Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You're responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it--details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums' policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it's understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users' profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses -- Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it's related to a horse for sale, regardless of who's selling it, it doesn't belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions -- Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services -- Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products -- While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements -- Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be "bumped" excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues -- Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators' discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you'd rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user's membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Eric Lamaze rant on Facebook

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Badger
    replied
    I've been to four WEGs and one Olympics. Huge multidisciplinary events are unwieldy at best. This was way better than Normandy and in many ways better than Kentucky. Aachen is the gold standard and once TIEC is completed IMHO it will be able to rival it. As a volunteer and a spectator I saw things improving noticeably day by day, and given the short timeline TIEC has to host these games and the added challenges of weather (uncharacteristiclly wet year, a hurricane, and unusual hot weeks) I think they did an admirable job. No horse show is perfect and this one certainly wasn't, but put in context it was quite a success according to most everyone I talked to who was there, and a disaster if you weren't and were reading opinions of non-attendees posting on social media.

    I had a great time, and saw lots of great sport. The endurance fiasco is IMO inexcusable but I put that squarely on the FEI and not the venue. I'm impressed with what was pulled off in 18 months.

    It was this WEG or no WEG, I'm glad I went and I'm glad we got a WEG at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • SlamDunk
    replied
    Originally posted by APirateLooksAtForty View Post
    Most likely because he provides for his own grooms and rented a house or condo, as many of the more experienced and well-known teams did. Therefore he wouldn't have had firsthand knowledge of the grooms conditions.
    This 100% I've stabled near to Eric at Spruce and his grooms are very happy and well taken care of

    Leave a comment:


  • poltroon
    replied
    Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post
    I think it is also kind of unrealistic to expect huge crowds here.
    The stands were packed for Kentucky. We totally have the fan base.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tiramit
    replied
    Originally posted by Moosequito View Post

    First he was being vilified for what he said, now for what he didn't say.
    I'm not vilifying anyone. I AM finding fault with his timing and carefully chosen words delivered in a highly public setting known to froth up the masses. To me, it was an unsportsmanlike and insensitive act. He has taken attention away from all of the athletes who achieved within that same setting, on "their day."

    He's also directed his ire toward the TIEC (at least it reads that way), when some of the issues were really the FEI. In this case the professional path is to work with the organization directly with an eye on the future, not try to create an online mob bashing what has already happened.

    There were amazing stories that came out of this WEG. In show jumping, we had the first woman to win gold. Not only did Simone and Alice win, but they did it without dropping a single rail all week! Our own team won gold in spectacular fashion, arguably one of the most exciting finals in history. Another inspiring story was the Colombian rider who climbed from 26th to 5th by riding 2 clear rounds on the last day. Remarkable sport.

    Add to that all of the other sports and athletes who rode in the same heat, stabled in the same barns, and had their own VIPs. The Para athletes rode day after day in the middle of the weather. Haven't heard any of them complaining. I'm fact, they seemed very pleased with the event.

    The weather was hot - unseasonably according to the locals. Today it was in the 70s and cool. Lovely weather and a complete change from yesterday. The olympics are often held in very warm climates during summer months. Rio? Atlanta? Heck, the last Winter Olympics were too warm and had to have snow created. Compete on the day or scratch, don't compete, do less than ideal, then go online and complain. That's why it smacks of sour grapes.

    I would have started this same thread if a USA rider had been so unsportsmanlike. Liking a rider and respecting his or her achievements doesn't mean they walk on water and should have every act or word heralded.
    Last edited by Tiramit; Sep. 24, 2018, 07:00 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tackpud
    replied
    Originally posted by AffirmedHope View Post

    This is what's funny to me about that whole paragraph. The only specific thing he said was that you had to walk through a construction zone to get to the VIP, but aside from saying 'ZZOMMMGGG ITS THE WUURSTTT EVERRRRR" he did not give specifics of why it was the worst ever. I doubt Bellissimo was serving cold cut sandwiches and tap water on plastic table linens.
    Want to bet on that last line?? Lol!! The VIP lounge did have plastic plates, plastic cutlery, and paper napkins along with cold sandwiches in the afternoons if you missed the short lunch time. Yes - the area was away from the heat but that's about all that made it special. Oh - that and the free booze.

    Leave a comment:


  • fordtraktor
    replied
    I think it is also kind of unrealistic to expect huge crowds here. SJ is much more a spectator sport in Europe. And plenty of American fans, like me, couldn't go for the thousand reasons we can't...money, time, work, family, farms. Pick one or all. Oh, and add hurricane (many locals in Eastern NC are still dealing with issues).

    i would love to attend if it comes back. My DH is commuting to a temp thing and was gone all of WEG so it was impossible this time....but wouldn't be if the dates worked for me in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • skydy
    replied
    I expect that when the facility is complete, it will probably be quite nice. It's just too bad that it wasn't done in time for the WEG.

    I also believe that everyone has the right to express an opinion about the venue as it was for the WEG.

    Leave a comment:


  • poltroon
    replied
    I think it's impossible to know the precise reason spectators weren't there but I think it's fair to say that there were plenty of reasons well beyond TIEC's control that spectators didn't arrive that would probably not carry over to a future Tryon WEG, should there be one. I get that that would be a big disappointment for the competitors, but I think it was just the confluence of many events.

    I think it is a reminder that the FEI's insistence on seating for gazillions of people might not be the best way to choose a venue.

    There's kind of three targets for this kind of criticism. First, the FEI, for the whole selection process in the first place. Second, the attempt to tell of the shortcomings so next time things are done better. But third, is the attempt to tear down TIEC as a future venue, and I don't think that's necessary or appropriate - with lead time and the experience they have, I bet it could handle this competition better in the future (especially in October).

    Leave a comment:


  • Moosequito
    replied
    The organizers dealt with the grooms housing at the beginning of week one, which was before the show jumpers even arrived. Perhaps he didn't include the issue of the groom's housing in his statement because it wasn't an issue for his grooms because the organizers had already arranged for alternatives long before the show jumping grooms arrived, so he didn't have any negative firsthand experience with that issue.

    First he was being vilified for what he said, now for what he didn't say.

    Leave a comment:


  • APirateLooksAtForty
    replied
    Most likely because he provides for his own grooms and rented a house or condo, as many of the more experienced and well-known teams did. Therefore he wouldn't have had firsthand knowledge of the grooms conditions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tiramit
    replied
    Originally posted by MHM View Post

    I did read Eric's entire post on Facebook, and I did not see one word about the grooms. He seemed to be very concerned about the comfort of the owners, riders, and VIPs. The grooms, also known as the hardest working people at any horse show, not so much. Or at least, he did not mention them.
    That omission was rather telling, wasn't it? It's been suggested that his was a carefully measured and worded post. If true, his grooms' comfort must not have been as important as his VIPs.

    I'm working off of memory that the SJ VIP tickets were close to $5k each or something like $26,000 for a table. That covered all days, meals, bar, private indoor area with a/c and external balcony over the ring, etc. The pricing wasn't that out of the norm when one considers it was for a week. I've been to events that were more than that for a few hour evening.

    Leave a comment:


  • Madison
    replied
    Originally posted by kenyarider View Post
    I loved the NBC Olympic Channel coverage. It did look very hot and the un-shaded stands were empty. But the horses and courses were wonderful!!!! The video view from above over the warm up area looked good, but I never saw any shots of the barns, VIP, or other areas. . . . Loved watching it.
    How the un-shaded stands looked depended on when you saw them - at times they had a decent number of people for the show jumping and at other times I think everyone was hiding from the sun under the stands!! It absolutely cleared out at every drag break. But, it was not the full house I might have expected with that many top riders and horses in one place. It would be interesting to know how many people cancelled their trips because of the storms, or were scared off by some of the challenges people encountered in the first couple of days.

    Leave a comment:


  • MHM
    replied
    Originally posted by skydy View Post

    I didn't look at the actual facebook post just the quote on this thread, but you're right, I don't see a specific complaint about the accommodations.

    I think this blog led me to believe that the sexes were not segregated, though it doesn't say it outright. https://britishgrooms.org.uk/blog/26...odation-at-weg
    The tents for separate genders were not spelled out anywhere I saw in print, but the video definitely showed a sign on the front of each tent, designating them for men or women.

    I did read Eric's entire post on Facebook, and I did not see one word about the grooms. He seemed to be very concerned about the comfort of the owners, riders, and VIPs. The grooms, also known as the hardest working people at any horse show, not so much. Or at least, he did not mention them.

    Leave a comment:


  • skydy
    replied
    Originally posted by MHM View Post
    OK, I will chime in here to say that when I saw a video posted on Facebook of the tent arrangement, it looked like there was a tent for men, and a tent for women. That does not make the arrangement acceptable in any way, but as far as that one point goes, it looked like the tents were divided by gender.

    I will also say that nowhere in Eric's post did I see one word about the grooms' accommodation or comfort. If I missed it, I'm sure someone will point it out to me.
    I didn't look at the actual facebook post just the quote on this thread, but you're right, I don't see a specific complaint about the accommodations.

    I think this blog led me to believe that the sexes were not segregated, though it doesn't say it outright. https://britishgrooms.org.uk/blog/26...odation-at-weg

    Leave a comment:


  • kenyarider
    replied
    I loved the NBC Olympic Channel coverage. It did look very hot and the un-shaded stands were empty. But the horses and courses were wonderful!!!! The video view from above over the warm up area looked good, but I never saw any shots of the barns, VIP, or other areas. . . . Loved watching it.

    Leave a comment:


  • MHM
    replied
    Originally posted by skydy View Post

    Expecting men and women (any people really) who don't know each other to sleep in the same tent is completely unacceptable and that is only the first issue with those accommodations. Thankfully owners and riders stepped up to keep their grooms from having to sleep there.

    That the organizers thought it was OK is embarrassing.
    OK, I will chime in here to say that when I saw a video posted on Facebook of the tent arrangement, it looked like there was a tent for men, and a tent for women. That does not make the arrangement acceptable in any way, but as far as that one point goes, it looked like the tents were divided by gender.

    I will also say that nowhere in Eric's post did I see one word about the grooms' accommodation or comfort. If I missed it, I'm sure someone will point it out to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jealoushe
    replied
    I love Eric.

    Eric is far from a spoilt brat. He came from absolutely nothing. I believe his parents were addicts and he escaped his home life at the barn. Eric has been through so much turmoil in his life, he has had the lowest of lows and the highest of highs (no pun intended ). I seriously doubt he would post such a thing publicly if he didn't feel strongly about it.

    Eric has plenty of Olympic and world medals; I really do not think (my own opinion I am not friends with him lol) that he is THAT upset Canada didn't do better at the Games. He said he was there to support the team and help the team.

    He also has these accomplishments to name a few;

    In 2007, Lamaze became the first Canadian jumping rider in 20 years to make the top ten in the world rankings. He was also the first North American jumping rider to exceed one million in prize money a year, a third of these earnings came as a result of winning the CN International Grand Prix at Spruce Meadows.[1]

    In the January 2009 Rolex World Rankings for show jumping by the International Equestrian Federation, Lamaze was named to the top spot for the first time.[3] Lamaze returned to No. 1 for July 2010
    He has shown around the world, and seen many many things. Passing his comments off as sour grapes reminds me a bit of the meetoo movement and victim blaming.

    It is not Bromonts fault Tryon is being seen as a failure. Bromont should NEVER have been awarded, they were practically in financial ruin when they were. Tryon agreed to host the games knowing the timeline. The blame lies fully on their own and the FEIs shoulders.

    Leave a comment:


  • skydy
    replied
    Originally posted by ladyj79 View Post

    Yup, lots of cothers, who also wanted to say it was better than stalls where they sleep at shows...failing to understand that a) that's not a thing at all at this level and b) I'm sure most of us would way rather sleep in a stall than 40 to a tent in awful weather, or honestly any weather. As I said before some people are awful!
    Expecting men and women (any people really) who don't know each other to sleep in the same tent is completely unacceptable and that is only the first issue with those accommodations. Thankfully owners and riders stepped up to keep their grooms from having to sleep there.

    That the organizers thought it was OK is embarrassing.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladyj79
    replied
    Originally posted by skydy View Post

    Oh. I didn't realize that anyone thought the bunk tent was good enough. It so obviously wasn't.
    Yup, lots of cothers, who also wanted to say it was better than stalls where they sleep at shows...failing to understand that a) that's not a thing at all at this level and b) I'm sure most of us would way rather sleep in a stall than 40 to a tent in awful weather, or honestly any weather. As I said before some people are awful!

    Leave a comment:


  • skydy
    replied
    Originally posted by ladyj79 View Post

    I'm not talking about the owners, I'm talking about the spectators/cothers who thought the accommodations were good enough.
    Oh. I didn't realize that anyone thought the bunk tent was good enough. It so obviously wasn't.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X