• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Continued from Off-Topic: Discussion about the Farmer Assurance Provision

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Continued from Off-Topic: Discussion about the Farmer Assurance Provision

    I did not get to reply back to the "Is anybody concerned with the passing of the "Monsanto Protection Act" thread on the OT. However, since it is a farm related topic, I was hoping we could continue over here.

    In that thread, Daydream Believer posted this:

    "Recently in India, organic farmers outproduced the GMOs by huge margins.

    http://www.naturalnews.com/039766_ri...re_yields.html "


    The first 3 paragraphs make me itch. Here's why:

    #1 - Kumar (the grower) planted half the number of seeds. So yes, he has less competition between each of his plants, therefore allowing each one to use what is around it for nutrients without sharing with anyone.

    #2 - In this example, it says THE WEEDS WERE HAND REMOVED. (Enough Said.)

    #3 - This was a TWO ACRE plot. Two acres is GARDENING, not FARMING. I had trials that average 340 bushel corn on two acre plots in 2012 - in a historic drought. That is compared to 2012's national average of 123.4 bushels per acre. But I don't get articles about that in magazines, because that is NORMAL for plots. Micro-small samples of the overall picture.

    Also, his 22 tons is compared to the national average. There are parts of the country where rice doesn't grow well, and their yields would also be factored into the national average they are comparing to. Do we know what his NEIGHBORHOOD, TOWN, and REGION averages were? My corn yields compared to the national average look pretty darn good, but if you compare them with my immediate region, they aren't quite as impressive.

    #4 - In many of my trials, I use "unlimited" nutrients. We don't know what his fertilizer plan was. There is no info about that in the article. For me, I would expect that he used high fertilizer rates than "normal." This would be a good example of typical results of "unlimited" nutrients. However, putting "unlimited" nutrients on entire fields is highly impractical, not economical, and not recommended.

    #5 - The weeds were HAND REMOVED. When you removed competition for sunlight, water, nutrients of course your yields improve!

    #6 - Genetics. What variety did he plant? Does the whole nation plant the same genetic family? Is he using a new hybrid that has a naturally higher yield potential? Are others using a more defensive hybrid, rather than high yield, and he just lucked out with good weather conditions?

    #7 - Did I mention that he hand picked his weeds?

  • #2
    Do a little digging into the credibility of NaturalNews.com before you get too up in arms. Not exactly an unbiased and reliable source of information.


    The source (Truth Publishing and that cast of characters) is far more frightening than a few pesticides, if you think about it.
    Click here before you buy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by goldenrow View Post
      #3 - This was a TWO ACRE plot. Two acres is GARDENING, not FARMING. I had trials that average 340 bushel corn on two acre plots in 2012 - in a historic drought. That is compared to 2012's national average of 123.4 bushels per acre. But I don't get articles about that in magazines, because that is NORMAL for plots. Micro-small samples of the overall picture.
      this is what I was trying to say in the other thread. This 2 acre plot is going to feed a few people. A few. Not many, a few. Without GMO and the fertilizers/pesticides/soil enhancers we have now, there won't be enough food to feed people. Monsanto is a company, I am sure they aren't perfect, but sometimes I think people in this country forget what we have.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by threedogpack View Post
        this is what I was trying to say in the other thread. This 2 acre plot is going to feed a few people. A few. Not many, a few. Without GMO and the fertilizers/pesticides/soil enhancers we have now, there won't be enough food to feed people. Monsanto is a company, I am sure they aren't perfect, but sometimes I think people in this country forget what we have.
        People lately love to bash farmers and agriculture in general.
        No one can do right, while their bellies are full, their pantries overflowing and they have superstores with some of the most abundant, varied, cleanest, already prepared and safest food the world has ever seen.

        People also love to bash doctors and medicines, alternative medicine is perfect, of course, all that until they are very sick and the ER doctor saves their bacon.

        People will bash attorneys right and left, until they need one, then that one is perfect, of course.

        And so on.

        When we live in a first world, we have first world problems, as reflected above.

        May they be so lucky to never have to live in times and places where they may have any real need.

        Comment


        • #5
          land in India is messured in hectares which is about 2.5 US acres to one hectare


          22 tons of rice is pretty good pile.... While in Cambodia we uncovered a 100 ton storage pile and that took two days to fly out and we couldn't get it all so I called in F4s with napalm to burn it

          Comment


          • #6
            so are you saying that in Cambodia they routinely grow 22 tons of rice on what, 2.5 acres? And they will feed the world? Which then means Monsanto doesn't need to be protected in Cambodia?

            Honestly, I don't understand what you mean by your post unless it is that Cambodia can grow 22 tons of rice and hide it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by threedogpack View Post
              so are you saying that in Cambodia they routinely grow 22 tons of rice on what, 2.5 acres? And they will feed the world? Which then means Monsanto doesn't need to be protected in Cambodia?

              Honestly, I don't understand what you mean by your post unless it is that Cambodia can grow 22 tons of rice and hide it.
              My point, dear, is 22 tons of rice is a hell of lot of rice that will feed a lot of people

              Also when using comparison data is nice to know the base lines. If one is supposing an acre is an acre but not aware of the different measurements then whole discussion become worthless

              Also the article does not say if the weight is in metric or US tons.... my thoughts are the messurement is in metric tons (long tons) with is 1.10231 times greater than a US short ton.

              Comment


              • #8
                I had a Fb friend post about "suicide farmers" in India yesterday. I googled up some information on the Prince of Wales trust Bhoomi Vardan Foundation including some commentary by a native Indian blogger.


                Neither GMO nor organic seem to work for the chronically impoverished small Indian farmer.
                Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
                Incredible Invisible

                Comment

                Working...
                X