The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May. 2, 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    357

    Default Saddle pad question - Thin Line, Ultra TL or BoT?

    So I am still sorting out back/body pain on my horse coming back after a few years of loafing. Have injected hocks, cleared stifles and lower legs. Treated and cured ulcers (scoped before and after). Had saddle fitter out. Doing vet approved conditioning plan.

    Now I am very tuned in to his girthy behavior. Have researched Thin Line and Back on Track pads. I think TL will make more of a difference for us than BoT. Do I want the regular TL? Or the Ultra? Does 1/8" difference in thickness make THAT much difference in saddle fit? My saddle has been flocked for him, but it's not a custom saddle. I usually use a simple pad - either a Moxie or single weight poly pad.

    I know there is the combo TL BoT pad, but I think I would rather have the two pads separate, if I decide to even try a BoT pad. It's about the same price to buy the two separate pads or the combo.

    Any guidance?
    Fox Wood Farm



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov. 16, 2009
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    804

    Default

    I love my Thinline to the moon and back. I do not think there's much difference between the Ultra and regular as far as saddle fit goes. I have the regular and it never threw off the fit of my saddle, which was flocked regularly to fit my horse. I have never tried the Back on Track pad though, so I am coming at you with a one sided opinion! I have a Thin Line girl too, and love that as well.



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb. 19, 2009
    Posts
    5,437

    Default

    Thinline says that the Ultra is more for rider comfort, the regular for the horse's comfort. I've had both, and neither affected saddle fit.



  4. #4
    Join Date
    May. 2, 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KateKat View Post
    Thinline says that the Ultra is more for rider comfort, the regular for the horse's comfort. I've had both, and neither affected saddle fit.
    Thanks KK,
    I knew there had to be a reason... I will try the regular!
    Fox Wood Farm



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec. 6, 2000
    Location
    SE Mass
    Posts
    4,515

    Default

    I have the Thinline Trifecta and LOVE it. You can add inserts to lift the front and/or the back.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec. 27, 2001
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    6,995

    Default

    If your horse is coming back to work you may want a shimmable pad. After having a horse come back from time off and another young one grow and change on me I have switched to all pads that give me a shim option to help keep the saddles optimal even when the horses fluctuate due to work etc.
    The big man -- no longer an only child

    His new little brother



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr. 20, 2013
    Location
    Area IV
    Posts
    1,692

    Default

    And then there is Ecogold which I do not own but have been reading about. They have a cross country pad I see some use, sometimes with a half pad on top. Shock absorbing pad shopping is tedious....and expensive!



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul. 14, 2010
    Location
    North AL
    Posts
    948

    Default

    I have a regular Thin Line and the sheepskin one that is shimable.I really like them both. I use the regular one with my dressage saddle with fits well, and the shimable one with my jump saddle as it needs a little padding in the back.



  9. #9
    Join Date
    May. 2, 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    357

    Default

    I have a shimmable mattes half pad. And an ecogold. Both are too thick for my saddle, which, if anything may need to be a half tree size wider depending on how he muscles up.

    Cindy - yes, saddle PAD shopping of any sort is very expensive!
    Fox Wood Farm



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov. 16, 2000
    Location
    Concord, NH
    Posts
    5,164

    Default

    I think it really depends on what you need the pad for. I've had horses who practically shimmy under a real sheepskin fleece because it feels so good to them and they want nothing else - and honestly, I like the cheaper Dover one with NO rolls on the front or back - it will fit better and go under your saddle pad. It's also the thinnest for sheepskin.

    My uber sensitive mare liked the Thinline a lot until the she got too narrow and I needed more bulk then the Pro-Lite works just as well. I use a Poly Pad under it as she cannot have a seam in the saddle pad.

    And if the horse likes Back on Track? You have to use that regardless of what else you have between that and the saddle. If the horse is neutral to the BOT majik, (and it seems they either totally love it, or MEH) don't spend the $$ on it.



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,424

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilary View Post
    I think it really depends on what you need the pad for. I've had horses who practically shimmy under a real sheepskin fleece because it feels so good to them and they want nothing else - and honestly, I like the cheaper Dover one with NO rolls on the front or back - it will fit better and go under your saddle pad. It's also the thinnest for sheepskin.

    My uber sensitive mare liked the Thinline a lot until the she got too narrow and I needed more bulk then the Pro-Lite works just as well. I use a Poly Pad under it as she cannot have a seam in the saddle pad.

    And if the horse likes Back on Track? You have to use that regardless of what else you have between that and the saddle. If the horse is neutral to the BOT majik, (and it seems they either totally love it, or MEH) don't spend the $$ on it.
    Which Dover pad? I have been looking for a less bulky sheepskin pad!
    There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the
    inside of a man.

    -Sir Winston Churchill



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun. 27, 2002
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    5,254

    Default

    I have a Thinline Trifecta and also the sheepskin version, for different saddles. The Trifecta (non-sheepskin) is one of the most versatile pads I've ever used because it doesn't add any real bulk under the saddle, but is shimmable if you have a horse that is changing or need to tweak saddle fit slightly.



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov. 16, 2000
    Location
    Concord, NH
    Posts
    5,164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodhillsmanhattan View Post
    Which Dover pad? I have been looking for a less bulky sheepskin pad!
    Hmmm - looks like they don't have it anymore - it was a Dover brand, and cost about $90. And didn't have any rolled edges. This is the closest to what it looked like: http://www.doversaddlery.com/flcwrk-...fvd0vdojkam4ck



Similar Threads

  1. Saddle repair question - flap wearing thin
    By CAJumper in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Mar. 10, 2013, 09:33 PM
  2. Thin line Vs. Ultra thinline
    By enjoytheride in forum Eventing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jun. 13, 2012, 07:52 PM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: May. 29, 2012, 02:27 PM
  4. Finish Line's Ultra Fire?
    By SCF01 in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Aug. 11, 2009, 01:02 PM
  5. KK Ultra Aurigan Bits: thin, thick, heavy, light..
    By islandrider in forum Dressage
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: Jul. 29, 2008, 09:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness