The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 8 of 44 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 869
  1. #141
    Join Date
    Jun. 20, 2009
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Share on Facebook.....and print and hand out copies at horse shows, tack shops and all horse related events.


    3 members found this post helpful.

  2. #142
    Join Date
    May. 5, 2009
    Location
    Location: Indiana, but my heart is in Zone II
    Posts
    2,666

    Default

    No one brought the daughter into it. Using a child as a shield to deflect ones wrong doings is disgusting.
    Come to the dark side, we have cookies


    12 members found this post helpful.

  3. #143
    Join Date
    Sep. 30, 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by War Admiral View Post
    Well, yeah, but let's take an informal poll here: hands up, how many of you have ever actually SEEN a USEF drug tester alive and in person, let alone had a horse tested? How many have had a horse tested more than once?

    I have only ever SEEN a USEF drug tester ONE time at ONE show. I'm 54, been riding/showing since age 6. (And remember, I'm multi-disciplinary, so I "get around" a LOT: breed shows, carriage driving shows, etc. as well as H/J.) So if you do the math, that's pretty close to 50 YEARS of USEF shows at which I never saw a tester and could, if so inclined, have cranked whatever I wanted into horsie.

    With the multi-day shows, if the USEF testers are on the show grounds on Day 1 you can bet the word gets out within a couple of hours, and those testers are going to be VERY hard pressed to find a positive for the remaining 10 days of the show.

    I'm in agreement that the fines and suspensions should HURT (and that the entry blank loophole needs to somehow get closed, stat). I also wonder about making the *shows* pay to have USEF drug testers on the grounds at all times. If USEF passed that AND simultaneously passed a rule that required all USEF show managers to freeze their fees (ALL fees not just drug testing) for a period of x years, and just made the presence of USEF drug testers part of the show manager's cost of doing business I wonder if that would help?
    I've been showing in NJ for 15 years and before last winter I saw a drug tester maybe once or twice. Since last winter they have been at every single show I've been to except 1 or 2, from AAs to random small C shows. I've been tested twice in the past year, once in April and once in September. So I don't know if they're sending them all to NJ or what, but they have definitely been here the past year.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  4. #144
    Join Date
    Apr. 25, 2008
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pennywell Bay View Post
    No one brought the daughter into it. Using a child as a shield to deflect ones wrong doings is disgusting.
    This was told to her numerous times the last time she tried to bring her daughter into it. What kind of mother does that, I wonder?
    Quote Originally Posted by alicen View Post
    We have no intentions of tarring and feathering anyone: this is now a thread about dipping Ryan Reynolds in chocolate.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  5. #145
    Join Date
    Jun. 17, 2001
    Location
    down the road from bar.ka
    Posts
    31,433

    Default

    That Times article is pretty good for a non horsey publication. Apparently she has filed a compliant against the USEF head counsel with the Ky State Bar Association (dismissed) and has numerous legal actions pending against many individuals and entities trying to "defame" her.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  6. #146
    Join Date
    Jan. 28, 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    4,588

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by findeight View Post
    She has a long history of posting on here accusing others of all sorts of things-and naming them. Pretty much her MO and has been for years. I don't know if you can search her past posts from before May of 2012 with the new format change but...you can see the trend easily if you can.

    Lots of drama and hardly new.
    Yes, and what was the username she used to post under here years ago...ponymom something? That's worth a read too, if you have an afternoon to bang your head on your desk!

    I know people similar to this always reason that everyone else is just jealous or out to get them. Sadly, it's just never the case. Most people with any sense of reason or moral compass can smell a rat a mile away. Though, sometimes it seems to take a few years for the ship to finally start sinking and the rats start scrambling to shore.

    I also find that innocent parties or people falsely accused tend to stay fairly quiet and let the truth come out in the courts. Not a good sign when someone starts to ramble on, produce unrelated, trivial facts and start throwing others under the bus.
    www.DaventryEquestrian.com
    Home of Welsh Pony, ISR/Oldenburg & RPSI pony stallions Daventry's Power Play, Goldhills Brandysnap LOM & Alvesta Picasso
    Also home to www.EquineAppraisers.com


    4 members found this post helpful.

  7. #147
    Join Date
    May. 5, 2009
    Location
    Location: Indiana, but my heart is in Zone II
    Posts
    2,666

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carolinadreamin' View Post
    This was told to her numerous times the last time she tried to bring her daughter into it. What kind of mother does that, I wonder?
    Besides a guilty one?
    Come to the dark side, we have cookies


    2 members found this post helpful.

  8. #148
    Join Date
    Sep. 12, 2007
    Posts
    234

    Default

    This is not an isolated case, but certainly dramatic enough to be chronicled in the Times.
    This is the problem. The big successful barn use drugs in their programs. How do you account for $500 or more per month on meds?
    The less successful trainer afraid that their customers may leave emulate the winning ones and follow with the same practice. It trickles down to amateurs and pony moms wanting to play in the big leagues until they get caught. But the punishment for many is a three month suspension so is worth the punishment. Major riders, and trainers get suspended and have someone else bring their clients to the ring so no big loss. Some have adopted the practice of listing grooms as the trainers in their entry forms. Some of the "suspended" trainers go on to win awards six months after their punishment. So this is the example. You can do anything, because all you get is a $500 fine or a three month suspension. And then you come back to judge, and/or win awards.
    And as for the judges listed in the article pretending that this is a problem that needs to be addressed is ironic since they are part of the problem. They reward the offenders with the best ribbons time after time.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  9. #149
    Join Date
    Mar. 8, 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    19,732

    Default

    EM, please define the word drug for me as in "I don't drug my horses." What exactly would you call the drugs listed in plain sight on your board?


    16 members found this post helpful.

  10. #150
    Join Date
    Jun. 17, 2001
    Location
    down the road from bar.ka
    Posts
    31,433

    Default

    Not all barns do it. Some are honest with their clients about what the horse can or cannot do...but nobody wants to hear that Pookie is not suitable so they go to where a trainer will lie and overmedicate to keep them happy. Especially if said trainer sold them an overpriced, undertalented and/or unsound horse they can't ride.

    Right now the owners do NOT get suspended, usually a wrist slap and 300 fine. Thats a problem.

    I keep hearing rumors that some of the pending cases involving some huge names are going to result in major suspensions...still waiting for conformation on those rumors. But unless they ding the owners too, the ones who fund it all? It will go on.
    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.


    3 members found this post helpful.

  11. #151
    Join Date
    Nov. 14, 2000
    Posts
    436

    Default

    By declining to be interviewed for The NYT article, Ms. Mandarino forfeited any right to bitch and moan. But the article is far broader than her personal drama (although she seems bound and determined to keep the focus shining on her "breadth" of issues). Return to the early comments on this thread to consider the real challenges... (I do not consider hers to be anything more than an example of gross greed, stupidity, narcissism and manipulation...although it does raise questions of why anyone would trust an animal or child with such a "trainer.") The article and video were excellent on many levels: Most important, challenging the USEF to reconsider how subjective judging sectors of 'equestrian sport' should be structured, standardized and managed. This is huge business, both on the table and off of it. After years of feeling frustrated by wanting to trust that trainers had my daughter's and my animals' interests top of mind, I decided to stop questioning every line item on every bill, better educate myself, take ownership of my own entries (which also saved me tons of $ in unreported scratches because trainers were often too busy to worry about $50 here or there), sign as trainer (although I was NOT a trainer), control all meds and supplements purchased and given to the animals, and then train my daughter to take on these responsibilities in her later junior years. Was this popular? Heck no. Should every horse show parent do this? Of course not. But, they can seek out the most reputable trainers (and, man, if I Googled Ms. M now, I'd run in the other direction as quickly as possible), educate themselves and discuss their expectations openly with those trainers, and continue to pressure those governing the sport and managing the shows to create structures and environments that optimize the safety and well-being of the horses and riders and that discourage and penalize those who try to do otherwise.
    Last edited by adhock; Dec. 29, 2012 at 10:39 AM.


    9 members found this post helpful.

  12. #152
    Join Date
    Sep. 27, 2001
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    2,798

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by War Admiral View Post
    Well, yeah, but let's take an informal poll here: hands up, how many of you have ever actually SEEN a USEF drug tester alive and in person, let alone had a horse tested? How many have had a horse tested more than once?
    I don't know how many horses I've had tested over the years and how many times I've seen testers at the shows when I haven't been tested. They are out there and do the best job they can given the monetary constraints. Once bought a horse in Ocala for a client, had it shipped to Gulfport to show on the winter circuit, and it go tested after the first class she showed it in. Great way for a pre-purchase drug test - too bad we'd already paid for one! Had another 1st year horse get tested at 4 shows back to back.

    The biggest problem is the sheer number of shows compared to the number of testers available. And when a horse is chosen to test, that tester may be held up from 1/2 an hour up to 2 hours waiting for the horse to urinate so they can't be testing other horses during that time.

    The USEF did a great presentation at the USHJA convention - it's too bad more weren't there to listen. I specifically stayed 2 extra days in Miami to go to that presentation. (And yes, I know not everyone has that luxury - I really didn't have the time or money either, but felt it was worth it.) The number of positive tests compared to the number tested is extremely low and most are for excess amounts of a legal drug. That's good to hear. However, all the anecdotal evidence about the misuse of drugs leads one to believe otherwise - good news - the USEF is on top of this and is working hard to develop tests for naturally occurring substances that may be misused. I think we need to give them the space to get this right.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  13. #153
    Join Date
    Nov. 30, 2006
    Posts
    953

    Default

    Just how does one make a pony sound enough in wind when "the pathologist stopped and called me and asked me if I knew about it because he had never seen lungs so diseased in an animal of that age."?

    Seriously, the pony was schooled that day? The day before? Nobody heard anything funky in its diseased lungs, so diseased a pathologist stopped to make a call? How could you not know this pony has lungs that diseased?

    Oh, and I think I might be tempted to sue someone who made personal communications public. Just sayin.


    22 members found this post helpful.

  14. #154
    Join Date
    Sep. 27, 2011
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Ms. Mandarino posted some really accusatory comments on her Facebook page yesterday, or this morning, regarding the owners of Sparkle Plenty and Blue Cowboy. I see they've since been removed. Wonder if someone got a screenshot of that?


    2 members found this post helpful.

  15. #155
    Join Date
    Jan. 21, 2006
    Posts
    1,006

    Default

    Perhaps we and the entire industry might be better served by ignoring the personal comments and focusing instead on the implications for the sport and what can be done to control and regulate inappropriate actions.

    he sport must acknowledge and regulate the inappropriate off label use of drugs for calming - dex and magnesium. Make the cost of inappropriate action actions MUCH higher than the benefits. Hold EVERYONE related to the horse accountable - Owner, Rider, Trainer, Groom.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  16. #156
    Join Date
    Oct. 2, 1999
    Location
    Mendocino County, CA: Turkey Vulture HQ
    Posts
    14,417

    Default

    One might wonder if a regimen of 15 pharmaceuticals might be a factor in an unusual and unprecedented lung disease in a young pony.

    The story is that the injection was Legend. I know of no legitimate reason to give Legend two hours before a class. Maybe that's what was in the syringe, but it doesn't make me feel any better about the situation.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket


    5 members found this post helpful.

  17. #157
    Join Date
    Aug. 15, 2008
    Posts
    4,579

    Default

    Adhock, I hope that folks like you are the direction things will start heading. I doubt it, but I can hope. You are exactly what this industry needs more of.
    "Aye God, Woodrow..."


    2 members found this post helpful.

  18. #158
    Join Date
    Nov. 30, 2006
    Posts
    953

    Default

    The USEF is unable to enforce the rules it currently imposes. Perhaps the focus would be better put on enforcing the rules that exist rather than imposing additional rules. That can't be enforced.



  19. #159
    Join Date
    May. 6, 2006
    Location
    rapidan,virginia
    Posts
    1,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poltroon View Post
    One might wonder if a regimen of 15 pharmaceuticals might be a factor in an unusual and unprecedented lung disease in a young pony.

    The story is that the injection was Legend. I know of no legitimate reason to give Legend two hours before a class. Maybe that's what was in the syringe, but it doesn't make me feel any better about the situation.
    Despite the novel that EM wrote to defend herself here, she never said what was in the injection that killed the pony. "I don't drug my horses" she said. OK, so what was in the syringe?

    My guess is that she has been warned that if she falsely claims the injection contained Legend or some other legitimate pharmaceutical, while also claiming she did not botch the injection process itself ("I thought I'd hit the carotid but I was wrong"), then the manufacturer of said pharmaceutical will come down on her head with a lawsuit that might finish her.

    Of course I am just speculating here.
    "Can you imagine what I would do if I could do all I can?" Sun Tzu, The Art of War
    Rainy: http://tinyurl.com/kj7x53c
    Stash: http://tinyurl.com/mmm3p4e


    2 members found this post helpful.

  20. #160
    Join Date
    Jan. 21, 2006
    Posts
    1,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gumshoe View Post
    The USEF is unable to enforce the rules it currently imposes. Perhaps the focus would be better put on enforcing the rules that exist rather than imposing additional rules. That can't be enforced.
    Maintaining and even enforcing what exists which as you state is not working - is not going to work. Changing the entire paradigm and the people in control of it has a much better chance of success.

    As already stated many of the abuses are NOT even able to be uncovered (dex/magenesium/over use of allowed drugs) under the existing rules


    2 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. New york times
    By Airfern in forum Racing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May. 18, 2012, 12:20 AM
  2. New York Times Front Page article 4/30/12
    By Lizzie in forum Racing
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: May. 2, 2012, 01:58 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sep. 28, 2010, 09:39 PM
  4. New York Times article on air vests
    By JAGold in forum Eventing
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: Sep. 13, 2010, 10:24 PM
  5. Replies: 75
    Last Post: Apr. 9, 2008, 08:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness