The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 14 of 44 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast
Results 261 to 280 of 869
  1. #261
    Join Date
    Sep. 26, 2010
    Posts
    3,498

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Discobold View Post
    And I haven't yet seen a child die from blue ribbon deficiency
    Maybe not die but massive temper tantrum.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  2. #262
    Join Date
    Dec. 20, 2000
    Posts
    1,068

    Default

    I just dont understand the need for all of these drugs, let alone IV injections...maybe because I've never competed in the upper levels of any sport where the mindset seems to be common. At shows, I have a "trainer" but she's not my Puppet Master...I wouldnt want anyone but a vet, that I called, going anywhere near my horses with a needle. I think saying that you NEED to have syringes and a supply of injectable meds at shows is bizarre. Yes, colics and injuries do happen, but they are rare and its not like shows are held in the middle of nowhere where a vet might not be available. Yeah, yeah, I'm sure someone has an anecdote about just this happening at a show and thank God their trainer was there during a colic or the horse would have died, but seriously, people! I've gone to many, many, many shows and events and rides in my day, by myself and with groups, and I/we never packed any needles or injectables and no horse ever suffered because of it.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  3. #263
    Join Date
    Aug. 14, 2000
    Location
    Clarksdale, MS--the golden buckle on the cotton belt
    Posts
    17,540

    Default

    Don't know if this has been mentioned here, but it is on the thread on the Breeding board.

    There is an article in the current COTH about the USEF and drugs. Apparently the vet in charge of the USEF program brags that USEF has spent the past eighteen months working for an exemption from FEI rules on FEI disciplines adopting FEI drug rules for National events. Of course the FEI Rules are much more stringent than USEF drug rules. He's PROUD that the US is allowed to apply its current rules instead of FEI ones.

    I know Hunters are not an FEI discipline, but the horses should still have FEI level protection and not the lax USEF ones. Why are US horses includng those in the FEI disciplines, so much more frail and medication dependent than horses in the rest of the world?
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire


    1 members found this post helpful.

  4. #264
    Join Date
    Nov. 30, 2006
    Posts
    834

    Default

    Were these shows where you stabled 5 or 6 days at a time? Or shows that were multiple weeks and the horses lived on the show grounds for 3 weeks without leaving?

    Quote Originally Posted by saratoga View Post
    I just dont understand the need for all of these drugs, let alone IV injections...maybe because I've never competed in the upper levels of any sport where the mindset seems to be common. At shows, I have a "trainer" but she's not my Puppet Master...I wouldnt want anyone but a vet, that I called, going anywhere near my horses with a needle. I think saying that you NEED to have syringes and a supply of injectable meds at shows is bizarre. Yes, colics and injuries do happen, but they are rare and its not like shows are held in the middle of nowhere where a vet might not be available. Yeah, yeah, I'm sure someone has an anecdote about just this happening at a show and thank God their trainer was there during a colic or the horse would have died, but seriously, people! I've gone to many, many, many shows and events and rides in my day, by myself and with groups, and I/we never packed any needles or injectables and no horse ever suffered because of it.



  5. #265
    Join Date
    Jun. 17, 2001
    Location
    down the road from bar.ka
    Posts
    30,688

    Default

    FEI rules also require sequestration and controlled access which is not going to fly with over 2k horses on the grounds...and who is going to pay for the security guards and fencing? What about haul ins, most are not going to want to be there with a stall 12 or 24 hours out or more as FEI requires.

    If you are speaking of zero tolerance? I think thats a little draconian with horses living on the road for weeks at a time as is the reality of the show circuit today, like it or not.

    I don't see a thing wrong with declared therapeutic amounts within a defined time frame for specific reasons approved by a vet-and they are busting alot of people for abusing those limits...but the penalties are a joke and that's a big part of it. I have no problem declaring them or the reason they were given and a vets name.

    For the record, mine went on 1.5 g of bute paste 12 hours out when stabled on concrete and living on the road without turnout, regumate or Depo from April thru Sept. Once or twice she got dex at least 12 hours out for actual hives (with no behavior change noted). She had hock injections every 18 months or so from age 15 to when she was retired at age 20. She got Legend IV about a week before shows and then I switched to the oral LubriSyn. Thats all.

    I think the vet profession overall needs to take a hard look at themselves and their ethics here too.

    But don't see the need for FEI level enforcement with no additional infrastructure when we cannot even enforce what we have now.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.



  6. #266
    Join Date
    Aug. 14, 2000
    Location
    Clarksdale, MS--the golden buckle on the cotton belt
    Posts
    17,540

    Default

    They could adopt the FEI standards on responsible parties and the FEI standards on what are considered illegal medications, as well as the FEI standards on pre-filing when a medication is used before competition. They haven't even done that. Mario Deslauriers didn't get set down by the USEF when his horse tested positive for cocaine at the USEF sanctioned Olympic Trials. He lost Jane Clark as a sponsor, though. She's bolted the USEF, and her show jumpers are now being ridden by a Brit. You'd think that loss would make an impact.
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire



  7. #267
    Join Date
    Sep. 24, 2001
    Location
    on the road.....again
    Posts
    1,820

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vineyridge View Post
    Don't know if this has been mentioned here, but it is on the thread on the Breeding board.

    There is an article in the current COTH about the USEF and drugs. Apparently the vet in charge of the USEF program brags that USEF has spent the past eighteen months working for an exemption from FEI rules on FEI disciplines adopting FEI drug rules for National events. Of course the FEI Rules are much more stringent than USEF drug rules. He's PROUD that the US is allowed to apply its current rules instead of FEI ones.

    I know Hunters are not an FEI discipline, but the horses should still have FEI level protection and not the lax USEF ones. Why are US horses includng those in the FEI disciplines, so much more frail and medication dependent than horses in the rest of the world?
    What you failed to include in this was that they were working to be allowed for FEI disciplines to apply their OWN rules and not use the mandatory FEI suspension times.

    This work did not have any impact on the how hunter drug ininfractions would be applied as they are not an FEI discipline.

    Also, the FEI has a zero tolerance only in the last few years, due to work of the USEF, has started to allow certain medications.

    The USEF drug lab is afterall an approved FEI lab.

    What they worked on, had NOTHING, to do with the permitted drugs. That had already been addressed for non-FEI disciplines. FEI disciplines have stricter guidelines even if it is only a national level show. At least now, the USEF can use their judgement in determining suspension times.

    Before this FEI ruling, if you showed in the jumpers at a local USEF show and misjudged the amount of Bute you gave the horse, were drug tested and found positive; you would have been subject to the FEI suspension period. Now the USEF can use their own hearing panel to decide the time period and infraction.

    Would you really have been OK for an FEI level suspension imposed on a .90m horses at a small USEF show simply because the FEI bans that substance and the FEI allows a small amount?



  8. #268
    Join Date
    Sep. 24, 2001
    Location
    on the road.....again
    Posts
    1,820

    Default

    The FEI deems the rider as the responsible party. If that would to be the USEF responsible party you would never have a catch rider again. You better hope you have access to a good rider in your current barn. Juniors/parents would be less inclined to allow their children to catch ride horses for the simple liability.

    Plus the FEI has age restrictions where would all the under 14 children show???

    You can't simple move to part of the FEI rules, without looking at all the implications of their other rules that are part of their big picture.

    USEF is a national level, it makes sense that the FEI (international) would have more restrictions.

    Look at any other sport the rules become tighter as you move up the ladder.

    We need to stop trying to be the FEI. They are far from perfect with their own set of issues.


    3 members found this post helpful.

  9. #269
    Join Date
    Aug. 14, 2000
    Location
    Clarksdale, MS--the golden buckle on the cotton belt
    Posts
    17,540

    Default

    Yes, indeedy. The USEF has been a force in the FEI to move away from zero tolerance. I don't consider that a benefit. As to your last question, the answer is "Yes". If the FEI penalty applied, maybe more riders, trainers and owners would be less willing to inject.

    I agree that hunters isn't an FEI discipline, so FEI penalties wouldn't apply there. But we're still talking horses and riders and horse welfare; and why should hunters be less protected than reiners and show jumpers and eventers and dressage horses? Or, as the USEF has done, reduce the protection for the other disciplines to match that of hunters?

    Other countries have multiple FEI competition opportunities for the young and even young on ponies. Not the United States and the USEF. Why not? I just looked at the FEI Jumping rules and they make provision for 12 and over, Children, Juniors, Young Riders and Ponies. They do have some height limits--for 12 year olds, it's 1.20 meters.

    From recent results, whatever the USEF is doing isn't working. We did much better internationally under AHSA.

    As to catch riding, that basically means that we prefer to protect riders on drugged horses rather than getting to the knot of the problem which is the drugging itself. If no catch riders would be willing to ride, well, tough. The trainers who drug would either have to quit drugging or do without. If it cost them money to hire a "barn rider", tough. They'd be going through "barn riders" like snot through kleenex.
    Last edited by vineyridge; Dec. 30, 2012 at 12:21 PM.
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire


    1 members found this post helpful.

  10. #270
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,101

    Default

    I will ask again-is there a valid reason to pack liquid magnesium in your show trunk??


    3 members found this post helpful.

  11. #271
    Join Date
    Sep. 14, 2000
    Location
    Goochland, VA
    Posts
    8,528

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Limerick View Post
    I will ask again-is there a valid reason to pack liquid magnesium in your show trunk??
    No.
    Laurie
    Finding, preparing, showing and training young hunters, in hand and performance.
    www.juniorjohnsontrainingandsales.com


    9 members found this post helpful.

  12. #272
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,101

    Default

    Why can't USEF fine those caught with it? I know one needs to prove intent but since there are no valid reasons for having it, couldn't it be treated like alcohol in a teen's high school locker??


    1 members found this post helpful.

  13. #273
    Join Date
    Oct. 14, 2002
    Posts
    486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Limerick View Post
    Why can't USEF fine those caught with it? I know one needs to prove intent but since there are no valid reasons for having it, couldn't it be treated like alcohol in a teen's high school locker??
    Even if the USEF had the time or power to search everyone's trunks (and again, without FEI level stabling, not sure how that would work), it would be pretty easy for people to just tear the label off the bottles.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  14. #274
    Join Date
    Feb. 5, 2007
    Posts
    1,125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Limerick View Post
    I will ask again-is there a valid reason to pack liquid magnesium in your show trunk??
    Check out this website http://www.nupafeedusa.com/magnesium.htm
    Last edited by PonyPenny; Dec. 30, 2012 at 12:28 PM. Reason: Wrong website.



  15. #275
    Join Date
    Sep. 14, 2000
    Location
    Goochland, VA
    Posts
    8,528

    Default

    Or they just keep it off the showgrounds unless they are using it. Not hard. If someone doesn't want to be seen injecting a horse, it isn't hard to do. There are 24 hours in a day, and many of those hours have very few people on the showgrounds.
    Laurie
    Finding, preparing, showing and training young hunters, in hand and performance.
    www.juniorjohnsontrainingandsales.com


    1 members found this post helpful.

  16. #276
    Join Date
    Feb. 28, 2008
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    seriously, go to the Amber Hill Farm facebook page and say what you feel on her wall. i did, i am sarah hochschwender. also look on elizabeth's personal page. first thing you see are names of people i respect and consider friends in most cases. why are Robin Greenwood, Bill Schaub, Anna Jane White-Mullin, Cynthia Williams, Jimmy Lee, Missy Roads, Ron Danta, and Don Stewart acting as de facto endorsers of this lunatic ? WHY not just quietly delete your name from her list? this crazy woman has already proven that she relies heavily on facebook and other internet connections to gain clients. she will point to her position vby showing these REAL BNT names as proof of her legitimacy. this is not about that poor child and being NICE to her. we have a cancer in this business, and it is time to excise it.


    15 members found this post helpful.

  17. #277
    Join Date
    Feb. 22, 2000
    Location
    passepartout
    Posts
    9,782

    Default

    Who is Scott Stewart? His name is mentioned on here repeatedly, usually with nothing other than 'Scott Stewart' in the post.

    So please explain, for those of us who don't speak the shorthand of the h/j scene.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  18. #278
    Join Date
    Feb. 28, 2008
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    ..... and here you have it folks. if you even POST to Amber Hill's wall you get the attention of tammy tucker, attorney to the lunatic. what a piece of work she must be....... " Ms. Hochschwender,
    Thank you for contacting my client, Elizabeth Mandarino. I understand that you post on the Chronicle Forums as “fair judy.” In June of this year, you posted that Kristen Williams, the woman who filed the protest regarding Humble, had “counsel for the protest.” You also have posted other comments that indicate a working knowledge of facts that are currently being litigated in a case pending in New Jersey. I would like to schedule a time to interview you by telephone regarding these facts. Depending on our discussion, I will be able to determine if we will ultimately need to issue a subpoena for your testimony.
    Please let me know a convenient day and time after January 1 to talk.
    Thank you, Tammy Tucker
    tamara.tucker@nelsontucker.com, 434-979-0049"


    8 members found this post helpful.

  19. #279
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,101

    Default

    Scott Stewart is one of the top hunter riders in the country. Sadly, he was caught twice this year for drug infractions and had some time off. I know he was set down for either June or July but don't know what other time he was made to take off away from USEF sanctioned shows,


    2 members found this post helpful.

  20. #280
    Join Date
    Feb. 28, 2008
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    i have already retained counsel. if every single person here posts on Amber Hill, an OPEN page will she sue the entire world?


    4 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. New york times
    By Airfern in forum Racing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May. 18, 2012, 12:20 AM
  2. New York Times Front Page article 4/30/12
    By Lizzie in forum Racing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: May. 2, 2012, 01:58 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep. 28, 2010, 09:39 PM
  4. New York Times article on air vests
    By JAGold in forum Eventing
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: Sep. 13, 2010, 10:24 PM
  5. Replies: 75
    Last Post: Apr. 9, 2008, 08:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •