The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 33 of 44 FirstFirst ... 23313233343543 ... LastLast
Results 641 to 660 of 869
  1. #641
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2000
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    12,813

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ambitious Kate View Post
    Yeah. It'd be a disservice to all of us, really, if she was stoppered here. Where else can she hang herself in front of virtually the entire horse world and surely infront of the entire pony hunter community? Come back, Little Amber. Come back.
    Gee, I suppose she could post on that board she keeps mentioning, horse show diva.
    "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

    ...just settin' on the Group W bench.



  2. #642
    Join Date
    Nov. 30, 2006
    Posts
    1,138

    Default

    One of the pages posted said the necropsy was required by insurance.

    Quote Originally Posted by mvp View Post
    Not if she could merely collect on the mortality claim for the insured pony. Why spend a fortune suing Big Pharma when you can collect on an insurance policy instead with greater speed and less effort?

    Above, Mandarino does mention an insurance company. Someone else has asked the right question:

    Was that claim paid?

    But others matter as well: Did Mandarino submit a claim? Did the insurance company require a copy of the necropsy report or ask for any particular findings?



  3. #643
    Join Date
    Jan. 5, 2011
    Posts
    242

    Default

    No I did not but have followed all the 30 plus pages of this plus so many other trainwrecks, Pony Final debacle, etc.....USEF does what it can not to get its hands dirty, it NEVER does the best it can......please post what you think that makes it looks like it did the "best it could"....would love to see it and make me feel better about the money I pay them every year.....



  4. #644
    Join Date
    Jan. 5, 2011
    Posts
    242

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Limerick View Post
    Did you read the hearing transcript?
    My above reply was about this reply... will try and read transcirpt tomorrow....



  5. #645
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gumshoe View Post
    One of the pages posted said the necropsy was required by insurance.
    Yeah, that's what I remember, too. And in an ancient thread, I assumed that Mandarino, who owned Humble, did not submit a claim.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat



  6. #646
    Join Date
    Oct. 2, 1999
    Location
    Mendocino County, CA: Turkey Vulture HQ
    Posts
    14,863

    Default

    The Ted Stevens Act applies to any NGB that represents the USA in the Olympics and some aspects of it apply to the grassroots levels as well as to elite athletes. For example, one of the reasons it was written at all was because one of the governing bodies was restricting the rights of women to compete and interestingly, now that I think about it... given the latest shenanigans by the FEI about non-sanctioned events, it limits the ability of an NGB to deny eligibility for the Olympic type competitions over things like sponsorship.

    This is the USOC due process list:

    "The USOC recommends the following be included in such a hearing:
    • Notice of the specific charges or alleged violations in writing, and possible consequences if the charges are found to be true;
    • Reasonable time between receipt of the notice of charges and the hearing within which to prepare a defense;
    • The right to have the hearing conducted at such a time and place so as to make it practicable for the person charged to attend;
    • A hearing before a disinterested and impartial body of fact finders;
    • The right to be assisted in the presentation of one's case at the hearing, including the assistance of legal council, if desired;
    • The right to call witnesses and present oral and written evidence and argument;
    • The right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses;
    • The right to have a record made of the hearing if desired;
    • The burden of proof shall be on the proponent of the charge, which burden shall be at least a "preponderance of the evidence" unless the NGB requires or provides for a higher burden of proof;
    • A written decision, with reasons therefore, based solely on the evidence of record, handed down in a timely fashion;
    • Written notice of appeal procedures, if the decision is adverse to the person charged, and prompt and fair adjudication of the appeal.
    To me the real question about whether the Act would apply is less about pony hunters not being an international discipline, and more about Mandarino being an athlete. She's not, and I don't think the ponies count as athletes for the purposes of the Act either. I haven't reread the text recently, but believe it would only apply to riders, not trainers and owners.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket



  7. #647
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poltroon View Post
    The Ted Stevens Act applies to any NGB that represents the USA in the Olympics and some aspects of it apply to the grassroots levels as well as to elite athletes. For example, one of the reasons it was written at all was because one of the governing bodies was restricting the rights of women to compete and interestingly, now that I think about it... given the latest shenanigans by the FEI about non-sanctioned events, it limits the ability of an NGB to deny eligibility for the Olympic type competitions over things like sponsorship.

    This is the USOC due process list:



    To me the real question about whether the Act would apply is less about pony hunters not being an international discipline, and more about Mandarino being an athlete. She's not, and I don't think the ponies count as athletes for the purposes of the Act either. I haven't reread the text recently, but believe it would only apply to riders, not trainers and owners.
    Nothing would be finer--- and more embarrassing-- than a body as august as the USOC having to step into fix the USEF's f-up because a pony to be ridden by a child was drugged to death.

    With horse racing, John Q. Public might be able to understand the financial incentive for drugging a money-making horse. But a kid's pony?

    You can't make this stuff up!
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat


    1 members found this post helpful.

  8. #648
    Join Date
    Jun. 21, 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    462

    Default

    Do you think that this will do any difference ?:

    http://www.dressage-news.com/?p=19064

    Has Chrystine Tauber in any way been involved in working against drugging?



  9. #649
    Join Date
    Jun. 21, 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    462

    Default Drug Testing of Horses in Pioneering Expansion to Training Ring in Germany

    As earlier been described, Europe follows FEI rules and their "zerotolerance" policy when it comes to drugs. There are tests being performed at shows but now the germans has extended that into the training ring with funding and help from the German OC..

    http://www.dressage-news.com/?p=19069
    Last edited by LucyShow; Jan. 2, 2013 at 06:45 AM.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  10. #650
    Join Date
    Jun. 21, 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    462

    Default Trying to keep horses healthy - A movie about about equine locomotion

    I found this video at a swedish website. The opposite approach, keep horses healthy and showing without drugging.

    It´s a study Professor Lars Roepstorff doing concerning the horse biomechanic. Professor Lars Roepstorffs is really big here on trying to find better footing, better training methods and so on from a scientific perspective to make the horses healthy and happy.

    It´s really interesting and I hope they will publish a series of videos when the study is finished! Right now there´s 2 videos published and in it´s in english :-)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSk_K8ks-9s


    1 members found this post helpful.

  11. #651
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    The Facts About USEF Protests & What USEF Members Should Know about the Ted Stevens Act and the USOC Rules and Regs for NGB's and the USOC's Due Process Checklist.

    http://amberhillponies.com/Amber_Hil...ould_Know.html

    The USOC is already involved in mediating a resolution between the USEF and AHF. The USOC was responsible for the USEF releases the transcripts that were fully paid for and being held against USEF Rules and Regs and responsible for the release of the rulings.
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977



  12. #652
    Join Date
    May. 6, 2006
    Location
    rapidan,virginia
    Posts
    1,639

    Default

    I found this information on the BayerDVM website pertaining to Legend:

    ADVERSE REACTIONS:
    No local or systemic side effects were observed in the Legend Injectable Solution clinical field trials with either intravenous or intra-articular injections.
    Post-Approval Experience: While all adverse reactions are not reported, the following adverse reactions are based on voluntary post-approval reporting for Legend Injectable Solution:
    Following intravenous use: Occasional depression, lethargy, and fever.
    Following intra-articular (Legend Injectable Solution - 2 mL only) use: lameness, joint effusion, joint or injection site swelling, and joint pain.
    For medical emergencies or to report adverse reactions, call 1-800-422-9874.

    I intend to contact Bayer and speak to them about the sudden death of a pony following a routine injection of their product.
    "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
    Rainy: http://tinyurl.com/kj7x53c
    Stash: http://tinyurl.com/mmm3p4e


    10 members found this post helpful.

  13. #653
    Join Date
    Aug. 1, 2002
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,178

    Default

    You are being sarcastic....right?



  14. #654
    Join Date
    May. 6, 2006
    Location
    rapidan,virginia
    Posts
    1,639

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird! View Post
    You are being sarcastic....right?
    Don't you think Bayer would be interested in knowing that an animal died immediately after the reported administration of Legend?
    "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
    Rainy: http://tinyurl.com/kj7x53c
    Stash: http://tinyurl.com/mmm3p4e


    5 members found this post helpful.

  15. #655
    Join Date
    Oct. 6, 2002
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    16,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2bayboys View Post
    Don't you think Bayer would be interested in knowing that an animal died immediately after the reported administration of Legend?
    I think Bayer would.
    ~Veronica
    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/


    5 members found this post helpful.

  16. #656
    Join Date
    Aug. 1, 2002
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    6,178

    Default

    Hmmm....true. In that case, maybe we should be contacting the makers of Robaxon, Dex and Baninime?


    1 members found this post helpful.

  17. #657
    Join Date
    Oct. 6, 2002
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    16,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freebird! View Post
    Hmmm....true. In that case, maybe we should be contacting the makers of Robaxon, Dex and Baninime?

    None of those things were in the injection (allegedly) that was given properly (allegedly) moments before the pony dropped dead. It appears that what EM is claiming is that she injected Legend, properly, did not nick an artery, and the pony dropped dead from that moments later. Heck YES Bayer should know about that claim!
    ~Veronica
    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/


    8 members found this post helpful.

  18. #658
    Join Date
    Jun. 17, 2001
    Location
    down the road from bar.ka
    Posts
    32,235

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mvp View Post

    With horse racing, John Q. Public might be able to understand the financial incentive for drugging a money-making horse. But a kid's pony?
    Most race trainers do not bill anything near what a kid Pony trainer on a major circuit does i.e 2 to 4k a MONTH not including extras. Race trainers depend on a percentage of anything the horse wins and may be tempted to "enhance" it's chances or giving it "help" to keep going when it shouldn't to generate those dollars.

    The kid Pony trainer needs to keep the gravy train on the track via basic training and board charges at the home barn when the Pony is gone, lessons at home, day care charges at shows, schooling charges at shows, prep fees at shows, class coaching fees at shows, set up fees, hauling fees et al and may be tempted to "enhance" the amount of time it can generate income from said charges by "helping" the Pony keep going when it shouldn't to generate all those bills to the owner.

    I don't see any difference at all.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  19. #659
    Join Date
    Jun. 17, 2001
    Location
    down the road from bar.ka
    Posts
    32,235

    Default

    Well there is no syringe with traces of Legend, the groom who reportedly either witnessed or actually gave the injection has disappeared and the necropsy was too late for any meaningful blood toxicology...even if Legend was detectable since it's not really a drug.

    But they are certainly being trashed publically as a possible trigger in the Pony's massive allergic reaction and dropping dead. Many will read it on the net and assume this really reliable product is actually unsafe and not use it. And tell their friends. All because of what EM personally has said on the net.

    Liable suit? Her lawyers need more work.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  20. #660
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LucyShow View Post
    Do you think that this will do any difference ?:

    http://www.dressage-news.com/?p=19064

    Has Chrystine Tauber in any way been involved in working against drugging?
    Don't know, but not impressed by her non-sequitur answer to a question about the success of the British team as funded by a public lottery. She discusses the causes of the USET's poor competition results, being careful to praise their performances along the way, and talking about things the need to rebuild.

    Yeah. And also, no reference to funding it all or the original question about how the Brits did that.

    Perhaps, OT and irrelevant, but I'd like to see a Top Official apply her brains or balls to answering a question asked, not evading it.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat


    1 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. New york times
    By Airfern in forum Racing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May. 18, 2012, 01:20 AM
  2. New York Times Front Page article 4/30/12
    By Lizzie in forum Racing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: May. 2, 2012, 02:58 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep. 28, 2010, 10:39 PM
  4. New York Times article on air vests
    By JAGold in forum Eventing
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: Sep. 13, 2010, 11:24 PM
  5. Replies: 75
    Last Post: Apr. 9, 2008, 09:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •