The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 342
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2000
    Location
    Nokesville, VA
    Posts
    35,327

    Default G.M. article on Hunters in 5/14 COTH

    I am curious what people actively competing in the hunters think about Geaorge Morris's latest article.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec. 22, 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    15,119

    Default

    Link? Haven't seen my hard copy yet.



  3. #3
    Janet is offline Schoolmaster Premium Member
    Original Poster
    Join Date
    Feb. 3, 2000
    Location
    Nokesville, VA
    Posts
    35,327

    Default

    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug. 5, 2003
    Posts
    933

    Default

    Sounds great but the barn door is closed and all the horses have run far away. Too late. Aside from those over 60 types the present trainer population has grown up with the present industry and I would not expect any change on their part whatsoever.



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov. 6, 2009
    Posts
    2,202

    Default

    I agree with the article, GM is spot on, but like Dinah-do I won't be holding my breath waiting for the hunter divisions to change.



  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar. 19, 2006
    Location
    VA / NJ
    Posts
    2,504

    Default

    Sorry, but no one is going to return to those times. Those times had few amateurs riding at all. They also had acepromazine. In 1993 ( I think I'm right here) GM judged the hunters at the national horse show. They couldn't find a course designer to work the show because evidently he wanted to be involved in the courses. Well, he was and it wasn't pretty. Times have changed. Time to move on folks.
    www.midatlanticeq.com
    Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
    November 13-15, 2015



  7. #7
    Join Date
    May. 12, 2012
    Location
    Des Moines, Ia
    Posts
    5

    Default I think G.M. is right on

    I think he's right on, hunters is horrible to watch and it teaches nothing. Everything is the same, the horses move too slow, there's no expression, it reminds me of western HUS only with cute fences in the way. I really like that hunter derbies are coming back, those are fun to watch and will require a different type of riding, more like an actual hunter out in the field.

    It would be great if the show hunters would change but I doubt it will.
    The only thing that shatters dreams is compromise. -- Richard Bach


    1 members found this post helpful.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct. 21, 2009
    Location
    South Central: Zone 7
    Posts
    1,968

    Default

    I agree that the courses need more variety, especially more verticals. However, I like the direction that hunters have moved towards, in general. There used to be a blending of the hunter, eq, and jumper disciplines but now they have become much more distinct and specialized.

    And since the hunters are the foundation for eq and jumpers, I think it is smart to keep the lower hunters accessible to new or novice riders. We should expect more out of our high performance hunters or derby horses, but I'm fine with seeing an ammy or jr. cantering around eight easy fences and having a blast.



  9. #9
    Join Date
    May. 6, 2009
    Location
    The Left Coast
    Posts
    3,318

    Default Love the guy, but...

    If he were correct, the US would not be competitive at international show jumping. And we are.

    I understand what he's bemoaning, but isn't it true that US riders do get there, albeit on a different path?
    2012 goal: learn to ride like a Barn Rat

    A helmet saved my life.



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr. 29, 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    240

    Default

    Here's how I look at things:

    Riding changes. I has ever since humans have been involved with horses. We used to jump with our legs out in front of us and take the "back seat". Who said this was "wrong" (it is for obvious reasons...)? Then Caprilli came around with a different way to do things. Not necessarily "better" in the respect that it still achieved the same result (getting the horse and rider to the other side), but it just overall made things easier for the horse and rider. Now we are evolving into a time where progression is going to be made again. I see no need to revert to the past. The hunter riders we have today are great riders; the horses are fantastic too. Change has to happen for progress in the horse world. I don't think we need to back-peddle.
    --Chris--



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr. 2, 2011
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    2,535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheHorseProblem View Post
    If he were correct, the US would not be competitive at international show jumping. And we are.
    Not necessarily. I think it means that we would not be competitive ten years from now, when the riders learning in the hunters right now are moving onto international show jumping competition.

    On the other hand, Reed Kessler grew up in the pony hunters and seems to be doing just fine. Same goes for Tori Colvin, a big name hunter rider who ironically just won GM's excellence in equitation class. Of course these are somewhat out of the ordinary examples.



  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan. 2, 2007
    Location
    Alpharetta
    Posts
    2,131

    Default

    If you want the jumps to change talk to the show managers not the exhibitors.
    If you want the horses' training to change talk to the trainers, not the clients.
    And if you want to make the divisions tougher like they were "back in the day" fine, enjoy. Because not so many people will be able to compete.

    Frankly, we competed back in the day on TBs in the junior hunter at places like Upperville and Keswick, which he mentioned. And I MUCH prefer competing today on my lovely, QUIET warmblood, doesn't have to be a WB,( a quiet TB is fine as well, I had one of those as well in 2005-2008, RIP MO.)
    We do not find it necessary to drug our horses and we do not look dead, and we win at many shows.
    SO GM go a other shows than WEF, were most of the people who DO Do what you say are, the rest of us not as much.
    Open your eyes, there are lots of us in the hunters that do it right. Tired old argument that just isn't that previlant as he thinks, and where it is, there will always be people who can't seem to get it right.



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep. 18, 2006
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Bottom line is not everyone is looking to compete at the olympics! The discipline has evolved, just like everything else in the US. This isn't the 1950's this is 2012!



  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan. 31, 2007
    Posts
    264

    Default Ick

    Do you want to be like the western shows....where the horses have un-natural gaits that are supposed to resemble a canter?....that is where we are headed....wake up people! The guy has a point! Oh, yeah- he only won the Medal/Maclay- and has coached our show-jumping team for years...what the heck does he know? I guess we should listen to "Joe Amatuer" who shows every weekend and needs a "dead" horse to get around!


    2 members found this post helpful.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May. 24, 2006
    Posts
    2,896

    Default

    I am in complete agreement. It bears zero resemblence today to when I was showing hunters in the 70s. It is completely tedious to watch and the horses look like they are falling asleep. I was also astounded to see the amount of gadgets used in the warm up ring. Not everything has to be the way that it was, but the hunter ring could certainly use a wake up call literally and figuratively.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May. 4, 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,333

    Default

    I'm going to be a small voice of dissent. DD was being taught by two previous barns how to perch on her hands and count strides instead of being taught to "ride." Her life depended on a dead quiet ride. She wouldn't have been able to take something around that showed any expression at all, let alone been able to ride herself out of trouble. I see the same thing at higher and higher fence levels at the a/aa shows all the time. Kids that get dumped or hurt when they get a bad distance and don't know how to ride out of it, riders that get hurt when their horse isn't properly "prepared" for them.

    I understand what he is saying about teaching our riders to "ride" instead of be passengers and I completely agree. We have been fortunate enough to start training in the last few years with one of his former students and it has made a world of difference. She can ride whatever distance comes up and make a choice at each fence how to help her horse get around successfully. This is a skill. She has learned how to adjust down a line if she needs to, and how to tell. Had she stayed where she was, she would never be riding the way she is today, unfortunately not everyone knows how to teach that.

    I also wish there was a greater variety in fences. Some of them get so ramped up you can hardly see the rails under all the brush, etc.
    Sorry to see xtranormal is gone
    For funnies, search youtube for horseyninjawarrior!

    Www.caringbridge.org/visit/mysecretgarden


    2 members found this post helpful.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb. 14, 2008
    Posts
    937

    Default

    I agree that we all need progression and all that, BUT what GM says is true.
    We have not progressed in the show ring for the better. We have many ( I know not all ) people showing on horses that are kept way too quiet be it by over training, over lungeing, over medicated.
    My old trainer couldn't ride my OTTB she kept saying how " dangerous" he was. Um no he is a OTTB that has days when he feels fresh. That's great but because he wasn't a dead barely cantering machine she COULD NOT ride him!!!! ( and sadly she trained under GM but has lost all that he taught her)
    What we have in the hunter ring is NOT riding. I'm sorry but there is no challenge for the rider or horse. The courses are a joke. My non horsey family could learn them!!!!!

    I have left the hunter world due to the not only the way they are ridden/ courses but the fashion obsessive people!!!!! Who cares what clothes/tack/shades of brown/black everyone is wearing!!!!!!!! Just ride your freaking horse!!!!

    Flame suit on


    2 members found this post helpful.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb. 22, 2000
    Location
    Keswick, VA
    Posts
    7,871

    Default

    Hunters aren't about the courses or the spectators. The course should have very little effect on the placings, other than to encourage a flowing trip with good jumping efforts. The course designer's job in the hunter ring is to help show the horses at their best so the judge can pick the best horse. The show ring is not where or how you teach people to ride.
    I fail to see how first year horses "staggering" over the first jump is any better, although I guess it IS more entertaining for the spectators.

    I wish they'd highlighted the part about losing the emphasis on good movement and especially a good canter though. It's not as provoking a statement as the rest of the article, but it's 100% true, and in my opinion a lot more threatening to the tradition of the hunter ring than anything else at this time. Just because it looks like a hunter standing still and jumps slow enough, it is not necessarily a hunter, even if you show it in the hunter derby.



  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb. 4, 2001
    Location
    Member of both the Southern California and Michigan clique - currently residing in Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    1,323

    Default

    After coming back to the hunter ring after two kids, I'm switching to jumpers. And that's with a nice, successful young horse. It's just not that fun anymore. George is spot-on, as usual.

    However, I do love the clothes.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar. 7, 2001
    Location
    va
    Posts
    1,000

    Default

    George was on the money. Unfortunately, very few have access/opportunity to ride anywhere except a ring any more. I had returned to riding again after many years away, but I became quite frustrated with being confined to a ring. A ring is great if you're getting a young horse started or prepping for a show. I was doing neither of these. Driving over an hour going to the barn and another hour returning just wasn't possible. I wanted to be able to ride in a field or canter through the woods once in a while. As that was not going to happen, I could not justify continuing the time and expense. Those learning to ride while only having ring time will be limited by the variety lacking in their experience.

    Next week I'll go to Keswick and enjoy sitting in the old grandstand under the trees at the top of the hill. I'll admire what I see in the ring, but I certainly will miss the pace and variety of years gone by.


    1 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. coth article - humor. really?
    By duecavalle in forum Dressage
    Replies: 248
    Last Post: Jul. 30, 2012, 12:57 PM
  2. Showjumping Article in COTH
    By buschkn in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: Apr. 18, 2012, 02:08 PM
  3. Showjumping Article in COTH
    By buschkn in forum Sport Horse Breeding
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Apr. 15, 2012, 09:30 AM
  4. Buck's COTH Article
    By flutie1 in forum Eventing
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: Dec. 1, 2010, 02:37 PM
  5. What classes do COTH Jr's show their 3' hunters in?
    By kdriding in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Mar. 3, 2010, 10:32 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness