The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 28 of 44 FirstFirst ... 18262728293038 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 560 of 869
  1. #541
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2003
    Location
    NorthEast
    Posts
    24,508

    Default

    MistyBlue, in those cases that you referenced, did Elizabeth Mandarino use that same excuse for 2 different cases?
    According to what EM has posted, court documents and dates on those documents...yes, 2 different cases at 2 different times. September 17th and November 4th IIRC.
    You jump in the saddle,
    Hold onto the bridle!
    Jump in the line!
    ...Belefonte


    1 members found this post helpful.

  2. #542
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cdnsp0rthorse View Post
    Is dex legal to use at a show in USA?
    Quote Originally Posted by PonyPenny View Post
    Yes, within certain limits.
    But not for the purpose of making a horse quiet. It's not legal to use it that way in any amount. That element of the D&M rules is one of the primary causes of this problem.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat


    1 members found this post helpful.

  3. #543
    Join Date
    Sep. 24, 2001
    Location
    on the road.....again
    Posts
    1,820

    Default

    I don't see anywhere in the article where is says that Carrie Ray is a steward.

    Also, it would be a conflict for a steward to have a family member or trainer showing at a show they were officiating.

    FYI- a quick search of the LOC does not show that Carrie Ray is a USEF steward.

    I suspect you read the one sentence where the say in the steward's report, Carrie Ray is quoted as saying. That is not stating that Carrie Ray is the steward, but that the stewards report has a quote from her.

    Also, I am not sure what eye witness information you would expect from the steward as this occurred for the start of the show. This all happened at least an hour before the start of the show. Stewards only need to be there by the start of the show, however most are there approx. 30 mins before.



  4. #544
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MHM View Post
    Exactly. All the horses deserve that protection, not just the winners.
    A philosophy that is a lovely as it is expensive.

    But look, everyone shows to try and win. Don't the also rans get protection if the winners are tested? Who would bother with a horse who always was 5th in his division... so long as you could drug him?
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat


    1 members found this post helpful.

  5. #545
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,268

    Default

    [
    Quote Originally Posted by juststartingout View Post
    I'd rather spend time enlisting! ALL like minded people to change what is .... rich poor and in between ... than complain about the bad actors who happen to have money is ... they are just part of the problem like any other bad actors
    by juststartingout


    I don't know if Mrs. Williams would agree.....she lost her money to file a protest and now is becoming embroiled in a lawsuit.[/QUOTE]

    ANd -- she did the right thing and that has a satisfaction all of its own. The suit against her - if it is even filed - is frivolous and everyone knows that... my guess - she would agree and she would probably do it all over again[/QUOTE]

    You are still ignoring the money problem.

    Would you file a protest if you knew that that might entail the cost of defending yourself in a separate legal battle?

    I wouldn't. Getting someone to quit drugging show horses paired with a governing body that has show itself to have no interest in really doing that it not a cause I'll go bankrupt for.

    IMO, no one asking the USEF to enforce its own rules should be subject to this risk. If they are, it means that the rich can do what they want-- those with deep enough pockets can cheat because they can afford to threaten further litigation. I suppose that other people with still deeper pockets can pursue these protests. But raising the stakes this way as Mandarino's suit has takes the option of protesting out of most USEF members' options.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat


    6 members found this post helpful.

  6. #546
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eventer13 View Post
    So, these people who hint about BNTs that drug their horses... why don't you out them? Aren't you perpetuating the problem? Maybe if these BNTs were publicly shunned they might be less likely to drug their horses?
    Start it up, then!

    I want you to write a letter to the editor of Practical Horseman criticizing that magazine for featuring a trainer who has been set down for D&M infractions in recent memory. Cite the Humble hubbub to support your "outing" of Mr. Stewart and disappointment of PH if you wish. But put your money where your mouth is. I'll look forward to reading your letter of BNT shunning.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat



  7. #547
    Join Date
    Sep. 12, 2007
    Posts
    237

    Default

    the problem is if you out the BNTs and you have a child showing or yourself, the judges will retaliate against you. Some of the BNTs are also judges.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  8. #548
    Join Date
    Dec. 22, 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    14,977

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Molly99 View Post
    Random testing is really the best option, for various reasons. I do agree that at certain level events testing the top 3 would be good as well, but not a rule. Random implies that anyone at anytime can be tested. That impacts every horse at the show, not just the winners.
    Mvp, perhaps you missed that my post was in response to the above comment regarding the value of random testing. If people know that ANY horse might be tested at any time, that protects ALL the horses.

    Quote Originally Posted by mvp View Post
    A philosophy that is a lovely as it is expensive.

    But look, everyone shows to try and win. Don't the also rans get protection if the winners are tested? Who would bother with a horse who always was 5th in his division... so long as you could drug him?
    There are plenty of horses that are very unlikely to get top ribbons in certain competitions- the kind, safe, slow, habitual four-faulter in a big childrens' jumper division at WEF, the novice adult hunter whose rider will usually miss at least one distance in every class, if not more. Those horses still deserve protection, even if they never win.

    There's the old saying that 10% of the horses win 90% of the ribbons. The other 90% of the horses also need protection from bad chemistry experiments.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  9. #549
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cdnsp0rthorse View Post
    Is dex legal to use at a show in USA?
    Quote Originally Posted by Molly99 View Post
    I don't see anywhere in the article where is says that Carrie Ray is a steward.

    Also, it would be a conflict for a steward to have a family member or trainer showing at a show they were officiating.

    FYI- a quick search of the LOC does not show that Carrie Ray is a USEF steward.

    I suspect you read the one sentence where the say in the steward's report, Carrie Ray is quoted as saying. That is not stating that Carrie Ray is the steward, but that the stewards report has a quote from her.

    Also, I am not sure what eye witness information you would expect from the steward as this occurred for the start of the show. This all happened at least an hour before the start of the show. Stewards only need to be there by the start of the show, however most are there approx. 30 mins before.
    Gotcha. No, I didn't expect the Steward to have been there when this one pony was collapsing on cross-ties. But I did recall from an earlier thread a less-than-Sherlock Holmes'-best report and wondered why that was.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat



  10. #550
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MHM View Post
    Mvp, perhaps you missed that my post was in response to the above comment regarding the value of random testing. If people know that ANY horse might be tested at any time, that protects ALL the horses.



    There are plenty of horses that are very unlikely to get top ribbons in certain competitions- the kind, safe, slow, habitual four-faulter in a big childrens' jumper division at WEF, the novice adult hunter whose rider will usually miss at least one distance in every class, if not more. Those horses still deserve protection, even if they never win.
    Yeah, but holey mole the cost of protecting every last horse showing!
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat



  11. #551
    Join Date
    Jul. 21, 2011
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    4,375

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leyla25 View Post
    the problem is if you out the BNTs and you have a child showing or yourself, the judges will retaliate against you. Some of the BNTs are also judges.
    I think the problem REALLY is, that even if you have leased a pony for your child to show at Devon ,(a competition held under USEF rules) and it drops, convulses and dies at the end of a needle, administered by Elizabeth Mandarino the "trainer", and you PAY to file a protest with USEF (because something must be wrong yes?), the result is that the "trainer" sues YOU,the person who leased the pony and filed the protest, and USEF throws it's hands in the air and claims that they can't do a thing about it.

    Do you really believe that reporting to USEF that someone is injecting their horse with a banned substance would have any conequence whatsoever when a dead pony at the end of a needle is beyond USEF's ability to handle?

    The problem does not lie with honest competitors not stepping up to report the doping of horses, but with the USEF that claims that it is unable to punish this behaviour.
    Last edited by skydy; Jan. 1, 2013 at 03:06 AM.


    17 members found this post helpful.

  12. #552
    Join Date
    Dec. 22, 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    14,977

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mvp View Post
    Yeah, but holey mole the cost of protecting every last horse showing!
    I'm not suggesting they test them all. I'm endorsing the idea of testing AT RANDOM. That discourages everybody from breaking the rules. Not just the people who expect to win.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  13. #553
    Join Date
    Apr. 20, 2011
    Posts
    758

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MHM View Post
    I'm not suggesting they test them all. I'm endorsing the idea of testing AT RANDOM. That discourages everybody from breaking the rules. Not just the people who expect to win.
    exactly. this is how it is done at the show series I mentioned. completely random. and up to the vet as to how horses are chosen. some years the vet will roll dice for class number and placing. other years just walking the show grounds w/ steward and saying "that one, that one and that one".

    it is well known that if your horse is on the show grounds, competing or not, it's "up for" being chosen to have blood pulled. If horse tests positive, the entire barn is disqualified for the current year, and the next.

    this show series is a large schooling show series. not huge, but a three day event that is well known and fun, there's a littlel bit of everything for everyone. A few years ago, a "BNT" (big fish, little pond) had a horse test positive, claimed that it had been showing colic signs the day before so he gave it banamine. Took his protest all the way to state court, where he lost.

    Now, I'm not so naive that I believe there are NO drugged horses, but I do know that there are a lot less drugged horses than at the A rated shows that are local.

    working on the committee for a couple of years, I believe the cost to test (test kit plus lab fees) is about $500, per horse. Is there no way the larger shows couldn't budget in a few tests?? we test 3 horses per show/ 3 shows per series. seems like not alot, as there's a couple hundred horses showing, but it's the RANDOMNESS that really discourages attempting.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  14. #554
    Join Date
    Mar. 19, 2003
    Posts
    374

    Default

    I was under the impression that drug testing at USEF shows was random. That they could test any horse on the show grounds whether it was showing or not.
    M
    Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from behind, or a fool from any direction


    1 members found this post helpful.

  15. #555
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2003
    Location
    NorthEast
    Posts
    24,508

    Default

    it is well known that if your horse is on the show grounds, competing or not, it's "up for" being chosen to have blood pulled. If horse tests positive, the entire barn is disqualified for the current year, and the next.
    Is it the entire barn or anyone under that trainer?
    Because if an owner has their horse stuck without their knowledge because that trainer wants everyone under his/her name at the show to look good...and that horse gets DQed, owner gets pissed off, can owner leave barn for new barn and continue to show elsewhere or are they screwed for up to 2 seasons no matter where they ride out of?

    Or if the trainer's own horse from a barn is tested positive but none of the boarders/students are...are they all screwed from showing for that long or can they move and show under someone else?
    You jump in the saddle,
    Hold onto the bridle!
    Jump in the line!
    ...Belefonte



  16. #556
    Join Date
    Dec. 22, 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    14,977

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monarch View Post
    I was under the impression that drug testing at USEF shows was random. That they could test any horse on the show grounds whether it was showing or not.
    M
    It is random now. Some people were suggesting that should change to concentrating on the winners. I beg to differ, for the reasons stated above.

    I believe as it stands now, a horse must be entered in the show to be subject to drug testing. If you have a non-showing horse on the grounds, it is not subject to testing, IIRC.



  17. #557
    Join Date
    Apr. 20, 2011
    Posts
    758

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MistyBlue View Post
    Is it the entire barn or anyone under that trainer?
    Because if an owner has their horse stuck without their knowledge because that trainer wants everyone under his/her name at the show to look good...and that horse gets DQed, owner gets pissed off, can owner leave barn for new barn and continue to show elsewhere or are they screwed for up to 2 seasons no matter where they ride out of?

    Or if the trainer's own horse from a barn is tested positive but none of the boarders/students are...are they all screwed from showing for that long or can they move and show under someone else?
    I would have to investigate that one, but my understanding is that, for the current showing year, you are out. If you move barns when the current year is over, I would assume you could show then next year under a different trainer.



  18. #558
    Join Date
    Mar. 19, 2003
    Posts
    374

    Default

    Thanks for clarifying MHM. Re read GR402 testing misunderstood earlier.
    M
    Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from behind, or a fool from any direction



  19. #559
    Join Date
    Mar. 12, 2006
    Posts
    4,343

    Default

    I just wanted to post this... my New Year's Resolution is to be a bitch when needed.

    If you KNOWINGLY drug a horse too sore, too unsettled, too lame.... for the purpose of winning ribbons, you are an [ass]. I'd like to take you to the nearest Cross Fit Box. Make you workout. Pump you fill of pain meds and some valium. Take you back the next day and the next and the next. Just keep repeating, keep "fixing you up" without a break. Joint injections, whatever. Then when I finally break you, I'll dump you somewhere.

    People who do this [edit] are an embarassment and more disgusting than the bikers and others that drug to win because you bringing along a partner with no say in your disgusting activity.

    I understand the need for occasional therapy, but it goes too far too often. Really? There is that much money in the hunters? The owners really need the prize money or a giant return on investment that there is need to overuse the horses like work mules?

    [edit] Did she even consider the hit to her bottom line when that pony collapsed under a young rider who's parents probably had access to bigger lawyers? WTF happens to your bottom line, USEF and trainers when your stupidity and greed kills a cute little rich girl who's drugged pony stumbles and she is injured or worse yet, killed?

    You know, occasional bute and joint injections and even some Ace are one thing.... but these wonderful combos that don't test are just despicable. May all of the people who use these things go rot in hell and I pray for your horses.
    Last edited by Moderator 1; Jan. 1, 2013 at 01:25 PM. Reason: language


    30 members found this post helpful.

  20. #560
    Join Date
    Feb. 7, 2000
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,988

    Default

    Why can't testing involve both scenarios? Mandatory tests for the top 3 or 4 places plus random tests for any horses registered to show? In many cases there will probably be some overlap in the top placings anyway, which should help with any increased costs.
    "Whether you think you can or think you can't, you are right." -Henry Ford


    3 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. New york times
    By Airfern in forum Racing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May. 18, 2012, 12:20 AM
  2. New York Times Front Page article 4/30/12
    By Lizzie in forum Racing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: May. 2, 2012, 01:58 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep. 28, 2010, 09:39 PM
  4. New York Times article on air vests
    By JAGold in forum Eventing
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: Sep. 13, 2010, 10:24 PM
  5. Replies: 75
    Last Post: Apr. 9, 2008, 08:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness