• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Equine Canada Statement and backlash from Eric Lamaze

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by RAyers View Post
    I think there are some great ideas about the rule, but in the end it is the the lying bastards in the FEI and ALL of the national federations who sold out to the IOC to keep horses in the Olympics. The system has been established that allows non-horsemen to govern and dictate to horsemen allowable conduct all in the name of monetary return (e.g. the aforementioned EC response).

    Eric Lamaze can do all he wants but in the end it will be moot because he has little to no pull with the FEI/IOC.



    Agree with both points.

    Comment


    • Eric alone, no. But he is a member of NARG, and that includes a LOT of North American riders. If they, and their sponsors, can band together, they will have some political power. And they need to address it now, while the issue is fresh. Enough wasn't done after Sapphire's elimination, so Denis Lynch, a French rider and now Tiffany have been caught by it. It cost Lynch his spot at the Olympics, and we know how it ended for Tiffany. I happen to agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of the FEI, RAyers. The riders have got to figure that ANY of them could be next.
      Laurie

      Comment


      • I do think Eric's intent was first to put pressure on EC and it appears he was successful at that. Then, to hopefully work with EC and other riders/owners to approach the FEI to make changes to that rule. At least, Eric took the first step and I hope others will follow him now.

        Comment


        • http://www.barnmice.com/group/barnmi...ation-of-canad

          and I guess, all's well that ends well
          http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/...ting-protocol/

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Glimmerglass View Post
            Never thought I'd see the day that was said about Eric. He was banned twice by Canadian sport officials after testing positive for cocaine before the 1996 Games in Atlanta and then testing positive for ephedrine before the 2000 Sydney Olympics, for which he was handed a lifetime ban. That was revoked later.
            I remember this, too. But what was done to the Canadian rider is unconscionable, and Eric is right to protest. Pure unmitigated bullspit.
            In loving memory of Laura Jahnke.
            A life lived by example, done too soon.
            www.caringbridge.org/page/laurajahnke/

            Comment


            • Originally posted by lauriep View Post
              Eric alone, no. But he is a member of NARG, and that includes a LOT of North American riders. If they, and their sponsors, can band together, they will have some political power. And they need to address it now, while the issue is fresh. Enough wasn't done after Sapphire's elimination, so Denis Lynch, a French rider and now Tiffany have been caught by it. It cost Lynch his spot at the Olympics, and we know how it ended for Tiffany. I happen to agree wholeheartedly with your assessment of the FEI, RAyers. The riders have got to figure that ANY of them could be next.
              I think you are giving NARG a lot more importance than they actually have.
              It is not an inclusive group. While important to a small group of GP show jumpers it has little relevance to the vast majority of those who show in NA and little impact on USEF's positions .

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Secret Dove View Post
                For those who haven't read the statement from Equine Canada here it is:

                “We fully support the FEI in its hypersensitivity testing protocol. This is an important testing procedure for the fairness of our sport and for the welfare of the horse which must always be paramount. Victor, our team horse, did have a small but sensitive area on the coronary band as a result of a minor lesion. This resulted in the disqualification of the horse in accordance with the FEI’s hypersensitivity protocol. The Canadian Team is disappointed with the outcome, and the impact both on our team and the Olympic dreams of our athlete Tiffany Foster,” states Mr. Gallagher.

                “Equine Canada appreciates that the FEI has shared with us the findings of the veterinary examinations. We also thank the FEI and its president, HRH Princess Haya Al Hussein, for making it clear that the disqualification in no way implies any wrong doing on the part of the Canadian Team, nor athlete Tiffany Foster.”


                Eric Lamaze released a statement following Equine Canadas statement:

                "Canadian rider and 2008 Olympic Gold Medalist Eric Lamaze has just informed the Canadian Federation that he will not ride on any Canadian Team, including Spruce Meadows and in Spain until Equine Canada releases a new statement in support of their rider"

                I give Eric a lot of credit for standing up for Tiffany. I wonder how this is going to play out.
                Coming to this late, but what is "hypersensitivity protocol?" Are they looking for something like "soring?"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by S A McKee View Post
                  I think you are giving NARG a lot more importance than they actually have.
                  It is not an inclusive group. While important to a small group of GP show jumpers it has little relevance to the vast majority of those who show in NA and little impact on USEF's positions .
                  It is the only organized body of riders there is. They work with USEF and can certainly pool their voices with those of their sponsirs to develop a cohesive plan to present to the FEI. It would behoove riders in other countrues to get onboard as well.
                  Laurie

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by SwampYankee View Post
                    Coming to this late, but what is "hypersensitivity protocol?" Are they looking for something like "soring?"
                    I think that's the angle they're aiming for. I think there's bigger fish to fry (did you see the photos and video of the dressage warm up area?? All the privacy curtains...). I think Tiffany was an easier target...

                    Comment


                    • I'll standbehind Eric's comments, if for no reason than it shows he has a backbone and moral courage. He's come through a lot his whole life long, he has taken his lumps and bumps and I, for one, Glimmerglass, believe in redemption. For years after his ban the CBC reporters never let him come on tv without bringing up the old garbage - I finally wrote a couple of letters, one to the BBC and one to a prominent horse magazine. I go so much positive feedback from people after that and the CBC has refrained from bringing up these past issues again and again. I don't believe it was my input for one moment, actually, but a Gold medal in Hong Kong didn't hurt either. Eric has never shied away from the truth, he's been humble, well spoken and honest, but has moved on regarding his sport.

                      Not riding on the team may bot hurt him - he has owners and horses who would probably gain more by Eric riding as an individual financially without risking the horse as a Team member. Remember Milton? the Bradley's would not send him to the Games in case he got hurt on the long route to Seoul. At the time the Brits were outraged as they had taken Milton firmly in as their own horse!
                      Proud member of People Who Hate to Kill Wildlife clique

                      Comment


                      • If thread is still alive...

                        To me, I don't think it's a bad thing that the FEI had to "sell out" to the IOC in order to keep equestrian in the Olympic Games. If that is what it took, it is OK by me. Because that is the state of things right now, and horses remaining in the Olympics is essential to the future of the sport. It was the pragmatic choice.

                        Is it ethical that it had to happen this way? No. Appropriate? No. Do the best horses and riders get selected and then compete at the Games? Yes. Is the sport of high quality? Yes.

                        Because the competition pits the best against the best, I don't see too much fallout from 'selling out.' (And so the FEI vents its anger from the mistreatment from the IOC on the North Americans when it can. )

                        I am not agreeing with it, and we should continue to do what we can to right this ship. But, no free lunch.

                        And although Eric Lamaze may not make THE change occur, bit by incremental bit, change will be made. That's how it gets done. Slavery wasn't ended in 5 years. Voiced discomfort over it went on for decades prior to the Civil War. But, that era did get ended.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X