• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

The Anky thread that has nothing to do with anything but has a whole lot to say about alot

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Original Poster

    Anky is a gorgeous rider. I think that the picture that PaulaM posted of Junior was typical of how Anky had to ride him with all of the hubbub going on around her. There were sponsors out looking around the course, riders walking the lines, and kids rolling down and running up the grass hill in front of the stands. Junior did not put a foot wrong, he was obedient and did his job------he just looked very strong. She reassured him but he is a young stallion and the atmosphere was alot for him to handle. On the Wednesday that we watched Spruce Meadows gave her NO time to warm him up so she did it in the ring!!!! If you have ever been to Spruce you know that's a holy sh&% experience for anyone. So back off the slagging of Anky and appreciate what she did and will continue to do. Show Dressage at it's top level.


    • #62
      <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Accomplishments don't mean a lot all the time either <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

      Um ........I don't agree. Especially not in dressage. I know how gosh darn hard it is for me to do my dinky little Training level tests. For someone to acceive that many accomplishments in such a hard dicipline she has to be doing something right. It isn't like there was just one instance. I don't think you can accuratly judge a horse and rider untill you yourself have ridden at the level they do. And I certainly don't think you can deny a list of acceievments like the one she has. To say she didn't deserve those awards is basically saying all of competative dressage is wrong because she is obviously what the judges are looking for.


      • #63
        Totally agree with Velvet on this one (shocking, huh?). And adding on to Eilonwy's good points is this: Anky has brought a number of horses to the FEI levels; not just one! Also, Bonfire is at least 17 (maybe older) and still SOUND! If that isn't a testament to the correctness of someone's training methods than I'm sure I don't know what is. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif[/img]

        I don't think there is any ONE person in any discipline that you can unequivocally say is the BEST. There are a number of people in every discipline who are among the best, and that's a pretty nice place to be.

        P.S. I personally do not see where comparing a hunter rider's seat to a dressage rider's seat is of any value -- they are two different disciplines!


        • #64
          I would much rather watch a dressage rider who may flop their legs in rhythm than a hunter rider kissing the horse's ears. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_rolleyes.gif[/img] As for good seats, how about Gunther Siedel or C. Traurig or Klimke, or Debbie MacDonald?


          • #65
            I like her riding, I think she presents a pretty picture on a horse.

            I have a question that on one has answered yet however...

            How can one be correct if a horse is broken at the 4th vertebra? Is it ok now not to be through and connected in Grand Prix tests?

            If you look at Anky's photos, you will see this over and over.

            Is it not considered important to have a "thru" horse anymore? Or one that is engaged? I see in many photos her horse not working off the hind end.

            I'm not trying to say what she does is wrong or trying to stir up more trouble, I'm just trying to understand what is correct and what isn't.

            In the 15 years that I have been riding dressage, these things that I mentioned above, have been incorrect. When did this change?

            Can anyone explain this to me? [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_confused.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_confused.gif[/img]

            I\'m aging like fine wine....I\'m getting complex and fruity...


            • #66
              The pictures of her horse in that deep outline were taken in the warm-up arena, not during competition. She warms-up very deep, but right before her test, she rides her horse into an uphill outline and the competition photos show that. [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img]


              • #67
                Ok, so this brings up another question.
                It's ok to school incorrectly, broken vertebre, overbent?

                I again, have been taught and all that I have read tells me to school correctly, show the same, not school one way, and show another.

                [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_confused.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_confused.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_confused.gif[/img]

                I\'m aging like fine wine....I\'m getting complex and fruity...


                • #68
                  I would like an explanation of what riding with the neck over-bent does for a horse. I've not heard or read anything that gives me a good idea. I may just be over-sensitive to the issue, having had a horse whose main evasion was going behind the bit. Why wouldn't it be as easy for horses trained this way to use it as an evasion? Don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying they *are* going to do it in expert hands, but if this becomes acceptable, many less than expert riders are going to be doing it.

                  As far as Anky's riding, there's no denying that she's an expert. That doesn't mean, of course, that she's perfect. If I question some of what she does, that does not take away from her expertise. There are many very good riders, but apparently she has had the winning combinations many times. She certainly has been a boon in popularizing dressage, all the more reason to not ride a horse with its neck over-bent and waaay behind the vertical, unless she can say what the bio-mechanics are of the activity.

                  If any of you reading this know what it is accomplishing, I would appreciate an explanation as I can't quite understand yet.


                  • #69
                    Mary Wanless stated publicly in a clinic in Canada last November that Anky is the most perfect rider she has ever seen. Mary stated that Anky's position is absolutely classic and that she uses her body position, particularily her front, in a way that enables her to be very effective with her aids yet ride very softly at the same time.


                    • #70
                      You know, I'm really tired of hearing about Anky, competition, deep vs. not deep, etc. I'm not even reading this thread anymore. I just hope at least some of you guys have some common sense. Bye y'all.

                      --Checkers324, forever faithful in the classical methods... The old masters' knowledge cannot be denied!
                      [I]\"His [the horse\'s] is a power enhanced by pride, a courage heightened by challenge. His is a swiftness intensified by strength, a majesty magnified by grace. His is a timeless beauty touched with gentleness, a spirit that calls our hearts to dream


                      • #71
                        I never understood this to be a problem with how Anky looks on a horse.
                        I thought we were talking about how the horse was being schooled.

                        Anky is a beautiful rider, her position is perfect.

                        That's never been in question.
                        My question is, and has been...

                        How do the mechanics of riding a horse way behind the bit, and over bent, help a horse in his training? Especially when you are showing in a completly different frame? Is there anyone out there that can explain this??


                        I\'m aging like fine wine....I\'m getting complex and fruity...


                        • #72
                          Ok, I'm going to step out on a limb here. I know very little of the mechanics of deep. But from what I have read and seen, deep does not just employ the horses neck. Deep is the haunches engaged, the horse working over the back, a lift to the shoulders. You are NOT holding the horses head down with your hands. Deep actually promotes flexability and engagement.

                          Oh goodness, please some brave soul help me out here.

                          There was a good article on deep in I believe "Hunter and Sport Horse" magazine. Jean Brinkmann was describing deep. If you can wrangle up the magazine it is worth the read.

                          What gets people in trouble, is those who see Anky, or Isabelle doing this exercise, they go home, try to duplicate it and get their horses all stuck and on the forhand. Correct deep work is misunderstood by many many many people. And as someone earlier stated, deep is only done for short periods of time. You don't spend your hour schooling session, 6 days a week riding deep. As with everything, good in moderation.

                          HELLLLLLLPPPPPPP, Why can't I leave this thread alone.


                          • #73
                            For a super article on "riding deep", read the July/August issue of "Hunter & Sport Horse" - it really describes how "deep" is a tool for getting the horse "through" and "engaged".

                            I just started taking dressage lessons with an upper level rider who trains with an Olympic dressage rider. I have made more improvement in a month with my mare than over the past year. We do incorporate "deep" into our warm-up.

                            The top riders and trainers use this method with great success. I have refrained from getting into this argument since I know that the training I am receiving is correct and it is kind of pointless to try and debate it with people who really don't seem to have a clear idea of what it is like to ride at the upper levels. When they are asked to ride at a demonstration at Spruce Meadows or when they win an Olympic Gold Medal, then they can judge all they want.

                            And I think that picking a horse or rider to bits from one picture is nonproductive to say the least. The picture only catches one moment in time and without witnessing an entire test or performance, how can we adequately judge a horse and rider at all?

                            Donning flamesuit now!


                            • #74
                              I won't profess to being (*giggle*) anywhere close to being a dressage expert, but all the same, I have just one question to pose...

                              What if the ODG's aren't right?

                              I mean, speaking from the hunter world, we have a bunch of current ODGs that have usurped the last group of ODGs. But if we hadn't taken the time to listen to the current ODGs, back when they were NOT actually OLD or DEAD, but were alive and kicking, we would still be sitting somewhere around the horse's tail over the top of a jump...
                              Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.


                              • #75
                                The problem with trying to explain how it is done correctly is pretty near impossible. Riding is a feel. You have to be able to ride under someone who really knows how to ride a horse deep so they can tell you when it's correct. If you just watch and try to emulate what you "think" you see (with no idea of the feeling), you'll get the wrong thing.

                                When you ride a horse that is truly deep and over the back, but elastic, supple and free in the front...you'll know it. And you'll know there is nothing like that feeling and everything you thought about it was wrong.

                                Guess that's my last comment on this issue (yeah, right--if I can stay away).
                                "And I'm thinking you weren't burdened with an overabundance of schooling." - Capt Reynolds "Firefly"


                                • #76



                                  • #77
                                    This is how I look at it.
                                    Anky, Nicole,Isabel, and all the others that are top riders in our sport have a big responsibility.

                                    Because they have the ability, and the feel to do something that "appears" to be less than correct or accepted training. They go on to win the gold medal, then every yahoo in the dressage world with no idea of the why's and wherefore's of riding deep will go and bury their horse's head in their chests and think they're riding "deep" when in fact their doing more harm than good.

                                    I have always been taught that a horse cannot be through with a broken 4th vertebra. I don't care what anyone says, it cannot be through in the back and hind end if he's broken the connection in the neck. He also cannot be raising the wither if he's not connected.

                                    I think it's wrong, incorrect, and flawed training. and i imagine that we will be arguing about this for a long time. But I am hoping that one of these days, this "fad" will subside, and the top riders will come back to the classical way of doing things.

                                    This is also my last post on the subject as we could be argueing about this forever. Kinda like religion and politics heh?? [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_wink.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img] [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_eek.gif[/img]

                                    I\'m aging like fine wine....I\'m getting complex and fruity...


                                    • #78
                                      Well, since I set myself up on another thread for a critique, I may as well crucify myself here....

                                      Here's me and the same 4 yr old, same day as the other photo was taken but earlier in the ride. I KNOW that he's behind the vertical and normally his position is not this way. But he's only 4 and still not always steady in his position and this kind of thing can happen. But I do warm him up "deep" like this in the neck...

                                      I know it's impossible, but TRY to ignore the nose position and look at his legs. Do you think he's stepping under? I do. And this is the warm up of our ride - you can see another picture on the critique thread of our "working frame". I can move his neck where I want it and to me that's a good thing.
                                      Besides, I wuv him [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_razz.gif[/img]


                                      • #79
                                        If we assume (for the moment only) that I am an expert rider, capable of riding my horse through and forward in all gaits, at what point do I start riding deep? Is it started at the low levels or is it only a higher level exercise? Once that is figured out, *why* do I do it? What does it accomplish? People are saying it's good to do it but not why. So I do it for a few minutes at a time and I do it correctly, what have I done?

                                        This appears to be the same type of situation as there is in the rein back. There is the opinion that the rein back is never to be over-trained, then some say that reinback can help develop muscles in the hindquarters and should be used accordingly. Two different points of view, but what are the mechanics involved?

                                        A lot of us go on hearsay, we do it because it works for someone else, but how often do we actually know *what* we are doing? For the tried-and-true training, it's probable safe to accept and use the principles that are taught, but for something new and relatively untried, shouldn't we know more than just that the Olympic riders are using it?

                                        I'm not saying it's right or wrong, I just want to know what it is supposed to accomplish, and why.


                                        • #80
                                          Seems like the only answer to this thread is to get Anky involved. She then can explain what was going on at SM and what she�s doing when she trains/rides/competes with her horses. You all can argue for ever about training/riding but if the object of you criticism is not able/here to defend /explain herself, you�d be best off to not relate your remarks to that persons riding. It REALLY easy to criticize someone when their not around. Sure, you can have an opinion and express it but critics are a dime a dozen.