• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Dressage judges during the intermission

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dressage judges during the intermission

    Are the dressage judges really supposed to be talking during the intermission????

    Just had time to look over my photos from the event.

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3238/...33b1e990_b.jpg
    www.dmwarmbloods.com
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/DM-War...3105523?ref=hl

  • #2
    Shows like the Quarter Horse congress judges aren't even allowed to speak to each other after that days showing is over...Maybe the dressage world should adopt that rule. Should they be talking during any part of the show/weekend of shows....NO but that is the problem IMHO with dressage.
    Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

    Comment


    • #3
      Every dressage show I have worked, the judges gab during every break.
      Beth Davidson
      Black Dog Farm Connemaras & Sport Horses
      http://blackdogconnemara.com
      visit my blog: http://ponyeventer.blogspot.com

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by pcwertb View Post
        Every dressage show I have worked, the judges gab during every break.

        Even during the test and between the tests they signal each other. It's a team of judges you know. And a good head of the judges make this a democratic process, and hardly never decides by him or herself that a combination receives the bell because of lameness. Specially in this last case they need backup from a judge at the longside of the arena.

        Theo

        Comment


        • #5
          I wish the really good judges (and yes there are a few) would talk MORE to the other judges.

          Maybe they could instill more of a sense of decency, of generosity of spirit, of fair playing field, of sympathy and understanding.

          Maybe a little bit more of the superior judges' experience and knowledge could pervade the score sheet.

          ANd I am not just talking about the Olympics.
          one oak, lots of canyons

          http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by canyonoak View Post
            I wish the really good judges (and yes there are a few) would talk MORE to the other judges.

            Maybe they could instill more of a sense of decency, of generosity of spirit, of fair playing field, of sympathy and understanding.

            Maybe a little bit more of the superior judges' experience and knowledge could pervade the score sheet.

            ANd I am not just talking about the Olympics.
            I know what you mean, and I also know that this is a ongoing project for the FEI. New judges are guided by the more experienced judges during 10-20 competitions. However this work is mostly done by her royal highness MW. But if this is good for the future

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't see a problem. This isn't Congress, it's dressage. The way a score for an individual movement is chosen is subjective, but the final score is a black and white number. It's not like a hunter round where you could say that a group stood together and compared cards and THEN picked the winners. Plus, I believe that the scores were made public in real time. If somebody wanted to 'make an adjustment' to 'even out' a final score due to a score they didn't like.... Well, yeah, that wouldn't be hard and they didn't need to open thier mouth either.

              They were chosen months in advance, if somebody *really* wanted to do something that would skew the final outcome they wouldn't have waited until the breaks between rides at the actual event.

              I'm a big conspiracy theorist myself, but I just don't see one living here.

              Comment


              • #8
                I suppose we really have no idea what they are doing. They could have talked before the show and are just following up with the plan during the breaks
                Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

                Comment


                • #9
                  Here's the likely chatting...

                  *chew, chew, chew*
                  "Did you get the pastrami on rye or on white?"
                  *smack smack*

                  "Oh, I got mine on white. Can't stand all those little seeds in the rye... makes my divaticilitis act up."
                  *slurp, slurrrp*

                  *pause in eating*
                  "Oh yeah, I'd forgotten 'bout that week you spent in the hospital last year... You know, *sluck, chew, slurp* my MIL had that and was bleeding from her rectum for two solid days before they figured it out."

                  "Rough"
                  *munch, munch, munch*

                  *slurp, hiccup*
                  "Hey, did ya'll see that gorgeous bay standing over by the in gate?"
                  *chew, chew*
                  "Yeah, the one w/the rear sock. Reminds me SO much of my old Cammy."

                  "Oh yeah, how is she, btw? Still out on pasture board or did you ever get that stall ready at your house?"
                  *burp*

                  And so forth and so on.

                  sylvia
                  Never explain yourself to someone who is committed to misunderstanding you.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yes, of course judges talk to each other. They are supposed to. The Chair of the Jury will discuss scores with the group.

                    Only in America is there this paranoia about judges talking to people (and possible conflict of interest). It's actually very insulting.

                    In Europe, not only do judges talk to each other, but heaven help us, they will even have a beer with a competitor and talk to them!

                    Think about it. If you can't explain your score over a beer to a rider, you have no business handing them out!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bronte View Post
                      Yes, of course judges talk to each other. They are supposed to. The Chair of the Jury will discuss scores with the group.

                      Only in America is there this paranoia about judges talking to people (and possible conflict of interest). It's actually very insulting.

                      In Europe, not only do judges talk to each other, but heaven help us, they will even have a beer with a competitor and talk to them!

                      Think about it. If you can't explain your score over a beer to a rider, you have no business handing them out!!
                      Insulting
                      Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive. Dalai Lama

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        There is frequent complaint about score disparity. I think judges should talk to each other (and to competitors) more often.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I don't see a problem with judges talking after all the riders have gone. However, talking about scores during a round carries the potential for affecting the scores given by the judges to later riders, intentional or not, and should be a no-no.

                          In the same way, in my other sport, the Chief Judge can review possible points of contention and any recent changes in the judging criteria before the start of a round, and give his or her input on the scoring at the end of the round after all the competitors have gone, but may not say anything to affect the scoring during the round.

                          And yes, I agree that the judges should be able to explain and justify their scores to the competitors :-)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I don't think they should have to justify their scores to many of the competitors, who don't understand how dressage is judged and don't want to know, they just want to complain because they didn't win. It's like having criminals critique the judges' sentences; that needs to be done by a more disinterested party.


                            --SWEDED

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by slc2 View Post
                              I don't think they should have to justify their scores to many of the competitors, who don't understand how dressage is judged and don't want to know, they just want to complain because they didn't win. It's like having criminals critique the judges' sentences; that needs to be done by a more disinterested party.


                              --SWEDED
                              I know from my own experience and my clients, that it is a relieve to talk with the judges after a test. Many unwritten rules are explained by the judges to the riders. I have made so many films about judge-clinics and I learned a lot by attending them. Did you know that the judges want to see three canter strides to come back from the extended canter to working canter not more and not less etc...etc... The Dutch Ponie-, Junior- or Youngriders- team will never go to a European championships without some judgeclinics before department. Trully I think you can't do without these tips and tricks from the judges.

                              Theo

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I guess I will never quite understand why it might be misconstrued as a "bad" thing for judges to "chat" during intermission of a dressage show. For all we know, they were chatting about the weather, the food or who knows what. I loved the previous post that gave an example about what they could have been talking about.

                                As far as riders being able to talk to judges; I never have understood why not. I guess, because most of my horseshow career was spent across the pond, and we all talked--riders, judges, coaches--I never gave it a second thought not to speak to a judge here.

                                I have never seen any rule that says riders are not allowed, it seems to be an unspoken rule....
                                Bethe Mounce
                                Head Trainer, AmeriCan Romance Equestrian
                                https://www.facebook.com/AmericanRomanceEquestrian
                                Brentwood CA

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X