The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314
Results 261 to 268 of 268
  1. #261
    Join Date
    Jan. 30, 2010
    Location
    Satan's Steam Sauna
    Posts
    626

    Default

    I've been off of the COTH for quite a while and saw mention of Jill Burnell on an email from thehorse.com. After catching up on a lot of reading -- Whew ...just wow! Kudos to all of those who put so much time, effort, and heart into trying to do right by Jill's human & equine victims. What a damn mess!

    On topic-
    From a business perspective, I have been completely surprised / baffled that those buying / attempting to buy / standing Jill Burnell's stallions do not seem to have thought through the PR aspect ahead of time. Because the Jill Burnell story has gone far beyond defrauding mare owners (bad enough) and is now an abuse / neglect case involving lots of people investing time & money into attempting to clean up Jill's messes - helping mare owners & supporting the Marin County Humane Society; anybody involved is going to be under the public opinion microscope. It is what it is, and honesty & transparency is the way to go.

    I am still baffled by the Romantic Star non-purchase lawyer situation. Historically, California has some of the strongest consumer protection laws; and I am just not understanding how the seller's attorney can also represent the buyer's interests in a given transaction. Any lawyers out there who can explain how that would work? I'm just curious. The few times that I have worked with law firms, step one was that they had to check their records to see if they had done any work for the other parties.

    I'm with everyone else in hoping that the horses all land softly & that Jill Burnell faces the full legal consequences of all of the pain she wrought -- and is permanently out of the horse business.

    Carry on.
    Disclaimer: Just a beginner who knows nothing about nothing


    9 members found this post helpful.

  2. #262
    Join Date
    Apr. 20, 2011
    Posts
    804

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anteup View Post
    I'm the one that posted on the Redwine FB page stating that Jill still owned Redwine. That sparked the "We are leasing but working on buying" comment. I asked after that post if Jill was getting any money, and both my posts got deleted. My opinion is that if they want to stand the stallion, they should be willing to answer these questions. Didn't they know this was coming?!
    I posted today that while I thought it was a good thing both stallions were in better hands, mare owners should think twice about rushing in to breed to either of them, as the legal owner could just take them back, resulting in the same sort of heartache as the mare owners that bred to them in the past.... something of that nature, my post not only got deleted, but I'm blocked from the page now.

    if these people hoped to have any sort of better reputation, they really should be able to withstand all the questions and comments concerning these stallions and their (from what we can surmise) LEGAL owner.


    10 members found this post helpful.

  3. #263
    Join Date
    Feb. 15, 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    8,224

    Default

    I really wonder how much homework they did ... and if they thought people were that stupid and buy the story without asking any questions!!
    They are hurting their reputation in a big way but there will always be MOs that only see the bling and don't think any further.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  4. #264
    Join Date
    Jan. 14, 2003
    Location
    Rawley Springs, Virginia
    Posts
    2,466

    Default

    To be honest, I am not sure why anyone would choose these stallions at this point when there are so many other choices out there. I feel badly for the new farms but yes the controversy is not going to just disappear. Too many people hurt and deceived.
    Chris
    Ladybug Hill--Hunters and Ponies
    WWSD? (what would Suerte do?)


    10 members found this post helpful.

  5. #265
    Join Date
    Oct. 13, 2003
    Location
    Eastern Pacific coast
    Posts
    3,719

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Toadie's mom View Post
    I would hope Ashland has a contract that includes confiscation for lack of payment. (
    If that happens, I hope Ashland is lawyered up.
    -Amor vincit omnia-



  6. #266
    Join Date
    Sep. 15, 2002
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Not to intentionally bring this topic to the top of the list again but a final comment made here might just end this rather "insightful" topic. Has there not already been a post made about a privacy clause perhaps being in place with respect to the sale/lease whatever of these two stallions? I think that obviously answers a lot of questions about why the parties involved are not posting publically on a website......just saying. I don't think there is a cover-up or anything of the sort involved. And given the owner of the stallions at the time of the deal it would probably have been a wise position for her to take.



  7. #267
    Join Date
    Mar. 8, 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    20,363

    Default

    Who cares what the reasoning is? If they posted the contract online, word for word, I wouldn't breed to either stallion for free at this point.


    10 members found this post helpful.

  8. #268
    Join Date
    Feb. 21, 2001
    Location
    Western NY
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cherham View Post
    Not to intentionally bring this topic to the top of the list again but a final comment made here might just end this rather "insightful" topic. Has there not already been a post made about a privacy clause perhaps being in place with respect to the sale/lease whatever of these two stallions? I think that obviously answers a lot of questions about why the parties involved are not posting publically on a website......just saying. I don't think there is a cover-up or anything of the sort involved. And given the owner of the stallions at the time of the deal it would probably have been a wise position for her to take.
    That, a privacy clause, would be a PR disaster. Marketing/PR 101 in adversity is to disclose as much as you can to prevent rumor and negative campaigning by others. Nobody involved with these lovely horses have done so and thus are making it only harder for themselves, if not destroying too much goodwill from others.

    I've watched this train wreck of a situation, and I just don't get it. THis is a high profile case for the horse world with much money at stake. Hire a marketing consultant, or spokes person for a few hours/days to protect your investment. This is a business.


    10 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. Chestnut missing from Ontario, Canada
    By mgarzon in forum Missing Horses
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Dec. 22, 2012, 10:57 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Mar. 16, 2012, 03:19 PM
  3. Hay in Ontario, CANADA ...
    By TrueColours in forum Hay
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Jul. 5, 2010, 12:55 PM
  4. Reg. Appendix mare-Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    By Equine Studies in forum Giveaways
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Aug. 4, 2009, 11:34 PM
  5. Reg. Appendix mare-Ontario, Canada
    By Equine Studies in forum Giveaways
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Apr. 20, 2009, 08:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •