• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Rodrigo Pessoa's horse tests positive now

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Fixerupper View Post
    The FEI labs do not test for drug residues...they use the ELISA method...which essentially tests for antibodies to medications. It is invaluable for drugs like anabolics, resperpine, and depo cortisone which can be given literally months before competition and still have 'performance enhancing' effects. What I do not understand is why anyone cares whether a horse got NSAIDs, let's say bute, more than 10 days before competition. In the FEI veterinary rules it actually states that the withdrawal time for topical medication is very unpredictable (that would include Surpass, Felbinac and in all likelihood capsaicin as well).
    There is a pretty short list of medications which the FEI considers to be 'legitimate' with some sparse information on 'withdraw' times. One can argue that in the case of these Olympics, because of the extensive quarantines there should have been sufficient time to withdraw any medication...but without any real study (particularly with the caveat that topicals are unpredictable) does anybody really have any idea what a reasonable withdraw time actually is? If the medication is not actively in the horse's system at the time of testing...only that the meds were given at some unknown time in the past...is it actually legitimate to call it DOPING?
    I understand (and agree) that the FEI should be all about the wellfare of the horse, and that they need to be and appear to be proactive. However it seems this is a case of technology warping the concept.
    You are right For some to say NSAIDS have a profound effect on lameness is just crazy...They certainly help but profound...NO
    Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

    Comment


    • #22
      Well I can put surpass on my horse that has knee issues with Dengerative Arthritis (sp?) and has had sx and vet stem inj. and steriod inj. and one joint on his knee has fused and waiting for the other to fuse. When I put the surpass on his knee he is a different horse (he still limps because the main joint in his knee is fused so it can't really bend), he runs and bucks and plays etc... So I'd have to say it has a profound effect on the horse.
      Horses aren't our whole life, but makes our life whole

      Comment


      • #23
        Flame suit on...this is becoming a ridiculous witch hunt. The sensitivity of the testing available makes "no foreign substance" rule nearly impossible to comply with....Equi block (and other hot pepper type rubs) might be used in SIGNIFICANT doses to hyper sensitize legs but trace amounts are of negligible use in "doping". I am fairly certain world class riders trainers vets etc would not risk their repute by intentional doping. AND access to the animals is waaaaaay to easy even by people with FEI passes to the barn...rub some "foreign substance" on the stall bars/walls/drop into the feed tubs....it is all to easy to stick it to someone you want to see flounder. This whole process needs to be revamped.
        The thing about smart people, is they look like crazy people, to dumb people.

        Comment


        • #24
          I totally agree with you Jumphigh83!

          Comment


          • #25
            Or heck, just leave some chips and salsa on a tack trunk.
            If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

            Comment


            • #26
              fyi

              aspirin is a kind of NSAID, btw.

              as a matter of fact, some tests in humans have show that the 'name' NSAIDs such as alleve or ibuprofen have no more pain relieving effect than aspirin (when dosed accordingly.)


              we now return to our regularly scheduled programming...

              Comment


              • #27
                ...

                Originally posted by YankeeLawyer View Post
                I am not speaking to this case specifically, but just fyi sample and lab contamination DOES occur, even in respected laboratories. Modern tests are very, very sensitive.
                Hello,

                The sample Chain of Custody is extremely explicit and detailed
                but this is true, in extremely rare cases mistakes can and do
                occur in laboratories.

                After all, we Chemists are human !

                This is built into analytical protocol, or SOP's (Standard Operating
                Procedures) hence a second sampling et.al. to catch any anomalies.

                The instrumentation utilized to analyze these samples have been
                increasing in sensitivity for some time now but the capsaicinoids
                (family to which capaicin belongs) is not a sensitive component at
                all in my opinion for chromatographs to detect.

                It would have been detected at the low parts per thousand level in
                the early 1970's. Yes, it is detected at the parts per billion now, but
                based on the concentration allegedly "allowed" that level of sensitivity
                is not relevant.

                What continues to confuse me with respect to "allowed" and "banned"
                substances is the lack of consistency in units utilized to detail the
                concentrations of substances ...! mg/mmol ? mg/mL ?? ug/mmol ???

                Yours in sport,

                Lynn
                Last edited by WhatzUp; Sep. 8, 2008, 02:25 PM. Reason: ~ addition ...
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message...
                Suerte Hostage Crisis Survivor
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                Comment


                • #28
                  YUM !

                  Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                  Or heck, just leave some chips and salsa on a tack trunk.


                  < spits tea on keyboard >

                  Please tell me whose - I am hungry !!!

                  Yours in sport,

                  Lynn
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message...
                  Suerte Hostage Crisis Survivor
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by WhatzUp View Post
                    Hello,

                    The sample Chain of Custody is extremely explicit and detailed
                    but this is true, in extremely rare cases mistakes can and do
                    occur in laboratories.

                    After all, we Chemists are human !

                    This is built into analytical protocol, or SOP's (Standard Operating
                    Procedures) hence a second sampling et.al. to catch any anomalies.

                    The instrumentation utilized to analyze these samples have been
                    increasing in sensitivity for some time now but the capsaicinoids
                    (family to which capaicin belongs) is not a sensitive component at
                    all in my opinion for chromatographs to detect.

                    It would have been detected at the low parts per thousand level in
                    the early 1970's. Yes, it is detected at the parts per billion now, but
                    based on the concentration allegedly "allowed" that level of sensitivity
                    is not relevant.

                    What continues to confuse me with respect to "allowed" and "banned"
                    substances is the lack of consistency in units utilized to detail the
                    concentrations of substances ...! mg/mmol ? mg/mL ?? ug/mmol ???

                    Yours in sport,

                    Lynn
                    My understanding is that there is no level of the substance that is permissible. As for sample and lab contamination -- regarding the former, that can occur in or outside the lab. As for the latter, I am familiar with cases in which that has occurred. I would not consider it to be so extraordinarily rare as to rule it out completely as a possibility.
                    Roseknoll Sporthorses
                    www.roseknoll.net

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Capsaicin is easy to transfer to all kinds of um, interesting, places, and does not readily wash off, as anyone who has been sloppy with handling very hot chile peppers can attest.
                      If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                        Capsaicin is easy to transfer to all kinds of um, interesting, places, and does not readily wash off, as anyone who has been sloppy with handling very hot chile peppers can attest.
                        LOL. But I don't think that's the issue now. Three riders have said they used Equi-Block and the jar of Equi-Block clearly states - in big letters - that it contains capsaicin. It also states - in big letter - "will not test." If what YankeeLawyer says is true - that there is no level of the subtance that is permissible - these riders violated the rules and it doesn't matter that the manufacturer said it "wouldn't test."

                        I wish the FEI would just quietly let this go away. I do think they are being "pig-headed." Just read the interim decisions Theo posted and especially paragraphs 10 through 14, which talk about the FEI protesting the initial lifting of the suspension on the ground that letting these riders compete would cause "immeasurable harm" to the sport

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by ellemayo View Post
                          Wow I had no idea that things have gotten so strict! I guess avoiding all of the banned substances has become a full time job...
                          My endurance horse is now on Gastrogard to treat her for severe ulceration, and I was told by the vet that it is a banned substance by the AERC. That's ridiculous. Trailering, camping overnight, conditioning, competing, electrolytes, grain, everything about the sport causes increased stomach acid and apparently about 75% of endurance horses have ulcers. But the medication that effectively treats and cures ulcers to keep the horses healthy and comfortable and competing is BANNED. That's just absurd.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            My endurance horse is now on Gastrogard to treat her for severe ulceration, and I was told by the vet that it is a banned substance by the AERC. That's ridiculous. Trailering, camping overnight, conditioning, competing, electrolytes, grain, everything about the sport causes increased stomach acid and apparently about 75% of endurance horses have ulcers. But the medication that effectively treats and cures ulcers to keep the horses healthy and comfortable and competing is BANNED. That's just absurd.
                            While your horse is in the middle of a gastrogard treatment for 'severe ulceration" , why would you even want to compete and subject her to all those things which you say increases stomach acid.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X