• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Blundstone boots - no longer quality??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Blundstone boots - no longer quality??

    I was considering buying my first pair of Blundstone boots, hoping they might work for my wide feet! But I'm worried now, after reading reviews, that the quality has gone down...and badly! People wrote about crumbling soles and poor quality leather, a sharp contrast from their earlier reputation. Anyone know if these issues have been addressed? Corrected? Recent experiences? Worth buying?
    Thanks for any input!

  • #2
    Yes they work for wide feet. And I agree that the quality of my last pair with is not as good as the first several. Heels have crumbled and worn poorly.
    Hindsight bad, foresight good.

    Comment


    • #3
      I've owned 3 pair.

      1st pair made in Oz, excellent lifespan even though I treated them poorly (never cleaned the mud off)

      2nd pair made in China, much reduced lifespan, leather separated from sole along outside edge of right boot. rest of boot still looked great. Paid full price at time of purchase, treated them like first pair (never cleaned)

      3rd pair made in China, found a closeout Internet deal and paid 1/2 what 2nd pair cost. Still wearing and trying to take better care. I don't wear these in the mud

      All 3 pairs were worn part or all day long, 6 to 7 days per week.

      When 3rd pair goes I'll buy another pair.

      I believe that all styles are made in China now and are glued to the sole and not sewn and I have wide feet also.
      Last edited by tnscvaga; Apr. 28, 2011, 09:45 AM. Reason: added info

      Comment


      • #4
        Yep, no longer made in Australia and quality much reduced.

        No price reduction though...

        It is kinda sad. I love my older ones, new ones are stiffer, leather peeling immediately and just not as comfortable.

        Comment


        • #5
          I used to wear Blundstones but found that it took a lot of
          wear for the arch to become comfortable (I must have
          a high arch I guess). A suggestion to look at an American
          boot maker called Smoky Mountain Boot Company in
          the western USA found that this company had some very
          similar styles in a wide range of lengths and widths (including wide) for moderate prices.
          Robin from Dancing Horse Hill
          Elmwood, Wisconsin

          Comment


          • #6
            Bummer to see their quality isn't as good.

            I was getting ready to order some new ones. My previous two pairs lasted YEARS (both bought in 2005!) and were very comfy. I wore them to ride, do stalls and so on - they were far from pampered. I can't ever remember cleaning them.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Robin@DHH View Post
              I used to wear Blundstones but found that it took a lot of
              wear for the arch to become comfortable (I must have
              a high arch I guess).
              I had the same problem and I bought a pair of birkenstock insoles. They did the trick and I wore my very comfortable blundstones for a couple of years. They are a lot more insoles on the market now too.

              Comment


              • #8
                You might try Red Packs. They are also made for someone with a wide foot and I think they are also made in Australia. I have 2 pair, one several yrs old and trying to die, and another pr that I bought about 2 yrs ago so when the first pr dies, I have good footwear. I don't know if their quality has gone down or not but the ones own are the same quality of the old Blundstones as I had those before the Red Packs.
                Sue

                I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying let's remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think, msj, that the type is Red Back, a type of spider
                  found in Australia. There are several companies in
                  Australia making shoes simlar to the Blundstone ones.
                  R.M. Williams are the upscale version. Red Back is
                  another Blundstone competitor. There are more.

                  For the OP, be aware that in Australian sizing of shoes,
                  half sizes are wider than the corresponding full size, not
                  longer. I used to order my shoes sent from Australia
                  because that was the only way I could get the half
                  size, the importers didn't bring them in.
                  Robin from Dancing Horse Hill
                  Elmwood, Wisconsin

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Robin@DHH View Post
                    I think, msj, that the type is Red Back, a type of spider
                    found in Australia. There are several companies in
                    Australia making shoes simlar to the Blundstone ones.
                    R.M. Williams are the upscale version. Red Back is
                    another Blundstone competitor. There are more.

                    For the OP, be aware that in Australian sizing of shoes,
                    half sizes are wider than the corresponding full size, not
                    longer. I used to order my shoes sent from Australia
                    because that was the only way I could get the half
                    size, the importers didn't bring them in.
                    Yep, you're right about Red Back. I always thought they were called Red Pack, which never made any sense. Now it does and I HATE spiders but love the boots.

                    Thanks for the correction.
                    Sue

                    I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying let's remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Love my Blundstones they be my slippers, I wear them with everything from dresses to skirts to short to jeans my pair are over 17 years old and still going strong, although I have another pair from the same era (issued every six months at an old workplace, when they tend to last me for years and years) that are brand new and are hardly worn I will cherish these seeing as though the quality is gone in the newer versions.

                      Red Backs are good just not as stylish (rougher grain leather) than the Bluddies, talking of red backs found one in my helmet today thank goodness it was big so I saw it instead of being the little critters they usually are.

                      Hedgy
                      I have lost the key to my imagination and now my unicorn won't start.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        In Australia last year, I found a pair of Blundie-type boots called T-boots that fit my narrow feet MUCH better, look a bit more tailored, and are holding up dramatically better than my last two pairs of Blundies. Have liked them so much after seven months that I decided to order a couple more pairs. Had a devil of a time ordering them from AU to the US until I contacted a website that sells Blundies and Red Back to the US and he said he would get the T-boots for me. The kicker is they fit me better, look better, wear better, and are CHEAPER than Blundies...so of course they are not easy to get in the US.
                        Hindsight bad, foresight good.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          my first pair of blunnies lasted me from about 2000 to 2009 before they got so scuzzy from daily wear mucking stalls and riding and such that I needed another pair. I passed them on to someone who still wears them as her mud boots. The second pair I bought lasted about 3 months before the leather in the lower arch completely gave way in a nicely sliced cut. So even though it was a small slice, probably made in the factory by a razor knife or something, it let the leather break in short order and they were no longer warm nor waterproof. Took them back to the store where I bought them and they claimed I'd stepped on a piece of glass or something and it was 3 months after I bought them, so no refund. Threw them out. Won't buy another pair of overpriced slave labour produced fashion icons.
                          "The Threat of Internet Ignorance: ... we are witnessing the rise of an age of equestrian disinformation, one where a trusting public can graze on nonsense packaged to look like fact."-LRG-AF

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            R.M. Williams

                            I love & have worn my Australian made R.M. Willams boots for years now. I bought them in Germany while stationed overseas & have worn them on the street, in the saddle, on the tractor, etc. With a quick shine you can even wear them with a suit! One of the best made & most comfortable from the start pairs of shoes I have ever owned! They are pretty pricey, but well worth the $$$ IMHO!!!

                            http://www.rmwilliams.com.au/home.as...6B299F55B297E8

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X