• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Lucinda Fredericks Not Jump in Individual Round?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lucinda Fredericks Not Jump in Individual Round?

    Any idea why Lucinda (and a couple of others) did not jump in the individual medal round although they were qualified to?

  • #2
    Hmm, not sure, but neither did Ostholt (Mr Medicott) for Germany nor Daisy Dick for GB. Is it because they were one of the drop scores for their teams?

    Comment


    • #3
      Actually I was wondering how they came up with having 25 horses come back to jump when there are only three medals and probably only the top ten really figure in the possibilities. I realize that having only ten people compete for an Olympic medal probably doesn't sit too well with the IOC, but I would guess some of those 25 riders figured that they had no chance for a medal so why put their horse over another ten or so unnecessary jumps.

      Comment


      • #4
        Ostholt was in 8th and Fredricks in 10th after the Team jumping. If Ostholt would have gone in the Ind jumping round and gone clear he would have finished .4 of a fault out of bronze.
        It's crazy that riders in the top 10 wouldn't get to go into the Ind jump off.
        The whole Olympic set up for eventing is nuts.

        Comment


        • #5
          They may have decided that their horses were not up to it and it was not worth the risk. It seems it was more important to the smaller countries (ones without a team) to say they finished 20th in a field of 67 rather than 25th, or something.

          To the individuals that have already won a team medal, especially from those countries where they are likely to be able to come back next Olympics, it does not matter as much.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Ajierene View Post
            They may have decided that their horses were not up to it and it was not worth the risk. It seems it was more important to the smaller countries (ones without a team) to say they finished 20th in a field of 67 rather than 25th, or something.

            To the individuals that have already won a team medal, especially from those countries where they are likely to be able to come back next Olympics, it does not matter as much.
            Both Ostholt and Fredricks were in medal contention. Like I said, if Ostholt had gone clear he would have finished in 57.80, the bronze medal was 57.40.
            I really doubt he decided to sit it out.
            From the looks of who partook in the jump off, there were only a maximum of 3 riders from each country, so I'm thinking that must have been some kind of rule.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Drvmb1ggl3 View Post
              Both Ostholt and Fredricks were in medal contention. Like I said, if Ostholt had gone clear he would have finished in 57.80, the bronze medal was 57.40.
              I really doubt he decided to sit it out.
              From the looks of who partook in the jump off, there were only a maximum of 3 riders from each country, so I'm thinking that must have been some kind of rule.
              Maybe. Worth looking up.

              Comment


              • #8
                I believe the new rule from the IOC is that only three representatives of any one country can compete in an individual final, in order to allow more countries to compete.
                Originally posted by PeanutButterPony
                you can shackle your pony to a lawn chair at the show...so long as its in a conservative color.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Alterageous View Post
                  I believe the new rule from the IOC is that only three representatives of any one country can compete in an individual final, in order to allow more countries to compete.
                  God, that is so stupid. Both Germany and Australia had 4 riders in the top 10 after the team jumping, all in medal contention.

                  Maybe they should make the Olympics a training level course, with each country sending just one athlete, that way Belize, Laos and Moldova can all send a rider.... and they can all hold hands and sing Kum Bay Ah.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I know it applies to all sports--there was some fuss about it in the selection of the women's gymnastics team because athletes compete, they don't have to be the SAME 3 athletes for all 4 events, and there is no "drop score" anymore.

                    I think it's a little dumb but with all the controversies surrounding these olympics, I'm not sure if I was running things for the US that I would have even sent teams.
                    Originally posted by PeanutButterPony
                    you can shackle your pony to a lawn chair at the show...so long as its in a conservative color.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Drvmb1ggl3 View Post

                      Maybe they should make the Olympics a training level course, with each country sending just one athlete, that way Belize, Laos and Moldova can all send a rider.... and they can all hold hands and sing Kum Bay Ah.
                      Hey, I have family that lives in Belize. Perhaps I should investigate getting my Belizean citizenship if the Olympics become a 1/2 star!!!
                      Random horse pics http://www.flickr.com/photos/glfprncs/
                      Talk to me about fitness or nutrition (I'm an A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer)!
                      My blog! http://personalsweatequity.blogspot.com/

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I have to say that this Olympic forum has resulted in a dramatic increase in people on my ignore list
                        Chronicles of the $700 Pony
                        The Further Adventures of the $700 Pony
                        www.blithetraveler.com <-- My Blog

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Drvmb1ggl3 View Post
                          God, that is so stupid. Both Germany and Australia had 4 riders in the top 10 after the team jumping, all in medal contention.

                          Maybe they should make the Olympics a training level course, with each country sending just one athlete, that way Belize, Laos and Moldova can all send a rider.... and they can all hold hands and sing Kum Bay Ah.
                          The idea is to give more riders a chance to get a medal. Yeah, the likelihood that Pawel would have medaled is slim, but he can put his standings in his resume. The riders from the countries that can field a team put their top three up there for medal contention and let the other countries at least have a shot. I'm not seeing a problem with this. I am seeing very sportsmanlike behavior.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Alterageous View Post
                            I know it applies to all sports--there was some fuss about it in the selection of the women's gymnastics team because athletes compete, they don't have to be the SAME 3 athletes for all 4 events, and there is no "drop score" anymore.

                            I think it's a little dumb but with all the controversies surrounding these olympics, I'm not sure if I was running things for the US that I would have even sent teams.
                            I think that the sending three forward has been a rule for some time--seem to recall only three in the final individual event for both show jumping and dressage in Atlanta (eventing was two totally separate events there for ind and team and honestly can't remember what they did for the individual--maybe each country only got three to start??)
                            The Evil Chem Prof

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X