Stallion Spotlight

Feinrich-Nr_1-12-18-10-074 Beelitz

Real Estate Spotlight

A-Frame 2
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Update and Petition

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Update and Petition

    https://www.facebook.com/789533453/p...6809589998454/
    https://www.change.org/p/usda-amend-...511-en-us%3Av2
    Last edited by AppaloosaDressage; Nov. 11, 2018, 11:03 AM.

  • #2
    I think someone else on the FB comments said this, but contact the lawyer that worked the last case that was similar to this. That's what I would do, personally. I don't understand the USDA's reasoning. Testing again seems simple? I don't know, maybe I'm missing something.

    Comment


    • #3
      Holy cow.

      Looks like there is a lot in the works to help this, but if a GoFundMe comes up related to efforts to change this process, I'll GLADLY contribute.
      If Kim Kardashian wants to set up a gofundme to purchase the Wu Tang album from Martin Shkreli, guess what people you DON'T HAVE TO DONATE.
      -meupatdoes

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes. I'd be on the phone to the lawyer Al Guden hired to handle the Sagacious situation ASAP.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by CanteringCarrot View Post
          I think someone else on the FB comments said this, but contact the lawyer that worked the last case that was similar to this. That's what I would do, personally. I don't understand the USDA's reasoning. Testing again seems simple? I don't know, maybe I'm missing something.
          Have been in touch with same lawyer and internist who got Sagacious cleared and we're told this colt's case is very similar to Sagacious' situation. Our personal vet has informed us he's starting a GoFundMe- will keep everyone posted. Thank you for reading/sharing/following here and on FB.
          Last edited by AppaloosaDressage; Nov. 9, 2018, 12:43 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't know if linking directly to a Go Fund Me is against COTH rules...


            What is USDA's actual argument? Do they just have a hard stop that says yes we 100% go by and rely on the results of this sole unreliable test.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Originally posted by CanteringCarrot View Post
              I don't know if linking directly to a Go Fund Me is against COTH rules...


              What is USDA's actual argument? Do they just have a hard stop that says yes we 100% go by and rely on the results of this sole unreliable test.
              They are claiming that despite the negative CFTs from Europe, two positive CFTs and one negative Western Blot obtained here in US are sufficient to determine he will not be allowed entry in the US and to refuse any further testing.
              Same was the case with Sagacious (2 positive CFTs-similar tider level shared by both horses) and one negative Western Blot.
              The case went to court and Sagacious was allowed re-entry into the US after two negative western blots and two positive CFTs. They needed a court order to obtain the additional western blot because quarantine facility refused further testing. The case went to Washington.
              We have same team involved and are starting the process to do the same.

              Comment


              • #8
                Wow, AppaloosaDressage . . . {{{hugs}}} for you. What a horrible situation to be in. Sounds like you have an awesome team in your corner. Wishing the best outcome for you and your new horse.
                ~~ How do you catch a loose horse? Make a noise like a carrot! - British Cavalry joke ~~

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'm sorry this is happening to you, and as someone who knows NOTHING about importing horses, I don't understand why they won't retest. Is it general laziness, a stubborn attitude...? I'd gladly sign a petition to get this horse retested.

                  I would like to point out however, and I hope this doesn't make anyone too mad, as a scientist (BS biochemistry and almost done with PhD in biomedical science) who eat sleep and breathes biomedical science....western blots are ROUTINELY inaccurate and difficult to interupt. I quite literally watched a senior lab mate run about 20 western blots with the same sample and get different results. The point, is that with this type of assay, it needs to be repeated and I would never trust just one run of the horse's sample. I understand why the authorities dont trust one negative western with such an infection disease.

                  still don't understand why they won't retest though.....

                  Comment


                  • #10

                    I am sorry for the struggles you are going through.

                    Your facebook post is misleading. The Western Blot is NOT a reliable test, whereas the other test is accepted to be highly accurate, particularly in healthy horses. I also think Glanders is a bacterial infection, so if your horse has a bacterial infection, could it not be additional evidence to support possible glanders? (or did they identify the specific bacteria?)

                    I am surprised the other horse was allowed in with the Western Blot test as it's defense.

                    I hope your horse is indeed healthy, and able to be imported. it is unfortunate that Germany has had Glanders reintroduced, and I appreciate that they are trying to prevent that happening here, but a better process needs to be in place.
                    Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by CanteringCarrot View Post
                      I don't know if linking directly to a Go Fund Me is against COTH rules...
                      A Go Fund Me link, if the link is not for a non-profit is not allowed in the rules.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by CHT View Post

                        I am sorry for the struggles you are going through.

                        Your facebook post is misleading. The Western Blot is NOT a reliable test, whereas the other test is accepted to be highly accurate, particularly in healthy horses. I also think Glanders is a bacterial infection, so if your horse has a bacterial infection, could it not be additional evidence to support possible glanders? (or did they identify the specific bacteria?)

                        I am surprised the other horse was allowed in with the Western Blot test as it's defense.

                        I hope your horse is indeed healthy, and able to be imported. it is unfortunate that Germany has had Glanders reintroduced, and I appreciate that they are trying to prevent that happening here, but a better process needs to be in place.
                        Lawyers and internist are telling us the western blot is most reliable for identifying false positives on CFT. Literally within 30 seconds of being on the phone with Several vets and lawyers they say "CFT is a terrible test." Or "CFT has history of being very unreliable." Or something to that effect. I've heard ELISA test also trumps CFT and am trying to get Roo tested with this. All data I have found online states CFT is notorious for inaccuracies, including the COTH article from when Sagacious went through this in 2017.
                        http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...-glanders-test

                        http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...-glanders-test

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          Originally posted by trubandloki View Post

                          A Go Fund Me link, if the link is not for a non-profit is not allowed in the rules.
                          I'll remove it

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by AppaloosaDressage View Post

                            Lawyers and internist are telling us the western blot is most reliable for identifying false positives on CFT. Literally within 30 seconds of being on the phone with Several vets and lawyers they say "CFT is a terrible test." Or "CFT has history of being very unreliable." Or something to that effect. I've heard ELISA test also trumps CFT and am trying to get Roo tested with this. All data I have found online states CFT is notorious for inaccuracies, including the COTH article from when Sagacious went through this in 2017.
                            http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...-glanders-test

                            http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/...-glanders-test
                            I would prefer an ELISA to a western, if they could do that I don't see why they doesn't besides maybe cost and ineffective lab turn around. I would be wary to take any scientific advice from a lawyer unless they also trained as a scientist, which some definitely do. They must have a reason for using these test, even if it's such a reason as finacially cheaper. Which I'm not saying is good.

                            I just wanted to point out that a western is never 100 percent, as your Facebook post says, that's misleading. To be honest, as much as this is heartbreaking and financial a mess for all involved, I don't blame the authorities for not trusting it and trying to keep our country free of this disease. I hope it works out for you and your horse and you get your further testing.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Westerns can be unreliable, but it depends on the specific antibody and assay. If this is a standard, well-validated detection method run by a reliable lab one can't just categorically say a Western is less reliable that CFT.

                              That said, CFT itself seems like a somewhat outdated technique and I'm surprised it hasn't been replaced as the initial screening method by ELISA or PCR.

                              I had a horse test strongly positive for Lyme with ELISA and negative using the "go to" Cornell PCR (which I think screens for 3 different antigens). I wanted to run a Western (which was suggested by the Dr at Cornell who developed their assay) mostly because as a scientist I was curious. But my vet would have had to come out and draw more blood, so since he was symptomatic I just treated.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                What a sad situation for all involved (especially the poor horse!). It makes me wonder - should these health tests occur BEFORE the horse is shipped to the US? Of course, they would occur again once in quarantine here, but couldn't that avoid shipping a horse across the pond that has a potential health issue?

                                I certainly hope this story has a positive ending - keep us updated!

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by MysticOakRanch View Post
                                  What a sad situation for all involved (especially the poor horse!). It makes me wonder - should these health tests occur BEFORE the horse is shipped to the US? Of course, they would occur again once in quarantine here, but couldn't that avoid shipping a horse across the pond that has a potential health issue?

                                  I certainly hope this story has a positive ending - keep us updated!
                                  He tested negative on CFT in Germany before he boarded the plane.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Such an upsetting situation for the OP; can't imagine how difficult this must be. The FB page has a zillion comments and responses, but the one that caught my eye is that if they choose to send him back to Europe, which they can do, that the state vet in Germany would also consider euthanizing. So hoping this all works out...

                                    Comment

                                    Working...
                                    X