The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct. 11, 2007
    Location
    Andover, MA
    Posts
    6,506

    Default Totally naive question: do any WB books take Morgans?

    As the subject line says, do any WB registries accept Morgans or Morgan crosses (say Morgan x TB)? I'm not a breeder, just asking for a friend. We already know that AWS does, and possibly AWR. Any others? And does it matter if the horse is a stallion or a mare?
    You have to have experiences to gain experience.

    Proudly owned by 1998 Morgan mare Mythic Feronia; G-dspeed Trump & Minnie; welcome 2014 Morgan filly MtnTop FlyWithMeJosephine



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan. 2, 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,189

    Default

    I'm almost certain the answer is no. Well, no reputable one, anyway.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug. 15, 2010
    Posts
    1,944

    Default

    RPSI and Old NA/ISR will approve Morgan mares for breeding (or almost any mare for breeding - their mare requirements are similar to AWS and AWR, including using different books), thus their offspring would be registerable if bred to an approved stallion of those registries. Old NA puts them in the ISR books, but they still compete for Oldenburg USDF awards, etc. Neither will approve a stallion of those lines. I'm a bit puzzled as to why it is OK for the mare to be of "non-Warmblood" lines, but not the stallion.



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep. 4, 2006
    Location
    Somewhere in the Southwest
    Posts
    1,282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticOakRanch View Post
    RPSI and Old NA/ISR will approve Morgan mares for breeding (or almost any mare for breeding - their mare requirements are similar to AWS and AWR, including using different books), thus their offspring would be registerable if bred to an approved stallion of those registries. Old NA puts them in the ISR books, but they still compete for Oldenburg USDF awards, etc. Neither will approve a stallion of those lines. I'm a bit puzzled as to why it is OK for the mare to be of "non-Warmblood" lines, but not the stallion.
    Money. There's a lot more mare owners out there than stallion owners.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May. 25, 2005
    Location
    best place so far
    Posts
    1,744

    Default

    Definitely not AHS or GOV...or obviously the closed books like Traks and Holsteiner.

    The above books only take offspring from approved WB parentage, approved Tb and approved arabian (not holsteiner).
    Read about my time at the Hannoveraner Verband Breeders Courses:
    http://blumefarm.com/hannoveranercourse2011.html
    http://blumefarm.com/hannoveranercourse2012.html


    1 members found this post helpful.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun. 30, 2006
    Location
    Middle Tennessee
    Posts
    5,705

    Default

    I have a friend who has a Holsteiner/Morgan cross mare branded AWR. The mare is an athletic freak of nature, too. What a jump!
    Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug. 13, 2009
    Posts
    675

    Default

    RPSI will approve her for the pre-mare book which means her offspring would only be able to get a COP regardless of who the sire is.
    Check us out on Facebook at EVER AFTER FARM


    1 members found this post helpful.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun. 14, 2006
    Location
    here, there, everywhere
    Posts
    562

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticOakRanch View Post
    RPSI and Old NA/ISR will approve Morgan mares for breeding (or almost any mare for breeding - their mare requirements are similar to AWS and AWR, including using different books), thus their offspring would be registerable if bred to an approved stallion of those registries. Old NA puts them in the ISR books, but they still compete for Oldenburg USDF awards, etc. Neither will approve a stallion of those lines. I'm a bit puzzled as to why it is OK for the mare to be of "non-Warmblood" lines, but not the stallion.
    Quote Originally Posted by dressurpferd01 View Post
    Money. There's a lot more mare owners out there than stallion owners.
    Yes, it's all about money. Nothing about quality or improving the breed, it's just shameful greed. I'd guess they figure with mares, at least, they'll only have a very limited impact on anything, even if they're bred every year.

    Also plenty of people don't understand COP or lower books. A COP doesn't make a Morgan/x a Zweibrucker.
    "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." George Burns



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan. 21, 2003
    Location
    Charles Town, WV
    Posts
    6,637

    Default

    ISR approval doesn't mean Oldenburg, either. It's the lowest book and equivalent to a COP.
    Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
    Now apparently completely invisible!



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug. 15, 2010
    Posts
    1,944

    Default

    COP or lower books still allows the horse to be shown as an Oldenburg or Zweibruker, or whatever. AWR and AWS also put them in a lower book for breeding purpose. But only breeders seem to understand the different books, brands, etc (and they are branded so they look even more like a WB to the average horse person). I have seen plenty of horses shown as RPSI and Oldenburg who were out of non-WB mares - Appaloosa, QH, Paint, Arabian, Draft cross, whatever - and they are still qualifying for USDF all breeds awards for those registries. So from a non-breeding standpoint (and the vast majority of the horse world is non-breeding), they "are" Warmbloods

    If you look them up in the USDF All Breeds results, they are listed within that registry's results, and if they are a high scoring inspection score, they may even be listed in the registry's publications (a friend had an Appy/WB cross who was pictured in the registry's magazine one year because of his high inspection score). So even the registry is listing them as a horse within that registry. It blurs the lines, doesn't it?



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct. 11, 2007
    Location
    Andover, MA
    Posts
    6,506

    Default

    Thank you everyone! I've passed this info on to my friend. I think there's an RPSI inspection she would like to take her Morgan filly to. Her Morgans are definitely bred for sport.
    You have to have experiences to gain experience.

    Proudly owned by 1998 Morgan mare Mythic Feronia; G-dspeed Trump & Minnie; welcome 2014 Morgan filly MtnTop FlyWithMeJosephine



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug. 15, 2010
    Posts
    1,944

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quietann View Post
    Thank you everyone! I've passed this info on to my friend. I think there's an RPSI inspection she would like to take her Morgan filly to. Her Morgans are definitely bred for sport.
    RPSI will inspect a Morgan for breeding approval - but not a filly for registration. There is a difference. If a Morgan mare is approved for breeding, then she can be bred to an approved RPSI stallion and the offspring can be entered into one of the RPSI books.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun. 12, 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    6,491

    Default

    Take Morgans as in register them? Or take Morgans as in give them some status for breeding purposes? If the Morgan needs to be registered, I think you will be limited to AWR, AWS, PHR and Morgan. If the horse is already registered, and you are looking to change/improve registry options of her future foals, then you could take her to one of the above listed warmblood registries for breeding approval.



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr. 29, 2008
    Posts
    167

    Default

    BWP will inspect Morgan mares for breeding to make their offspring eligible. I was going to do that with my mare but the closest inspection was 18 hours away and I decided since I currently plan on keeping the colt it wasn't worth it to me. Also keep in mind the foal must be by an approved stallion



  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun. 14, 2006
    Location
    here, there, everywhere
    Posts
    562

    Default

    This discussion of course begs the question... just because you can register a Morgan cross with some of the less respected registries, and just because you may be able to then pass it off to an ignorant buyer as a "Warmblood"... should you?

    I should add. The fact that the reputable registries wouldn't accept Morgan x's, and even the less reputable registries put a Morgan/x in their lowest books, this should send a message that they're not recommending this. Warmblood registries aren't endorsing Morgan x's, not even the registries willing to take your money and issue lower papers.

    I hope the OPs friend will think long and hard about this.
    "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." George Burns


    2 members found this post helpful.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct. 11, 2007
    Location
    Andover, MA
    Posts
    6,506

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pinecone View Post
    This discussion of course begs the question... just because you can register a Morgan cross with some of the less respected registries, and just because you may be able to then pass it off to an ignorant buyer as a "Warmblood"... should you?

    I should add. The fact that the reputable registries wouldn't accept Morgan x's, and even the less reputable registries put a Morgan/x in their lowest books, this should send a message that they're not recommending this. Warmblood registries aren't endorsing Morgan x's, not even the registries willing to take your money and issue lower papers.

    I hope the OPs friend will think long and hard about this.
    Well, my friend's already decided not to take her filly to the WB inspection, because it just doesn't get her that much.

    I do think that those of us in the sport Morgan world get tired of our horses being ragged on by the big WB people. Sometimes I think it's a strong misperception that Morgans are only for saddleseat or driving, that they cannot canter, that they are too crazy/hot, etc. The AMHA tries to promote "other" Morgans, but is somewhat limited because the saddleseat/breed show people are the ones with the money, and with Morgan registrations having dropped precipitously (less than 1000 registrations last year, down from 3000+ ten years ago!), money talks louder than anything else.

    A good sport-bred or working western Morgan might bring something to the WB table: soundness, great hooves, trainability/willingness, and *smaller* size as many AAs realize that they do not need or want a 17-hand plus horse. But there are plenty of good WBs out there, so it's not something they "need."
    You have to have experiences to gain experience.

    Proudly owned by 1998 Morgan mare Mythic Feronia; G-dspeed Trump & Minnie; welcome 2014 Morgan filly MtnTop FlyWithMeJosephine


    3 members found this post helpful.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr. 22, 2013
    Location
    Cloudland, USA
    Posts
    616

    Default

    I don't think the "big WB people" are ragging on Morgans. Or at least I've never interpreted the Warmblood breeding rules (which discourage the use of a lot of breeds, not just Morgans) as a personal thing. I think they're simply aiming to produce the best horses possible and they know what's likely to work and what's likely to fail so they've designed their breeding regulations accordingly. Nobody gets offended that National Show Horses only allow Arabian and Saddlebred, or that AQHA only allows Quarter Horse and Thoroughbred, so I never understand why people might get offended at Warmblood rules. Ultimately they're designed with the best interests of the horses and the breed in mind (and yes I use the term "breed" loosely but everyone knows what is meant.) I'd be more suspicious of registries with no rules, than a registry looking to promote responsible quality breeding. But ymmv of course.


    6 members found this post helpful.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr. 29, 2008
    Posts
    167

    Default

    IMO it's frustrating that many of the Warmblood registries accept Arabians and Thoroughbreds but not Morgans. I understand the closed registries that feel they do not need to cross breed anymore. But I would think if you have an open registry and you inspect, then the breed should not be as important as the quality the specific horse brings to the registry.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun. 14, 2006
    Location
    here, there, everywhere
    Posts
    562

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quietann View Post
    A good sport-bred or working western Morgan might bring something to the WB table: soundness, great hooves, trainability/willingness, and *smaller* size as many AAs realize that they do not need or want a 17-hand plus horse. But there are plenty of good WBs out there, so it's not something they "need."
    There are Warmblood stallions who are sound with good hooves, trainability, and smaller. There are also GRPs if you really want smaller. There's no need to go outside of Warmbloods (or GRPs) looking for something which "might" bring qualities, when these qualities are already available and proven.

    Quote Originally Posted by Serious Leigh View Post
    I don't think the "big WB people" are ragging on Morgans. Or at least I've never interpreted the Warmblood breeding rules (which discourage the use of a lot of breeds, not just Morgans) as a personal thing. I think they're simply aiming to produce the best horses possible and they know what's likely to work and what's likely to fail so they've designed their breeding regulations accordingly. Nobody gets offended that National Show Horses only allow Arabian and Saddlebred, or that AQHA only allows Quarter Horse and Thoroughbred, so I never understand why people might get offended at Warmblood rules. Ultimately they're designed with the best interests of the horses and the breed in mind (and yes I use the term "breed" loosely but everyone knows what is meant.) I'd be more suspicious of registries with no rules, than a registry looking to promote responsible quality breeding. But ymmv of course.
    Amen (bolding mine.)

    Quote Originally Posted by JustMyStyle View Post
    IMO it's frustrating that many of the Warmblood registries accept Arabians and Thoroughbreds but not Morgans. I understand the closed registries that feel they do not need to cross breed anymore. But I would think if you have an open registry and you inspect, then the breed should not be as important as the quality the specific horse brings to the registry.
    Good breeders (and registries) consider genetics and not just the individual.
    "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." George Burns


    2 members found this post helpful.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep. 20, 2002
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    3,808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticOakRanch View Post
    RPSI and Old NA/ISR will approve Morgan mares for breeding (or almost any mare for breeding - their mare requirements are similar to AWS and AWR, including using different books), thus their offspring would be registerable if bred to an approved stallion of those registries. Old NA puts them in the ISR books, but they still compete for Oldenburg USDF awards, etc. Neither will approve a stallion of those lines. I'm a bit puzzled as to why it is OK for the mare to be of "non-Warmblood" lines, but not the stallion.
    Because a mare has much lesser impact on the breed as such as a stallion - due to possible number of offspring.
    I am not responsible for spelling misstacks - just my PC
    www.hannoveranerzuechter.de
    2015: Likoto- Florencio - Prince Thatch; Lissaro - Don Frederico - Prince Thatch; Edward - Sandro Hit - Rouletto


    1 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. Arab breeders, sorry for stupid, very naive question
    By sign of Grace in forum Sport Horse Breeding
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Mar. 20, 2013, 12:04 PM
  2. A naive question about shipping to shows...
    By wcporter in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Oct. 18, 2012, 09:26 PM
  3. Weird But Totally Serious Question?
    By alteregotistic in forum Off Course
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Mar. 6, 2011, 09:24 AM
  4. Replies: 41
    Last Post: Dec. 26, 2010, 07:15 PM
  5. naive question
    By Limone in forum Sport Horse Breeding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Apr. 7, 2010, 03:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness