-
Dec. 22, 2012, 10:37 AM
#1
Selling a performance horse with existing issues
When you see an ad for a horse currently in work/being shown and the ad says "healthy and sound", what does this really mean? If a horse has preexisting injuries that require special care/maintenance etc would it be ethical to call this horse "healthy and sound"?
I am tired of seeing this in ads then you find out that they have a laundry list of issues that have to be done to maintain a level of "soundness".
What is sound? Currently not lame? Would like input!
-
Dec. 22, 2012, 11:40 AM
#2
What you describe should be listed as "healthy and sound with maintenance"
"Healthy and sound" as a stand alone statement means x ray to your hearts desire, you won't find anything.
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Dec. 22, 2012, 12:03 PM
#3
I disagree with this. Horses can and do get around just fine, sometimes in serious competition, without maintenance, healthy and sound, yet won't x-ray "clean". An "existing issue" would include mental issues as well as physical, which would be revealed when pursuing purchasing said horse, one would hope.
-
Dec. 22, 2012, 12:12 PM
#4
"Healthy and sound" means that the owner doesn't see anything wrong. It's a correct assessment, so far as the owner goes or has tried to find out.
It means almost nothing by itself. You ask questions, you see the horse go, you get your favorite PPE vet to do all the verifying of "healthy and sound."
So I don't put too much stock in that advertising statement, but I also don't get pissed at an owner whose horse turns out not to be "healthy and sound." I try to limit the PPE by doing my best to see lameness before I drag out a DVM.
 The armchair saddler
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Dec. 22, 2012, 08:43 PM
#5
Clinically, "sound" means its doing what it needs to do in it's life without limping. A PPE can find a ton of stuff in just about anything. And a clean set of xrays doesn't mean it's not going to be sound.
I always ask about "maintenance" when discussing the care of and barn habits/manners.
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Dec. 22, 2012, 08:44 PM
#6
Last edited by littlecreek; Dec. 22, 2012 at 08:45 PM.
Reason: double post
-
Dec. 22, 2012, 08:52 PM
#7
The term "sound" is relative. Sound for what? trail riding? Light flatwork? Low jumping?
1 members found this post helpful.
-
Dec. 23, 2012, 09:59 AM
#8
OK..so if there is an upper level performance horse for sale that would NEVER pass a flexion test (would be lame at the walk after tests) but is not lame otherwise is this horse sound? Struggling with disclosure ethics, I guess...
-
Dec. 23, 2012, 11:57 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by NJRider
OK..so if there is an upper level performance horse for sale that would NEVER pass a flexion test (would be lame at the walk after tests) but is not lame otherwise is this horse sound? Struggling with disclosure ethics, I guess...
I would say yes.
In my neck of the woods, if the horse does the job, no matter what the maintenance, radiographs, flexion tests, etc, then people will advertise and sell the horse as 'sound.' 'Sound' NOT being equal to 'perfect physical specimen.'
Which is one reason why you have to ask a LOT of questions. And preferably get full disclosure of all recent vet work/records. People will inject the hell out of a horse and then sell it as 'sound.' The catch here is, that if you are talking 'performance' horse, then the people (in this neck of the woods) have the finances and motivation to continue with the veterinary work on the horse in order to keep it doing it's job.
Enough people (competitive folks) would rather have a super, reliable horse that they have to support with lots of vet work, over a less reliable horse that is perfect physically.
-
Dec. 23, 2012, 11:57 AM
#10
 Originally Posted by NJRider
OK..so if there is an upper level performance horse for sale that would NEVER pass a flexion test (would be lame at the walk after tests) but is not lame otherwise is this horse sound? Struggling with disclosure ethics, I guess...
I would say yes.
In my neck of the woods, if the horse does the job, no matter what the maintenance, radiographs, flexion tests, etc, then people will advertise and sell the horse as 'sound.' 'Sound' NOT being equal to 'perfect physical specimen.'
Which is one reason why you have to ask a LOT of questions. And preferably get full disclosure of all recent vet work/records. People will inject the hell out of a horse and then sell it as 'sound.' The catch here is, that if you are talking 'performance' horse, then the people (in this neck of the woods) have the finances and motivation to continue with the veterinary work on the horse in order to keep it doing it's job.
Enough people (competitive folks) would rather have a super, reliable horse that they have to support with lots of vet work, over a less reliable horse that is perfect physically.
Similar Threads
-
By GypsyInSteelToeds in forum Off Course
Replies: 7
Last Post: Nov. 23, 2012, 08:39 AM
-
By JoZ in forum Off Course
Replies: 5
Last Post: Apr. 4, 2012, 07:33 AM
-
By pattnic in forum Hunter/Jumper
Replies: 2
Last Post: Mar. 30, 2012, 09:58 AM
-
By stephstphn in forum Hunter/Jumper
Replies: 0
Last Post: May. 3, 2010, 01:35 PM
-
By ShotenStar in forum Dressage
Replies: 87
Last Post: Mar. 25, 2008, 12:03 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|