• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

PSA on raw milk warnings:

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Just watched a relevant documentary on some of these issues last night: "Farmaggedon". It was available on Netflix.
    Jigga:
    Why must you chastise my brilliant idea with facts and logic? **picks up toys (and wine) and goes home**

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Bluey View Post
      Not so fast, the latests studies have shown that producing and transporting a few items of food locally is not efficient, it costs more in fuel use and carbon footprint than commercially produced, marketed and transported produce.

      There is efficiency in volume.

      Now, if someone prefers local produce for the qualities they perceive are better, like certain taste or other concerns, that is to them, as some say, "priceless".

      Just don't try to make niche producing food sound like a more efficient process, because, well, that is not.
      Bluey, do you have any sources you can link on the efficiency aspect?
      Jigga:
      Why must you chastise my brilliant idea with facts and logic? **picks up toys (and wine) and goes home**

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #63
        Long story, but yes, I do.

        The food producers had assumed local meant less transporting, etc.
        That should mean less cost, right, savings there?

        Ok, when some started adding all inputs, I mean, all, well, efficiency of volume won big time.

        The difference between one mechanic at the time fabricating parts and building one car at the time in a shop by his house or a factory building them assembly line, which gave us the transportation and so civilizations we have today.

        The same applies to food production.

        That assuming tripped the United Nations in their now debunked "Cattle's long shadow" report of 2006, clearly politically motivated, ready made for some agendas at that international meeting.

        Once different sources, one often quoted a scientist in the U of W.State, the Cooper report, came out and were reviewed and accepted, well, it was clear that even there, those kinds of assumptions were wrong.

        In retrospect, we should know that assumptions alone really should not carry weight without proof.

        There are many such studies out there, but yes, you have to sort thru all those with anti-agriculture agendas to find the relevant ones, that are not that many, how many you need to say the same thing, over and over?

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
          Assuming everything DB says is true can the methods cited feed 40-50 million people on a regular and consistent basis? It's a real question deserving a real answer.

          One fellow I correspond with has observed that all civilization is three or four meals away from collapse.

          The hard truth is that our present population is highly concentrated and dependent upon a massive system of food transport from production areas to consumption areas. The "locavor" movement ignores this reality and holds out a chimera ("local production") as a model. It won't work; it can't work. But that doesn't stop the "daydreamers" from imagining otherwise.

          This does not mean that some folks can't make good money supplying "niche" markets. It does mean that we tinker with our present system at our peril.

          G.
          Yes, I agree we are very susceptible to interruption in the food supply in many areas. If we ever have a major disruption to transportation of food in the US, people will starve. Most grocery stores only carry a three day supply of food for their customer base and most people do not have emergency reserves.

          Why is producing food regionally in ways that work for that area for all those people so much less efficient than trucking it across the US from California or from foreign countries? I'm not talking a few small farms competing with the grocery store like we have now but I'm talking building the infrastructure locally to feed that many people. It can be done and I think ultimately it would be a whole lot more efficient and dependable than bringing foods in from long distance to save resources as well as to insure the above scenario would not happen. Sure it won't happen overnight but it's happening now slowly but surely despite the food industry's best efforts to stop it or over regulate locally sourced foods.

          Interestingly I know quite a few local farms in our areas getting their products into grocery stores and restaurants. I know a man putting in an aquaculture farm to raise Tilapia. Right now the only Tilapia you can get around here comes from China. Won't it be nice to buy from him instead? You bet...I know him personally and can't wait to have a local source of my favorite fish that is actually inspected and raised to US standards. People see the needs and they're filling them.

          Cripes I can't keep eggs in stock...I delivered 50 dozen yesterday to my buying club folks. Real good fresh eggs are so much better than what you buy in the stores and the demand is HUGE.

          Bluey, no one is suggesting that people drive to the farms to get all their stuff. It's very naive to think that anyone is going to drive out to the country to do their shopping...trust me...people are not that stupid especially with gas so expensive. It is way more efficient to bring the products into the cities for distribution. I have several buying clubs now that I deliver to where folks meet me at a distribution point near their homes to get their orders and I make a big circle around the area in one afternoon. Most farms like mine do the same thing. Some areas have regular farmers' markets or coops delivery points in the cities. Also growing are locally sourced groceries where the products are produced nearby. There are solutions to the problem but it you aren't going to hear them reading Ag industry magazines. THINK about it...they have their profit margins to protect so of course they are going to pay someone to produce a study that says that. I read that study and it was very biased and not even peer reviewed.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by JSwan View Post
            An alternative is to develop a local food system; which includes re-establishing the infrastructure that used to exist. This includes aggregation facilities, recreating distribution channels, and more slaughterhouses - either USDA, T/A, or custom exempt. The products from within that system CAN legally enter the food supply; which gives farmers a much wider range of options, while still keeping the profits of their labor instead of becoming or remaining serfs. The farmer can still sell the products under his farm label - he is still 100% independent. But wholesale buyers, school systems, and restaurants will conduct business with that person - because the products are inspected and safely packaged. Local products. Some of that is happening now - but more needs to.

            Before anyone claims that is a pie in the sky statement - this is already happening across the US, in rural areas near urban centers. I'm part of such an effort where I live - and the biggest impediment is the NIMBY's. Folks who talk a good game about "local food" but when it means a small slaughterhouse will be built in their region they freakin' flip out.
            THIS! JSwan is involved in her county's farm movement at the planning level. If you won't believe me that this is possible, at least listen to what she's saying.

            I agree also..we need way more animal processing facilities close by. I'm bringing my animals up to Fredericksburg as it's the most cost effective and best custom plant around. It's a 3 hour one way trip for me so I'd be so happy to have a closer option. We do have a small local plant but it's not USDA inspected so it's not an option for my business.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Daydream Believer View Post

              Why is producing food regionally in ways that work for that area for all those people so much less efficient than trucking it across the US from California or from foreign countries? I'm not talking a few small farms competing with the grocery store like we have now but I'm talking building the infrastructure locally to feed that many people. It can be done and I think ultimately it would be a whole lot more efficient and dependable than bringing foods in from long distance to save resources as well as to insure the above scenario would not happen. Sure it won't happen overnight but it's happening now slowly but surely despite the food industry's best efforts to stop it or over regulate locally sourced foods.
              I want to know how you are going to produce enough fresh produce to serve NYC (and, indeed, the entire urban corridor from Baltimore to Bangor) in January.

              We won't even get into staples, meat, beverages, etc.

              G.
              Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #67
                Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                I want to know how you are going to produce enough fresh produce to serve NYC (and, indeed, the entire urban corridor from Baltimore to Bangor) in January.

                We won't even get into staples, meat, beverages, etc.

                G.

                Greenhouse skyscrapers in every block, rooftop greenhouses?

                I vote for a matter transmitter booth, or a matter transforming little box, that you type in what you want and it produces it from a little magic battery.
                Steak and potatos, or your favorite salad with nut toppings, all for the asking.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                  I want to know how you are going to produce enough fresh produce to serve NYC (and, indeed, the entire urban corridor from Baltimore to Bangor) in January.

                  We won't even get into staples, meat, beverages, etc.

                  G.
                  There's a lot of farmland outside NYC. The problem is that the small farms can't compete with the big corporate farms.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #69
                    Originally posted by grayarabpony View Post
                    There's a lot of farmland outside NYC. The problem is that the small farms can't compete with the big corporate farms.
                    Right, just like the one mechanic making one car every six months can't compete with the factories producing several a day.

                    On the other hand, where price is not that important, for the upscale markets, those niche farmers seem to be getting as much as they need.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      I read not too long ago in what I believe was Time magazine how there is like millions of pounds of food being thrown away. The article didn't say where (US or world wide) but made me wonder about the whole "feeding the world" argument...
                      I LOVE my Chickens!

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Megaladon View Post
                        I read not too long ago in what I believe was Time magazine how there is like millions of pounds of food being thrown away. The article didn't say where (US or world wide) but made me wonder about the whole "feeding the world" argument...
                        True, very true.

                        Who is going to cut back, give up some of their good standard of living?
                        I grew up right after WWII, I know rationing, not having much and going hungry often.
                        Half the world is still living like that, all their many times short lives.

                        Lets live frugally, really frugally.
                        Give up single housing, cars for mass transportation, give up horses first for those they are a luxury, that is for most here.
                        You go first.

                        Seriously, distributing the excess to those in need is not that simple, sadly, although plenty are trying already.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                          I want to know how you are going to produce enough fresh produce to serve NYC (and, indeed, the entire urban corridor from Baltimore to Bangor) in January.

                          We won't even get into staples, meat, beverages, etc.

                          G.
                          The same way it's produced elsewhere pretty much. As someone pointed out, New York has a lot of farmland and much of it's sitting unused right now. For that matter a lot of inner cities have been adopting intensive farming with cold frames, greenhouses, unused lots, rooftops, and other very innovative programs and they are producing a LOT of food.

                          http://www.mottgroup.msu.edu/uploads...ens%20Hamm.pdf

                          http://thelowell.org/features/112-al...-down-to-earth

                          http://www.icic.org/connection/blog-...he-food-cluste

                          As JSwan said earlier...the changes are already happening all over the US. Some of what these people have accomplished is nothing sort of incredible. They've helped a lot of inner city youth also find some self worth and learn some independence..got them off the streets and productively engaged. Imagine that...people actually engaged in their own food production. Might even catch on...and judging from how popular gardening is getting again in the US, I'd say the time is now.

                          Yes, it can be done in January using some protection for crops and also using some common sense and preserving tender crops/food through the cold seasons...ie freezing it, canning it, eating seasonally, etc...

                          Meat can't really be raised in quantity inside a city but there is a lot of farmland nearby (much of it fallow) that can be used to raise beef, pork and chicken and feed for those animals as well as small farmers who would love the opportunity to direct market as many of us are doing.

                          I'll bet you didn't know that Paris, France, at the turn of the century around 1890-1900 was not only feeding itself...the entire city... via cold frames, manual labor and greenhouses but exporting food to other European nations. Not only is it possible for a city to produce it's own produce year round but it's been done before...so yes, with a little common sense and using land wisely as well as intensive growing practices integrating modern innovations, it's possible.

                          The question is will people be allowed to do it or have to fight for the right to? Even to have a garden in their yard instead of grass can be a problem with city planners and zoning for some absurd reason.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Yes there is a crapload of food being thrown away. For $5 I can buy a pallet of old bread for my animals if I wish at the local discount bakery...I've done it but my pigs were not that crazy about it..can't blame them. I am quite sure that all those restaurants/buffets are forced by law to throw all food away also rather than save it, reuse it or even donate it to the needy. The waste is appalling.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #74
                              Originally posted by Daydream Believer View Post
                              The same way it's produced elsewhere pretty much. As someone pointed out, New York has a lot of farmland and much of it's sitting unused right now. For that matter a lot of inner cities have been adopting intensive farming with cold frames, greenhouses, unused lots, rooftops, and other very innovative programs and they are producing a LOT of food.

                              http://www.mottgroup.msu.edu/uploads...ens%20Hamm.pdf

                              http://thelowell.org/features/112-al...-down-to-earth

                              http://www.icic.org/connection/blog-...he-food-cluste

                              As JSwan said earlier...the changes are already happening all over the US. Some of what these people have accomplished is nothing sort of incredible. They've helped a lot of inner city youth also find some self worth and learn some independence..got them off the streets and productively engaged. Imagine that...people actually engaged in their own food production. Might even catch on...and judging from how popular gardening is getting again in the US, I'd say the time is now.

                              Yes, it can be done in January using some protection for crops and also using some common sense and preserving tender crops/food through the cold seasons...ie freezing it, canning it, eating seasonally, etc...

                              Meat can't really be raised in quantity inside a city but there is a lot of farmland nearby (much of it fallow) that can be used to raise beef, pork and chicken and feed for those animals as well as small farmers who would love the opportunity to direct market as many of us are doing.

                              I'll bet you didn't know that Paris, France, at the turn of the century around 1890-1900 was not only feeding itself...the entire city... via cold frames, manual labor and greenhouses but exporting food to other European nations. Not only is it possible for a city to produce it's own produce year round but it's been done before...so yes, with a little common sense and using land wisely as well as intensive growing practices integrating modern innovations, it's possible.

                              The question is will people be allowed to do it or have to fight for the right to? Even to have a garden in their yard instead of grass can be a problem with city planners and zoning for some absurd reason.
                              One little problem, that befell Paris also, growing any crops is not a reliable input in = desired output.

                              Ask any long time farmer how many times crops fail, for many reasons, all kinds of crops and reasons.
                              Some of those important enough to cause famines.

                              We have now, for many reasons, that produce is redistributed globally one, the most abundant, safest and varied food ever.
                              We can keep adding to what we have, we should not so offhandedly dismiss it on some utopian old way that we think was supposedly better.

                              We really need to cut population back or, that being very hard to do, at least keep working with what we have and adding to it, not fighting for market shares by demonizing the competition.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by grayarabpony View Post
                                There's a lot of farmland outside NYC. The problem is that the small farms can't compete with the big corporate farms.
                                You need to fly up the East Coast, starting just south of Hampton Roads and continue up to Brunswick, ME. Note that the sea of lights between these two places, and ultimately extending several tens of miles inland, is continuous. I don't know where you think there's a "lot of farmland" that's not being used within a short distance of the East Coast Megaplex. Nor do I understand how this land would feed 30-40 million people in Jan.

                                G.
                                Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  Well, there is. Certainly within a 2-3 hour drive. Your belief is not required for something to be true.

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Originally posted by grayarabpony View Post
                                    Well, there is. Certainly within a 2-3 hour drive. Your belief is not required for something to be true.
                                    Nor does your assertion make something true.

                                    G.
                                    Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      And yet it is! I'd love for you to tell all those small town New Yorkers and people in other states that their farms don't exist. That'd be rich.

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                                        One little problem, that befell Paris also, growing any crops is not a reliable input in = desired output.

                                        Ask any long time farmer how many times crops fail, for many reasons, all kinds of crops and reasons.
                                        Some of those important enough to cause famines.

                                        We have now, for many reasons, that produce is redistributed globally one, the most abundant, safest and varied food ever.
                                        We can keep adding to what we have, we should not so offhandedly dismiss it on some utopian old way that we think was supposedly better.

                                        We really need to cut population back or, that being very hard to do, at least keep working with what we have and adding to it, not fighting for market shares by demonizing the competition.
                                        That really makes no sense to me bluey. You are against regional food production because of famine or crop failures and I guess you are saying that would starve out those people? I'm not suggesting a return to the dark ages where no one ships anything. Of course if someone needs help elsewhere, they should get it from those who have extra to sell...what this does instead is reduces the need to move food all over the place from distant places as is done now further reducing our need to burn petroleum to do it. It also brings the food supply a lot closer to the people who will consume it and reduces our susceptibility to terrorism and famine.

                                        I would think spreading out food animal/plant production to all over the US would help prevent or minimize famine, disease, or drought effects...kind of like not putting all your eggs in one basket. It would seem to me that the drought last year would drive the point home well. Use corn for an example. Let's say that corn is only grown in the corn belt since that is the best place to grow it (for now) and shipped to others who need it. Along comes several years of drought, a new dust bowl, and no corn...thankfully there were places in the US that grew corn last year that got in a good crop or we'd have more than just high prices and shortages to contend with. It's called building resilience into the food supply. As G. pointed out earlier, our food supply is very limited right now to just in time deliveries and anything that might disrupt that and you've got a major problem.

                                        Another example is California where all the winter veggies are grown now. What happens if some insect infestation or plant disease or water shortage (since it's all brought in by irrigation there) affects that area? All of a sudden the folks in NY aren't going to get their no-so-fresh vegetables from California because no one else anywhere is producing it in sufficient quantities. Growing veggies under cold frames is not difficult nor a new technology nor does it take all that much room...it's easy and it's not that expensive.

                                        I do think there are too many people in the world also but that really is a another topic.

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
                                          I want to know how you are going to produce enough fresh produce to serve NYC (and, indeed, the entire urban corridor from Baltimore to Bangor) in January.

                                          We won't even get into staples, meat, beverages, etc.

                                          G.
                                          "Local" is food produced within 400 miles of where it is consumed.

                                          Obviously in most parts of the country this means that you will not get fresh strawberries in January.

                                          Except no one is claiming that you shall. But there is no reason a farmer near Washington DC is forced to sell his cattle at auction - when he could have it cut and packaged and eaten in Washington DC and keep the profit. What prevents him from doing so is the fact that over 80% of the nations cattle are processed at 4 plants. If he has no USDA inspected facility near him - he is forced to sell at auction. He has no choice.

                                          A local food system is not designed or intended to supplant the system that exists. The system is intended to keep farmland in production instead of being destroyed by sprawl and poor planning. It's also intended to provide people in the region with as much safe, inspected food as possible.

                                          A regional study of farmland was performed near me - the results were nothing short of appalling. Only .4% of cash receipts from farms were from sales to people who lived in that region. The region was losing 1.4 billion dollars in revenue - annually - because the output from farms was leaving the region.

                                          In other words - others were profiting heavily from the labors of those farmers. The region was not even feeding its own residents.

                                          This is a poor region of the state. Very poor. It wouldn't be as poor if that 1.4 billion dollars stayed in the region.

                                          This is a rural economic issue. A big one. We need more farms, and we need more farmers. We also need that infrastructure - and frankly the same issues affect the horse industry. We used to have 6 auctions in my county. 6. Now we're down to one. And that one no longer auctions horses. It's a loss to the ag community as well as the horse industry. We have growing ethnic population in this region. And they they have difficulty obtaining halal products. One consumer told me he's getting his halal products from New Zealand. Why? Because we do not have the ability to provide him with the products he requires. If we restore that infrastructure - he and others like him would buy their products from OUR farmers.

                                          Perhaps these things are not true where you live. it's a big country. But where I live - there are organized efforts to restore that infrastructure and they are well supported.
                                          Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                          Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                          -Rudyard Kipling

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X