• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Ain't this some S@%$T, (pardon my French)...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ain't this some S@%$T, (pardon my French)...

    Ok, so I'm mainly venting but kind of want some advice. I just recently rented my home to two people who are going into foreclosure. When I spoke with them about the house they said they had 9 dogs. Ok, so that's a lot of dogs and most people would turn them away. But I agreed to let them rent the property with the understanding that two of the dogs were to be rehomed leaving them with 7. We get to the lease signing and I am told, "oh by the way we have 12 cats." Well my jaw about hit the floor. I felt I was being very generous in allowing 7 dogs onto my property. I said absolutely not. You will have to find homes for them. So we sign the lease and they begin to move in. Then I come to find out they do in fact still have 9 dogs. The lease says 7. So I have ammended the lease to include no more than the 9 original dogs on the property. Then I wake up this morning, grab the newspaper and find this article:

    http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2...3022009/449171

    Tell me what you think. Am I crazy?
    Sailing the high seas but secretly wishing to be on the back of a horse.

  • #2
    Oh my! That is an insane amount of cats! I am not sure I would be really thrilled to have them as tenants!
    www.rockhillfarm.net

    Comment


    • #3
      I think you have a very big heart to take the 9 dogs. It is ok to say no. I think you were very wise to say no to the cats. I know it says they are all housebroken but I would think you would have to put a lot of work into your house once the tenants moved out--if you let them bring 46 cats!

      Comment


      • #4
        You are very generous, amending the lease for 9 dogs, when you originally agreed on 7. They signed the lease for the dogs, and did not disclose the cats, so that is their problem.

        The article does not make the landlord of their rental property look like a mean person - it looks more to be an appeal for people to adopt some of their 46 cats rather than see them starve.

        So, if you are worried about looking like a bad person - don't.

        You are kind of crazy to allow those people into your house and watch them carefully, they look to be the type to...um...not disclose or stretch the truth.

        Kind of like that kid that is told they aren't allowed any pets and next thing you know he's hiding a hamster in his room....

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          I am beginning to think I have stepped in a big pile of doo doo, no pun intended. I have however contacted the county to discuss my legal rights and am pretty confident that I will be able to evict if it comes to that. I understand wanting to help animals, but come on, if it means the difference between keeping your house... I think it may be a sickness. Like hoarding. We shall see...
          Sailing the high seas but secretly wishing to be on the back of a horse.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            Originally posted by Ajierene View Post
            You are kind of crazy to allow those people into your house and watch them carefully, they look to be the type to...um...not disclose or stretch the truth.

            Kind of like that kid that is told they aren't allowed any pets and next thing you know he's hiding a hamster in his room....
            You are right, the truth has been streched on a few occasions with these two. The amendment is very clear. Hopefully it will be a deterent.
            Sailing the high seas but secretly wishing to be on the back of a horse.

            Comment


            • #7
              Let me get this straight...you are renting your place to a couple who is in foreclosure and has 9 dogs...and 12 cats, and this news article surprises you?
              I see nothing but a headache for you.
              Run as fast as you can....

              Comment


              • #8
                Pardon my French, but.... Merde!!! et Zut Alors!!!!!

                So those are your tenants featured in that article?
                They have breached your lease agreement and you are justified in giving them notice to vacate.
                Of course, speaking as a former landlord (and depending on the law in your state) that could take months.

                Please don't tell me they keep this menagerie inside your house.
                I would tell them to take their bleeding hearts to a Home Depot ASAP and buy some kennel materials to get those dogs outside.
                As for the cats - no fruitbattin' way would I allow tenants to keep that many cats inside my rental property!
                I hope you at least collected a hefty damage deposit as you will most likely be needing it.

                Live & learn - I could tell you some horror stories involving tenants. It appears to be part of the game.
                *friend of bar.ka*RIP all my lovely boys, gone too soon:
                Steppin' Out 1988-2004
                Hey Vern! 1982-2009, Cash's Bay Threat 1994-2009
                Sam(Jaybee Altair) 1994-2015

                Comment


                • #9
                  It is A LOT like hoarding - while they are taking in strays, and my grandma had 20 cats in her house at one point. There is a major difference. My grandma worked with the local animal shelter. She was retired, so she had time to nurse the babies until they could eat on their own, at which time they would be sent back for adoption. She also agreed to take in many unadoptables and give them a home rather than having to put them down. These were older cats, cats with behavior issues that made them unappealing for people with young kids (such as fear of people making them hide or tend to scratch and bite).

                  She also took in cats on temporary basis when they were sick and needed just time and medication to heal.

                  She also took them to the vet and had them euthanized, if deemed necessary (we won't mention that she's stolen neglected dogs and cats from neighbors, taken them to the vet and some were euthanized on the spot due to unfixable problems that resulted from neglect).

                  These people are taking in strays, but not rehoming them, just collecting. I would not want to buy that foreclosed home and you will have to do a lot to your home when they are done renting. I hope you asked for a pet deposit!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I guess I can identify to some degree as a cat lover who has rescued quite a few and have about 15. I also have rescued alot of dogs. I worry about all these animals that are the "silent victims" of this economic mess and lose homes along with their caregivers. It's just too sad. I fully understand your position regarding renting your house as I have a mobile home on my farm I rent (or try to keep rented). It's a real headache. I don't have a solution. I hope the article in the paper might help on placing the cats, but there are just so many pets needing help and so many people who are no longer able to take them. Maybe a rescue group could help out or a pet store could have an adoption day for them. I know some of the rescues here use pet stores or other venues to get animals adopted. The fosters are full and the shelters don't keep them long. It is really tragic for the animals as much as the people involved, whether you are the owner of the rental property of the one getting evicted. I hope this can be resolved in the cats' best interest as well as yours.
                    PennyG

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      If anyone needs some barn cats, let me know. Or contact the paper. Most of them are already neutered.
                      Sailing the high seas but secretly wishing to be on the back of a horse.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'm all for rescuing animals--if you have your own place! If you have to rely on the kindness of strangers to rent to you then you have to rethink your position.

                        I would never expect someone who rents me a place to live to take in my animals.... I know things can change in a blink of an eye, but these folks are being foreclosed on--it doesn't happen that fast, does it? Generally people have some kind of notice they are going into foreclosure, even if it's a month or two.

                        It's kind of you to take in those dogs (personally I would not have). Yes, that sounds cruel but I have had animals and I know what kind of damage can be done--I would not be interested in that as a lessor. Humans create enough problems when they rent without dragging animals into the mix.

                        Just the fact that they weren't upfront with you about their entire situation would be enough to turn me off. I would rather people tell me the truth about something--no matter how bad it might be--than for me to read about it in a newspaper or hear about it from someone else! It doesn't do much as far as instilling trust in my mind about them.

                        Even I don't have 46 cats! I don't know how they could have provided care for that many adequately. These folks should have started re-homing them after the first couple of cats--the fact that they have 46 is a testament to how difficult it is to rehome a cat in this society....

                        The fact that they were not upfront with you about their situation could probably be considered fraud on their part.

                        Just remember--no good deed goes unpunished!

                        Good luck!
                        "None of us can move forward if half of us are being held back." ~Anonymous~

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I have not read all of the other replies but I do think you are nuts to allow all those pets unless you don't mind having your property absolutely destroyed. I don't care how well behaved those pets are, that many in a residence is a health issue and is going to pose substantially more than the ordinary amount of wear and tear on the place. I have tenants and no longer permit remodeling projects, numerous animals, etc because I am tired of having to repeatedly redo my very nice house just to get it back to where it was when turned over to tenants.

                          In addition, I would be very concerned that these people obviously like media attention and are trying to gain public support / empathy by whining to the newspaper about their predicament (and btw, I noticed in the article that the represented they were permitted to bring NINE dogs to the rental property, when apparently the agreement was that they could only take seven). So, if you do end up having to evict them, be prepared to see "their side" splashed all over the papers also. It is sad that the animals are helpless in all of this, but I don't see why that means you have to foot the bill for damage that will inevitably occur if these people move their menagerie in.

                          FWIW, I just bought a condo where the former owner had a Sharpei and two cats, and the place absolutely reaked from the animals (and yes she did walk the dog / clean the cat litter). I also had to spend $$$$ having all the ducts cleaned out as they were clogged with pet hair, and we had to replace the HVAC because the former owner never bothered to change the filters in the 5 years she was there. We also have to replace the wood flooring as it is rotted in places from pet urine as a result of accidents over the years.
                          Roseknoll Sporthorses
                          www.roseknoll.net

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I would want photos of the condition of the house they are leaving. If it looks like I suspect it will look, I'd be very hardcore about the pets.

                            They were very dishonest with you. That tells me they know they have a problem but are in some level of denial.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by PONY751 View Post
                              We get to the lease signing and I am told, "oh by the way we have 12 cats." Well my jaw about hit the floor. I felt I was being very generous in allowing 7 dogs onto my property. I said absolutely not. You will have to find homes for them. So we sign the lease and they begin to move in.


                              Tell me what you think. Am I crazy?

                              I don't know you well enough to make that diagnosis...

                              BUT...I would say that, if I were you, I never would have signed a lease agreement with people who waited until the lease signing to give me a "BTW..." statement. They would seem sneaky to me...a BIG red flag that would have been a deal-breaker for me.

                              Good luck!
                              "We need a pinned ears icon." -MysticOakRanch

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                One wonders if they would have been able to pay their mortage if they had fewer animals. God knows my 7 cats and 2 dogs cost a LOT every month. I can't imagine what their feed bill and vets bills look like.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Not really pertaining to YOUR situation but: My heart goes out to those people. Lets try not to fall into condemnation...we don't KNOW these folks!! You just need to make a decision that you feel comfortable with and stick to it.

                                  And as a person that was NOT formerly a cat person...I now have 6...(oh my) Cats just seem to happen. All of mine but one were rescued as tiny kittens ...who knew they were so hard to rehome!!
                                  "My treasures do not sparkle or glitter, they shine in the sunlight and nicker to me in the night"

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by birdsong View Post
                                    Not really pertaining to YOUR situation but: My heart goes out to those people. Lets try not to fall into condemnation...we don't KNOW these folks!! You just need to make a decision that you feel comfortable with and stick to it.

                                    And as a person that was NOT formerly a cat person...I now have 6...(oh my) Cats just seem to happen. All of mine but one were rescued as tiny kittens ...who knew they were so hard to rehome!!
                                    birdsong:
                                    6 kittens is a far cry from 46 cats!

                                    That many animals & losing their home to foreclosure smacks of a Hoarding Syndrome.
                                    Not healthy for the people or animals involved.
                                    There is some Major Denial going on here and OP does not need to get sucked into it.
                                    *friend of bar.ka*RIP all my lovely boys, gone too soon:
                                    Steppin' Out 1988-2004
                                    Hey Vern! 1982-2009, Cash's Bay Threat 1994-2009
                                    Sam(Jaybee Altair) 1994-2015

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Simkie View Post
                                      One wonders if they would have been able to pay their mortage if they had fewer animals. God knows my 7 cats and 2 dogs cost a LOT every month. I can't imagine what their feed bill and vets bills look like.
                                      Conversely if times are that hard on them, what care have they neglected for these dogs and cats, and is it really a situation those animals should be in/deserve?

                                      Just because you take animals from a bad place does not mean you can cut corners and not do what you are supposed to do for them.
                                      If you were a horse rescue, for example and took in so many horse [say 40-50] but then could not afford their vaccinations, farrier care or dental care [who could with that many?]... how is that better for the horses than the neglect you may have taken them out of?
                                      Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                      http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        These folks have not used the best judgement in the world and maybe they haven't tried very hard to re-home the cats. However, the article in the paper did state he lost his construction job and has a much lower-paying job now, which probably led to the foreclosure.

                                        I know cats are hard to re-home and alot of people have an "attitude" about cats, but guess what -- they are victims, have feelings and deserve a home -- even though it is not the OP's problem! Instead of condeming their kind hearts -- and hoarders don't usually take the initiative to neuter or even feed them very well -- maybe some help and good ideas in placing these cats would be time better spent. No one knows how the news story came about, but it could be useful in a positive way. Maybe the newspaper would help with making an adoption venue public information.

                                        If I were closer I'd take one -- helping animals is not about "needing" another --
                                        (as I tell my sister all the time) -- which I certainly don't, it's the fact that they need help and you might be their last hope. Every cat placed is a positive step. Compassion is as free as criticism.
                                        PennyG

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X