• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Very costly mistakes of Isabelle and Anky

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Very costly mistakes of Isabelle and Anky

    Just to give you an opinion :

    We all have seen the mistakes both Anky and Isabelle made in the GPS.

    Both movements involved could have scored 100 points

    Anky received for this movement 19 points and Isabelle received 18 points.

    Hope this explanation will help !

    Theo

  • #2
    Not even a little bit.

    What on earth are you talking about?

    Comment


    • #3
      I read that Isabell was given 0s by some judges on that - deservedly so. But the rest of test scored very highly - deservedly so.

      As for Anky, even that mistake aside, I still think Steffen rode a better all over test today, and I still think that I have never seen Anky appear to enjoy a competition less than this one. But that's just my opinion.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks Theo,

        The numbers are always interesting. For anyone who competes, its very understood how you can have a quite good test on some days that scores low depending on where your errors fall exactly in the test and other days it doesn't hurt you so much. Nevertheless, you will get marked down where needed, but you can "earn points back" on another movement. It also speaks to the overall high quality of the rest of the tests that each woman put in. I'm anxious to see how they adjust for their rough spots for the freestyle. Either way, it makes for exciting sport in my book.

        No other sport relies on another living creature with its own feelings, sensations, attitudes, and instincts. Its that art of communication and sometimes miscommunication that can happen to any rider at any time that makes it fascinating. There is a relationship there that must work. Not always so black and white, but the judge does HAVE to give a score.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by yaya View Post
          Not even a little bit.

          What on earth are you talking about?
          5 judges each with the ability to give a 10 out of 10.
          That's 50 points right there.
          Add the coefficient of 2 into it which doubles the mark each judge awards and that gives you 100 POSSIBLE points to be earned on that one movement that was ruined.

          Anky received 19 out of a possible 100 or 19% on that movement.
          Isabell received 18 out of a possible 100 or 18% on that movement.

          I think Theo is trying to point out that neither of them were given any kind of a gift on that movement.
          Ahhhh, spring is here. The birds are singing, the trees are budding and the paddocks are making their annual transformation from cake mix to cookie dough.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by dressagetraks View Post
            As for Anky, even that mistake aside, I still think Steffen rode a better all over test today, and I still think that I have never seen Anky appear to enjoy a competition less than this one. But that's just my opinion.
            She's not pregnant again, is she? I remember being amazed, in hindsight, at how well she did in Athens, considering that she was pregnant. I think she announced her pregnancy a month or so afterwards.

            Ok, rumor-starting over....
            Last edited by RunningwaterWBs; Aug. 16, 2008, 06:13 PM.
            Kendra -- Runningwater Warmbloods
            Home of EM Raleska (Rascalino/ Warkant) and Donatella M (Furstenball/ Jazz Time)
            'Like' us on Facebook

            Comment


            • #7
              But - Anky ruined 3 movements.
              ... _. ._ .._. .._

              Comment


              • #8
                Dressagetraks, I watched both of those tests and there were brilliant moments. The 0 was given when the horse spooked, almost went up and backed up very close to the edge of the arena but thankfully did not step over and out. She kept her cool and went on to ride a beautiful test, but the movement,,,I think it was supposed to be Piaffe (?)...was not done, hence the 0.
                It was an amazing moment, and a powerful reminder that these really are incredible animals. To recover from that complete breakdown of communication and go on to have some beautiful movements is quite an accomplishment.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Oh, that's an interesting idea (totally hypothetical, of course ) on Anky. Hadn't thought of that possibility. I, too, was impressed how well she did at Athens. She just doesn't quite seem like herself to me, nothing I can quite put my finger on. Totally apart from the riding, I mean. But again, just my opinion, and I don't know her. No doubt 18 people closer to her are about to certify that nothing at all is bugging her, maybe even with clean vet reports.

                  And I totally agree on Isabell, Chai. Her scores - the 0 for that moment and the high ones for the rest of the test - were respectively deserved. And Isabell does get my nerves of steel award.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The days that dressage has been on have been hectic for me, so I've only been able to catch KKD's ride and the video of DM's ride. Is there video of these two? Considering it's appeared they've both been given gifts in the past (one moreso than the other, at least to my viewpoint), I'd really like to see.
                    "IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      In Anky's first test (the GP), she was riding rather oddly IMHO. Tilted back, not vertical at all. It was so unlike her. At the time, I posted a question about it, but no replies.

                      In the GPS, she was vertical most of the time.

                      But hey, she's a world champ, not me....

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        If anyone has a link to the video, please post it-I heard about it but wasn't able to find anything on the NBC site.
                        Worry, doubt, fear and despair are the enemies which slowly bring us down to the ground and turn us to dust before we die.

                        ~ Douglas MacArthur

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Mardi, I thought she looked a bit "parked" in the saddle as well. I know NOTHING about GP dressage, but her posistion didn't look right. She was better in the special, though. Anyone else have some insights?
                          God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh.

                          Voltaire.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Sjeff said she rode the whole ride with the hand brake on.

                            It looked to me like the horse was getting too strong, and she was having to deal with it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If I were riding out there next to these riders, I would feel I have the right to critique. But........... my backyard if far from there, so I will just clap and say........ "Good ride!"
                              www.spindletopfarm.net
                              Home of Puerto D'Azur - 1998 NA 100 Day Test Champion
                              "Charcter is much easier kept than recovered"

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Lower level equivalent

                                Hi,

                                I'm no grand prix expert but I've certainly seen equivalent scoring at the lower levels -- horse rearing HIGH in the halt at x but delivering a super performance after that (with great gaits) scoring in the 70s.

                                Now here is a question. I don't recall the specifics of the ride, but remember Michelle Gibson having a similar problem with Peron many years ago at the Olympics? I think her scores tanked and we were all horrified as spectators. I was kind of expecting the same thing here, but isn't she still at or near the top in scoring?

                                I'm not suggesting anything untoward but maybe someone with a better memory can explain the difference...
                                http://behindthebitblog.com
                                Dressage, riding, sport horse blog
                                BTBbrowbands.com
                                Unique browbands for dressage and hunter riders

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Can somebody fill me in? What movement did Isabell get a 0 on? And is there a video anywhere?
                                  Making Your Ambitions a Reality at Secret Ambition Stables.
                                  Quality Welsh Ponies and Welsh Crosses bred for sport
                                  Facebook Page.
                                  Section A and Section B Welsh Ponies at stud

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Peron

                                    What I remember from 1996, IMHO only, there was more than that one really bad spot. Yes, the one really bad spot, spook, disobedience, but my interpretation then, what I felt watching is that Michelle was rattled a bit by that, and the remainder of the ride was not close to their best. My impression was that both horse and rider carried the memory of that mistake through the remainder of the 1996 test. Isabell had one mistake and recovered amazingly, keeping her composure.

                                    And at that, Peron finished I believe 5th at the Olympics. There is no shame at all in finishing 5th at the Olympics, and I freely admit that Michelle is a far better rider than I am. Hats off to her for a great performance over those three tests. I loved seeing her and Peron go.

                                    Edited to add: I just looked up my notes. I took notes while there on every single ride, all three days, impressions immediately afterwards before the next horse entered. Here is what I said about Peron's freestyle that day: "Rhythmic music. Tempi zigzag good. Passage half pass. Good changes in music for movements. Good first piaffe, but Peron spooked, hit wall, and stung himself in second piaffe. A few awkward hops, then Michelle got him back together and went on. Passage half pass other way, piaffe pirouette. Looked a bit conservative after error, but good ride, brilliant horse. Don't know what spooked him, but hitting the wall made it worse, I think. He looked stung for a step or two. Thanks for the memories, Michelle and Peron. 222.73, 73.25%."
                                    Last edited by dressagetraks; Aug. 16, 2008, 09:44 PM. Reason: Adding Peron Notes

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Nobody got a 0. 0 means movement wasn't attempted and she did attempt it.

                                      If you go to this page

                                      http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/EN...html#EQX001201

                                      Then click on reports on the right

                                      Then click on judges individual marks

                                      Then click on the + next to each riders name, you will see the marks.

                                      Helps to have a copy of the tests in front of you - which can be downloaded in pdf format from the FEI web site.

                                      Anky got 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 (with x 2 coef) for trot half pass left in Special
                                      Anky got 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 x 2 coef for submission

                                      Isabelle got 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 but no coefficiant on that movement Piaffe
                                      Isabelle got 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 x 2 coef for submission

                                      The German judge gave only Briar and Balagur 7 for submission - every other horse got 6 - and the 25th placed French horse got a 5.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Dressage_Diva333
                                        Can somebody fill me in? What movement did Isabell get a 0 on? And is there a video anywhere?
                                        If you go to the nbcolympics online videos : The individual GP special (dressage)
                                        http://www.nbcolympics.com/equestrian/video/index.html
                                        - Isabell's mishap is around 4:42:06
                                        - Anky's mishap is around 4:08:13


                                        I really feel for both riders. Nevertheless I think a brilliant performance of both. I can't copy them for sure, even if you were to put me on a Satchmo or a Salinero, I still wouldn't be able to get anywhere near the performance they showed....
                                        I hope both riders can put the hiccup behind them, move on and focus on the next & final step.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X