• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

why don't I understand dressage scores?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • why don't I understand dressage scores?

    Ok, I saw a lovely ride by Fox-Pitt...comments online were flawless ride. Scored in the 40s. Amy who I thought did not looked as refined as most---in the 30s. How is this?

    Then lovely rides from others...and then a guy named shane had TONS of tense moments(a very unhappy horse) got a 53 or 58??? How did some riders score in the 70s? I thought Shane didn't look all that great and others looked better.

  • #2
    Well...um....

    It is all dependent on what the judge sees, how they interpret it, exactly what happened. It depends on how many times the horse misses parts of the test and the like.

    I am not remember names right now - but a gray horse had an error (Dag Albert, if I remember correctly), but did the rest of the test fine. That is only two points off.

    A dark horse (was that Shane?) had a long moment where he was not accepting the bit, but if he was still doing the movement, he would not get a zero. He did the rest of the test excellently, which makes up for that one movement.

    Another rider (chesnut, being ridden by a woman?) had lots of mistakes, so I thought the score of 70 was just right.

    We aren't always going to agree with the judges....that's all I know.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      yeah--I actually know we see it different however there is really no reason that Shane's test was scored as high as it was---when other tests had such better flow.

      Comment


      • #4
        Not that I am an expert...but dressage tests are judged movement by movement. It appeared that Shane's horse was only stuck during one or maybe two movements. He did have a rather nice test overall, and could have scored much higher in other movements than some of those other riders. Also, if a horse is a better mover than some of the other horses, and comes under themselves more, they generally get higher scores regardless of the flow of the overall test...although that is important too. Also, if the horses are not spot on in the changes or letters, or crooked in other areas, they get marked down too. The judges at each end of the arena probably have a better visual than we do...although the videographers have been doing a great job giving us different views of the rides.

        Anyway, not sure if I really helped at all. I did scribe a few weeks ago for the first time at a local show, and it was definitely an eye opener for me! Judges can be very picky about certain things...and everything has to be just right to warrant a higher score.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think the dressage scores were for the eventing team and they are scored on penalty points not percentages.

          Comment


          • #6
            Well, I thought the 65 for Dag Albert was generous, for sure. Besides going off course, the horse broke gait multiple times and didn't perform at least one movement.

            I think that Mark Todd's opening right which got a 49 something was NOT equivalent to the rider who got a 49.40 at the end. Mark's test was better. I think the judges started out scoring VERY low.
            Originally posted by PeanutButterPony
            you can shackle your pony to a lawn chair at the show...so long as its in a conservative color.

            Comment


            • #7
              I thought the comment about WFP's ride being "flawless" was a triumph of optimism and enthusiasm on the part of the online commentor.

              To my eyes, the ride was very tense, and, among other things, the ride down the centerline wouldn't pass a sobriety test.

              It was neither horse nor rider's finest test.

              Comment


              • #8
                Sometimes the horses that look nicest to the 'untrained' eye are not the most correct. (Not saying you're 'untrained', I'm just assuming for the sake of the question that you're not a dressage rider.)

                The judges are looking for very specific things... a pair might look harmonious but lacks in other technical aspects.

                A horse that looks pleasant may have appeared flawless but not had the required impulsion or engagement. Perhaps he had another flaw, such as coming behind the bit. Perhaps the majority of the test was good but they really flunked a movement or two, and a significantly lower score here or there is definitely going to affect the overall percentage. *Especially* if the movement that flunked had a coefficient (some movements are only performed once but counted twice).

                And don't forget the collective marks - those scores that aren't tied to a specific movement, but are overall impression scores marked after the test is completed. Those have coefficients as well. There are scores for things like overall quality of gaits, obedience, and rider position/aids. If something was lacking, such as impulsion or engagement, or the horse performed technically well but appeared tense throughout, or the rider's position gets a lower score, etc etc... getting a so-so score on those heavier marks will negatively affect the overall score.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bosox View Post
                  yeah--I actually know we see it different however there is really no reason that Shane's test was scored as high as it was---when other tests had such better flow.

                  Remember, this is eventing dressage which is scored on penalty points. So his high score is actually a bad score. Lower is better.
                  Happiness is the sweet smell of horses, leather, and hay.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Melanie Smith Taylor said at some point during TV coverage that the judges were probably being less forgiving with scoring earlier on as they had much yet to see.
                    Appropriate or not, this is what she said.
                    Also, remember that the dressage phase of eventing is converted from the percentage score to a penalty score, so lower = better.
                    bar.ka think u al.l. susp.ect
                    free bar.ka and tidy rabbit

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Jinx!
                      bar.ka think u al.l. susp.ect
                      free bar.ka and tidy rabbit

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        There are two sets of scores that they're talking about.

                        During the ride, they'll say, 6, 7, 8, 9 etc. In this case the high score is better, just like regular dressage. They've given out some 9's and I seem to recall Lucinda Fredricks, the leader, got a 10.

                        Once the ride is completed, there's a formula to take the percentage (say 75% in the case of a very good ride, 55% in the case of a poor ride) and convert it to penalty points. At this point, the low score is better. In the 30's and you're in the hunt. David O'Connor laid down a 29 at the Sydney games with Custom Made, which I think is the only time someone beat 30.

                        Note that the USEA score conversions are very simple, just the inverse of the percentage: ie 70% -> 30 penalties. The FEI tests use a different formula that I don't recall at the moment.
                        If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X