• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Montana gov. offical wants all pitbulls in her state destroyed..please help

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Montana gov. offical wants all pitbulls in her state destroyed..please help

    For all of our pitbull owners and dog lovers....please take a moment and write Ms. Driscoll an email (address on the link below) and let her know how you feel about this bill. She wants ALL pitbulls rounded up in her state and euthanized.


  • #2
    It's so wrong. I get so cranky when people judge my pit just because they are ignorrant. My pit is an amazing dog. The BS that fuels BSl is the biggest load of garbage! I wish people would meet her(my pitt) before they judge her. It's amazing how opinions change when they meet her. Even if they have reserves about the breed, they melt away in a heartbeat!
    If history has taught us anything is that ethnic cleansing is so wrong. And once one "ethnic" group is "removed" then there will always be another.

    3 dog attack fatalities in the last 43 years...??? So there are ample pits running rampant in Montana killing people? What is the basis for needing BSL in a state that really has next to 0 dog attack related deaths in the last 43 years?


    • Original Poster

      Originally posted by Blinkers On View Post
      It's so wrong. I get so cranky when people judge my pit just because they are ignorrant. My pit is an amazing dog. The BS that fuels BSl is the biggest load of garbage! I wish people would meet her(my pitt) before they judge her. It's amazing how opinions change when they meet her. Even if they have reserves about the breed, they melt away in a heartbeat!
      If history has taught us anything is that ethnic cleansing is so wrong. And once one "ethnic" group is "removed" then there will always be another.

      Hey, I've never owned a Pitbull and this bill infuriates me.......its a DOG!!! There are good and bad in EVERY breed...and there are good and bad owners with EVERY breed. I sent her a letter on behalf of those dogs. I couldn't imagine having to turn my dog over to the government to be killed, just because of his breed.


      • #4
        It certainly leaves me wondering what bee flew into her, um, bonnet.

        What a terrible proposal.
        If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket


        • #5
          If my dog were subject to this trype of BS, I'd be living somewhere else in a heartbeat! Ignorrance is bliss for whom? The pit? The people who love them? And care for them and make the useful members in society?

          She comes very high on my list of priorities!


          • Original Poster

            Originally posted by Blinkers On View Post
            If my dog were subject to this trype of BS, I'd be living somewhere else in a heartbeat! Ignorrance is bliss for whom? The pit? The people who love them? And care for them and make the useful members in society?

            She comes very high on my list of priorities!
            What a cutie......yeah, she looks really vicious in those pictures. Hopefully this nut's bill will never pass.


            • #7
              The proposed bill seems to grandfather in all the Pit Bulls already there.

              (3) The prohibition in this section does not apply to a person who:

              (a) owned a pit bull dog and registered the ownership of the dog with the county government and obtained a license tag identifying the dog as a registered pit bull dog on or before [the effective date of this act];

              Its still stupid, but they will not be killing the dogs already in the state.


              • #8
                What an F-tard.

                Don't even have the breed but it begs the question who or what would be next?

                Most people suck.
                "look deep into his pedigree. Look for the name of a one-of-a-kind horse who lends to his kin a fierce tenacity, a will of iron, a look of eagles. Look & know that Slew is still very much with us."


                • #9
                  BSL is BS. Using this logic, then we should euthanize all white men because Charlie Manson was a killer. I don't own a pit, but I am strongly against BSL (in case you can't tell). My family owned a pit bull when I was a kid, and he was the best dog we had while I was growing up.

                  I will send the governor an e-mail, but I urge everyone to write a letter (not just e-mail) since it has so much more impact than e-mail.



                  • #10
                    I just wrote a respectful e-mail to Ms. Driscoll. But now that I think about it, I think we need to ban Female Democrats. It is obvious they can't be trusted, and are a hazard to society.


                    • #11


                      • #12
                        I don't think she would listen to me - I probably would be rude. Idiot.
                        Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique


                        • #13
                          I want to know who voted this idiot into office. Was she the only choice or what? I can't believe that someone this dumb didn't show glimpses of it during the campaign.

                          3 fatalities in 43 years, none of which involved pit bulls = banning pits? WTF?

                          And how are they going to define a pit? American Pit Bull Terriers? American Staffordshire Terriers? Staffordshire Bull Terriers? Bull Terriers? American Bulldogs? Or just kill it if it "sort of looks like a pit" ?


                          • #14
                            That's in The proposed bill too. If you want to prove your dog is not a Pit you have to pay for it and the hearing.

                            All those are mentioned plus any dog that looks like it might be one.


                            • #15
                              The woman is an idiot. I don't believe in painting with that broad a brush, that's ridiculous, what's her personal beef? It's extreme, but, speaking as someone whose innocent dog was just mauled by three pits and was lucky to not be eviscerated on the spot, I can't say that there isn't some merit in paying them special attention if they've already been a problem. The owners of the dogs expressed shock that their beloved pets could do something so horrible, completely missing the fact that 1) pits have a prey drive, they're hard wired that way, you don't get rid of it, you only manage it wisely, and 2) when you have three, you have a PACK. Let them run loose and they act like one. their dogs go to day care, socialize with other dogs and have never had a problem. Till now. I was stunned at the ferocity of the attack, and still can't think about it without having a panic attack, it was one of the most frightening things I've ever witnessed, my dog's screams will never leave my memory.

                              Add to that that unfortunately a large number of owners of pits are just looking for 'dicks on a leash', it's a macho thing, and the more vicious they are the better they like them, their reputation isn't entirely undeserved. There are a lot of bad owners, and some bad dogs. I'm a big fan of Cesar and love that he's taken his dogs and given them new lives, but he's a good leader, and Cesar's are few and far between.


                              • #16
                                Unfortunately there seems to be a rash of this going on around me too. I'm a member of the kennel club and this is the topic of choice right now. Many towns in SD and I've heard of legislation in NE as well, are seeking to ban not only pits, but dobermans, GSD, wolf hybrids, Rottis, Akitas, etc., or "any other agressive breed." (Good luck defining that).

                                There are two towns within 20 miles of me that I actually couldn't move to because I have 2 dobermans, or if I did they have to be neutered/spayed (they are) I have to have a six foot fence WITH a seperate fenced-in dog run, they must be muzzled at all times in the public venue and on leash.

                                I know it sounds just insane, but there are ALOT of people supporting this insanity then. One town outlawed GSD because a man on the board had heard a story of a retired police dog attacking someone before (not there of course).

                                Seriously don't get me started, but something has to be done to educate the public. This is a huge problem.
                                DIY Journey of Remodeling the Farmette: http://weownblackacre.blogspot.com/


                                • #17
                                  I'm sorry that your dog was on the recieving end of "pack mentality!" I've watched my own dog.. not the pit, the other one a white shepherd mix.. start acting with pack mentality when with a yellow lab and a mix breed coyote looking also shepherd mix dog. Something I will not allow! I am responsible for their lives if I allow pack mentality I allow my dogs to act stupidly and that is irresponsible. That gives idiots like this woman some wacky leg to stand on. I will never do that.


                                  • #18
                                    Have to add if cities would just ENFORCE THEIR LEASH LAWS I think most attacks would never occur...dog to dog or dog to human.

                                    I've had TWO dogs attack me and my dogs while on a walk. Both loose and not under control of their owners. One a male lab who was seriously scary (he had his junk ;-) came after my mother, sister and I and both dobes (and I'm holding my male's muzzle because you know what dog is getting in trouble if something goes down...mine...) and another an English Springer Spaniel, who I was able to scream away after she bit my female doberman in the face (female dobe is a total puss and had no idea what to do...she thinks every dog is her best friend).

                                    I love springers and labs, I just point out breed to point out how stupid these laws are.
                                    DIY Journey of Remodeling the Farmette: http://weownblackacre.blogspot.com/


                                    • #19
                                      Isn't the actuality that Black labs are the culprits in more dog bites a year than ANY other breed???
                                      InnisFailte Pinto Sporthorses & Coloured Cobs

                                      Bits are like cats, what's one more? (Petstorejunkie)


                                      • #20
                                        5th amendment

                                        One more thought, because I'm getting fired up. Has anyone attacked this type of legislation with a 5th amendment argument? Outcome?

                                        The one that says a person shall not "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." I think there is a strong argument that dogs are property.

                                        Also, this is fair to those who seek to destroy dangerous animals after due process ... in other words "Punish the deed, not the Breed!"

                                        I WOULD support $ a 5th amendment law suit if the facts were right...just wondering if it has been done.
                                        DIY Journey of Remodeling the Farmette: http://weownblackacre.blogspot.com/