• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Make it easy for me......when does Rafalca (Romney's horse) go?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by TeddyRocks View Post
    Can't we all just get along... I love Rafalca... And I am happy for the extra spotlight to our sport...
    Ditto.
    Free bar.ka and tidy rabbit.

    Comment


    • #22
      I liked her go in the first round. And it was a pleasure to see somebody (rider) who was so obviously thrilled to be taking part in the Olympics.

      Wishing her luck in the Special.

      Comment


      • #23
        I love Rafalca's page. Hilarious.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Wellspotted View Post
          Who cares? She has now become the Democrats' joke. Some TV reporter said she is necessary to Anne Romney's well-being. What a joke. I don't know of a single therapeutic riding center that uses Grand Prix horses as therapy animals. I don't know of a single one that spends $77,000 a year on any of their horses.

          I wonder if Romney will bring Rafalca home in a crate tied to the top of the jet, the way I read that he travels with his dog--the dog in a crate tied to the top of his car.

          If you want to cheer for someone who actually had to WORK to get to the Olympics Cheer for all the people who benefiit from therapeutic riding on non-Grand Prix horses. Cheer for all the people who donate their non-Grand Prix horses to therapeutic riding centers. Cheer for all the people at your show who have just one horse and hope that one doesn't go lame the morning of the show. Get real.
          Typical liberal comment. Very classy and becoming....
          Even talking "Horses" brings out the hatred...cripes!
          MnToBe Twinkle Star: "Twinkie"
          http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...wo/009_17A.jpg

          Proud member of the "Don't rush to kill wildlife" clique!

          Comment


          • #25
            Hunter--I will follow you, my friend. Stop stalking anyone who says anything about Romney and IGNORE it. If I said "typical right wing nut case Faux News brainwashed comment," how would you feel? Why are you going back and bringing up political comments when everyone else is commenting on HORSES?

            ON TOPIC--Rafalca and Jan did a respectable job, as did ALL of the horses and riders, I say, though they are outclassed with this superb bunch of horses, so I don't think we'll see much hype on their results. ALL publicity is great for dressage, though!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by caffeinated View Post
              Good grief. Like Jan E and Rafalca didn't "work" just because the mare is owned and supported by some rich people? Same as most of the other combinations in the olympics? There's something wrong with people wanting to see how the horse does?

              I'm not hugely into dressage, and I'm not a Romney fan. But the interest and coverage they've brought to the sport makes me want to see her, too. So shoot me. sheesh!

              (and since when does having interest in rafalca mean people aren't cheering for people "who deserve it" or do therapeutic riding? I am so confused!)
              I am with you on all of this.

              Aside from the Olympics discussion, I am impressed that Anne Romney can start riding as an adult and do what she has done (yes, with more $$$ I could certainly get farther than I am, but she def. put in work!) I can also connect with her, as I am sure many of us can, when she explains how her horses gave her a reason to get up in the morning. If statements like this get attention in the press, I am all for it, as it may help others understand where we horse nutjobs are coming from.

              I don't dislike Romney, personally, but I dislike his party. To me, this is irrelevant.
              I, do, however, like horses, and I assume others on this board do, too. Don't you want to pat her (horse, not Anne) on the nose?

              Rafalca is a lovely horse, she did a nice job (which does not just happen, no matter how much money is involved) & the attention surrounding dressage at this Olympics has been fun.

              I would like to see more in the news about the sport & less about the $, but that was another thread.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Beentheredonethat View Post
                Hunter--I will follow you, my friend. Stop stalking anyone who says anything about Romney and IGNORE it. If I said "typical right wing nut case Faux News brainwashed comment," how would you feel? Why are you going back and bringing up political comments when everyone else is commenting on HORSES?

                ON TOPIC--Rafalca and Jan did a respectable job, as did ALL of the horses and riders, I say, though they are outclassed with this superb bunch of horses, so I don't think we'll see much hype on their results. ALL publicity is great for dressage, though!
                BTDT,
                Nice try, but I'm not stalking anyone.

                When I see an asinine, irrelevant comment on the "Olympic Forum", solely for the purpose of picking on Ann Romney who has Multiple Sclerosis and happens to own a Dressage Horse, I'll call out the stupidity.

                I don't have to worry about being called a right wing nut, as I wouldn't be so insensitive to bring something like this up on the "Olympic Forum".

                "Why are you going back and bringing up political comments when everyone else is commenting on HORSES?"

                I assume your above quote is to the poster who first made several political comments when everyone else is commenting on the horses?
                MnToBe Twinkle Star: "Twinkie"
                http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...wo/009_17A.jpg

                Proud member of the "Don't rush to kill wildlife" clique!

                Comment


                • #28
                  Yes it is, and it was addressed and dropped days before you picked it up again. And this has been dropped for days, and now you're picking it up, again.

                  You're the one going back to OT after everyone else swerved it away and ignored Hippolyta trying to bring it up again. I'd be GLAD to discuss the "picking" on the poor Romneys on OT day, when it is appropriate.

                  Care to discuss Rafalca's go, or did you watch it? Like I said in the threads of the Olympic trials, I think the mare is good, but going to be way outclassed here. She was. She had a very good go for her, though the extensions were weak, but there are just way too many horses better than here.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    um, to get back to the title of the thread...

                    Rafalca goes in the GP Special at 10:45 am London time on Tuesday August 7.

                    That's 2:45 am Pacific, 5:45 am Eastern.

                    Class starts at 10:00 am, and ends just after 4 pm.
                    Dablino goes first, Parzival goes last.

                    Now that's alotta dressage !
                    Last edited by Mardi; Aug. 7, 2012, 01:01 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Beentheredonethat View Post
                      Yes it is, and it was addressed and dropped days before you picked it up again. And this has been dropped for days, and now you're picking it up, again.

                      You're the one going back to OT after everyone else swerved it away and ignored Hippolyta trying to bring it up again. I'd be GLAD to discuss the "picking" on the poor Romneys on OT day, when it is appropriate.

                      Care to discuss Rafalca's go, or did you watch it? Like I said in the threads of the Olympic trials, I think the mare is good, but going to be way outclassed here. She was. She had a very good go for her, though the extensions were weak, but there are just way too many horses better than here.
                      Yes, I saw her perform. But, I know very little about Dressage to make an informed decision about her performance, but she looked great...
                      MnToBe Twinkle Star: "Twinkie"
                      http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/f...wo/009_17A.jpg

                      Proud member of the "Don't rush to kill wildlife" clique!

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        I thought her test was very correct (in a basic way) but VERY conservative and not filled with enough impulsion and at this level...

                        She was not forward enough IMO, or really active enough in most every movment. It all just seemed very plain but very nice for what it was

                        I though she would score higher but at the same time I felt like the judges were seeing more obviously then I that she was not quite using herself enough for the better scores.

                        She sitill did her riders/owners proud!
                        ~~Member of the TB's Rule Clique ~~
                        http://www.off-breed-dressage.blogspot.com/

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          I thought she was very nice, but it seemed to me she had less flow, or fluidity to her movement, or something, than some of the other horses. I'm not a dressage person so don't know how to phrase that But still, what a gorgeous mare
                          "smile a lot can let us ride happy,it is good thing"

                          My CANTER blog.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by Huntertwo View Post
                            BTDT,
                            Nice try, but I'm not stalking anyone.

                            When I see an asinine, irrelevant comment on the "Olympic Forum", solely for the purpose of picking on Ann Romney who has Multiple Sclerosis and happens to own a Dressage Horse, I'll call out the stupidity.

                            I don't have to worry about being called a right wing nut, as I wouldn't be so insensitive to bring something like this up on the "Olympic Forum".

                            "Why are you going back and bringing up political comments when everyone else is commenting on HORSES?"

                            I assume your above quote is to the poster who first made several political comments when everyone else is commenting on the horses?

                            Lovely horse,and great to see dressage (any equestrian sport !) get some media attention.
                            I agree, we should be able to discuss a horse and her performance without politics inserting itself.
                            However, realistically?
                            This is an election year and one of the co-owners (wife) is running for President.
                            Every single thing they do is under a microscope and open for comment.
                            On another BB I even saw some RW person in an uproar because Michelle Obama was wearing Jimmy Choos. ...
                            Can you imagine what Glenn Beck et all would have to say if she had an expensive dressage horse????

                            The scrutiny and attention in terms of Rafalca is increased due to the fact that Romney (for some reason) has refused to release his tax info - but one of the ones that IS available shows a claim for $77,000 for the upkeep of the horse.

                            Not surprisingly there is increased scrutiny.

                            I would also suggest that the OP's OP is not without political motivation.
                            Her FB posts are a pretty clear indication.

                            Politics aside however - lovely horse!
                            A Fine Romance. April 1991 - June 2016. Loved forever.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by Fred View Post

                              The scrutiny and attention in terms of Rafalca is increased due to the fact that Romney (for some reason) has refused to release his tax info - but one of the ones that IS available shows a claim for $77,000 for the upkeep of the horse.

                              !

                              Give the guy a break. He made millions of dollars a year, and paid 13% tax.

                              What could possibly be wrong with that.
                              www.OneJumpAhead.ca

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Cannot for the life of me figure out why people want to see other's tax returns. As history has shown, someone's tax returns have little to do with how well they lead the country.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by Mardi View Post
                                  Cannot for the life of me figure out why people want to see other's tax returns. As history has shown, someone's tax returns have little to do with how well they lead the country.
                                  Well since you asked, for one thing - and this is actually a small thing in this particular context given that a man who claims to have paid as little as 13% for 10 years is running on the idea that the wealthy should pay lower taxes - because it proves that he has a documented history of lying.

                                  http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...01-Tax-Returns

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by Huntertwo View Post
                                    Typical liberal comment. Very classy and becoming....
                                    Even talking "Horses" brings out the hatred...cripes!
                                    NOT a typical "liberal" comment. I am liberal and an Obama fan. But almost as important is my love for the sport. As such, I am pleased about any talented horse. Yes, I can rant about this dollar or that dollar....but to what purpose. Sadly, that poster seems to be a sad and sour person. Glad they are not at my barn.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by allison finch View Post
                                      But almost as important is my love for the sport. As such, I am pleased about any talented horse. Yes, I can rant about this dollar or that dollar....but to what purpose. Sadly, that poster seems to be a sad and sour person. Glad they are not at my barn.
                                      I'm not sure if I grew out of stupid or ran out of brave.

                                      Practicing Member of the Not too Klassy for Boxed Wine Clique

                                      Comment

                                      Working...
                                      X