• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Professional athletes in the Olympics, aren't they supposed to be amateurs?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Professional athletes in the Olympics, aren't they supposed to be amateurs?

    I've always wondered this and remember some discussion on it many years ago and can't remember the answer (showing my age lol). The Olympics are supposed to be for amateur athletes only (or is this not a requirement anymore?). So how do all the obviously pro riders who make their living from the horse business get around the amateur athlete requirement? Ditto I guess there are pro baseball, basketball, tennis etc players in there too I think (don't really follow other sports or know "who's who" but I think there are big names and multi-million dollar earning athletes in there too right?)

    Anyone know the answer

  • #2
    yeah, well, I guess, but some time ago the rule was dropped, so the Germans could bring Steffie Graf and the US the Dream Team.

    Then again, it's not such a long leap from having 'Carrier Soldiers' participate....or people who had a cushy job with a major sponsor....

    It's just, the Dream Team, and the Tennis players burn my butt....I mean.... with THAT much money....most other sports just don't pay that well...jealousy I suppose!
    Originally posted by BigMama1
    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
    GNU Terry Prachett

    Comment


    • #3
      I don't mind that the amateur rule is gone, because the whole reason it was there to begin with was that the rich didn't want to have to compete alongside (heavens! quelle horror!) working class men, therefore the amateur rule, because working class people, unlike "gentlemen," could not afford to train because they had to earn their living.

      <<Coubertin and the IOC intended from the start for the Olympics to be open only to amateurs. Amateurism was determined by adherence to the amateur rule, which was originally devised in the 19th century to prevent working-class athletes from participating in sports such as rowing and tennis. Because the amateur rule prevented athletes from earning any pay from activities in any way related to sports, working-class athletes could not afford to make a living and train for competition at the same time. >>

      Quote is from MSN encarta, but you can find the info anywhere.

      The modern reason to eliminate the rule was so that you had the best of every sport, which, let's face it, is either professional athletes like NBA players, or else athletes who live at training centers all-year round practicing. That certainly isn't "amateur."

      Comment


      • #4
        The rule was changed in more recent years so that top level athletes in any sport could come to compete.

        Comment


        • #5
          It was my understanding that we got the rules changed during the Cold War so we could beat the state-supported athletes coming out of the Communist sports machines.
          According to the Mayan calendar, the world will not end this week. Please plan your life accordingly.

          Comment


          • #6
            eligibility for the OG is now left up to each sport's international federation (since the early '80s). so an individual sport can still have an amateur rule if they want; they have changed at various times. equestrian changed for '88, along w/tennis, basketball in '92.

            Comment


            • #7
              There was a thread on this very subject here earlier. Lexi is correct, a sport's governing body makes the decision on eligibility (for instance, in men's football -- or soccer in this confused corner of the world -- limits the number of players over the age of 23; the reasoning is that the World Cup is the premiere and paramount competition, so the Olympics should be more of a showcase for younger players and not take away any of the gloss from the World Cup).

              As others have noted, the change was to even the playing field (so to speak) between true amateurs in some countries and the state-sponsored athletes of others. IMHO, it's really cheapened some of the sports (i.e. men's basketball, tennis).
              Congratulate me! My CANTER cutie is an honor student at Goofball University!

              Comment


              • #8
                The Olympics were restricted to filthy rich amateurs who had all the time in the world to exercise because they didn't need to have jobs.

                Now the Olympics are restricted to filthy rich professionals who have all the time in the world to exercise because that's their job.

                BIG DIFF.

                Except that that's not exactly the way it is. There are a lot of different kinds of athletes in the Olympics. Some are on professional teams, like basketball players, and others are living very modestly, and giving up alot to do other more minor sports.

                Comment


                • #9
                  slc nails it. And the cold war was part of it, because one way around the rule was to get someone a sinecure that would allow them to be paid while training and competing full time. Even so, for equestrian, most of the international riders, even though they rode full time, were international amateurs. Only a few, like Rodney Jenkins, were considered professionals. I'm not quite sure how that all worked out: I expect a lot of it went through the USET with earmarked contributions.
                  If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Avery Brundage

                    The amateur rule went out with IOC president Avery Brundage, its last fervent supporter. A not very flattering Wikipedia entry can be found here.
                    ------------------------------------------------------------
                    But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
                    You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      also, the boundaries between amateur and professional were never clear to begin with. I remember reading that Jim Thorpe, who won the decathlon in 1912, later had his medal taken away because he once earned 20 bucks or so playing a bit of baseball or football. What a nonsense.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Lexi View Post
                        eligibility for the OG is now left up to each sport's international federation (since the early '80s). so an individual sport can still have an amateur rule if they want; they have changed at various times. equestrian changed for '88, along w/tennis, basketball in '92.
                        Well, that can't be right. The US SJ were pro's in 1984. Right? Joe Fargis, Conrad Homfeld, Leslie (Lenehan) Howard and Melanie Smith. They had all turned pro prior to the Olympics, right? I was a kid, so maybe I'm wrong.

                        The event team was: Mike Plumb, Torrence Watkins, Karen Stives and Bruce Davidson. I think the 'girls' were ammys, uh, right?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Pat View Post
                          Well, that can't be right. The US SJ were pro's in 1984. Right? Joe Fargis, Conrad Homfeld, Leslie (Lenehan) Howard and Melanie Smith. They had all turned pro prior to the Olympics, right? I was a kid, so maybe I'm wrong.

                          The event team was: Mike Plumb, Torrence Watkins, Karen Stives and Bruce Davidson. I think the 'girls' were ammys, uh, right?
                          My understanding is that they were "bending the rules" in '84.

                          See the other thread.
                          Janet

                          chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Ian Millar was named to the Canadian Equestrian Team in 1971 and went to his first Olympics in 1972.

                            When did he turn pro?

                            ETA: now that I think of it I'm sure I remember watching him jumping on TV at Spruce Meadows in the 70s. No way he was an amateur back then.

                            Eileen
                            Mad Mare™ Studio
                            Custom Swarovski®, Czech glass and gemstone browbands in Circlet, Diadem and Tiara styles. Matching stock pins, bracelets and belts.
                            http://MadMare.com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              This was discussed earlier on this thread.
                              Basically the synopsis is that the Olympics were opened up to pro riders in '88. In the period between '72 and '84 there was a gradual slide where riders who were for all intents and purposes pros started to show up in all three Olympic disciplines under the guise of amatuerism. Some countries respected the rule more so than others.
                              By the time '84 came around it had basically become a farce (look at the list on the other thread of showjumpers from the US, GB and GER who competed in those games, mostly famous well known pros), which may have been the impetus behind opening the doors in '88.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X