in the front end or has some knee action? This is not hunters. Regarding her legs/bone, again, who cares? She didn't say she wanted to breed her, she said she wanted to RIDE her... and do lower level dressage and a little jumping. Not the Tevis Cup.

                                        The horse has a nice proportion. Her conformation will challenge her rider.. ALL CONFORMATIONS CHALLENGE THEIR RIDERS. The horse who is "built perfectly for dressage" with the modern short back and high set neck provides his OWN set of challenges for the rider.

                                        The only thing I would keep in the back on my mind about this horse is that her shoulder is indeed a bit heavy. If I started jumping her, and she jumped over her shoulder, I would stop jumping her rather than try to fix it - or waiting for the crash.

                                        Otherwise, I'd enjoy her. And whoever said she looks cresty, I agree.. I'd be looking to her diet!
                                        "Kindness is free" ~ Eurofoal
                                        ---
                                        The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X