The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul. 21, 2011
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    4,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slewdledo View Post
    Surprised by the current results. Wonder if they're skewed toward a certain breed or what. I can only think of two mares among hundreds (all TBs) in 10 years who went more than 365.
    Very interesting observation! I honestly think that animals that are required to reproduce naturally (live cover) will have the best reproductive outcomes, as time goes on.. JMHO



  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct. 29, 2008
    Posts
    1,641

    Default

    I had one mare (retired last year after a 357 day gestation), who routinely went in the 343+ range, who surprised me once popping out a perfectly formed filly at 330 days. Another mare has had 4 in the 316 to 320 range, and a couple about 324 (I love that time range). Ditana has gone 318 to 328 (7 foals). The rest seem to go from 328 to 345. Once they hit 340 days I am a zombie, so I fare better (as do we all, I expect) with the ones 330 or less
    I believe the winter births generally are a little longer gestation, while the june babies average a little shorter (not afraid to stick their noses out into the cold).



  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun. 14, 2012
    Location
    california
    Posts
    307

    Default

    first to bag today! at day 315



  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb. 9, 2011
    Posts
    117

    Default

    I have had my one mare have four in a row.. all different stallions at day 329. And this year our maiden mare.. was I guess 321.. however she was bred at 11 pm, and foaled at 1 am.. so truly 320 days.. tiny filly, but healthy.. Thank goodness.



  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul. 21, 2011
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    4,189

    Default

    Very interesting and helpful article E.R.

    I hope you have many participants in your poll.



  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug. 30, 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    599

    Default

    Thanks for posting Kathy. I too would be interested in knowing when is "too soon" to start seeing certain signs. If you didn't know what day my mare was at, you'd throw her in the foaling stall immediately. Non maiden at just day 294, has had a decent bag for a week now, very relaxed vulva, loose tail head, etc. I had vet out tonight to get that caslicks out & get her vaccs done, & placenta looked normal thank goodness. Both of her other foals were within 5 days of 340(both by same stallion, & both colts...perhaps I will be getting my filly? ). Just wish we could develop some sort of "how soon is definitely too soon to see XYZ" chart!



  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct. 20, 2005
    Posts
    2,805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skydy View Post
    Very interesting observation! I honestly think that animals that are required to reproduce naturally (live cover) will have the best reproductive outcomes, as time goes on.. JMHO
    Yes, interesting indeed. I hadn't thought about the live cover aspect.

    Our mares come in every night into a large covered paddock under lights. As they look ready or approach their due date, we move them into stalls in the adjacent barn - most end up spending 2-3 weeks in the stall before they foal. We used to have a mare who three or four years in a ROW foaled the FIRST night she was stalled. 1st time "Wow! You didn't look ready!" Second "wow! Again?" 3rd "SERIOUSLY?!"
    It's a uterus, not a clown car. - Sayyedati



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Jan. 17, 2010, 05:54 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: May. 12, 2009, 12:44 PM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: Apr. 18, 2009, 09:51 AM
  4. Replies: 59
    Last Post: Oct. 17, 2008, 06:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •