The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 63
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr. 25, 2011
    Posts
    856

    Default

    So stem cell research should be encouraged.



  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan. 4, 2007
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    41,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by happymom View Post
    So stem cell research should be encouraged.
    Can't tell what you are trying to say there.

    When any kind of cell research, including stem cell research is what gives you or your kid a chance to get well, as it is happening to many already, then I expect you will be glad someone did that research.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan. 14, 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    5,829

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by happymom View Post
    So stem cell research should be encouraged.
    Absolutely.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct. 25, 2012
    Posts
    4,421

    Default

    I heartily agree with stem-cell research. I do NOT necessarily agree with the idea the corporations can be allowed to "own" biological products of Nature.

    I DO believe that this kind of life-saving research should be subsidized by governments, and the results then be in the public domain.

    As in, no corporation should be holding your life hostage for profit.

    Capice?


    4 members found this post helpful.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec. 30, 2000
    Location
    The land of heat waves and unbearable humidity
    Posts
    4,039

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enjoytheride View Post
    I found this article very informative.

    http://doccamiryan.wordpress.com/201...ont-need-gmos/
    That woman is full of shit.

    If GMO is really safe, then why doesn't Monsanto label their products GMO? Why is the rest of the world banning GMO? Why doesn't Monsanto release all their research for all to read? What are they hiding?

    I found this report very informative:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/118876549/...ths#fullscreen
    "Common sense is so rare nowadays, it should be classified as a super power."-Craig Bear Laubscher



  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb. 28, 2001
    Posts
    15,232

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikki^ View Post

    What about horse feed? Could happen.
    Almost ALL horse feed already is! If it contains soy-anything, it is GMO.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan. 4, 2007
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    41,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikki^ View Post
    That woman is full of shit.

    If GMO is really safe, then why doesn't Monsanto label their products GMO? Why is the rest of the world banning GMO? Why doesn't Monsanto release all their research for all to read? What are they hiding?

    I found this report very informative:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/118876549/...ths#fullscreen

    One reason some countries are trying to ban GMOs is because it is part of trade barriers, as the hormones in beef ban was until the USA and good science prevailed and won in the International Tribunal case, although it took 10 years to get there.

    Europe is very protective and subsidizes their farmers, or their food would be so much of it imported.
    They can't compete with other countries, their cost of production is way too high, land for one too tight.

    Why do they protect farmers at great cost with any and all excuses they can?
    After the recent wars, europeans know how important it is to be self sufficient when it comes to all we get from farm products, that is not only food.

    Of course, other countries that would love to have those customers to sell to object, as the USA did with hormones in beef, where the amount beef given hormones has is less than we produce in our own bodies and even less than vegetables have, so it really was a non-issue used for a trade barrier, obvious to anyone, but that is the way the game is played.

    As for GMOs, there are all kind of techniques and products that are GMO and some of those have been one (of several) reason now "only" 1/2 of the world, not as a few decades ago, 2/3 of the world is starving.

    Do learn more about GMOs than hatchet type articles put out by some with agendas of all kinds, because there really is much more to those technologies and products than "frankenfood" stories make it be.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct. 25, 2012
    Posts
    4,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LMH View Post
    Almost ALL horse feed already is! If it contains soy-anything, it is GMO.
    And it's no coincidence the horses are suddenly coming up with all these metabolic ailments, ulcers, new diseases we never saw 30 years ago.

    That's why I've got all but the very oldest and hardest keepers now eating 100% natural pasture and hay and no concentrates whatsoever. Back to the Future--all are shiny, bright-eyed and at natural weight with no supplementation or meds whatsoever. This crowd averages age 21, too!



  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr. 3, 2006
    Location
    Spooner, WI
    Posts
    2,290

    Default

    I stopped eating processed foods 10+ years ago as well as (all but) stopped using commercial horse feeds. I feed my chickens organic and my dogs and cats are on grain free foods.

    I consider most of what's out there for food in a box a slow acting toxin. I grow my veggies and fruits either eat venison or local meats. I weigh 115 pounds at age 54 and I don't "diet". I changed my eating habits. NO corn syrup allowed.

    A "treat" for me is usually something awful like soda or potato chips. Even then the soda comes from Mexico and is made with sugar.



  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb. 8, 2008
    Location
    Delaware Valley
    Posts
    1,658

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enjoytheride View Post
    I found this article very informative.

    http://doccamiryan.wordpress.com/201...ont-need-gmos/
    Yes. It's a bit biased, but less biased (and misinformed) than the anti-GMO pseudoscience that comes across my Facebook feed every day. I'm super liberal, not a fan of Monsanto, and pesco-vegan, but I'm not willing to mindlessly jump on the "GMO is evil" bandwagon.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Apr. 3, 2006
    Location
    Spooner, WI
    Posts
    2,290

    Default

    GMO's may not be evil but we really don't know since they are relatively new. Think asbestos. However, Monsanto's relationship with Blackwater is highly suspect.

    I just Googled it, no they don't own them but they use them against activists etc.



  12. #32
    Join Date
    Sep. 11, 2008
    Location
    Snohomish, WA
    Posts
    4,087

    Default

    Bluey - it's her sig. line - it was a joke -

    Quote Originally Posted by Bluey View Post
    In a way, that is exactly the trouble, lack of even the most basic education, as is obvious.

    GMOs are way too many in many diverse ways and forms to even try to make them all be about any one thing and that evil.
    That is a very broad fields that is just now being tapped with all the new ways continuously discovered.

    If antibiotics had been discovered in todays anti-science world, we would still be dying like flies from all kinds of infections, as people used to do before we had them.
    I should know, I was one of the first babies in the hospital with advanced pneumonia in the 1940's to get that new strange medicine "antibiotic", that saved me.



  13. #33
    Join Date
    Sep. 11, 2008
    Location
    Snohomish, WA
    Posts
    4,087

    Default

    There's either so much sugar in their food or there's really nothing. Reading labels has become very interesting.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Eboshi View Post
    And it's no coincidence the horses are suddenly coming up with all these metabolic ailments, ulcers, new diseases we never saw 30 years ago.

    That's why I've got all but the very oldest and hardest keepers now eating 100% natural pasture and hay and no concentrates whatsoever. Back to the Future--all are shiny, bright-eyed and at natural weight with no supplementation or meds whatsoever. This crowd averages age 21, too!



  14. #34
    Join Date
    Feb. 28, 2001
    Posts
    15,232

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Eboshi View Post
    And it's no coincidence the horses are suddenly coming up with all these metabolic ailments, ulcers, new diseases we never saw 30 years ago.

    That's why I've got all but the very oldest and hardest keepers now eating 100% natural pasture and hay and no concentrates whatsoever. Back to the Future--all are shiny, bright-eyed and at natural weight with no supplementation or meds whatsoever. This crowd averages age 21, too!
    bingo.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Oct. 21, 1999
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    12,424

    Default

    This is a very interesting discussion. I'm on the fence, willing to give GMO a chance and not terribly worried about the modifications themselves. But, I am worried about the control that large corporations have over these products, and, maybe even more about the lack of diversity that could very well be developing because the superior productive capabilities of the genetically modified products that are out there make it senseless for the large farming organizations that now dominate our farming landscape to utilize anything else. In a world where we already feel the need to store heirloom seed in almost impenetrable facilities, in case of some unforeseen disaster, do we really need to reach the point where we are producing only a limited number of food varieties per crop?

    I don't know the answer, but I do feel that, in this new era that we are entering, we had better have adequate safeguards in place before we proceed too much further.
    Originally Posted by Alagirl
    We just love to shame poor people...when in reality, we are all just peasants.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Sep. 11, 2008
    Location
    Snohomish, WA
    Posts
    4,087

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    This is a very interesting discussion. I'm on the fence, willing to give GMO a chance and not terribly worried about the modifications themselves. But, I am worried about the control that large corporations have over these products, and, maybe even more about the lack of diversity that could very well be developing because the superior productive capabilities of the genetically modified products that are out there make it senseless for the large farming organizations that now dominate our farming landscape to utilize anything else. In a world where we already feel the need to store heirloom seed in almost impenetrable facilities, in case of some unforeseen disaster, do we really need to reach the point where we are producing only a limited number of food varieties per crop?

    I don't know the answer, but I do feel that, in this new era that we are entering, we had better have adequate safeguards in place before we proceed too much further.
    I don't think there is enough long-term information about them.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Sep. 11, 2008
    Location
    Snohomish, WA
    Posts
    4,087

    Default

    I just ran across this on Facebook. It is "food" for thought.

    http://fracturedparadigm.com/2013/04...e-by-monsanto/

    Monsanto’s Dirty Dozen: The 12 Most Awful Products Made By Monsanto
    By
    Fractured Paradigm
    – April 15, 2013Posted in: Featured, GMOs, Pesticides & Herbicides, Population Control
    Help spread the word:
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Reddit
    Digg
    Stumbleupon
    Tumblr
    Delicious
    Email

    monsanto_sign
    When you take a moment to reflect on the history of product development at Monsanto, what do you find? Here are twelve products that Monsanto has brought to market. See if you can spot the pattern…
    #1 – Saccharin

    Did you know Monsanto got started because of an artificial sweetener? John Francisco Queeny founded Monsanto Chemical Works in St. Louis, Missouri with the goal of producing saccharin[1] for Coca-Cola. In stark contrast to its sweet beginnings, studies performed during the early 1970s[2],* including a study by the National Cancer Institute in 1980[3], showed that saccharin caused cancer in test rats[4] and mice.

    After mounting pressure from consumers, the Calorie Control Council[5], and manufacturers of artificial sweeteners and diet sodas, along with additional studies[6] (several conducted by the sugar and sweetener industry) that reported flaws in the 1970s studies, saccharin was delisted from the NIH’s Carcinogen List. A variety of letters from scientists advised against delisting[7]; the official document includes the following wording[8] to this day: “although it is impossible to absolutely conclude that it poses no threat to human health, sodium saccharin is not reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen under conditions of general usage as an artificial sweetener.” (*Read the Chemical Heritage Foundation’s History of Saccharin[9] here.)
    #2 – PCBs

    During the early 1920s, Monsanto began expanding their chemical production into polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to produce coolant fluids for electrical transformers, capacitors, and electric motors. Fifty years later, toxicity tests[10] began reporting serious health effects[11] from PCBs in laboratory rats exposed to the chemical.

    After another decade of studies, the truth could no longer be contained: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a report[12] citing PCBs as the cause of cancer in animals, with additional evidence that they can cause cancer in humans. Additional peer-reviewed health studies showed a causal link between exposure to PCBs and non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, a frequently fatal form of cancer.

    In 1979, the United States Congress recognized PCBs as a significant environmental toxin and persistent organic pollutant, and banned its production in the U.S. By then Monsanto already had manufacturing plants abroad, so they weren’t entirely stopped until the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants banned PCBs globally in 2001.

    And that’s when Monsanto’s duplicity was uncovered: internal company memos[13] from 1956 surfaced, proving that Monsanto had known about dangers of PCBs from early on.

    In 2003, Monsanto paid out over $600 million to residents of Anniston, Alabama, who experienced severe health problems including liver disease, neurological disorders and cancer[14] after being exposed to PCBs — more than double the payoff that was awarded in the case against Pacific Gas & Electric made famous by the movie “Erin Brockovich.”

    And yet the damage persists: nearly 30 years after PCBs have been banned from the U.S., they are still showing up in the blood of pregnant women, as reported in a 2011 study[15] by the University of California San Francisco.
    #3 – Polystyrene

    In 1941, Monsanto began focusing on plastics and synthetic polystyrene, which is still widely used in food packaging and ranked 5th in the EPA’s 1980s listing of chemicals[16] whose production generates the most total hazardous waste.
    #4 – Atom bomb and nuclear weapons

    Shortly after acquiring Thomas and Hochwalt Laboratories, Monsanto turned this division into their Central Research Department[17]. Between 1943 to 1945, this department coordinated key production efforts of the Manhattan Project[18]—including plutonium purification and production and, as part of the Manhattan Project’s Dayton Project[19], techniques to refine chemicals used as triggers for atomic weapons (an era of U.S. history that sadly included the deadliest industrial accident[20]).
    #5 – DDT

    In 1944, Monsanto became one of the first manufacturers of the insecticide DDT to combat malaria-transmitting mosquitoes. Despite decades of Monsanto propaganda insisting that DDT was safe, the true effects of DDT’s toxicity were at last confirmed through outside research and in 1972, DDT was banned throughout the U.S.
    #6 – Dioxin

    In 1945, Monsanto began promoting the use of chemical pesticides in agriculture with the manufacture of the herbicide 2,4,5-T (one of the precursors to Agent Orange), containing dioxin. Dioxins are a group of chemically-related compounds that since become known as one of the “Dirty Dozen[21]” — persistent environmental pollutants that accumulate in the food chain, mainly in the fatty tissue of animals. In the decades since it was first developed, Monsanto has been accused of covering up or failing to report dioxin contamination in a wide range of its products.
    #7 – Agent Orange

    During the early 1960s, Monsanto was one of the two primary manufacturers of Agent Orange, an herbicide / defoliant used for chemical warfare during the Vietnam War. Except Monsanto’s formula had dioxin levels many times higher than the Agent Orange produced by Dow Chemicals, the other manufacturer (which is why Monsanto was the key defendant in the lawsuit brought by Vietnam War veterans in the United States).

    (Pictured at left, Anh and Trang Nhan, with their father, when they first arrived at the Hoi An Orphanage; below are the same brothers shortly before Trang’s death. Source: Kianh Foundation Newsletter, Dec. 2011[22])

    As a result of the use of Agent Orange, Vietnam estimates that over 400,000 people were killed or maimed, 500,000 children were born with birth defects, and up to 1 million people were disabled or suffered from health problems—not to mention the far-reaching impact it had on the health of over 3 million American troops and their offspring.

    Internal Monsanto memos show that Monsanto knew of the problems of dioxin contamination of Agent Orange when it sold it to the U.S. government for use in Vietnam. Despite the widespread health impact, Monsanto and Dow were allowed to appeal for and receive financial protection from the U.S. government against veterans seeking compensation for their exposure to Agent Orange.

    In 2012, a long 50 years after Agent Orange was deployed, the clean-up effort has finally begun[23]. Yet the legacy of Agent Orange, and successive generations of body deformities[24], will remain in orphanages[25] throughout VietNam for decades to come.

    (Think that can’t happen here? Two crops were recently genetically engineered[26] to withstand a weedkiller made with one of the major components of Agent Orange, 2,4-D[27], in order to combat “super weeds” that evolved due to the excessive use of RoundUp.)
    8 – Petroleum-Based Fertilizer

    In 1955, Monsanto began manufacturing petroleum-based fertilizer after purchasing a major oil refinery. Petroleum-based fertilizers can kill beneficial soil micro-organisms[28], sterilizing the soil and creating a dependence, like an addiction, to the synthetic replacements. Not the best addiction to have, considering the rising cost and dwindling supply of oil…
    #9 – RoundUp

    During the early 1970s, Monsanto founded their Agricultural Chemicals division with a focus on herbicides, and one herbicide in particular: RoundUp (glyphosate). Because of its ability to eradicate weeds literally overnight, RoundUp was quickly adopted by farmers. Its use increased even more when Monsanto introduced “RoundUp Ready” (glyphosate-resistant) crops, enabling farmers to saturate the entire field with weedkiller without killing the crops.

    While glyphosate has been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide and is widely used, concerns about its effects on humans and the environment persist. RoundUp has been found in samples of groundwater[29], as well as soil[30], and even in streams and air[31] throughout the Midwest U.S., and increasingly in food. It has been linked to butterfly[32] mortality, and the proliferation of superweeds[33]. Studies in rats have shown consistently negative health impacts ranging from tumors, altered organ function, and infertility, to cancer and premature death. Reference the above “GMO Risks[34]” page which includes countless references to support these statements.
    #10 – Aspartame (NutraSweet / Equal)

    An accidental discovery during research on gastrointestinal hormones resulted in a uniquely sweet chemical: aspartame. During the clinical trials conducted on 7 infant monkeys as part of aspartame’s application for FDA approval, 1 monkey died and 5 other monkeys had grand mal seizures—yet somehow aspartame was still approved by the FDA in 1974. In 1985, Monsanto acquired the company responsible for aspartame’s manufacture (G.D. Searle) and began marketing the product as NutraSweet. Twenty years later, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a report listing 94 health issues[35] caused by aspartame.
    #11 – Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH)

    This genetically modified hormone was developed by Monsanto to be injected into dairy cows to produce more milk. Cows subjected to rBGH suffer excruciating pain due to swollen udders and mastitis[36], and the pus[37] from the resulting infection enters the milk supply[38] requiring the use of additional antibiotics. rBGH milk has been linked to breast cancer[39], colon cancer[40], and prostate cancer[41] in humans.
    #12 – Genetically Modified Crops / GMOs

    In the early 1990s, Monsanto began gene-splicing corn, cotton, soy, and canola with DNA from a foreign source to achieve one of two traits: an internally-generated pesticide, or an internal resistance to Monsanto’s weedkiller RoundUp. Despite decades of promises that genetically engineered crops would feed the world with more nutrients, drought resistance, or yield, the majority of Monsanto’s profits[42] are from seeds that are engineered to tolerate Monsanto’s RoundUp—an ever-rising, dual income stream as weeds continue to evolve resistance to RoundUp[43].

    Most sobering however, is that the world is once again buying into Monsanto’s “safe” claims.

    Just like the early days of PCBs, DDT, Agent Orange, Monsanto has successfully fooled the general public and regulatory agencies into believing that RoundUp, and the genetically modified crops that help sell RoundUp, are “safe.”

    Except Monsanto has learned a thing or two in the past 100+ years of defending its dirty products: these days, when a new study proving the negative health or environmental impacts of GMOs emerges, Monsanto attacks the study and its scientist(s) by flooding the media with counter claims from “independent” organizations, scientists, industry associations, blogs, sponsored social media, and articles by “private” public relations firms—frequently founded, funded and maintained by Monsanto.

    Unfortunately, few of us take the time to trace the members, founders, and relationships of these seemingly valid sources back to their little Monsanto secret.

    Fooling the FDA[44] required a slightly different approach: click on the below chart compiled by Millions Against Monsanto[45] to see how many former Monsanto VPs and legal counsel are now holding positions with the FDA. And don’t forget Clarence Thomas, former Monsanto attorney who is now a Supreme Court Justice, ruling in favor of Monsanto in every case brought before him.
    monsanto_fda+chart
    A Baker’s Dozen: #13 – Terminator Seeds

    In the late 1990s, Monsanto developed the technology to produce sterile grains unable to germinate. These “Terminator Seeds[46]” would force farmers to buy new seeds from Monsanto year after year, rather than save and reuse the seeds from their harvest as they’ve been doing throughout centuries. Fortunately this technology never came to market. Instead, Monsanto chose to require farmers to sign a contract agreeing that they will not save or sell seeds from year to year, which forces them to buy new seeds and preempts the need for a “terminator gene.” Lucky for us… since the terminator seeds were capable of cross-pollination and could have contaminated local non-sterile crops.
    What’s the Result of our Monsanto Legacy?

    Between 75% to 80% of the processed food[47] you consume every day has GMOs inside, and residues of Monsanto’s RoundUp herbicide outside. But it’s not just processed food—fresh fruit and vegetables are next: genetically engineered sweet corn[48] is already being sold at your local grocer, with apples and a host of other “natural” produce currently in field trials.

    How is it that Monsanto is allowed to manipulate our food after such a dark product history? How is it they are allowed to cause such detrimental impact to our environment and our health?

    According to the Organic Consumers Association[49], “There is a direct correlation between our genetically engineered food supply and the $2 trillion the U.S. spends annually on medical care, namely an epidemic of diet-related chronic diseases.

    Instead of healthy fruits, vegetables, grains, and grass-fed animal products, U.S. factory farms and food processors produce a glut of genetically engineered junk foods that generate heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer—backed by farm subsidies[50]—while organic farmers receive no such subsidies.

    Monsanto’s history reflects a consistent pattern of toxic chemicals, lawsuits, and manipulated science. Is this the kind of company we want controlling our world’s food supply?

    P.S. Monsanto’s not alone. Other companies in the “Big Six” include Pioneer Hi-Bred International[51] (a subsidiary of DuPont), Syngenta AG[52], Dow Agrosciences[53] (a subsidiary of Dow Chemical, BASF[54] (which is primarily a chemical company that is rapidly expanding their biotechnology division, and Bayer Cropscience[55] (a subsidiary of Bayer).


    Original article on GMO Awareness


    2 members found this post helpful.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Jan. 4, 2007
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    41,551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
    I just ran across this on Facebook. It is "food" for thought.

    http://fracturedparadigm.com/2013/04...e-by-monsanto/

    Monsanto’s Dirty Dozen: The 12 Most Awful Products Made By Monsanto
    By
    Fractured Paradigm
    – April 15, 2013Posted in: Featured, GMOs, Pesticides & Herbicides, Population Control
    Help spread the word:
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Reddit
    Digg
    Stumbleupon
    Tumblr
    Delicious
    Email

    monsanto_sign
    When you take a moment to reflect on the history of product development at Monsanto, what do you find? Here are twelve products that Monsanto has brought to market. See if you can spot the pattern…
    #1 – Saccharin

    Did you know Monsanto got started because of an artificial sweetener? John Francisco Queeny founded Monsanto Chemical Works in St. Louis, Missouri with the goal of producing saccharin[1] for Coca-Cola. In stark contrast to its sweet beginnings, studies performed during the early 1970s[2],* including a study by the National Cancer Institute in 1980[3], showed that saccharin caused cancer in test rats[4] and mice.

    After mounting pressure from consumers, the Calorie Control Council[5], and manufacturers of artificial sweeteners and diet sodas, along with additional studies[6] (several conducted by the sugar and sweetener industry) that reported flaws in the 1970s studies, saccharin was delisted from the NIH’s Carcinogen List. A variety of letters from scientists advised against delisting[7]; the official document includes the following wording[8] to this day: “although it is impossible to absolutely conclude that it poses no threat to human health, sodium saccharin is not reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen under conditions of general usage as an artificial sweetener.” (*Read the Chemical Heritage Foundation’s History of Saccharin[9] here.)
    #2 – PCBs

    During the early 1920s, Monsanto began expanding their chemical production into polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to produce coolant fluids for electrical transformers, capacitors, and electric motors. Fifty years later, toxicity tests[10] began reporting serious health effects[11] from PCBs in laboratory rats exposed to the chemical.

    After another decade of studies, the truth could no longer be contained: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a report[12] citing PCBs as the cause of cancer in animals, with additional evidence that they can cause cancer in humans. Additional peer-reviewed health studies showed a causal link between exposure to PCBs and non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, a frequently fatal form of cancer.

    In 1979, the United States Congress recognized PCBs as a significant environmental toxin and persistent organic pollutant, and banned its production in the U.S. By then Monsanto already had manufacturing plants abroad, so they weren’t entirely stopped until the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants banned PCBs globally in 2001.

    And that’s when Monsanto’s duplicity was uncovered: internal company memos[13] from 1956 surfaced, proving that Monsanto had known about dangers of PCBs from early on.

    In 2003, Monsanto paid out over $600 million to residents of Anniston, Alabama, who experienced severe health problems including liver disease, neurological disorders and cancer[14] after being exposed to PCBs — more than double the payoff that was awarded in the case against Pacific Gas & Electric made famous by the movie “Erin Brockovich.”

    And yet the damage persists: nearly 30 years after PCBs have been banned from the U.S., they are still showing up in the blood of pregnant women, as reported in a 2011 study[15] by the University of California San Francisco.
    #3 – Polystyrene

    In 1941, Monsanto began focusing on plastics and synthetic polystyrene, which is still widely used in food packaging and ranked 5th in the EPA’s 1980s listing of chemicals[16] whose production generates the most total hazardous waste.
    #4 – Atom bomb and nuclear weapons

    Shortly after acquiring Thomas and Hochwalt Laboratories, Monsanto turned this division into their Central Research Department[17]. Between 1943 to 1945, this department coordinated key production efforts of the Manhattan Project[18]—including plutonium purification and production and, as part of the Manhattan Project’s Dayton Project[19], techniques to refine chemicals used as triggers for atomic weapons (an era of U.S. history that sadly included the deadliest industrial accident[20]).
    #5 – DDT

    In 1944, Monsanto became one of the first manufacturers of the insecticide DDT to combat malaria-transmitting mosquitoes. Despite decades of Monsanto propaganda insisting that DDT was safe, the true effects of DDT’s toxicity were at last confirmed through outside research and in 1972, DDT was banned throughout the U.S.
    #6 – Dioxin

    In 1945, Monsanto began promoting the use of chemical pesticides in agriculture with the manufacture of the herbicide 2,4,5-T (one of the precursors to Agent Orange), containing dioxin. Dioxins are a group of chemically-related compounds that since become known as one of the “Dirty Dozen[21]” — persistent environmental pollutants that accumulate in the food chain, mainly in the fatty tissue of animals. In the decades since it was first developed, Monsanto has been accused of covering up or failing to report dioxin contamination in a wide range of its products.
    #7 – Agent Orange

    During the early 1960s, Monsanto was one of the two primary manufacturers of Agent Orange, an herbicide / defoliant used for chemical warfare during the Vietnam War. Except Monsanto’s formula had dioxin levels many times higher than the Agent Orange produced by Dow Chemicals, the other manufacturer (which is why Monsanto was the key defendant in the lawsuit brought by Vietnam War veterans in the United States).

    (Pictured at left, Anh and Trang Nhan, with their father, when they first arrived at the Hoi An Orphanage; below are the same brothers shortly before Trang’s death. Source: Kianh Foundation Newsletter, Dec. 2011[22])

    As a result of the use of Agent Orange, Vietnam estimates that over 400,000 people were killed or maimed, 500,000 children were born with birth defects, and up to 1 million people were disabled or suffered from health problems—not to mention the far-reaching impact it had on the health of over 3 million American troops and their offspring.

    Internal Monsanto memos show that Monsanto knew of the problems of dioxin contamination of Agent Orange when it sold it to the U.S. government for use in Vietnam. Despite the widespread health impact, Monsanto and Dow were allowed to appeal for and receive financial protection from the U.S. government against veterans seeking compensation for their exposure to Agent Orange.

    In 2012, a long 50 years after Agent Orange was deployed, the clean-up effort has finally begun[23]. Yet the legacy of Agent Orange, and successive generations of body deformities[24], will remain in orphanages[25] throughout VietNam for decades to come.

    (Think that can’t happen here? Two crops were recently genetically engineered[26] to withstand a weedkiller made with one of the major components of Agent Orange, 2,4-D[27], in order to combat “super weeds” that evolved due to the excessive use of RoundUp.)
    8 – Petroleum-Based Fertilizer

    In 1955, Monsanto began manufacturing petroleum-based fertilizer after purchasing a major oil refinery. Petroleum-based fertilizers can kill beneficial soil micro-organisms[28], sterilizing the soil and creating a dependence, like an addiction, to the synthetic replacements. Not the best addiction to have, considering the rising cost and dwindling supply of oil…
    #9 – RoundUp

    During the early 1970s, Monsanto founded their Agricultural Chemicals division with a focus on herbicides, and one herbicide in particular: RoundUp (glyphosate). Because of its ability to eradicate weeds literally overnight, RoundUp was quickly adopted by farmers. Its use increased even more when Monsanto introduced “RoundUp Ready” (glyphosate-resistant) crops, enabling farmers to saturate the entire field with weedkiller without killing the crops.

    While glyphosate has been approved by regulatory bodies worldwide and is widely used, concerns about its effects on humans and the environment persist. RoundUp has been found in samples of groundwater[29], as well as soil[30], and even in streams and air[31] throughout the Midwest U.S., and increasingly in food. It has been linked to butterfly[32] mortality, and the proliferation of superweeds[33]. Studies in rats have shown consistently negative health impacts ranging from tumors, altered organ function, and infertility, to cancer and premature death. Reference the above “GMO Risks[34]” page which includes countless references to support these statements.
    #10 – Aspartame (NutraSweet / Equal)

    An accidental discovery during research on gastrointestinal hormones resulted in a uniquely sweet chemical: aspartame. During the clinical trials conducted on 7 infant monkeys as part of aspartame’s application for FDA approval, 1 monkey died and 5 other monkeys had grand mal seizures—yet somehow aspartame was still approved by the FDA in 1974. In 1985, Monsanto acquired the company responsible for aspartame’s manufacture (G.D. Searle) and began marketing the product as NutraSweet. Twenty years later, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a report listing 94 health issues[35] caused by aspartame.
    #11 – Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH)

    This genetically modified hormone was developed by Monsanto to be injected into dairy cows to produce more milk. Cows subjected to rBGH suffer excruciating pain due to swollen udders and mastitis[36], and the pus[37] from the resulting infection enters the milk supply[38] requiring the use of additional antibiotics. rBGH milk has been linked to breast cancer[39], colon cancer[40], and prostate cancer[41] in humans.
    #12 – Genetically Modified Crops / GMOs

    In the early 1990s, Monsanto began gene-splicing corn, cotton, soy, and canola with DNA from a foreign source to achieve one of two traits: an internally-generated pesticide, or an internal resistance to Monsanto’s weedkiller RoundUp. Despite decades of promises that genetically engineered crops would feed the world with more nutrients, drought resistance, or yield, the majority of Monsanto’s profits[42] are from seeds that are engineered to tolerate Monsanto’s RoundUp—an ever-rising, dual income stream as weeds continue to evolve resistance to RoundUp[43].

    Most sobering however, is that the world is once again buying into Monsanto’s “safe” claims.

    Just like the early days of PCBs, DDT, Agent Orange, Monsanto has successfully fooled the general public and regulatory agencies into believing that RoundUp, and the genetically modified crops that help sell RoundUp, are “safe.”

    Except Monsanto has learned a thing or two in the past 100+ years of defending its dirty products: these days, when a new study proving the negative health or environmental impacts of GMOs emerges, Monsanto attacks the study and its scientist(s) by flooding the media with counter claims from “independent” organizations, scientists, industry associations, blogs, sponsored social media, and articles by “private” public relations firms—frequently founded, funded and maintained by Monsanto.

    Unfortunately, few of us take the time to trace the members, founders, and relationships of these seemingly valid sources back to their little Monsanto secret.

    Fooling the FDA[44] required a slightly different approach: click on the below chart compiled by Millions Against Monsanto[45] to see how many former Monsanto VPs and legal counsel are now holding positions with the FDA. And don’t forget Clarence Thomas, former Monsanto attorney who is now a Supreme Court Justice, ruling in favor of Monsanto in every case brought before him.
    monsanto_fda+chart
    A Baker’s Dozen: #13 – Terminator Seeds

    In the late 1990s, Monsanto developed the technology to produce sterile grains unable to germinate. These “Terminator Seeds[46]” would force farmers to buy new seeds from Monsanto year after year, rather than save and reuse the seeds from their harvest as they’ve been doing throughout centuries. Fortunately this technology never came to market. Instead, Monsanto chose to require farmers to sign a contract agreeing that they will not save or sell seeds from year to year, which forces them to buy new seeds and preempts the need for a “terminator gene.” Lucky for us… since the terminator seeds were capable of cross-pollination and could have contaminated local non-sterile crops.
    What’s the Result of our Monsanto Legacy?

    Between 75% to 80% of the processed food[47] you consume every day has GMOs inside, and residues of Monsanto’s RoundUp herbicide outside. But it’s not just processed food—fresh fruit and vegetables are next: genetically engineered sweet corn[48] is already being sold at your local grocer, with apples and a host of other “natural” produce currently in field trials.

    How is it that Monsanto is allowed to manipulate our food after such a dark product history? How is it they are allowed to cause such detrimental impact to our environment and our health?

    According to the Organic Consumers Association[49], “There is a direct correlation between our genetically engineered food supply and the $2 trillion the U.S. spends annually on medical care, namely an epidemic of diet-related chronic diseases.

    Instead of healthy fruits, vegetables, grains, and grass-fed animal products, U.S. factory farms and food processors produce a glut of genetically engineered junk foods that generate heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer—backed by farm subsidies[50]—while organic farmers receive no such subsidies.

    Monsanto’s history reflects a consistent pattern of toxic chemicals, lawsuits, and manipulated science. Is this the kind of company we want controlling our world’s food supply?

    P.S. Monsanto’s not alone. Other companies in the “Big Six” include Pioneer Hi-Bred International[51] (a subsidiary of DuPont), Syngenta AG[52], Dow Agrosciences[53] (a subsidiary of Dow Chemical, BASF[54] (which is primarily a chemical company that is rapidly expanding their biotechnology division, and Bayer Cropscience[55] (a subsidiary of Bayer).


    Original article on GMO Awareness
    Another hatchet article bashing some big company.
    If you like Monsanto or not, what gave that away is some of the last paragraphs, where Monsanto is now the cause of all our human ills.

    There is much good and bad in all we do and with Monsanto it is the same, some they did and do is helping us live better, some they messed up, but in the end, we are all ahead, if we want to admit it or being the eternal grump never happy with anything, "the glass is always empty" type, just suits us better.

    By the way, Monsanto is not the only large company, just happen to be the one those that make a living from hatchet job books and tours to promote them and running certain non-profits consider the easiest target.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Jun. 16, 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    3,441

    Default

    Monsanto is everywhere and they twist the laws to suit them. They are killing the planet and they know it. In

    As for how BO was voted in again even a blind fool can spot voter fraud when it is on the scale that the last election showed.
    The Denver Broncos went to visit an orphanage. "It's so sad looking into their faces so devoid of hope." Sara aged 6


    1 members found this post helpful.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Oct. 25, 2012
    Posts
    4,421

    Default

    Y'know, there are days I think Bluey would like to argue that Jeffrey Dahmer was just a little misunderstood.


    5 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Mar. 4, 2011, 04:01 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Oct. 5, 2010, 08:49 PM
  3. How to feed alfalfa Alfalfa pellets?
    By midwestrocket in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Sep. 15, 2009, 10:17 AM
  4. Alfalfa pellets VS Alfalfa hay
    By spook1 in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Sep. 8, 2009, 07:28 PM
  5. Replies: 21
    Last Post: Jan. 6, 2009, 10:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness