• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

USA Dutton Disqualified from games.??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USA Dutton Disqualified from games.??

    What happened?
    www.australiancolouredperformancehorses.com.au

  • #2
    Boots

    The boots used were too heavy and violated a new FEI rule of which Dutton was not aware.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      OK..Correction to that. there are reports that Phillip has been disqualified from the 2nd sj round due to a technicality with some jumping boots


      Phillip Dutton qualified for the second, individual jumping round, despite two rails down in the first round on Connaught, who he said was distracted by the lights. “Coming into fence 1 he was not concentrating; he was looking at everything apart from the jump,” he said. “He was still going high but not focusing on where he was going. It was a bit disappointing.”

      “Maybe I should have taken more use of the time we had to jump under the lights the other night, but we thought after yesterday he’d be a bit tired and more concentrated,” he added. But he came back in the second round to jump flawlessly, only to be disqualified for a piece of equipment that wasn’t allowed. A pair of weighted boots that Connaught wore were found to be over the weight limit of 500 grams set by the FEI in February of 2008. According to Jim Wolf, U.S. Equestrian Federation Executive Director of Sports Programs, the boots, which were front boots applied to the hind legs, weighed just over 700 grams each. The rule change is a jumping rule modification which is applied to eventing
      www.australiancolouredperformancehorses.com.au

      Comment


      • #4
        well, that sucks!
        "IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique

        Comment


        • #5
          Belambi did not paste the REST of the article ;

          "We should have known about it, but we didn't for eventing," said Wolf
          We should have known about it, but we didn't for eventing," said Wolf. "They felt heavy, so [the stewards] put them on a scale. I asked them to show me the scale, to make sure it was properly calibrated. Our federation owes Phillip an apology for not making him aware of [the change]. It's our federation's responsibility to make sure the athletes know the rules. Believe me, in the future we will be weighing everyone's boots in eventing. Phillip was unaware of the rule and certainly was not trying to give himself an unfair advantage. But the rule is on the books, and we're abiding by the rule, and Phillip is taking it on the chin."
          ... _. ._ .._. .._

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            Thanks for that..Wasnt in the email I received.
            www.australiancolouredperformancehorses.com.au

            Comment


            • #7
              darn that SUCKS!!

              Whats the advantage of having heavier boots, I wonder?
              "My shopping list is getting long but I will add the marshmallows right below the napalm." -Weighaton

              Comment


              • #8
                Heavier boots do the same thing as heavier shoes on TWH and the like. Horses tend to pick their feet up more with heavier boots and shoes.

                Must go out and weigh my boots. Never knew about this rule.

                Comment


                • #9
                  That is a terrible shame.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I always thought that the reason for using weight on a horse's legs was to improve the lift when you took the weight off. ie. train with weight and show without.
                    ... _. ._ .._. .._

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      You would have to think that people at this level of competition would bother to get to know the rules.
                      https://www.facebook.com/russellracingstable

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Easier said than done.
                        ... _. ._ .._. .._

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
                          Easier said than done.
                          It is an unfortunate situation, but there really is no excuse for failing to be aware of the applicable rules.
                          Roseknoll Sporthorses
                          www.roseknoll.net

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I have to wonder why he would be using heavier boots in the first place.....?
                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                            "There is just as much horse sense as ever, but the horses have most of it"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I know in the jumper world the boots are removed before going in the ring. Kind of like a baseball player swinging a bat with weights on it and then taking them off before stepping up to bat.
                              "To my Gub... Godspeed my friend, till we meet again." 1996-2007.
                              Runway (Sasha) 2009 Zweibrucker filly by Redwine.

                              "Silence is golden...and duct tape is silver."

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Phillip's Blog

                                From Phillip's blog. Did I miss something?

                                The US finishes 7th. Phillip and Connaught finish =12th in the individual medal competition on a 68.2 after a 40.6 in dressage, 19.6 time faults cross country, 8 jumping faults in the team stadium competition, and a clear round in the individual stadium jumping finals. Congratulations to Gina Miles and McKinlaigh for their silver medal in the individual competition!!
                                Last edited by Maryalden; Aug. 13, 2008, 01:16 AM.
                                God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh.

                                Voltaire.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
                                  I always thought that the reason for using weight on a horse's legs was to improve the lift when you took the weight off. ie. train with weight and show without.
                                  Yeah - I'm kinda baffled about this as well. I can see how you might want to train with heavier boots, but why wear them in competition? I know that horses move better with aluminum shoes (lighter) than steel shoes (heavier) so we put aluminums on for shows, and keep steel on at home. Just like soemone mentioned the baseball bat analogy below, this seems like the opposite of what I'd expect the rule to be.

                                  Too bad - he looked so thrilled at the end of that round.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by gubbyz View Post
                                    I know in the jumper world the boots are removed before going in the ring. Kind of like a baseball player swinging a bat with weights on it and then taking them off before stepping up to bat.
                                    Not always true. I used to care for a GP horse who had his boots put on right before he entered the ring. The heavier weights made his hindend much more careful as he kicked up better with the extra weight.


                                    I also agree that it's the rider/trainers job to know the rules.
                                    Originally posted by JSwan
                                    Prove it....Otherwise, you're just coming off as a whackjob.
                                    Founding member of the "Not too Klassy for Boxed Wine" Clique

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I guess someone is going to be carting around a scale now, it's not like you can really FEEL the difference in 200 grams. Some can, but the majority can't.

                                      Yes, all involved should've known the rule, new change, or not. But at least responsibility is being taken.
                                      "IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        OH COME ON!!

                                        You mean to say that all those people that have jobs with USEF and NOT ONE of them knew the rule, or "mentioned it" to the coach or grooms or the riders????
                                        Negligence, I think!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X