• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Rodrigo Pessoa's horse tests positive now

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rodrigo Pessoa's horse tests positive now

    From The Horse:

    The Fédération Equestre Internationale (FEI) has received notification of an additional doping/medication case at the 2008 Olympic Games. A test carried out on Rufus, mount of Rodrigo Pessoa of Brazil, following the individual show jumping final revealed an A sample that tested positive for the banned substance nonivamide, part of the capsaicinoid family. This is classified as a "doping" prohibited substance given its hypersensitizing properties, and as a "medication class A" prohibited substance for its pain relieving properties.


  • #2
    Reuters/Guardian (UK) Tuesday September 2 2008

    HONG KONG, Sept 2 (Reuters) - The horse of Brazilian rider Rodrigo Pessoa returned a positive doping test during the Olympic Equestrian competition last month, the International Equestrian Federation (FEI) said.

    Pessoa's horse Rufus tested positive for nonivamide, a banned substance known for its hypersensitising and pain relief properties, the FEI said in a statement. Pessoa and Rufus finished fifth in the individual showjumping final in Hong Kong.

    The B sample is due to be tested on Tuesday.

    The FEI said this was the sixth and final positive doping case to come out of the Olympic equestrian competition in Hong Kong.

    "In terms of testing at the 2008 Olympic Games, all results have now been received, and there are no remaining cases to be reported," the FEI added.

    Four riders, including Norwegian bronze medallist Tony Andre Hansen, were suspended from the Olympic Games after their horses returned positive tests for capsaicin, a chilli derivative banned for its hypersensitising and pain-relieving properties.

    The three others were Denis Lynch of Ireland, Bernardo Alves of Brazil and Germany's Christian Ahlmann.

    Last Thursday, the FEI said tests on the B samples for all four horses confirmed the initial findings. The FEI said it would make a final decision in the first week of October on whether the Norwegian jumping team would be stripped of their bronze medal.

    The horse of American dressage rider Courtney King also tested positive for the banned substance Felbinac.
    With his 10-year-old gelding, Rufus, Pessoa finished fifth in Hong Kong two weeks ago but the 'A' sample taken from his horse following the individual final revealed the presence of nonivamide, a substance similar to the chilli pepper derivative capsaicin which was found in Irishman Denis Lynch's ride Lantinus along with three other show jumping horses including fellow-Brazilian Bernardo Alves' ride Chupa Chup.

    Nonivamide can be manufactured synthetically and is used as a food additive to spice up seasonings and flavourings. It is also an active ingredient in pepper-spray used for riot control.
    Least we forget with some irony now that Rodrigo finished in the silver medal position behind Cian O'Connor at the 2004 Olympics and, following O'Connor's disqualification due to a positive test for his horse, Pessoa was awarded the gold medal when it was re-distributed at a special presentation in Rio de Janeiro in 2005.

    Comment


    • #3
      Sigh.

      I suppose I can be grateful that this is the last result, that they promise no more.

      When are the hearings?
      If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

      Comment


      • #4
        This may be a stupid question, but I don't understand why all of these riders are doping up their horses, when common sense would tell us that obviously they're going to be drug tested. Don't they get a list of the legal/illegal substances, and why on earth would they risk it?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by ellemayo View Post
          This may be a stupid question, but I don't understand why all of these riders are doping up their horses, when common sense would tell us that obviously they're going to be drug tested. Don't they get a list of the legal/illegal substances, and why on earth would they risk it?
          Many of these substances are banned substances and while the FEI and media refers to it as DOPING, the list of banned substances is extensive and it seems now one has to be not only a top level rider but an herbalist, chemist, and pharmacologist in order to avoid any postive "DOPING" Findings

          Tonight I went into a tack shop needing the old abscess arsenal, while I was there I decided to check out some of the labels of various products - most of these were topical agents - like shampoo, MCNasty Crib/chew stop,and linements - Would it surprise you to know that everyone of the products I picked up contained a banned substance. Oh Lavendar shampoo how nice for my horse - banned; McNasty so he'll stop chewing the barn door or his 5th rambo - banned substance.

          Did you know that Capsiacin is a dirivitive of paprika? As are Chili Peppers..If you didn't and gave your horse or put on your horse someting containing Paprika or Chili peppers you too could have a positive test! IF you share certain spicey snack foods w/ your horse as I did - could test positive. Certainly giving your horse a BBQ potato chip is not DOPING but to the FEI it is... Personally I think it's gotten a bit over the top. Now I'm wondering if this is some Plot to keep the equestrian events out of the Olympics in London...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ellemayo View Post
            This may be a stupid question, but I don't understand why all of these riders are doping up their horses, when common sense would tell us that obviously they're going to be drug tested. Don't they get a list of the legal/illegal substances, and why on earth would they risk it?
            Personally, I think the science behind the testing has outpaced the products on the market and the ability of vets to keep up with it. The tests are very sensitive. I can't imagine that a rider of the caliber and experience of Rodrigo would intentially drug his horse.

            Equestrian sports are SUCH a staple of the UK - I can't believe for a moment that the UK wouldn't fight hard to keep them in.
            Proud member of the Colbert Dressage Nation

            Comment


            • #7
              Wow I had no idea that things have gotten so strict! I guess avoiding all of the banned substances has become a full time job...

              Comment


              • #8
                I agree with J-Lu, and I think it's important to remember that the jumpers are all being charged with their horses having some derivative of chile pepper in their systems - ie, salsa, paprika, etc. The FEI is suggesting it was spread on their legs, but there are many other possibilities, including the "no chew" substances you spray on blankets, bandages, etc. Paprika will test even though to my mouth it is not at all spicy.

                As my husband said, "They're surprised to find hot peppers? In CHINA?"

                I don't know, but it appears that they unveiled a more sensitive test and were specifically searching for capsaicin for the first time at the Olympics.

                In Courtney King-Dye's case, it's likely that there was a mistake made during all the fuss to stabilize Mythilus when he arrived in Hong Kong in atrial fibrulation.

                In none of the cases is it likely there was any significant performance enhancement or advantage, or any harm to the horse. (Legs are/were separately inspected after each round.) This is unlike the case of Cian O'Connor, where the drug found was a mood-altering substance, or even the steroids that have been found in the past, where you can make a case for long term inappropriate use.
                If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                  I
                  As my husband said, "They're surprised to find hot peppers? In CHINA?"

                  I don't know, but it appears that they unveiled a more sensitive test and were specifically searching for capsaicin for the first time at the Olympics.

                  .
                  That was my thought exactly ! It's possible that some kind of cross contamination occurred. So the lab techs go out to lunch/have carryout - would they really know that chili peppers might be a banned substance??

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It's ridiculous that a substance legitimately used as a supplement for the coat (paprika) or no chew substances. Not that want people using stinging agents to pole their horses. (Or not pole, but for when they hit a fence.)

                    Maybe they should take dental records or growth plate xrays of the Chinese gymnasts instead. Good for the 33 year old Ukranian/Russian? who now is in Germany and for Nastia Lukin at the grand old age of 18 for kicking butt.
                    Strength does not come from physical capacity. It comes from an indomitable will. - Gandhi

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Sad thing is that although the FEI will say words to the effect that they did not think a rider intended to "dope" his horse, the rules say that a horse has to be disqualified. At least a rider will come out with his reputation fairly intact, even if it is not a medal.

                      In the Marion Jones case, they have not yet re-awarded the medals - they don't know how far the doping went down the line. And that was in Sydney.

                      If an athlete wishes to know if a substance is banned, they just have to go to the website (WADA, I guess) and search out the name of the product. I think they are wary to say a product is approved in case the manufacturer adds something inappropriate.
                      Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by gottagrey View Post
                        That was my thought exactly ! It's possible that some kind of cross contamination occurred. So the lab techs go out to lunch/have carryout - would they really know that chili peppers might be a banned substance??
                        That scenario seems exceedingly weak and suggests the lab is run by a few slackjawed unprofessional folks.

                        It would be right up there with a sad argument of: finding traces of cocaine on circulated currency and thus a person was touching bills then a horse and that's how a positive reading must've happened. Sure, uh yea that's the ticket ...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Glimmerglass View Post
                          That scenario seems exceedingly weak and suggests the lab is run by a few slackjawed unprofessional folks.
                          I am not speaking to this case specifically, but just fyi sample and lab contamination DOES occur, even in respected laboratories. Modern tests are very, very sensitive.
                          Roseknoll Sporthorses
                          www.roseknoll.net

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I know in TB world, the testing can determine minute amounts (single molecule basically), BUT there are thresholds based on scientific estimates of a level that can have an effect on a horse's performance.

                            There are outright banned substances though that "at any level" would result in suspension (i.e. EPO).

                            I've heard of trainers being called into the stewards and warned that their horse tested for an allowed veterinary drug, but it was just under the allowable threshold, so they were warned.

                            I think the FEI's rules haven't caught up with technology and/or common sense. The use of cayenne pepper on bandages is a common way to stop chewing, and some horses develop a taste for it.

                            Paul - "Aptly Asked"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              My only question is WHY???

                              This is not some backyard show and they KNOW the horses are going to be tested so why do it??

                              This is what I can't figure out and maybe someone can help me understand. Do they just think they will be the lucky one that squeeks by and the test results will be wrong? I just can't fathom why.
                              Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                www.sms-pferdenews.de

                                is now reporting that Pessoa's horse's B-Sample was (surprise!!) positive for the capsaicin derivative, nonivamide.

                                One big possible argument is going to come when the FEI tries to figure out if the riders can be shown to have used the capsaicin stuff on the horses' legs--in which case, am sure the entire book will be thrown at that rider-- or whether the rider was using the stuff on horse's back,etc., as way to make horse more comfortable, which then becomes a medication offense rather than D-O-P-I-N-G.

                                Only half the book thrown in that case.

                                Despite the Inquisition's (excuse me, FEI"s) insistence on 'fast track'. the defense lawyers have all been pointing out that FEI was, ah, rather tardy in actually sending out any of the lab analysis, etc etc...so the Sept. 5-6-7 look to be moved back to Sept. 25-6-7.

                                OTOH, from THIS release above, it looks as though CK-D may indeed keep to the Sept., 7 hearing date.

                                Which leads me to believe that her sentence will be extremely light--ie, no one able to figure out how horse got Felbinac, some kind of minimal costs assigned to defendant and suspension time to include time since test made public,yadda-yadda.

                                In other words, I am going out on a limb now and saying the FEI recognizes that it screwed up here and will bury the case as fast as possible.

                                Who knows? They have 5 more fish to cook, and that should satisfy their lord and master, WADA...they can afford to look magnanimous once.
                                one oak, lots of canyons

                                http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Mistakes can and do occur. But for most seasoned riders/athletes they are very, very aware of the rules and regulations and if they get caught with a banned substance 90% of the time they would have known about it. It is a perilous slope they are on. However, as in Silken Laumann's case she was approved to take cough medicine, but when she went and purchased it over the counter she bought Benelyn 'DM' and the DM is not approved. Simple and explainable,
                                  and she was lucky they understood that. She came out unscathed
                                  and is an excellent role model now.

                                  Myself, I think that there should be a level where if minute amounts, that could have no benefit to the horse whatsoever, are found it is not punishable. Even the track is looking now to zero tolerance. Some substances take a very long time to disappear from the system. It's crazy.
                                  Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    capcaisin is a pain killer, it wasn't necessarily present to prevent chewing.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by Foxtrot's View Post
                                      Mistakes can and do occur. But for most seasoned riders/athletes they are very, very aware of the rules and regulations and if they get caught with a banned substance 90% of the time they would have known about it. It is a perilous slope they are on. However, as in Silken Laumann's case she was approved to take cough medicine, but when she went and purchased it over the counter she bought Benelyn 'DM' and the DM is not approved. Simple and explainable,
                                      and she was lucky they understood that. She came out unscathed
                                      and is an excellent role model now.

                                      Myself, I think that there should be a level where if minute amounts, that could have no benefit to the horse whatsoever, are found it is not punishable. Even the track is looking now to zero tolerance. Some substances take a very long time to disappear from the system. It's crazy.
                                      The FEI labs do not test for drug residues...they use the ELISA method...which essentially tests for antibodies to medications. It is invaluable for drugs like anabolics, resperpine, and depo cortisone which can be given literally months before competition and still have 'performance enhancing' effects. What I do not understand is why anyone cares whether a horse got NSAIDs, let's say bute, more than 10 days before competition. In the FEI veterinary rules it actually states that the withdrawal time for topical medication is very unpredictable (that would include Surpass, Felbinac and in all likelihood capsaicin as well).
                                      There is a pretty short list of medications which the FEI considers to be 'legitimate' with some sparse information on 'withdraw' times. One can argue that in the case of these Olympics, because of the extensive quarantines there should have been sufficient time to withdraw any medication...but without any real study (particularly with the caveat that topicals are unpredictable) does anybody really have any idea what a reasonable withdraw time actually is? If the medication is not actively in the horse's system at the time of testing...only that the meds were given at some unknown time in the past...is it actually legitimate to call it DOPING?
                                      I understand (and agree) that the FEI should be all about the wellfare of the horse, and that they need to be and appear to be proactive. However it seems this is a case of technology warping the concept.
                                      * <-- RR Certified Gold Star {) <-- RR Golden Croissant Award
                                      Training Tip of the Day: If you can’t beat your best competitor, buy his horse.
                                      NO! What was the question?

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        NSAIDS are powerful drugs with performance enhancing effects, they are not 'aspirin' or 'bengay', I think because they are in such wide use under USEF rules we don't think they do much. In fact, NSAIDS have profound effects on arthritis and inflammation of a number of types, thereby functioning as a pain reliever, and they ARE used to mask lameness and they certainly can do that.

                                        While the USEF's drug policies are different toward NSAIDS, I can see why the FEI's are as strict as they are. The FEI horses are not supposed to be oldsters with arthritis getting nursed along, or horses with chronic problems. The level of work isn't appropriate for such horses, not only that, but if NSAIDS have recently been given anyone can argue the performance was enhanced and the placing was not fair. The policy is 'zero drug tolerance', basically, and I think that's why basically, the medications allowed are very limited, and any veterinary treatment during the competition has to be documented.

                                        I think the drug policy may seem unfair or the withdrawal times not well enough tested, and I'm sure there is room for improvement, but I think no matter what, a very strict drug policy overall is needed and justified.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X