-
Jan. 1, 2013, 03:31 PM
#601
 Originally Posted by wanderlust
It's not "h/j land", it's hunter-land. The barns I've been in or around that are focused on jumpers aren't injecting dex/magnesium/etc to turn their horses into lethargic robots, or double-dosing legend to get the hack winner.
Many have their issues, no way around that, but excessive administration of sedating drugs is not one of them.
I included the 'j' part of 'h/j' because Mario Deslauriers's hard-partying horse was a jumper, not a hunter.
The injections I referred to with the FL vet were not about sedation, but about joint injections with unusual substances, which could not possibly have any therapeutic value when used that way.
2 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 03:36 PM
#602
 Originally Posted by JER
Maybe it's time to give up on the USEF. The USEF has had numerous opportunities to show its own membership that it is serious about horse welfare and anti-doping, but the facts show otherwise. The USEF will always side with insiders and money.
This year, we had the Humble incident, the Uriaco (?)/Deslauriers/Clark incident, and the rather tawdry spectacle of the eventing chef d'equipe hiring his mistress as an assistant. When that last thing happens in the real world, as with Arkansas football coach Bobby Petrino, the corrupt cad is shown the door pronto. Not so with the USEF. Not a peep from them about it, and also not a peep from the 'industry news leader' known as the Chronicle of the Horse.
The vast majority of the USEF membership, just like the vast majority of the equestrian community, which includes all of us gathered here, does not support the USEF in terms of how it handled these incidents.
Perhaps its time to give up on the USEF and equestrian media. Does anyone really believe John Long and his organization wants real change? I'm sure Jane Clark's decision to send her horses and money overseas was more of a blow than anything any large group of ordinary USEF members could come up with.
Maybe it's time to get state/local law enforcement, local animal control/welfare and state/local licensing/professional boards involved. You've got a traveling carnival of controlled medications and syringes and unlicensed veterinary activity and child endangerment -- and they're coming to your town soon.
Maybe the USEF would start to listen if outside agencies -- with legal authority and powers of arrest and enforcement -- got involved.
This is essentially what happened with the sport of cycling. The UCI did nothing about doping, so LE stepped in. This happened in Spain with Operation Puerto, and most recently in the US with USADA and the Postal Service case. There are a number of cyclists and hangers-on who avoid certain European countries as a result -- if they show up, they risk arrest.
Sometimes change takes a real shake-up. With USEF, we clearly have a group at the top of the food chain that likes things the way they are with a strong interest in protecting their fiefdom.
The Pennsylvania State Police are still investigating I believe. http://www.ratemyhorsepro.com/news/a...stigation.aspx
2 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 03:37 PM
#603
 Originally Posted by amberhill
It works for me with windows 7, little hard to load but I can read it...or some of the 136 pages of back and forth.
I would hardly call that transcript much of a defense. EMs lawyer touted "the protester has to prove it, we don't have to produce anything". Then it was pointed out the toxicology was in question because the necropsy was not performed for 36 hours and no blood was pulled in time to get signifigant information...they had to use degraded 36 hours post mortem tissue samples. The body was not even delivered to New Bolton for 12 hours outside the window for viable blood samples.
So when that pathlologist dropped his probes and tools and excitedly called halfway thru the necropsy to report "emerging lung disease"? At least 3 days after the Pony died.
Thats just the first 10 pages.
Who needs RateMyHorsePro? Just read what EM puts up, nobody to sue on that one.
The Pa State Police are involved, no idea to what extent at this point but USEF did rely on them for some help.
When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.
The horse world. Two people. Three opinions  .
4 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 03:39 PM
#604
 Originally Posted by Pennywell Bay
I am not disputing quieting drugs in hunters, but you are blind if you don't see drugging in jumpers.
Ditto....
3 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 03:45 PM
#605
 Originally Posted by KellyS
And that's the scary part ~ what was the pony receiving that was NOT listed? I mean, the list only had the drugs on it that are considered "legal" and that list was bad enough, but it doesn't even cover the "illegal/untestable" drugs potentially being administered...
ETA: While Mandarino claims it was Legend in the syringe, well, we know her track record for telling the truth. If it really was Legend, I'd love to see her 9 lawyers up against Bayer's corporate lawyers.
Why should she bother with Bayer if she settled with the insurance company? Do we know if they paid out a claim on Humble? Also, since the syringe was not seized, along with whatever was in it, there would not be a way that EM could prove that Legend was administered. No evidence, no suit..in this case it cuts both ways. Nobody knows what was administered except EM and that only benefits her claim that she did nothing wrong.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 03:48 PM
#606
Member, COTH LUG. Ubuntu Studio 12.04 Precise Pangolin
3 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 04:10 PM
#607
 Originally Posted by JER
Yes, vineyridge, but that's due to this lawsuit. The vet was found negligent and liable for malpractice, and the case was then taken to the state agency in charge of professional licensing.
I referred to this case earlier as I made a public records request on it. The horse's vet records are in the file, and if this horse's injection regimen is anything approaching SOP for a show hunter, h/j land is not a place of evidence-based veterinary care.
About time somebody stepped up to the plate. Vet named is, frankly, not a surprise at all. Whatever else, owner (who has had one great and many very nice ones) should be congratulated for having the guts to openly proceed with it against a very busy and well known show vet. One there have always been some whispers about. Actually used him once for a minor procedure when horse was on the road for 3 weeks-bill was 3 times what it would have cost at home.
IMO there is a worse problem with overmedicating and using multiple drug combinations on sore horses in any discipline then quieting them and Jumpers would be just as much, or more, likely to need a little "help" as any Hunter.
When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.
The horse world. Two people. Three opinions  .
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 04:12 PM
#608
 Originally Posted by violethorse
Why should she bother with Bayer if she settled with the insurance company? Do we know if they paid out a claim on Humble? Also, since the syringe was not seized, along with whatever was in it, there would not be a way that EM could prove that Legend was administered. No evidence, no suit..in this case it cuts both ways. Nobody knows what was administered except EM and that only benefits her claim that she did nothing wrong.
She claims the last injection she gave Humble was Legend....and then Humble dropped dead. As a horse owner who has had the vet give my horse Legend, after surgery as part of his recovery, I want to know why a seemingly healthy horse dropped dead after getting Legend. Since Elizabeth Mandarino seems so enthusiastic to bring forth lawsuits, why isn't she suing Bayer, the manufacturer of Legend??
Is Bayer covering something up about Legend? Does the product need to be taken off the market after the sudden death of Humble after, according to Elizabeth Mandarino of Amber Hill Farm, and be investigated?? Is their product dangerous?? Will my horse drop dead just like Humble did??
We should all be contacting Bayer and demanding answers from them regarding the allegations as put forth by Elizabeth Mandarino.
 Originally Posted by alicen
We have no intentions of tarring and feathering anyone: this is now a thread about dipping Ryan Reynolds in chocolate.
4 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 04:32 PM
#609
Umm......have you seen the medication schedule that the pony was on?? Me thinks that Legend was the least of his problems....
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 04:46 PM
#610
 Originally Posted by Freebird!
Umm......have you seen the medication schedule that the pony was on?? Me thinks that Legend was the least of his problems....
Freebird, I think if you read it again you'll conclude that the poster does not actually believe that an injection of Legend caused the pony's death. However, with EM saying it did, if she is correct, then that leads down some, ahem, interesting paths.
If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket
3 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 04:54 PM
#611
 Originally Posted by findeight
Who needs RateMyHorsePro? Just read what EM puts up, nobody to sue on that one.
I agree. Everyone should read the transcript. It's more damning than anything that's been posted on any forum I continue to bang my head in sympathy for the 9 attorneys who are bleeding this woman dry.
2 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 04:58 PM
#612
I will be interested to see whether this very significant article gets discussed during the GM Horsemastership Clinic that begins tomorrow. The biggest challenge is that everyone there will probably think that Ms. Mandarino is perpetually self-medicated with whatever "wasn't" in the syringe (the one they never recovered from Humble). They may easily dismiss her as a deviant. But, if they really explore the subject with the vets during the portions of the clinic that address horse care, they may get some very interesting observations/thoughts from the kids that came up through the pony and hunter ranks. Hope they broadcast that part!
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:04 PM
#613
@ Findeight, since you read the transcript too, am I correct that on page 77 (or thereabouts) it says that Gabby, the groom who may or may not have been the one who actually gave the shot, is "presumed illegal," has disappeared, and has never provided an affidavit or been deposed?
Last edited by Discobold; Jan. 1, 2013 at 07:17 PM.
2 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:06 PM
#614
Don't suppose there is a live feed of the vet symposium on that???? They need to discuss the subject in general, even if they leave EM and her hoards of lawyers out of it. After all, one of their own just went down in a lawsuit referenced a couple opf pages ago.
I'd LOVE to sit in on that.
When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.
The horse world. Two people. Three opinions  .
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:10 PM
#615
 Originally Posted by War Admiral
One thing I did want to throw out there for consideration, in terms of bringing some pressure to bear on USEF - and I don't know HOW this could be done, but I assume that it COULD (and that the NYT article wouldn't hurt) - is how about getting word to the USOC somehow that the NGB for equestrian sport is doing absolutely-effing-nothing to effect cleanup of the sport, and in view of recent decisions, said Federation has effectively rendered its protest procedure null and void?
I hate to play this kind of hard ball, I'd far rather USEF stood up for itself and did the right thing - but if we could push USEF to the point where they believed their standing as the official NGB was affected, THEN we might see some change.
Oh, trust me. I've already started that process. A perk of not only living where the USOC and Anti-Doping Agency are located, but having military Reserve coworkers who are full-time employees/coaches/trainers various sports within the USOC community. I don't know how far it will go, but it definitely piqued the interest of one Paralympic trainer/coach in particular.
"IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique
3 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:12 PM
#616
 Originally Posted by Discobold
@ Findeight, since you read to transcript too, am I correct that on page 77 (or thereabouts) it says that Gabby, the groom who may or may not have been the one who actually gave the shot, is "presumed illegal," has disappeared, and has never provided an affidavit or been deposed?
I quit after page 10 and the late necropsy complicating any toxicology findings. I have been sipping the last of the bubbly and can't follow the gibberish of hearing procedures at the moment. Besides the format is wierd.
Wouldn't surprise me a bit tho. That very subject was referenced either here or on my Humble Initiative thread, expecting the "help" to do the deeds then blaming them for being "illegals" and vanishing. Crap, any groom regardless of status who was directed to give a shot and had the animal drop dead would probably split too.
When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.
The horse world. Two people. Three opinions  .
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:18 PM
#617
EM has posted letters from her vets in New Jersey, Florida, and Juan Gamboa (NC and Classic Company's show vet) on her amber hill farm Facebook page and many other documents. In their letters to the USEF they all praise EM for her horse's care etc. Of course Gamboa spends most of the space in his letter stating that he never sold any Carolina Gold to EM. If he did, would he have stated that in a letter to the USEF? Of course not given the banning of it. Also attached to her Facebook page are letters from her landlord, a customer leasing one of her ponies, her husband, etc.
At the end of the day we will never know all the details..but the outcome of all this publicity is that going forward more people will be more sensitive as to who they do business with..trainers, vets, etc...and that somehow the USEF will find a way to be aggressive and severe where they can prove drug issues. Civil cases do not have the same guidelines as criminal matters but it seems as though the USEF in it's hearings wants ironclad proof (tox reports, pictures, video or an admission of guilt) that an infraction has taken place. Black and White. Their current punishment for infractions are a joke and the recent USHJA cover photo is a testament to broken oversight. Can you search for all of SS's disciplinary actions over the years on the USEF site? NO....you would have to look at every month's "for the record" pages over the years. So the actions just fade away as each month comes and goes.....washed away with the most recent turmoil.
Again, only EM knows what took place and to debate anything else is futile.
We need to get the USEF to be a real governing body with some serious teeth or see the demise of hunters..it may already be tooooo late for a new generation of youngsters whose parents read the NYT and are walking away from the child's dream of owning a pony.
3 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:22 PM
#618
 Originally Posted by findeight
Don't suppose there is a live feed of the vet symposium on that???? They need to discuss the subject in general, even if they leave EM and her hoards of lawyers out of it. After all, one of their own just went down in a lawsuit referenced a couple opf pages ago.
I'd LOVE to sit in on that.
Who is that vet?
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:48 PM
#619
4 members found this post helpful.
-
Jan. 1, 2013, 05:50 PM
#620
 Originally Posted by poltroon
Freebird, I think if you read it again you'll conclude that the poster does not actually believe that an injection of Legend caused the pony's death. However, with EM saying it did, if she is correct, then that leads down some, ahem, interesting paths.
Indeed. I would think that Bayer may be very interested in what Elizabeth Mandarino is saying about their product.
 Originally Posted by alicen
We have no intentions of tarring and feathering anyone: this is now a thread about dipping Ryan Reynolds in chocolate.
1 members found this post helpful.
Similar Threads
-
By Airfern in forum Racing
Replies: 1
Last Post: May. 17, 2012, 11:20 PM
-
By Lizzie in forum Racing
Replies: 17
Last Post: May. 2, 2012, 12:58 AM
-
By Natalie A in forum Off Course
Replies: 3
Last Post: Sep. 28, 2010, 08:39 PM
-
By JAGold in forum Eventing
Replies: 75
Last Post: Sep. 13, 2010, 09:24 PM
-
Replies: 75
Last Post: Apr. 9, 2008, 07:46 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|