• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USDA killed NAIS?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USDA killed NAIS?

    No more NAIS, for now, anyway:


    Guess that all your protests helped.

  • #2
    "Of course it's hard. It's supposed to be hard. It's the Hard that makes it great."

    "Get up... Get out... Get Drunk. Repeat as needed." -- Spike


    • #3


      • #4
        You mean instead of issuing commands they are actually going to LISTEN???
        Wow. What a concept!
        "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein



        • #5
          The announcement; http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p...ELEASE#7_2_5JM
          ... _. ._ .._. .._


          • #6
            that GOD that for once the government is going to stay out of our lives! This was the most ridiculous example of goverment intervention into private lives I have ever seen, and also would have been exhobitantly expensive to implement and monitor. Perhaps they realized that they were going to spend WAY too much money (for once!)


            • #7
              It wasn't funded - was it?
              ... _. ._ .._. .._


              • #8
                Equibrit - portions of NAIS had been implemented in the states. I think Wisconsin (?) had some pretty draconian penalities if producers didn't sign up. Don't quote me on that though - not sure it was Wiconsin. Could have been some other state with lots of cows.

                It certainly was a clusterfu** wasn't it. But I think the premise is sound - traceback. Hopefully new measures will prove to be more workable.

                Wonder how this is going to affect exports in the short term????? Bluey - do you know? I have no idea.
                Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                -Rudyard Kipling


                • #9
                  If you read this; http://www.aphis.usda.gov/publicatio...aceability.pdf
                  you will discover that it is not quite all over.
                  This appears to be the USDA shifting responsibility and financing to the States, using a "framework" designed by USDA. Sounds like an even bigger cluster***k.
                  ... _. ._ .._. .._


                  • #10
                    Aha. That would make sense. Shift the requirement onto the states as an unfunded mandate. States have to figure out how to implement and pay for it (passing any costs onto the producer probably) then the program is off the USDA's budget. If a state refuses to cooperate, the feds just threaten to withdraw road money or something.

                    Well, it was kind of happening already - it was being implemented state by state.

                    SNAFU. 'Nuff said.
                    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                    -Rudyard Kipling


                    • #11
                      Here's the message I received from Downsize DC about this:

                      For four years DC Downsizers joined with other organizations and countless farmers to oppose the National Animal Identification System (NAIS).

                      Finally, the USDA saw the writing on the wall. It is scrapping NAIS! The USDA still has plans for an animal tracing system, but it is to apply only to animals moving in interstate commerce, meaning . . .

                      * animal owners won't have to file a report every time an animal leaves their property, whereas under NAIS horseback riders, for instance, would have had to file a report every time they went for a ride]

                      * there will be no premise registration

                      * those who raise animals for personal consumption or to sell in local markets won't be part of the new regulatory systemMoreover, the new system promises . . .to focus entirely on animal disease traceability; bogus NAIS justifications such as "terrorism" have been scrapped"allow for maximum flexibility for states, tribal nations, and producers to work together to find identification solutions that meet their local needs"

                      * encourage low-cost technology; alternatives such as old-fashioned branding will most likely be accepted, instead of expensive RFID tags]

                      * local and organic farmers will be represented.

                      We at DownsizeDC.org are realists. We anticipate that as the new system takes shape, new concerns will arise. But think about what just happened . .

                      The government ended a program because the people did not tolerate it.

                      We the people DO have the power. We used this power to bring a significant victory for pet owners and livestock producers.
                      "Things should be as simple as possible,
                      but no simpler." - Einstein

                      “So what’s with the years of lessons? You still can’t ride a damn horse?!”


                      • #12
                        You're never going to sell a horse across State lines ?
                        ... _. ._ .._. .._


                        • #13
                          I don't see where much has changed. Each state will still need to come up with some way of tracing animals they are just not dictating how.

                          Tracing still needs to be done when moving from state to state. The state you live in could decide to keep what ever NAIS structure they have in place.

                          I think they missed their traceability dead line so had to come up with a reason, excuse. It is definitely a wait and see situation.

                          Now that it doesn't have a name it may be harder to keep up with what is going on.
                          No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle. ~Winston Churchill


                          • #14
                            It is called .........................tada................

                            Animal Disease Traceability Framework
                            ... _. ._ .._. .._


                            • #15
                              Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                              Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                              -Rudyard Kipling


                              • #16
                                ... _. ._ .._. .._

                                That would make a neat signature.
                                ... _. ._ .._. .._


                                • Original Poster

                                  Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
                                  ... _. ._ .._. .._

                                  That would make a neat signature.
                                  .-.. --- .-..

                                  That it would.


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                                    Equibrit - portions of NAIS had been implemented in the states. I think Wisconsin (?) had some pretty draconian penalities if producers didn't sign up. Don't quote me on that though - not sure it was Wiconsin. Could have been some other state with lots of cows.

                                    It certainly was a clusterfu** wasn't it. But I think the premise is sound - traceback. Hopefully new measures will prove to be more workable.

                                    Wonder how this is going to affect exports in the short term????? Bluey - do you know? I have no idea.

                                    Wisconsin was the original testing grounds. They threatened us all with fines if we didn't sign up. I don't personally know a single soul who originally signed up. My husband signed us up the first time around because we had cattle to move but when the letter came around to re-sign up I threw it away and other than a couple notices hadn't heard back from them.

                                    We had at the time five pet chickens. Several times we got notices of a chicken disease three hours away. I get the same information in the weekly farm paper.

                                    NAIS was a serious waste of time, money and resources. I am sorry but a 10 cattle operation isn't going to want to microchip everything and then be forced to buy a 2K scanner to scan every time those cattle moved. And chickens? Please. They wanted us to report if number changes. Well, numbers can change overnight via Raccoon.

                                    Also they wanted us to carry an ID card whenever we took a horse off the premises. So a ride to the neighbors, don't forget your card. I told them to tattoo the damn thing on my broad *** and if they want to scan it I'd gladly let them.

                                    If they feel they need to crack down then go to the factory farms where the majority of the problems start and end.

                                    Just my humble opinion.


                                    • Original Poster

                                      The story made national news:



                                      • #20
                                        AVMA Requests Stronger Disease Traceability System


                                        In response to a statement by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) has reaffirmed its call for a strong, national animal disease traceability program to help maintain and improve the health of U.S. livestock.

                                        Vilsack announced that the USDA is creating a new strategy for animal disease traceability. This comes in reaction to a public comment period in which the program in place was heavily criticized for being too stringent. (Read more: "USDA to Revise Animal Disease Traceability Approach")

                                        "The USDA is planning to create a new, national animal disease traceability system that is administered by the states and tribal nations. If each state is allowed to develop and implement its own program, important questions arise concerning communication and coordination. Clearly, the USDA must create a system that allows for quick and accurate trace-back across state borders in an animal disease emergency, or there is no point in the new system," said Ron DeHaven, DVM, chief executive officer of the AVMA. "There are many unanswered questions that must be addressed as this new animal disease traceability program is being developed. For that reason, the AVMA cannot consider endorsing this concept at this time."

                                        The AVMA advocates creation of an animal disease traceability program that would allow veterinarians to trace diseased animals back to specific farms or herds in cases of disease outbreaks. This would help identify potentially infected animals, quickly address the disease, and minimize harm other food animals, food producers, and the public.

                                        "The government estimates that this new animal traceability program will take 18 months to two years to create and implement. We are concerned that, in fact, with a formal rulemaking process in place, implementation will be delayed for up to three or four years, and, during that time, the U.S. will continue without an animal disease traceability program," said Larry R. Corry, DVM, president of the AVMA. "Veterinarians are the foot soldiers in the war against livestock diseases, and it's a role that we take extremely seriously. It's critical that federal regulations on this new traceability program include input from the AVMA and veterinarians."
                                        One can only hope we can delay it forever! So is the AVMA saying we have no tractability right now?
                                        No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle. ~Winston Churchill