The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 19 of 44 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast
Results 361 to 380 of 869
  1. #361
    Join Date
    Mar. 8, 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    19,832

    Default

    You can not test for mag, it is a naturally occurring substance in the body.


    11 members found this post helpful.

  2. #362
    Join Date
    Sep. 26, 2010
    Posts
    4,419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pds View Post
    Please explain why you think, "The necropsy is a report that needs to be read by a professional..." Is there something in the report that you are afraid will be misinterpreted?

    You wanting to keep the necropsy from public inspection implies some level of guilt in my eyes. Otherwise why hide it.
    Not to take sides, but often you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. If there's nothing to hide and you open it up, people who have something against you will nitpick every little detail. If there is something to hide, it's even worse. We see this in business and politics all the time.

    I don't think the necropsy being unavailable for public inspection necessarily means anything one way or the other.

    After the Exxon Valdez debacle occurred, a prominent newscaster asked the captain why he wouldn't just come out and say he had not been drinking. If he had nothing to hide then the premise was he should just come out and say so. The captain said that for legal reasons (ongoing court case) he had been advised not to discuss certain subjects. Does that mean he was definitely drinking because he wouldn't say otherwise? No.
    Last edited by SnicklefritzG; Dec. 31, 2012 at 10:46 AM.



  3. #363
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2000
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    12,660

    Default

    Just as a point of information, a necropsy report lists all post mortem findings.
    For instance, a horse could be euthanized for an intestinal blockage, and the report might make note of a couple of lag screws in a front sesamoid. It could further note that this particular horse had evidence of prior exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage.

    Doesn't mean the screws caused the colic.
    Or the EIPH.
    "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

    ...just settin' on the Group W bench.


    9 members found this post helpful.

  4. #364
    Join Date
    Feb. 22, 2000
    Location
    Keswick, VA
    Posts
    7,868

    Default

    While determining Mg threshold levels for testing in live animals has been difficult, I believe it is pretty easy to determine if levels are high in a necropsy. Given the fact that the USEF was given access to the necropsy, and found no evidence of wrongdoing, I would have to assume it's unlikely the pony was given Mg. It's really easy to speculate on a tragedy, but facts need to be considered.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  5. #365
    Join Date
    Sep. 12, 2007
    Posts
    237

    Default

    The fact is that at high level of competitive riding most barn do administer illegal substances. But most of these trainers are skilled enough to not engage in public legal battle(although many are sued). They hide their "mistakes" or criminal acts under masks of human and animal compassion, i.e. join USEF committees, become a judge(so you can take revenge on those that scorn you now, or help your sales business) and advertise acts of kindness on FB and other forums of self promotion. The Talent Search was a great try. Follow that route and all will be forgotten. Follow the example of one of our most revered Olympic riders.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  6. #366
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CBoylen View Post
    While determining Mg threshold levels for testing in live animals has been difficult, I believe it is pretty easy to determine if levels are high in a necropsy. Given the fact that the USEF was given access to the necropsy, and found no evidence of wrongdoing, I would have to assume it's unlikely the pony was given Mg. It's really easy to speculate on a tragedy, but facts need to be considered.
    According to this letter from USEF to the New York Post, USEF was NOT given access to the necropsy or the full list of meds given to Humble.

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...er.html?ref=us


    6 members found this post helpful.

  7. #367
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    I have nothing to hide. Here is the report by Dr Reed of Rood and Riddle which summarizes the report and the findings:

    http://amberhillponies.com/Amber_Hil...nd_Riddle.html

    It took me a bit to get it uploaded.... this should put an end to the naysayers.
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977


    1 members found this post helpful.

  8. #368
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Limerick View Post
    According to this letter from USEF to the New York Post, USEF was NOT given access to the necropsy or the full list of meds given to Humble.

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...er.html?ref=us
    I can not speak for why Mr. Long says one thing one day and then another the next. Maybe he was doing damage control as a NY Times reporter was all over the USEF.
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977



  9. #369
    Join Date
    Mar. 8, 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    19,832

    Default

    You can't test for calcium.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  10. #370
    Join Date
    Mar. 22, 2005
    Location
    Where it is perpetually winter
    Posts
    5,130

    Default

    Interestingly, that letter does not state anything conclusive about an underlying condition. It asserts that there is the possibility because of the high level of eosinophils present in a short period of time, but that's not the same as diagnosing something.


    7 members found this post helpful.

  11. #371
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Laurierace View Post
    You can't test for calcium.
    well you may want to tell New Bolton that because Humble was tested for it.
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977



  12. #372
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by supershorty628 View Post
    Interestingly, that letter does not state anything conclusive about an underlying condition. It asserts that there is the possibility because of the high level of eosinophils present in a short period of time, but that's not the same as diagnosing something.
    The necropsy states "emerging lung disease".
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977



  13. #373
    Join Date
    Jan. 28, 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    4,596

    Default

    ...somewhere, a lawyer is banging their head on a desk repeatedly!

    Between this thread and the one in the Sport Horse Breeding forum about Jill Burnell, breeding something like Gerbils or Guinea Pigs looks more appealing every day! Oy!
    www.DaventryEquestrian.com
    Home of Welsh Pony, ISR/Oldenburg & RPSI pony stallions Daventry's Power Play, Goldhills Brandysnap LOM & Alvesta Picasso
    Also home to www.EquineAppraisers.com


    9 members found this post helpful.

  14. #374
    Join Date
    Jul. 10, 2001
    Posts
    6,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amberhill View Post
    I have nothing to hide. Here is the report by Dr Reed of Rood and Riddle which summarizes the report and the findings:

    http://amberhillponies.com/Amber_Hil...nd_Riddle.html

    It took me a bit to get it uploaded.... this should put an end to the naysayers.
    Elizabeth, honey, your ability to understand the letter is only outweighed by your ability to destroy this sport and to know how to give drugs.

    There are no definitive statements in the letter. Only a reiteration of facts presented at necropsy done as a professional consideration to his colleagues.

    The letter does nothing to bolster your assertions. It does nothing to hurt them either.

    Reed


    18 members found this post helpful.

  15. #375
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Regarding the NY times.... here is the correspondence proving he had an agenda and did not report our statement or the truth for that matter

    -----Original Message-----
    From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    To: mccrad <mccrad@nytimes.com>
    Sent: Sat, Dec 29, 2012 12:31 pm
    Subject: [FWD: RE: Elizabeth Mandarino]

    Mr. McGraw,
    I am not in the office due to the holidays and do not have a full list of the inaccuracies and omissions contained in Mr. Bogdanich's article. Just to give you a flavor of Mr. Bogdanich's communications with me regarding the reporting of this story, I am forwarding you a series of emails with Mr. Bogdanich. These emails followed a phone conversation wherein I attempted to give Mr. Bogdanich information regarding the lack of credibility of his "sources," the identities of whom were obvious by the uneducated phrases and accusations he was parroting. I tried to explain that these "sources" were all defendants, potential defendants, or their counsel in a case pending in New Jersey and had underlying personal animus towards my client. I was told that he was "not interested in hearing about that stuff." At that point, it was clear that he had an agenda other than reporting accurately on what occurred at the Devon Horse Show and the subsequent actions taken by USEF.
    Most troubling is the fact that I sent to Mr. Bogdanich a prepared statement (see below) refuting Mr. Long's assertions that my client did not cooperate with the Federation. Unless I missed something in the article, and please correct me if I am wrong, the only "fact" reported was that Ms. Mandarino had refused to comply with the Federation's requests for documentation and information. Mr. Bogdanich had a prepared statement from me with an email from General Counsel of USEF confirming that statement and USEF's "misunderstanding," and he intentionally chose not to use it. I found his antagonistic manner unprofessional, and his reporting to lack integrity. It is also worth noting that one of the Jane Doe defendants in the pending litigation was posting on an unseemly anonymous gossip website as early as June 4, 2012 that someone "should get the NY Times reporter that did the racing article" to do an article on Humble. I am surprised that a publication of the NY Times' stature would allow itself to be used to advance personal agendas, but in my opinion that is what has happened. Had the article focused correctly on the drug use in our sport, and on the people who actually have been suspended or otherwise punished (as opposed to Ms. Mandarino who has never been charged by USEF with a medication infraction despite dozens of random tests on her horses and ponies), it might have had some credibility. I will be in touch to discuss this further but would ask that the statement I prepared below be published immediately by the NY Times as a follow-up to yesterday's story.
    Thank you,
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: RE: Elizabeth Mandarino
    From: "Bogdanich, Walt" <waltbog@nytimes.com>
    Date: Thu, December 06, 2012 5:47 pm
    To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    I thought you said you were not going to communicate with me further?
    Since you have apparently changed your mind, please know that I remain open to discussing with you my request to interview Ms. Mandarino. Rest assured that I will be very careful in what I report.
    Thank you.
    Walt Bogdanich

    From:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:32 PM
    To: Bogdanich, Walt
    Cc: Purdy, Matt
    Subject: RE: Elizabeth Mandarino

    Mr. Bogdanich,
    Once again you are making a knowing misstatement of fact. My client proposed to produce the necropsy and toxicology to the NY Times with restrictions on its use and dissemination, and you declined because you didn't want to adhere to the proposed restrictions. That is the full truthful statement on what happened and is evidenced by your own email. Anything other than that statement is false and misleading.
    And again, your statement that I "have decided to deny [my] client, Ms. Mandarino, the opportunity to present her side of the controversy" has no basis in fact and I have already brought that to your attention. If any of these untruths are published, we will seek any and all appropriate remedies.
    Thank you,


    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX



    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: RE: Elizabeth Mandarino
    From: "Bogdanich, Walt" <waltbog@nytimes.com>
    Date: Thu, December 06, 2012 5:00 pm
    To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Cc: "Purdy, Matt" <purdy@nytimes.com>
    XXXXXXXXXXXXX
    You are incorrect. Your client DID offer me the necropsy and toxicology report. I’m sorry that you have decided to deny your client, Ms. Mandarino, the opportunity to present her side of this controversy. If you change your mind, please get in touch with me.
    Thank you.
    Walt Bogdanich
    212 556-5881

    From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 3:54 PM
    To: Bogdanich, Walt
    Cc: Purdy, Matt
    Subject: RE: Elizabeth Mandarino

    Mr. Bogdanich,
    My client did not agree to give you the necropsy and toxicology, and you are aware of that based on the attached email. As is shown by your own email, it was offered to you with certain restrictions on use and dissemination because it is a private document. You declined to accept it with those restrictions. You should be aware that there was a lawyer other than myself present with Mr. Mandarino during your phone call last night. You should also be aware that your statement that I am refusing to allow Ms. Mandarino to grant an interview has no basis in fact.

    Based on your deceptive conduct, my client has decided that she will not communicate with you further, and I have decided that I will not communicate with you further.


    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX






    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: RE: Elizabeth Mandarino
    From: "Bogdanich, Walt" <waltbog@nytimes.com>
    Date: Thu, December 06, 2012 3:05 pm
    To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Thank you for your email.
    Please send me the full and final necropsy report, plus toxicology. If you choose not to – even though your client had already agreed to send it to me – please state your reason for denying my request. Also please state your reason for not allowing your client, Ms. Mandarino, to grant me an interview.
    Please call me if you wish to discuss this further.
    Thank you.
    Walt Bogdanich
    212 556-5881

    From: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 2:41 PM
    To: Bogdanich, Walt
    Subject: Elizabeth Mandarino

    Mr. Bogdanich,
    In follow up to our conversation of last evening, please find the following on-the-record statement and an attached pdf of an email exchange with Sonja Keating of this morning showing the accuracy of this statement.

    Ms. Mandarino provided the Interim Client Report with the findings on necropsy as well as toxicology tests conducted by New Bolton to the United States Equestrian Federation on June 19, 2012 as part of a motion made pursuant to GR617, which allows the CEO or Executive Director to dismiss a protest if it is unsubstantiated. General Counsel for the Federation acknowledged receipt of the motion in an email, with the CEO copied, on June 27, 2012. The report provided was deemed “interim” because additional toxicology testing for over 1100 different substances was ordered. That testing was performed by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, and the results were received by Ms. Mandarino on June 28, 2012. I forwarded those results on June 29, 2012 to both General Counsel for the Federation and the Secretary of the Hearing Committee. On November 26, 2012, General Counsel for USEF contacted me to request a copy of the Final Client Report from New Bolton, and I immediately provided it to her. The findings in the Final Client Report were identical to those in the Interim Client Report that had previously been provided to the Federation. All of these results were also provided directly by New Bolton to the mortality insurer that provided coverage for Amber Hill Farm. I trust that the NY Times will ascertain the accuracy of all factual statements it chooses to publish regarding this tragic event.

    Thank you,

    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977



  16. #376
    Join Date
    Jun. 17, 2001
    Location
    down the road from bar.ka
    Posts
    31,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by amberhill View Post
    Ms. Pam Mahoney, Are you accusing me of posing as an attorney? You must know as an atty yourself that this is against the law. That is quite the accusation. I suggest you IMMEDIATELY retract the accusation unless you have proof to support your claim. You have been so advised.
    OMG, this is getting to rival the Arabian Jumper thread in wierdness...would the mods care to look into IP addys here loking for a houseguest?

    I know Pam is quaking in her Wellies after having been "advised" to cease and desist posting on a chat board. She IS a lawyer, you know.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.


    9 members found this post helpful.

  17. #377
    Join Date
    Feb. 8, 2008
    Location
    Delaware Valley
    Posts
    1,624

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daventry View Post
    ...somewhere, a lawyer is banging their head on a desk repeatedly!
    I'm banging my head, and I'm not even HER lawyer


    22 members found this post helpful.

  18. #378
    Join Date
    Dec. 23, 2010
    Posts
    79

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poltroon View Post
    Earlier I made a comment speculating that that list of regular drugs in combination could potentially contribute to the lung disease they saw.

    It occurs to me this morning that if you were a veterinary researcher wanted to test the long term health effects of all those drugs stacked, you probably couldn't get it past your university ethics committee.
    Excellent point. Look what happens when people stack medications and the possible drug interactions between herbal supplements and prescription drugs. Do we actually think horses don't experience the same issues when we give one drug or supplement on top of another?

    It just disgusts me to see the lengths that people will go for money, fame and a blue ribbon.


    6 members found this post helpful.

  19. #379
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RAyers View Post
    Elizabeth, honey, your ability to understand the letter is only outweighed by your ability to destroy this sport and to know how to give drugs.

    There are no definitive statements in the letter. Only a reiteration of facts presented at necropsy done as a professional consideration to his colleagues.

    The letter does nothing to bolster your assertions. It does nothing to hurt them either.

    Reed
    Dr. Reed is very well respected in his field and opines on the necropsy. By the way , I am not your honey. If you do not understand the letter, his contact information is included.
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977



  20. #380
    Join Date
    Jun. 23, 2008
    Location
    Bedminster, New Jersey
    Posts
    465

    Default

    My lawyers are not banging their heads... hardly. They are reading right along. I have explained what happened to Humble. It was a tragedy but had nothing to do with illegal drugs, stacking or the NY Times article on GABA.
    Elizabeth Mandarino
    www.amberhillponies.com
    cell 908.397.0977



Similar Threads

  1. New york times
    By Airfern in forum Racing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May. 18, 2012, 12:20 AM
  2. New York Times Front Page article 4/30/12
    By Lizzie in forum Racing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: May. 2, 2012, 01:58 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep. 28, 2010, 09:39 PM
  4. New York Times article on air vests
    By JAGold in forum Eventing
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: Sep. 13, 2010, 10:24 PM
  5. Replies: 75
    Last Post: Apr. 9, 2008, 08:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness