• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Muck boots or Mudruckers?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Muck boots or Mudruckers?

    Since the current pair of Muck boots is giving up the ghost after 2 1/2 years (liner worn through in heel area and tread getting smooth), I need to replace them soon (like before the semester starts and I'm schlepping the farm animal skills class around various livestock facilities).

    I had a pair of the original Muck boots, and they died from cracks. I was not happy. The second pair, also Mucks (Christmas gift from my inimitable mother), were slightly redesigned, and have held up well--my general criterion being that the upper should hold up until the tread is shot.

    Anyone here had both Muck boots and Mudruckers? The latter are slightly less expensive, but I know I like the Mucks, and would rather spend another $10 and be happy, but if there's a consensus that the Mudruckers are more comfy, I might go for them.
    "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

    ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

  • #2
    I have both -- and both pair have held up well - no cracks - worn daily (sorta of alternate) pretty heavy use - I have to say I found the Muck Boots more comfortable than the MuckRuckers - so much so that next time around I will spring the extra bucks for that comfort -- something about the arch that just fits my foot -- I find with the MuckRuckers my feet get a little sore and tired after a full day of use -- don't have that problem with Muck Boots -- I do love keeping my feet dry though - especially in dewy grass and/or mud -- I do not like getting water in either pair since it takes a while for them to dry out and I wish there was some way either pair could breathe a bit since my feet will stink if I wear them all day - socks or no

    Comment


    • #3
      I also think the Muck Boots are a little more comfortable, but IME both are pretty good on durability.
      Click here before you buy.

      Comment


      • #4
        I just bought a pair of Statesman (the brand name) at the Southern Feeds store in Paris KY when I was visiting the area. They were on sale for less than $30. They are lined w/ removeable soles just like all the others.

        The feature I look for is a complete shoe, not a clog, and to be able to slip them on without bending over every time - that ability to drop them at the door and go in and out of the house without having to keep them on for a short trip back inside just b/c they are a pain to put back on. These are the low shoe-like ones (I have others taller for winter) and they have a soft cuff, I can wear them barefoot and not get a rub! Extra nice for a quick trip out since I like to go barefoot in the summer around the house.

        I can't swear how they wear yet but at the price I might go back next trip for another pair.

        I have a mid height green muck boot that I bought from tack of the day when they first started up. No brand name on the boot. Open at the top, you can slip them on no-handed and tuck your jeans in them. I LOVE them!! They have a good solid foot form in them, not sloppy at all, give excellent support. They are the greatest, not too hot in fair weather and great even subzero. They have just started showing wear and the liner in one is tearing. I wrote to tack of the day asking about them to be reoffered and my testimony on the item and never heard back.

        It doesn't answer your question about the two you were questioning but it's my 2 cents on what I have found that works for me.
        Don't let anyone tell you that your ideas or dreams are foolish. There is a millionaire walking around who invented the pool noodle.

        Comment


        • #5
          The high-ankle/low-calf height is definitely my favorite. Easy to put on/take off, but enough boot to handle mud and snow within reason.
          Click here before you buy.

          Comment


          • #6
            My Mudruckers died after about 10 months. I loved them, wore them every day in all seasons. Great in the snow (well, 2" of Ky snow), and I rolled the tops down in the summer to keep cool. But I wore through the interior lining at the heel, and gave myself horrible painful sores (irritated ligament, not blisters) while walking my course in them at the AECs that year. Shortly thereafter, cracks developed in the footie part (near the outer toe) and they were no longer waterproof.

            I am a convicted Boot Murderer, but I was disappointed that they didn't last longer... I usually get at least 2 yrs out of boots, even with my abuse. I've learned not to buy expensive footwear; no matter how well-made, I will kill it prematurely. I just buy the cheapie rubber boots from WalMart; I can't wear them all day everyday, but at least they keep my feet dry and cost significantly less! And my current pair is going on 3 yrs, almost a record! (though they *are* only worn in wet, muddy conditions, to save my paddock boots from drowning)
            “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.”
            ? Albert Einstein

            ~AJ~

            Comment


            • #7
              I've had both Muck Boots and Mudruckers and honestly can't turn my hand over for the difference. I usually go through a pair a year or so and they are either retired due to cracks along the ball of my foot or wearing through the back of the liner as EventerAJ said. I think given the price difference, that the Mudruckers are a better buy.

              Comment


              • #8
                I own a pair of both, and honestly, I think that Mucks hold up the best. MudRuckers held up for me for a while (about 8 months), and are fairly comfortable, but when you are scouting about in the manuer (especially deep manuer with REALLY deep shavings via your barn manager), and cleaning stalls, and doing all this barn work, I personally, think that Mucks are definetley a better buy.

                Comment


                • #9
                  You need to get a boot made with urine resistant rubber. Only way to avoid the cracks and early retirement of your boots.

                  I use these http://www.muckbootsandshoes.com/muc...shoe-p-50.html

                  The Muckster Pet Lovers Muck Shoe

                  The Muckster™ is ideal for animal care professionals as well as pet lovers everywhere. The Muckster™ is resistant to all pet related contaminants. Features include breathable airmesh lining, full-perimeter wrapped outsole provides maximum protectection to the toe, arch and heel area. The CR flex-foam bootie with four-way strecth snag resistant cover is 100% waterproof, lightweight, flexible and boyant.
                  Available in Tan/Bark.
                  Available in men's sizes 4-14 and women's sized 5-15.

                  No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle. ~Winston Churchill

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I've had good luck with the LL Bean Stormchasers. They feel like tennis shoes (I think they have the same "padding" as Reeboks) and stood up to a summer of constant Virkon footbaths/cage cleaning/whatever while working at a zoo. They have redesigned them though, so I'm not sure about the durability of the new style. They're relatively inexpensive though (around $60 or $70) and come in multiple heights. Just thought I'd throw that out there in case you decide to go with an alternate brand.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I have worn both and I like them the same. However, both are WAY too hot to wear during any season besides late fall and winter down here, even if I roll the tops down.
                      Katie

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Brown Horse View Post
                        I have worn both and I like them the same. However, both are WAY too hot to wear during any season besides late fall and winter down here, even if I roll the tops down.
                        I wear mine year round! They come in a shoe. Can't imagine working around horses in less coverage than a shoe.
                        No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle. ~Winston Churchill

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Can't help with those brands.

                          But I did buy a pair of Bogs muck boots that I found at the local Big R store. Been several years, no sign of wear yet. Very comfortable slip ons and warm in the snow, and they are 100% waterproof just like they claim. They have several styles of boots - mine are hit just under the knee, soft sides, with sturdy thick rubber feet. Only problems I've had involved trying to step on the sharp "stick in the ground" edge of a metal t-post, which isn't good for any softer muck boot - just had a senior moment on that one. Normally wear these all summer and winter long for mucking, any farm chore, hiking out and atv'g around the property esp. in the winter, looking for cows, at fencing, etc.

                          The Bogs Rancher boots are a bit heavier and I think come with a steel toe, but they looked intriguing. Here is a photo of mine, the classic high boots (mine didn't come with the sockliner they mention):

                          http://www.amazon.com/Bogs-Womens-Cl...9934844&sr=1-5

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I have never owned either, but I know of several people who have been very happy with the muck boots.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X