• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Horse sport in danger for next Olympics!!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Horse sport in danger for next Olympics!!

    http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/news/397/266589.html

    THE president of the International Equestrian Federation (FEI) has warned that the status of equestrian sports within the Olympic movement is precarious.

    Princess Haya told H&H that despite the undoubtedly great sport and brilliant organisation of Hong Kong, there is no guarantee that horse sports can survive in the Olympics beyond 2012 — or even get that far — and could follow sports such as cricket and polo out of the Olympic door.


    "The FEI has a huge fight to even get to 2012," explained Princess Haya, who is also a member of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the FEI's first elected president.


    "The IOC have heard from our stakeholders and wrote to us about the set-up and presentation of dressage.


    "The popularity of dressage is abnormally low and there are complaints about judging and the make up of judging panels and committees," she said. "Anyone who thinks equestrian sports are secure for London is mistaken....."
    one oak, lots of canyons

    http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

  • #2
    You know what?

    I honestly say "give it up" at this point. Let it go, we're done here, let's focus on the WEG instead.

    All the equestrian disciplines have suffered because of trying to make compromises to stay in the Olympics. How much farther are we going to dumb down and how many more compromises are we going to make?

    I think we should just drop it and be done.
    "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree with War Admiral. Quite frankly, I'm surprised they haven't done away with the Equestrian events a long time ago.
      Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.

      Comment


      • #4
        I think it sucks...

        Comment


        • #5
          Go ahead. The Olympics are insane. They've gotten worse and worse over the years. The countries are going insane trying to win and doing anything to win. There is so much wierd crap going on. It's enough. Get riding out of it now and be building up the WEG and other competitions instead.

          The Olympics, hopefully, will dissapear or become some sort of 'Win The Most Beautiful Object in the Universe' contest on TV.

          Comment


          • #6
            even if you do not understand the rules of the equestrian disciplines, anyone would have obvious respect for the fact someone has convinced a horse to hurl over a 5 foot jump!
            I saw some sports this time around with hardly ANYONE in the stands..and some of which I had never seen anything close to that kind of sport before...
            It\'s not the color of the ribbon that counts,but the color of the ride.
            Oh My!

            Comment


            • #7
              I say drop it. The judging is a joke anyway. People apparently have to resort to abusive training tactics to win gold medals so what's the freakin point? I am a horse lover and I won't watch the equestrian events, say nothing about the non-horse people.

              Comment


              • #8
                The Olympics are becoming such a political and professional event. It's sad; they are moving away from the values that they are known for. I agree with those who think Dressage may go, because people just don't understand it. Plus, it's subjective, and there are those who think such sports shouldn't be in the Olympics at all.

                Show Jumping, on the other hand, has a format that is fairly easy to understand, making it more user-friendly for both spectators and Olympic officials. Frankly, I'm surprised they did away with polo, as that is a sport that most people have a bit of interest in, and is definitely more of a "sport" that the other equestrian disciplines.

                However, we have a long four years to go until the next games, and I'm sure that the IOC is more interested in wrapping up Beijing at this point than worrying about the future.
                Equestrianism
                Photography

                Comment


                • #9
                  I've got the fix!!!

                  No more stock ties, and all the women should wear water bras with the shirts un buttoned down to their navel. Guys can borrow Jerry Seinfeld's "Puffy Shirt". The fact that breast implants and waxed chests will now be needed are just part of the necessary evolution of the sport. .

                  Medal contention and any ties can be decided by a wet t-shirt contest just before medal ceremonies.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    No! I don't want them to take it out! At least not showjumping, I think that is far and away the most popular spectactor sport. An Olympic medal is something sponsors understand-- nobody cares about world championships, they only matter to the people in the sport. I don't care who won the world championship in swimming, but I think it's awesome when Canada wins a swimming Olympic medal-- I hear about it. I think taking the sports out of the Olympics will be the first nail in the coffin. Look what HAPPENED to polo. Polo is now a rare sport. I KNOW pretty much everyone who plays polo in western canada-- someone just down the road from me was on the canadian team. Polo has no global visibility and so it's disappearing.... that WILL happen to other sports too, maybe not fast, but eventually. Just my 0.02...
                    "Disapproval of the way other people run their businesses and treat their horses is the meat and drink of the hunter-jumper industry."
                    Working Student Blog
                    Current Blog

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Another one for "let it go." As others said, focus on WEG; in fact, in soccer, they limit the ages of the players, because their crowning achievement is the World Cup (they want to reserve the best for that).
                      If we have to nail on talent, it's not talent.
                      Founder, Higher Standards Leather Care Addicts Anonymous

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        "The IOC have heard from our stakeholders and wrote to us about the set-up and presentation of dressage.
                        what does stakeholder mean in this context?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Let it go.

                          The summer Olympics are at a difficult time of year for equestrian sports, unless there is complete freedom of location. Look at all the resources that go into keeping the horses comfortable at the past several. Granted, not such an issue for London, but what will be next after that?

                          Less of an issue for dressage and show jumping, perhaps but the judging issues with dressage are a disgrace. I could be happy with leaving show jumping only--the sponsorship issue is a valid one there, and jumping is accessible to a wide audience in terms of judging and spectacle.
                          "One person's cowboy is another person's blooming idiot" -- katarine

                          Spay and neuter. Please.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I say get rid of dressage. Its subjective and the common spectator cant understand it. Keep show jumping, and maybe eventing (although I'd say get rid of eventing if it means they'll bring back the long format).

                            Anyone wondering how that German dressage judge is feeling right now? Possibly he will be one of the driving forces that gets the equestrian competition kicked out.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The perception that the British don't want the games is completely erroneous.

                              What we do want is the muti million pound budget spent on a permanent site so we can in the future bid for events like WEG and meanwhile use the facilities to train our own riders.
                              What Londoners want is their Historic Grade I protected Unesco World Heritage Site left intact and who can blame them! It's a beautiful park and can never be replaced or repaired.
                              The small detail that it will look spiffy on tv is the only reason it was ever chosen and rather overlooks the growing objections of the local people plus it won't fit more than about 20,000 spectators. Aachen WEG had 50,000 for the dressage and was sold out, SJ, and in the uk particularly eventing, get a lot more supporters.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I thought that there was some sort of rule in place that prevents a sport being dropped from the Olympics in the 4 years between them: that the IOC can only announce additions/deletions during a current olympics for the next scheduled one. I mean how crappy would that be for an athlete to be one year away from competing in the olympics only to be told "sorry, we just dropped your sport"?

                                Does anyone know IOC the rules? I tried looking on the main IOC site but didn't have any luck.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  I do not understand any of this.

                                  The FEI fires its head vet 11 days before the Hong Kong Olympics start.

                                  And here I am going out on a limb to suggest that the vet, Frits Sluyters, wanted the pre-event drug test to actually TEST for capsaicin,etc so that the riders would have a chance to present all their horses as clean.

                                  But the FEI in its strange collusion with WADA, decided instead to use the pre-event test as some kind of false lulling of the riders by NOT testing for the very drugs they claim to be so worried about.
                                  Further, at no time do they appear to have used thermography--which they have emphasized will be in great use at this Olympics in order to determine any use of hyper-sensitizing agents.

                                  The results..are what we all can see now.

                                  They "catch" four riders who have been using Equi-Block in its non-test formula (there are TWO formulas and only the heavy one is generally used as a hyper-sensitizing agent,SFAIK)
                                  for their horses' backs. And the one rider who belatedly discovered the stuff was in the anti-chew spray they put on that horse's bandages and stall wraps.

                                  And they "catch" one rider whose horse was treated at the highly-acclaimed HK equine clinic and most likely got some Felbinac onto its skin through totally innocent means.

                                  Wow. Drug criminals par excellence!

                                  ANd the results is headlines everywhere blaring about "doping charges" and medals taken away,and parallels drawn to other drug tests at other Olympics.

                                  ANd then, of course, there is the specious judging in the dressage competition, not to mention the secret meetings,etc.

                                  Way to go, FEI!!!!

                                  I am truly nonplussed by Princess Haya's statement, as I have always had respect and admiration for her accomplishments.

                                  The Olympics is a stage that attracts major sponsors . To lose that world stage will prove, IMHO, to be a major tragedy for horse sport.


                                  If any single cause is to be found for the IOC deciding to remove horse sport from the Olympics, that cause is only the FEI itself.
                                  one oak, lots of canyons

                                  http://horsesportnews.wordpress.com/

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    On the other matters - if failed dope tests cause a sport to be dropped by the Olympic movement why are Athletics still in the games? Swimming? Gymnastics? Weightlifting?

                                    The dressage judging hmmm, trickier.
                                    But i have a hard time understanding synchronised diving, how on earth do they score that? rythmic gymnastics? beach volleyball? ladies bmx?!!! i ask you - they are all ridiculous sports to me but i wouldn't want them dropped, i like seeing something different in the general field of human endeavour once every four years.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Honestly I really wish that the Olympics had a permanent venue.

                                      It would really be a shame for the equestrian sports to be dropped.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I mean how crappy would that be for an athlete to be one year away from competing in the olympics only to be told "sorry, we just dropped your sport"?
                                        marginally less crappy than having trained, qualified, completed your test to find it was a waste of supreme effort because of "specious judging"?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X