The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 180
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul. 6, 2007
    Posts
    876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrowneDragon View Post
    Can you provide any kind of source for this bit of sensationalization?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpbS00RNZhY


    1 members found this post helpful.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan. 16, 2002
    Location
    West Coast of Michigan
    Posts
    36,312

    Default

    Yes, phytoestrogens are in soy, nobody's arguing that. In the case of a human patient with even a remote chance of a phytoestrogen interfering with a known medical problem, given the fact that we do not NEED soy, or milk for that matter, it seems pretty reasonable to just tell someone to avoid it.

    That is not the same as condemning these chemicals in soy as "dangerous" as a blanket statement.
    Click here before you buy.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct. 25, 2012
    Posts
    3,052

    Default

    In humans, the phytoestrogens aren't the only issue. Soy also contains chemicals that actually block absorption of various other vitamins and minerals. For people, there are so many other more desirable sources of protein (most from animals) that there are really very few reasons to eat it. The only soy products that do NOT have these problems are the traditionally-prepared Asian fermented varieties like tempeh, miso, and soy sauce. Most modern, industrially-processed soybeans are prepared with heat and hydrocarbons and when you know what you're eating, you won't.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec. 7, 2001
    Location
    Cullowhere?, NC
    Posts
    8,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deltawave View Post
    Yes, phytoestrogens are in soy, nobody's arguing that. In the case of a human patient with even a remote chance of a phytoestrogen interfering with a known medical problem, given the fact that we do not NEED soy, or milk for that matter, it seems pretty reasonable to just tell someone to avoid it.

    That is not the same as condemning these chemicals in soy as "dangerous" as a blanket statement.
    Very true.
    "One person's cowboy is another person's blooming idiot" -- katarine

    Spay and neuter. Please.



  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul. 10, 2003
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    2,638

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NorCalDressage View Post
    Oh. I stand corrected.


    *CrowneDragon*
    As Peter, Paul, and Mary say, a dragon lives forever.



  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul. 18, 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Eboshi View Post
    In humans, the phytoestrogens aren't the only issue. Soy also contains chemicals that actually block absorption of various other vitamins and minerals. For people, there are so many other more desirable sources of protein (most from animals) that there are really very few reasons to eat it. The only soy products that do NOT have these problems are the traditionally-prepared Asian fermented varieties like tempeh, miso, and soy sauce. Most modern, industrially-processed soybeans are prepared with heat and hydrocarbons and when you know what you're eating, you won't.
    Interesting! Which vitamins and minerals does the soy chemicals block?



  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep. 29, 2009
    Posts
    2,576

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by walkinthewalk View Post
    I have two horses with metabolic issues that do a whole better without eating soy.
    Where are you getting the McCauley's? It doesn't have soy?

    Do they sell it in Franklin like the Equipride?



  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan. 16, 2002
    Location
    West Coast of Michigan
    Posts
    36,312

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pippigirl View Post
    Interesting! Which vitamins and minerals does the soy chemicals block?
    The Weston Price Foundation would be happy to sell you a manifesto . . . err, BOOK that reveals these secrets!

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8142044

    Strictly speaking, there are "anti-nutrients" in almost ALL plant-sourced foods. They serve a purpose for the plant (such as not allowing seeds to be digested by something that eats it) and they are not sinister additives. It doesn't mean they're poison, it just means one enzyme or protein or chemical in a food may interfere with absorption or digestion of another. Which is why we evolved to eat a variety of things.
    Click here before you buy.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar. 16, 2006
    Location
    Larkspur, Colo.
    Posts
    4,704

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lady Eboshi View Post
    In humans, the phytoestrogens aren't the only issue. Soy also contains chemicals that actually block absorption of various other vitamins and minerals. For people, there are so many other more desirable sources of protein (most from animals) that there are really very few reasons to eat it. The only soy products that do NOT have these problems are the traditionally-prepared Asian fermented varieties like tempeh, miso, and soy sauce. Most modern, industrially-processed soybeans are prepared with heat and hydrocarbons and when you know what you're eating, you won't.
    Which is why I feed my horses tofu burgers made with only certified non-GMO sprouted organic soybeans. Heh.



  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun. 4, 2002
    Location
    Suffolk, VA
    Posts
    16,684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deltawave View Post
    Weston Price Foundation is the most rabid anti-soy group possible and their definition of "facts" is extremely questionable, about at the same level as their motivations. That's not research, it's a hysterical, one-sided article meant to provoke panic.

    Just think of what the WPF has to gain by trashing soy. Then ask yourself if they are being dispassionate and even-handed in their propaganda. Hmmmmmm.
    I have no idea what they stand to gain in telling people the truth about soy and how bad it is for them in the highly processed non traditional forms we Americans eat it but I can't imagine they are boogey men out to mislead millions from eating "healthy" highly processed foods. They don't sell alternative products that compete with soy and they are a not for profit unlike those companies pushing this stuff. Maybe they are just committed to telling the truth? What exactly DO they have to gain? Selling a few books...like that is going to come close to the profits of big food corporations selling all this highly processed "healthy" food to sick and fat Americans? And you think I wear the tin foil hat. Hmmmmmm is right.

    More articles discussing the estrogen equivalent in soy infant formula. No idea what study found this but I know there are hundreds of studies on soy out there now.

    This first article has some links to studies in it and some interesting charts. This information is out there if you look

    http://healthybabycode.com/5-myths-a...-to-meat-dairy

    http://nutrition2success.com/soy.php

    http://www.livestrong.com/article/11...nfant-formula/

    No if someone wants to eat this stuff, it's your business. Go for it. Just try not to be blind about the negatives also. I found it was like feeding slow poison to my horses and I personally don't eat it much either.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Jan. 16, 2002
    Location
    West Coast of Michigan
    Posts
    36,312

    Default

    The WPF is an activist group. They represent Big Dairy and Big Beef and if you don't think that intellectual property and manipulation of propaganda isn't big business, you are deluded. Telling Americans what to think and what to believe is the primary mission of groups like this, because Americans who think and believe soy is bad will stop buying it, and that only benefits the cow industry. They will go to great lengths to put their message across, including "inflating" facts or couching things in high-drama, chicken little fashion which appears to be S.O.P. There are many other groups with equally crazy and opposite viewpoints, by the way!
    Click here before you buy.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Oct. 25, 2012
    Posts
    3,052

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deltawave View Post
    The WPF is an activist group. They represent Big Dairy and Big Beef and if you don't think that intellectual property and manipulation of propaganda isn't big business, you are deluded. Telling Americans what to think and what to believe is the primary mission of groups like this, because Americans who think and believe soy is bad will stop buying it, and that only benefits the cow industry. They will go to great lengths to put their message across, including "inflating" facts or couching things in high-drama, chicken little fashion which appears to be S.O.P. There are many other groups with equally crazy and opposite viewpoints, by the way!
    With respect, Doctor, this time you are wrong. Furthermore, you have obviously not read anything on the Weston A. Price Foundation's website if you think they are in bed with Big Ag in ANY way, shape, or form.

    They are advocates for returning to a diet of whole, unprocessed, traditional foods--including raw milk, which I myself consume in quantity. They are DEATH on hormonally-enhanced grain-fed beef, antibiotics fed prophylactically to livestock, and all GMO crops. They advocate eating grass-fed, locally-sourced meat humanely raised.

    Their mission is to get the word out that the human species is being actively fed into many states of ill-health today for no better reason than the carefully cultivated ignorance of a proper human diet, and this tiny non-profit is up against the multi-million dollar marketing budgets of the likes of Monsanto and General Mills.

    They courageously tell the truth--that modern "foods" like soy are things that were never eaten by the human race prior to WWII, and are having unintended consequences. That veganism and other nutritional PC-ness can cause you grave harm. Among the things people don't want to hear is the fact that most people with diabetes and obesity could cure themselves for free and without drugs just by ditching the highly-processed, refined-carbohydrate crap they've been systematically, and knowingly, addicted to by the food companies for sixty years. And--here's a biggie--that saturated fat from animal sources is required for proper function by EVERY cell in the body, especially the brain, and has no PROVEN deleterious effects at all. Vegetable oil (yeah, soy again!) is a WHOLE OTHER STORY! But then, you already know all that.

    WPF's mission has nothing whatsoever to do with selling books. The original Nutrition & Physical Degeneration by Weston A. Price himself is a tough slog, though enlightening. Not exactly best-seller propaganda material.

    What they ARE about is re-teaching people what their grandmothers used to know without having to be taught, detoxing people from the lies of Big Food and it's deadly handmaiden, Big Pharma.

    The whole bottom line is, don't eat ANYTHING your great-grandmother would not have recognized as "food." Which pretty much confines you to the produce, meat & fish sections of the supermarket; I'd imagine that's something you'd recommend to a lot of your patients!


    6 members found this post helpful.

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Jan. 16, 2002
    Location
    West Coast of Michigan
    Posts
    36,312

    Default

    That is a nice and very user-friendly digesta of the WPF agenda. I have read Price's works, actually. Most of them. He was not anti-soy in any way, shape or form. Later minds have taken his work, much like that of Hahnemann and many other crackpots who had a brainchild that they flogged passionately throughout their lives, and twisted it to promote a very definite agenda. Which is not, the way I read it, anything like the wholesome "eat what your dear grandma ate" shtick at all. There is a lot of insidious and subtle misinformation that pollutes the pool of good scientific knowledge from this and other agenda groups. I don't happen to find this one any worse than some of the others: PETA, the "vegan" (Forks Over Knives) movement, the anti-vaccine crowd, and so many others.

    An agenda is an agenda. Those who believe in them passionately go to great lengths to defend and promote them. Even to the point of spreading propaganda and falsehood. That's where I have a problem. I have no dog in the soy fight one way or the other--some aspects of its use concern me, while some I feel are massively overblown and poorly understood. But I do have an agenda of my own: the eradication of pseudoscience and high-drama manipulation of the public WRT health information.

    saturated fat from animal sources is required for proper function by EVERY cell in the body, especially the brain, and has no PROVEN deleterious effects at all
    Oh, brother. I forgot one agenda group. The "cholesterol hypothesis deniers".
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	6 
Size:	33.9 KB 
ID:	37807  
    Click here before you buy.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Jul. 1, 2010
    Posts
    545

    Default

    Ever since removing soy from my mare a few years ago, I no longer have a fire dragon to contend with. As a matter of fact I just saddled up today for the first time since last October. (on a coming 5 year old, green broke mare with less than 40 hours on her.)

    Guess what, no problem, except one to get enough mud off her back so I could get a saddle on.
    Charlie Piccione
    Natural Performance Hoof Care


    1 members found this post helpful.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jan. 16, 2002
    Location
    West Coast of Michigan
    Posts
    36,312

    Default

    If you removed the soy a few years ago and the mare is now 5, you were expecting miraculous quiet in the temperament department on . . . what, a 3yo?

    Guess what? My fractious filly grew up, too. Been ingesting soy off and on probably most of her life. She was full of beans (no pun intended) as a baby and got quieter as she aged!
    Last edited by deltawave; Mar. 19, 2013 at 08:22 PM.
    Click here before you buy.


    6 members found this post helpful.

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Jul. 10, 2003
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    2,638

    Default

    There are a lot of people who are looking for something to blame. THIS is the reason I'm overweight. THIS is the reason my horse is too much for me to ride. THIS is the reason I've been riding intro for 8 years. If I just get rid of starch/soy or get new saddle #50, my problems will be solved. To me, soy seems like the scapegoat du jour. I certainly appreciate people's concern, but for me to come to a conclusion I need to see real data, and so far I haven't seen any. I work in research and for me to publish a study, I can't claim causation without reasonable proof. Saying that we haven't had any tornadoes in my town since I started washing my truck every week isn't going to cut it...
    Soy contains a really nice complement of amino acids and I eat a fair bit myself, and feed some to my horses. I DO wish that there was a lot more organic farming to raise the food I eat, and I buy organic where possible, but if I can't buy it organic, I'll probably buy it anyway.
    *CrowneDragon*
    As Peter, Paul, and Mary say, a dragon lives forever.


    6 members found this post helpful.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jul. 1, 2010
    Posts
    545

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deltawave View Post
    If you removed the soy a few years ago and the mare is now 5, you were expecting miraculous quiet in the temperament department on . . . what, a 3yo?

    Guess what? My fractious filly grew up, too. Been ingesting soy off and on probably most of her life. She was full of beans (no pun intended) as a baby and got quieter as she aged!
    Hi Doc, I think we went through this before. yes, she is quite but that is only part of the equation. I was able to milk her any day of the week any time of the year at age 2 1/2. I no longer can do that, and a coming 5 year old is not a grown up. She is full of beans still, just not soybeans.
    Charlie Piccione
    Natural Performance Hoof Care


    1 members found this post helpful.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Jan. 16, 2002
    Location
    West Coast of Michigan
    Posts
    36,312

    Default

    I am always somewhat bemused by reports of lactation from a putative "estrogen" effect of soy. Estrogen is directly inhibitory to lactation. Maybe the phytoestrogens are having an ANTI-estrogen effect. But that would put the kibosh on it being implicated in "mareish" behavior, wouldn't it? One can't have it both ways, I don't think.
    Click here before you buy.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Jun. 4, 2002
    Location
    Suffolk, VA
    Posts
    16,684

    Default

    Thanks Lady Eboshi for clarifying what Weston Price Foundation is about. I actually know a few of these people and they are not left wing whackos or nutcases. They buy chicken from me (despite the fact my bird eat soy) and make their own chicken stock...that sounds really nutty...maybe that raw milk they are drinking is affecting their brains and they forgot to stop at Walmart for their antibiotic fed and confinement raised chicken instead. Seriously unreal...


    3 members found this post helpful.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    May. 6, 2003
    Posts
    1,888

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katarine View Post
    Soy causes Republicans.
    Not according to the woman who got all up in my grill while I was preggers and eating some edamame for lunch. She claimed soy causes Teh Ghey.
    According to the Mayan calendar, the world will not end this week. Please plan your life accordingly.


    2 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. Everybody's a "Hero" nowadays!
    By Calvincrowe in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Nov. 27, 2011, 07:38 PM
  2. Replies: 17
    Last Post: Nov. 8, 2011, 08:24 PM
  3. Everybody's Free (to wear sunscreen)
    By Wooly Wintertime in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Jan. 15, 2011, 01:55 AM
  4. Training issue? Health Issues? WHAT IS HIS ISSUE??
    By TwiceAsNice in forum Off Course
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Jul. 8, 2009, 03:16 PM
  5. Training Issue or Pain/Management Issue?
    By saultgirl in forum Off Course
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Jan. 3, 2009, 12:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •