• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

BRAINSTORMING Thread: Post your favorite eventing solutions here

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BRAINSTORMING Thread: Post your favorite eventing solutions here

    I've been reading the Rolex accident threads with interest, as I read the Red Hills threads with interest, and as I read the November Ocala threads with interest.

    We have come up with a plethora of ideas over these difficult months, and we need to make a list that will be of use to the USEA and USEF, even the FEI.

    One unifying concern is that we are seeing that even the best of the best can make mistakes. So we need to consider reducing the deadly consequences of mistakes, as well as reducing the number of mistakes.

    Here are some of the options that have been tossed around.

    1. Do away with vertical faces, on fences with spreads or without spreads.

    2. Make XC fences collapsible with innovative engineering. The consequence for knocking such a fence down is elimination.

    3. Increase the use of frangible pins.

    4. Reduce the spreads of fences.

    5. Reduce speeds (already a rule change in the works for this).

    6. Change course design to include less technicality/ "showjumping over fixed fences".

    7. Bring back the long format, or some elements of it (vet checks, mandatory warmups).

    8. Make qualification criteria for Prelim and up much more stringent (there is already a rule change in the works for this).

    9. Conduct an analysis of style/proficiency (assessed by knowledegable officials) and their correlation with previous experience of horse and rider.

    10. Make 4-star events extremely difficult to qualify for/ be invited to.

    11. Institute a mandatory XC course meeting and course walk with a respected teacher and rider.

    12. Increase participation in the Instructor Certification plan, either by encouragement or requirement.

    13. Increase the powers of officials to stop a dangerous ride on XC.

    14. Conduct a detailed study of the numbers and frequency of serious injuries or deaths of horses and riders (TB or not TB's project).

    15. Conduct a detailed study of horse exercise physiology, including the causes of pulmonary hemorrhage (the latter is now delegated to a task force).

    16. Hold a moratorium on upper-level competitions until ____.

    We've made quite a list, wouldn't you say? Please add to/ comment on any or all of these as you see fit.
    Last edited by CookiePony; Aug. 2, 2008, 05:00 PM. Reason: changed title to include "eventing"
    SportHorseRiders.com
    Taco Blog
    *T3DE 2010 Pact*

  • #2
    1- Burn the square spreads! Keep a vertical face without a spread, but make it mandatory that every vertical be installed with frangible pins.

    2- Up the qualifications. Demand better results before moving up. It won't get rid of the "scary but clear" riders, but it will help slow some people down.

    Comment


    • #3
      SLOW DOWN SPEEDS

      RIDER RESPONSIBILITY

      I said this in a thread a little while ago

      Oxers: Frangible pins ALWAYS USED

      Verticals: Frangible pins, or built similarly to these fences:
      http://www.photostockplus.com/home.p...lbum_id=171186
      http://www.photostockplus.com/home.p...lbum_id=171186
      http://www.photostockplus.com/home.p...lbum_id=171186

      Ditches, water banks: Not much we can change, but they don't usually cause as many serious problems.

      Utilize more logs, hay bales, BRUSH FENCES, etc for jumps

      Tables: Slanted front, no vertical faces
      http://community.webshots.com/user/CloverExpress08/

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        c express- thanks for posting your comment from the other thread.

        Others: if you have made a post on another thread that includes your ideas for solutions, please copy them here. I would like us to have an archive of ideas and maybe even something that we could bring to the attention of the sport's leadership.
        SportHorseRiders.com
        Taco Blog
        *T3DE 2010 Pact*

        Comment


        • #5
          Great Thread

          Just have to say, I've been reading here for a long time but this is my first post. I have been eventing since my teens and just celebrated my 40th bday so I've seen the sport go through some major ups and downs. I won't say anymore on this thread here other than I think it is a great, useful and clear topic and well done!

          Comment


          • #6
            CP, very good list and I think it is fairly complete. I am not sure I agree with #16 but it belongs here as an idea to be considered.

            I'd add to #1 that square-topped fences should go -- make the back higher -- and for very wide oxers, use fill. Horses should not wonder whether they can or should put their feet down in the Footbridge (not that I think that was the main issue this weekend but it has certainly occurred to horses in the past).
            The big man -- my lost prince

            The little brother, now my main man

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by asterix View Post
              CP, very good list and I think it is fairly complete. I am not sure I agree with #16 but it belongs here as an idea to be considered.

              I'd add to #1 that square-topped fences should go -- make the back higher -- and for very wide oxers, use fill. Horses should not wonder whether they can or should put their feet down in the Footbridge (not that I think that was the main issue this weekend but it has certainly occurred to horses in the past).
              Actually, I think that's how Dornin's second fall occurred. A friend of mine has his facebook pics from this years rolex and there is a horse standing in the middle of the footbridge and the rider is being thrown over his head.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by CookiePony View Post

                2. Make XC fences collapsible with innovative engineering.
                I wonder if there are any engineering schools/colleges with engineering programs that have IHSA or similar teams that would encourage their members to tackle this as a senior project or something like that. I was on the team at Ga Tech I was one of the few riders who wasnt an engineering major.

                Just a thought....
                I have Higher Standards... do you?
                Apalachicola Native (Alfie), '02 TB Gelding,
                Wild Man of Borneo (Hank), '03 Redtick coonhound,
                Augustus McRae (Gus), '01 Bluetick coonhound

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think they might want to go back

                  and see what the courses looked like 40 years ago. The original purpose was 'the Military." A horse should go thru nearly anything, TRUSTING HIS RIDER. Now there have been great safety improvements, but do we really need cheese wedges with mice sticking out the top? Can't they do innovative things on a course, with the new pins?
                  I guess I think they should ALWAYS build an alternate route [safer] unless it is a straight up jump.
                  As much as I dislike regulation, there perhaps needs to be a little more here, and an Invitational Rolex is sounding better and better to me.
                  Qualifers sound like a good idea too.

                  Let's all pray for a safe Badminton
                  Another killer of threads

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    A couple more

                    1. Use the Rider Rep system all the time. Expand and explain it.
                    2. In Endurance, every horse death results in an immediate inquiry, and if the rider`s actions are found to be contributory, he/she is subject to anything from public censure (least penalty) to fines, suspension, etc.
                    This REALLY makes people think about going too hard with a tired horse.
                    3.Mandatory xc walks with the xc designer at major events, major to be determined.
                    4.More articles about rider responsibility in USEA News by respected ULRs.
                    5. More stringent penalties for dangerous riding.
                    I`ll think of some more, but those are a few.
                    The biggest difference I see between eventing`s response and endurance`s response to horse death, is that in eventing, the rider tends to be swamped with sympathy, whereas in endurance, the rider has to come before an inquiry to determine possible blame.
                    It makes endurance riders damn careful, let me tell you.
                    http://www.tamarackhill.com/

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Basically if you have a table or something like the footbridge, DON'T TAKE A TUG!
                      Anyway, what should be happening is NOT banning verticals and square oxers. If you can't ride them, go home and practice. BUT what's happening is that if you make a mistake, your horse and you can get seriously injured. THAT has to stop. I think if we can put a man on the moon, we can certainly make a table, vertical, square oxer collapsible so the rider/horse doesn't die.
                      Stop with that, will ya?
                      Anyway, onto address the points above.
                      Even duct tape can't fix stupid

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Basically, continue with what Denny said and add from CookiePony:

                        2. Make XC fences collapsible with innovative engineering. The consequence for knocking such a fence down is elimination.

                        3. Increase the use of frangible pins.

                        7. Bring back the long format, or some elements of it (vet checks, mandatory warmups).

                        8. Make qualification criteria for Prelim and up much more stringent (there is already a rule change in the works for this).

                        9. Conduct an analysis of style/proficiency (assessed by knowledegable officials) and their correlation with previous experience of horse and rider.

                        10. Make 4-star events extremely difficult to qualify for/ be invited to.

                        12. Increase participation in the Instructor Certification plan, either by encouragement or requirement.

                        13. Increase the powers of officials to stop a dangerous ride on XC.

                        14. Conduct a detailed study of the numbers and frequency of serious injuries or deaths of horses and riders (TB or not TB's project).

                        15. Conduct a detailed study of horse exercise physiology, including the causes of pulmonary hemorrhage (the latter is now delegated to a task force).
                        Even duct tape can't fix stupid

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          CookiePony -

                          Great idea. Thanks!

                          Something has been rolling around in my mind after reading a description on one of the related threads of a rider falling off, looking dazed, and the poster (who apparently witnessed this) being surprised that the rider got back on looking as dazed as the rider did. And the rider later suffered a serious accident on the course.

                          In a sports related fall or potential injury (in most / all sports performed on a high level), while the athlete's opinion is certainly important in the assessment of whether they are physically able to continue (or should continue), the final decision of their continued participation is based on the assessment of someone with medical training - and importantly someone other than just the athlete. With no disrespect to the athlete (of any sport), given that the athlete would be pumped up on adrenaline and the fall may have included a minor head injury, the athlete him/herself would not necessarily be a reliable / fair / unbiased final decision-maker on this.

                          On one of the related threads, flutie1 posted something about a possible rule change (apparently to be voted on soon), that if a rider falls off, that is automatic disqualification.

                          If that rule change goes through, obviously the above is mute. But if it does not, then it seems like there should be someone assessing the competency of the rider to continue after a fall other than just the rider him/herself. Not that the whole event needs to be delayed to give the rider a complete physical exam. But to me (my day job is medicine), it seems like an obvious "gap in the system" to not have the rider's competency (especially mental / cognitive) assessed after a fall. Shoot...even in boxing, the referee can stop the fight if a boxer appears stunned (or given that it is boxing, too stunned).

                          WJ

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Revamp the dressage tests so that they focus on balance.

                            What we're learning from some of these XC 'accidents' is the importance of balance and the rider's understanding of when, where and how to rebalance on XC.

                            We can teach balance/rebalance at the gallop but we can also make it a priority in the dressage ring.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Can we break down the proposals by topic?

                              1. Horse experience qualifications

                              2. Rider experience qualifications

                              3. Terrain modification

                              4. Jumps modifications

                              5. Procedural modifications after injury and/or before and after XC

                              6. Total design modifications, including speed, length of course, number of jumping efforts, etc.

                              7. Rethinking how the phases fit together

                              With proposed rules modifications after all this has been hashed out and not before.

                              If we can break down the issues into smaller and more focused ones, they can be addressed with more precision and more dialog.
                              "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                              Thread killer Extraordinaire

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by CookiePony View Post

                                2. Make XC fences collapsible with innovative engineering. The consequence for knocking such a fence down is elimination.
                                Easier said than done, and it will further encourage bad riding.

                                For several years there has been a strong emphasis on "safe" fence shapes, tilted tabletops, etc. Unintended result: People are moving up faster than they should.

                                Frankly, I'm wondering, where are all the much-maligned square tables and vertical faces? They certainly aren't here.

                                XC fences are already expensive as heck to build. For collapsible fences I can't even begin to estimate the cost, but I'm sure you can multiply the present cost by 2 or 3x and up.

                                Mandating collapsible fences would be the end of the sport as we know it, because organizers can't afford to abandon their existing jump inventory and replace it with jumps that cost lots more and require a Ga. Tech engineer (egads!) to build, certify, and maintain them.

                                Imagine what could happen if one of them failed to perform? The rider might say "It's not my fault that my horse died. The stupid jump didn't fall down. Who certified it? Let's sue them!"

                                The best solution is BE PREPARED AND RIDE SMART!
                                Glenn
                                Had enough hopey-changey yet?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Make the existing requirements for move ups requirements for both Horse and Rider, not just Rider.

                                  Make a long format *** a requirement for both horse and rider before moving up to a **** of either format, and add a long format *** at Rolex to be run along with the short format ****. It could also be a qualifying round for the next year's ****.

                                  N
                                  www.canterusa.org

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I am sorry but I find this to be myopic. Yes, a good, safe fence will be more expensive but I sure as HELL assure you that it will be cheaper than a vet bill, a loss of life or the risk of bad publicity or law suits that can shut this sport down. To say that it is too expensive is a cop out. Remember that in a study of 600 horses and riders it was found that 1 in every 3 horse falls results in a major horse injury and 1 in every 100 falls results in the horse's death (Murray et. al, 2006) regardless of cause.

                                    How would a fence that will collapse if a horse hits the face but can still bank off the top encourage bad riding? To use your logic, just because you have air bags in your car I assume you speed or play chicken with trucks on the road.

                                    Again, to pawn off responsibility SOLEY as a rider's function is to say that all car accidents are the driver's responsibility or that all plane crashes are the pilots. This is EVERYONE'S responsibility.

                                    Reed

                                    Originally posted by gooddirt View Post
                                    Easier said than done, and it will further encourage bad riding.

                                    For several years there has been a strong emphasis on "safe" fence shapes, tilted tabletops, etc. Unintended result: People are moving up faster than they should.

                                    Frankly, I'm wondering, where are all the much-maligned square tables and vertical faces? They certainly aren't here.

                                    XC fences are already expensive as heck to build. For collapsible fences I can't even begin to estimate the cost, but I'm sure you can multiply the present cost by 2 or 3x and up.

                                    Mandating collapsible fences would be the end of the sport as we know it, because organizers can't afford to abandon their existing jump inventory and replace it with jumps that cost lots more and require a Ga. Tech engineer (egads!) to build, certify, and maintain them.

                                    Imagine what could happen if one of them failed to perform? The rider might say "It's not my fault that my horse died. The stupid jump didn't fall down. Who certified it? Let's sue them!"

                                    The best solution is BE PREPARED AND RIDE SMART!
                                    Glenn

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I think I disagree with one

                                      "5. Reduce speeds (already a rule change in the works for this)."

                                      Perhaps change the wording to "re-evaluate what speeds are appropriate for what levels" (and phases, if some version of the long format were to be reconsidered). As several posters have pointed out, steeplechasers, p2p riders, etc. all travel at a much higher rate of speed than eventers typically do. They ride in a different position, and therefore fall differently. There was an excellent article in the British Eventing magazine a couple of years ago about learning how to fall, and using National Hunt jockeys as their models.

                                      Speed in itself may not be the culprit.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Make the jumps out of something soft and flexible. Get Hollywood/Disney Theme Park designers in on this one; they are masters at making styrofoam look like solid granite! In WWII the set designers from Hollywood were sent to England to disguise the large buildup of planes and equipment to be used in the D-Day invasion. I'm sure building jumps would be a piece of cake for them.

                                        After the soft/flexible jump is made, then install an electric eye/laser beam across the top of it. If the horse drags his feet through the soft "top," then the beam is broken, resulting in a penalty.

                                        The horses would think they had to clear the entire jump, but yet if they didn't make it, they wouldn't die or sustain horrible injuries.

                                        The technology is there, but I wonder if the "powers that be" will be bold enough to make the necessary changes.
                                        Barbara www.customstockties.com
                                        Tulsa-QH; Schnickelfritz-Holsteiner; Atikus-Danish Warmblood; Buddy-QH/TB; Winston-Shire; Thomas-Percheron/TB; Mac-Belgian Draft, gone but never forgotten

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X