• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

A new German-Holland battle has started

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A new German-Holland battle has started

    As predicted in another thread Isabell blamed the Dutch judge for not winning the WorldCup finals.

    Isabell Werth reacted differently: “It was very close and a hard competition. I hope next time I will have one judge more to decide for me. I think mr Ernes will have to explain something. He gave even more points to Steffen Peters than mrs Zang. Satchmo was very well with me and I was very happy with our performance.”
    Anky however stated at the same press conference that it was good for the sport that other riders are winning. Steffen also thanked Anky for her help during the WC-Finals.

  • #2
    Originally posted by freestyle2music View Post
    As predicted in another thread Isabell blamed the Dutch judge for not winning the WorldCup finals.



    Anky however stated at the same press conference that it was good for the sport that other riders are winning. Steffen also thanked Anky for her help during the WC-Finals.
    Theo you would be saying the same thing if this had happened to Anky and we all know what comments Sjef would be making. Would Anky be saying that if she had been riding her first choice?
    Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

    Comment


    • #3
      anky also stated she would go home and practice so to beat the other riders next time.

      Comment


      • #4
        Steffen deserved the win. Maybe some of the judges are finally judging the rides not just "who" the rider is. I am disappointed in Isabell's apparent poor sportsmanship. You expect it from another, not her. Sad.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think that's just her nature to be very candid about what she feels and to say whatever comes into her head without a lot of editing, at least you know what's on her mind, LOL. She's been in the sport a long time and people get outspoken. They want to win. As long as she isn't hiring someone to go wack anky in the shin with a pipe, it doesn't bother me if she mouths off now and again. I think competing in a tough sport for decades would make anyone a little rough around the edges. Too, she took a ton of heat for Satchmo and the press isn't particularly all sweetness and light in europe anyway.

          Comment


          • #6
            As I said on another thread, I was there and the difference between the two last night is that Isabell's kur is technically fab, but doesn't have the va-va-voom that Steffen's has. That's what it came down to, the artistry.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Originally posted by Coreene View Post
              As I said on another thread, I was there and the difference between the two last night is that Isabell's kur is technically fab, but doesn't have the va-va-voom that Steffen's has. That's what it came down to, the artistry.
              But the artistery consist out of many marks. So you can't say that.
              And looking at the scoresheets it's not true also.

              Theo

              Comment


              • #8
                Isabells's comments seem to portray a person who feels each judge is pre-determined to score a certain way, and she has come to depend on it.

                Her lack of sportsmanship and ungracious attitude is surprising from someone at that level.

                As the saying goes: Sports don't make character, they reveal it.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think Isabell's test was BY FAR better than steffens. No comparison in my book. At least, her horse is through the back and not just doing a bunch of circus tricks!!
                  dq140

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    OK, I'll bite.

                    Which circus tricks did Steffen do ?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Even if she disagrees she should have been more gracefull. Dressage is won or lost by judges points. Great if you win and it sucks if you loose however good sportsmanship is always gracious and not being a sour looser. My opinion on Isabel just went down a couple of points and Anky's went up.
                      Every time you ride, your are either teaching or un-teaching your horse.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Wow...circus tricks??!! I saw the vid and saw only the required movements. A VERY interesting comment.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by slc2 View Post
                          I think that's just her nature to be very candid about what she feels and to say whatever comes into her head without a lot of editing, at least you know what's on her mind, LOL. She's been in the sport a long time and people get outspoken. They want to win. As long as she isn't hiring someone to go wack anky in the shin with a pipe, it doesn't bother me if she mouths off now and again. I think competing in a tough sport for decades would make anyone a little rough around the edges. Too, she took a ton of heat for Satchmo and the press isn't particularly all sweetness and light in europe anyway.
                          LOL, Anky doesn't have to, she has Sjef....
                          Originally posted by BigMama1
                          Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
                          GNU Terry Prachett

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by dutchmike View Post
                            Even if she disagrees she should have been more gracefull. Dressage is won or lost by judges points. Great if you win and it sucks if you loose however good sportsmanship is always gracious and not being a sour looser. My opinion on Isabel just went down a couple of points and Anky's went up.
                            I can understand Isi completely- I thought her freestyle was tighter and better than Steffens' but I think Steffen had a little judge-support and I think he overall deserved it because he performed top world class in BOTH tests, whereas Isi was a little cocky in the GP, lost her concentration and made stupid mistakes afterwards- like trot steps in the pirouettes.

                            Isi is an amazing rider - trainer- competitor- she has brought numerous horses to worldclass GP levels and trained them all the way HERSELF. Not to be said from Steffen...yet! However I hope that he will attract more sponsor money now and get some amazing youngsters and show his real skill- which I believe he has. Getting Ravel to work like he has, after he had to be cut after importation and deal with a long term hoof injury- my hats off to him for mainly maintaining this amazing swing and elasticity in the horse...great kudos for that.

                            Isi is tired of being the bridesmaid- I can understand that...and right or wrong- she's gonna have to buckle down and get with it and find a way to be a tad better than the rest...
                            "the man mite be the head but the woman is the neck and the neck can turn the head any way she wants..." -smart greek woman

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It just amazes me how AMATEURS really believe they know anything about being at that level let alone give advice to riders at that level. Thank you for making me laugh this morning. I mean seriously people get a grip

                              Dutch come on Anky and Sjef would be screaming from the rooftops if they had just lost the WC because of the German judge scoring another rider out of line with everyone else. Anky can be gracious she had no expectations of winning with PB but let us not forget her and Sjef’s whine fest in the press about taking PB. You had three judges that put Isabell first and the American judge had Steffen only one and half points ahead of Isabell in the tech score and only one point ahead in the artistic score. Then you have the Dutch judge and let’s not pretend this was anything but politics had Steffen 4 points ahead in the tech score and 5 in artistic. Do not get me wrong I think Steffen deserved to win as Isabell deserved to win but I sure can understand her frustration. It sure is easy to say poor sportsmanship but when you make your living and have worked your entire adult career to be the best and have this crap go on you might be surprised what comes out of your mouth. Besides, she was stating the facts.

                              What I find funny is when Anky is quoted in a paper negatively Theo is screaming the press is wrong blah blah blah....LOL
                              Last edited by ridgeback; Apr. 20, 2009, 07:50 AM.
                              Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Mardi View Post
                                OK, I'll bite.

                                Which circus tricks did Steffen do ?
                                Any moments performed without the use of the horse's back are circus tricks. A flat back keeps the hind legs out behind the horse. The joints might articulate in a nice way but it is not pure. It amazes me these judges, in such high positions, that cannot evaluate this correctly. Hans Peter's horse was way more through the back as was Satchmo. It is so basic and should be the beginning point of each movement scored in a test...at every level!
                                dq140

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by dq140 View Post
                                  Any moments performed without the use of the horse's back are circus tricks. A flat back keeps the hind legs out behind the horse. The joints might articulate in a nice way but it is not pure. It amazes me these judges, in such high positions, that cannot evaluate this correctly. Hans Peter's horse was way more through the back as was Satchmo. It is so basic and should be the beginning point of each movement scored in a test...at every level!

                                  From Ridgeback [/QUOTE]Dutch come on Anky and Sjef would be screaming from the rooftops if they had just lost the WC because of the German judge scoring another rider out of line with everyone else. Anky can be gracious she had no expectations of winning with PB but let us not forget her and Sjef’s whine fest in the press about taking PB. You had three judges that put Isabell first and the American judge had Steffen only one and half points ahead of Isabell in the tech score and only one point ahead in the artistic score. Then you have the Dutch judge and let’s not pretend this was anything but politics had Steffen 4 points ahead in the tech score and 5 in artistic. Do not get me wrong I think Steffen deserved to win as Isabell deserved to win but I sure can understand her frustration. It sure is easy to say poor sportsmanship but when you make your living and have worked your entire adult career to be the best and have this crap go on you might be surprised what comes out of your mouth. Besides, she was stating the facts.[/QUOTE]


                                  I have to agree with both Dq140 and ridgeback.
                                  “Maybe some women aren't meant to be tamed. Maybe they just need to run free til they find someone just as wild to run with them.”

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by ridgeback View Post


                                    . You had three judges that put Isabell first and the American judge had Steffen only one and half points ahead of Isabell in the tech score and only one point ahead in the artistic score. Then you have the Dutch judge and let’s not pretend this was anything but politics had Steffen 4 points ahead in the tech score and 5 in artistic.
                                    Politics in Dressage, really?. Oh come on dressage has and always be politics. You know that the day you enter your first competition. If you can't stand the politics then go and do showjumping. Ofcourse we all get pissed if we think we should have won however you keep it to yourself. I try to promote sportsmanship to my students and to have the Top act like a bunch of hormonal teenagers doesn't set a good example.
                                    Every time you ride, your are either teaching or un-teaching your horse.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I don't pretend to be a DQ or a dressage judge, but I was there, in person, and watched all the rides.

                                      I think that the top placing was fair, and I did not see any "circus" tricks. I saw a lot of talented riders on amazingly athletic horses. The group of DQs I was with thought that Monica T. was cheated of being in the 2nd or 3rd place.

                                      I loved watching the artistry of some, and also noticed when the music didn't really add a lot. I also noticed that when the tails are gone, some of those rider's butts are coming pretty far out of the saddle on those huge movers.

                                      Of course, my personal laugh is that the USA won with a German immigrant in Dressage, and the Germans won with an American immigrant in Jumping.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by dutchmike View Post
                                        Politics in Dressage, really?. Oh come on dressage has and always be politics. You know that the day you enter your first competition. If you can't stand the politics then go and do showjumping. Ofcourse we all get pissed if we think we should have won however you keep it to yourself. I try to promote sportsmanship to my students and to have the Top act like a bunch of hormonal teenagers doesn't set a good example.
                                        I hardly say the quote that has been posted from her is poor sportsmanship or a hormonal teenager. If the top does not speak out and show some of those that might not be in the "know" what is going on the politics will never stop. We all know Anky and Sjef have no problem with it when they feel the judges are screwing her.
                                        Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X