• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

spinoff on Weedwackers-vent

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • spinoff on Weedwackers-vent

    The human behind the weedwacker-not the weedwacker it's self!

    I have a landscape company do my weedwacking under all my post and rail fencing and the ditch in front of the property. Have had them doing the work since '07 so this isn't something new. Anyway, the next to last time the crew was here, besides weedwacking, I had them trim back some of the bushes on the hedgerow so I didn't get cut up when I was mowing along there. I won't go into the problems there except to say they cut back quite a lot of the area about 8-10' back when only 1-2' was necessary thereby causing a much larger bill.

    There was also a significant descripancy in the billing for that and I pointed out that while the crew of 3 was there for an 8 hr pd, which would be a billing of 24 labor hrs, they did take a lunch break. I thought I was pretty generous when I subtracted ONLY 20 minutes/person or an hr for the lunch break from the bill bringing the total work hours to 23. In addition to the overbilling of work hrs they also charged an additional 1.5 hrs for weedwacking, which was done during the 23 work hours along with the hedgerow trimming. Basically there was at least a 2.5 hr overcharge and at $40/hr plus tax that came out to $108. So when I sent my check into pay for the work I wrote a letter pointing out the overcharge and paid $108 less than I was billed. I never heard word one. I don't know about you COTHer's but I sure dislike someone padding a bill.

    Fast forward to this past Friday when I had called for weedwacking to be done again. Normally, it takes 2 workers an hr or 2 labor hours ($80)for the work. Two crews show up with 2 guys each. I explain to both crews to NOT do anything on the back of the property by the hedgerow as I've used weedkiller and there aren't any weeds under the fencing. I look out as I'm washing dishes and sure enough don't I see one worker trimming the BACK of the property coming from the east side of the property and another worker trimming the BACK coming from the west side. The barn blocked most of my view so I couldn't see if they did the entire back or not. Needless to say, I was a bit pissed since they were expressly told NOT to trim back there.

    Now with 4 guys working, they should have been done in 1/2 hr easily but they were there just over an hr or ($160 cost when I'm used to paying $80). Yes, the grass was wet but that's no excuse as they've encountered that before and there was not an excessive time period between the last weedwacking and this. In addition, while we've had a wetter than normal summer, this last month or so has been pretty dry so not as much growth to the grass.

    Ok, maybe I'm paranoid but I think the owner was pissed about the last bill when I pointed out the billing 'error' and told both crews to make sure they took an hour or double the amount of time necessary thereby padding this bill also. I've decided when the bill comes, I will again write a note explaining that I told both crews to NOT trim along the back, and since neither crew could follow the homeowners instruction, I would be taking 0.5 hr off the bill. Also that I would expect the owner to reprimand the workers for NOT following the homeowners instruction. I will also point out that in all the years his crews have done the weedwacking they have never taken that long to do the work and point out to him the amount charged each time this yr alone as an example.

    Ok, vent over but I do need an emoticon with smoke coming out of my ears!
    Last edited by msj; Sep. 15, 2013, 09:57 AM. Reason: added 'dry' to 3rd to last paragraph
    Sue

    I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying let's remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.

  • #2
    Maybe not the owner.
    He/she may have penalized the workers for claiming more hours on that last bill.
    I am assuming they earn an hourly wage, not paid by the job since you are billed for hours worked.
    So maybe this time they wanted to make up the difference by working more hours?
    Just my $.02
    *friend of bar.ka*RIP all my lovely boys, gone too soon:
    Steppin' Out 1988-2004
    Hey Vern! 1982-2009, Cash's Bay Threat 1994-2009
    Sam(Jaybee Altair) 1994-2015

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      2Dogs, that could be a possibility BUT it was a different crew this time. None of the 4 workers this past time did the previous job. But, even so, the owner should be made aware of the problem.

      One of the workers, whom I think a lot of simply because he's quite the perfectionist, did the ditch which normally would take about 30 minutes, took an entire hour. Now, there was some water in the ditch so I rather imagine that it did take him a bit longer, but not quite the entire hour. But I honestly will give this particular guy a pass because he's done a lot of work for me before.
      Sue

      I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying let's remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hmmm - MSJ. Must be a Syracuse/Rochester area kind of thing. (See what you can get away with...)

        Used to live near Onondaga Hill when we first bought our cottage on the lake near here (2 hr drive). In the summertime, hired a fellow who lived nearby to mow the lawn. After not mowing it for the first 10 days after I had hired him, I did it myself, and again later that month. I went back and forth 2x a week. Ended up doing more mowing than he did.

        One Sunday morning I see his bill stuffed in my mailbox. He had charged me for 4 mowings when I had done 3 of the 4!

        Was still in my Sunday best, and I hopped in my car, drove over and rang the bell, handed him a check for mowing once, and told him I never wanted to see him again. He tried to argue that he had really done it! What noive!!
        But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          CVPeg, I've used this group for 6 yrs and make certain I'm always there when the work is done. Actually, the owner knows that I won't pay him if I'm not there when the work is done as I've told him. There was only one other time there was a discrepancy and the owner took my word for the amount of hrs worked.

          Considering this yr was the first yr that I had him mulch all the flower beds this spring(it took 8 guys 4 hrs to do that plus the weedwacking), and I had arranged (or so I thought ) that his crew was supposed to come back and weed every 2 wks. After 3 wks I pulled out Round Up and sprayed any emerging weeds and have continued to do so. After about 2 months, I told him not to bother having the crew come back to weed as I could handle it. I will admit this June was super wet and I suppose I can understand that he was probably way behind but.... Needless to say, I'm not too thrilled of late.
          Sue

          I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying let's remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.

          Comment


          • #6
            It has been a challenging year weed, & mowing wise for sure. My poor little mower was totally revamped last year, and believe it will need another overhaul, or replacement for next year.

            The one good thing - great apple production! Have a few wild trees that I never picked apples from before. Have two box loads up in the kitchen right now.

            But agree with you - sometimes it's less exasperating doing some things yourself, than overseeing those assigned to do the job.
            But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

            Comment

            Working...
            X