The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 98 of 98
  1. #81
    Join Date
    Jun. 4, 2001
    Location
    NW Louisiana
    Posts
    683

    Default

    I spend $83 per horse per month to feed my horses, now during the summer when I'm not feeding hay that number is reduced by $7. Of course that does not include farrier or vet which you pay separate for when you board so yes the dollar numbers are less. I have a wonderful neighbor that feeds for me when I go out of town if my DH goes with me. If it's just me then DH feeds and the neighbor is around if he needs any help. When I only had 3 horses I would load them up and take them to a boarding facility when I went on vacation and that worked really well until there were more horses than trailer space. I don't mind feeding in the morning as that is the nicest way I can think of starting my day and then after work I head to the barn for evening feed and chores and that is again the nicest way to un-wind for the work day. Of course when I bought the farm my riding really decreased as there is alwasy something that needs to be done...but I was about ready to put a hault on that anyway. Now I breed and raise a couple of foals and get them ready to race. (yep, I went from hunter to eventer to dressage to owner/breeder).



  2. #82
    Join Date
    May. 23, 2009
    Location
    Texas Hill Country
    Posts
    609

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fatappy View Post
    PS - Crone - you crack me up. Love your blog!
    Aw, shucks. Thanks.
    Dreadful Acres: the chronicle of my extraordinary unsuitability to country life



  3. #83
    Join Date
    Apr. 21, 2010
    Posts
    2,554

    Default

    I did not buy anything "extra" that was horsie, except for the fencing. The rest we would have needed whether they were at home or not, or whether they were used for horses or not.

    Things we already needed/had:
    - Truck
    - Trailer
    - Small john deere

    Now, granted, we're only on 4 acres. Hubby and I wanted land for both horses, and for him to be able to work on cars, and a place for our future kids to run around. So the land was dual-purpose. And I knew we could never afford a mortgage on even a "regular" house + board on a horse.

    We sacrificed on a fancy new house, for a beautiful, old stone farmhouse that needs constant work. I'm happy with the choice, for the most part!

    I would never be able to provide myself with a horse, my daughter with a horse, and have a spare, if I had to board. It would have been either me or her.

    Three is my manageable, not really sacrificing much, number. Especially the ones we have. They all can live out, so on nice nights, or the occasional coming home late, they're fine. In the morning, they take no time to feed and turnout. and if I can't get to the stalls in the am, oh well. I can do it when I get home from work.

    There really is a threshold that will be reached, when the number at home gets to be too much for one person, and then you consider a helper, which changes the game quite a bit. If I had the insurance, I would find a boarder to work off part of their board.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    May. 5, 2005
    Posts
    535

    Default

    Taxes are a huge component in Florida comparing boarding to keeping at home. A boarding facility can get an agriculture exemption and pay minimal taxes. If you have 5 - 10 acres and don't have an exemption, the property taxes can be sky-high!

    I've seen an empty ten-acre parcel with a $8,000 property tax bill! Someone put some cows on that land quickly! I think most counties in Florida like to punish people with land. They could get a lot more taxes if that acreage was split up into 30 houses.

    For my situation when I did the math I broke even at five horses with no ag exemption. I was surprised but recalculated a few times and I think the property taxes are the kicker. We'll see if Congress takes away mortgage deductions which will also have an impact.



  5. #85
    Join Date
    Nov. 6, 2009
    Posts
    2,160

    Default

    FWIW, nowhere in my post did I discuss horses kept at home suffering due to a reduced standard of care. I completely agree that keeping horses outside sans blankets with a run in shed is a very healthy setup. And many horses would also be quite happy without a ring they had work in.

    The point I'm trying to make is that reduced amenities and more simplified care = cost savings. The savings have little to do with the fact that the horses are at home vs. at a boarding stable. I stand by what I said: that in almost all circumstances if you compare the same amenities and level of care, and fairly include all costs including mortgage and labor, boarding is typically cheaper. No where in my post did I imply that boarding is inherently better. The boarding vs. horses at home decision is complicated. But from a financial aspect, I think many people think that they are saving money when they aren't simply by ignoring a lot of the costs on one side of the comparison.

    Here's just one example. Multiple people have discussed how much they save by not having to drive to the barn. Sounds reasonable, right? However, in most cases horse properties are further from town and you will find yourself driving an extra 10-15 minutes or more just about every time you go anywhere--work, school, shopping, out to dinner. So you might not be driving 30 minutes to the barn, but you're still driving the same overall amount--or more. And if you have an SO or spouse, they are driving that extra distance every day too, even if they don't ride.

    For the record, I know plenty of people who keep their horses at home and do a great job taking care of them and I think it works out very nicely in many cases. I think the ultimate truth is that horses tend to be expensive no matter what. The bigger decision is how to best fit them into your lifestyle so that they are well cared for but also a source of enjoyment. If you can "afford" your horses by keeping them at home and doing everything yourself, but you never have time to ride as a result (assuming you want to ride), that's not a good value. Likewise, if you already own a property suitable for horses and you don't mind the responsibility and don't need an arena or other amenities, well, then in probably is a good value to have the horses at home.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Oct. 14, 2003
    Posts
    1,702

    Default Cheaper at home

    My guys have a basic, functional setup: run-in sheds and paddocks. We're on 5 acres and will probably replace much of our fence in the next few years (we put it in 12 years ago, so it's getting on...), but I spend probably around $200per month for both of them. Now, we do have a good bit of mowing in the summer and I usually get my neighbor to weedwack the fencelines, so that adds to things. But we bought our place in 2000 before real estate got stupid and have a very reasonable mortgage, so all in all, I'm very lucky.



  7. #87
    Join Date
    Dec. 15, 2005
    Posts
    3,581

    Default

    Make sure you plan to minimize expenses. Not only does a run in shed mean that you won't have to run home from work to let the horses in the barn when it unexpectedly starts sleeting, but it also save on bedding because your horses can be out most of the time. Think about what you need to buy and what items are fun to have but not necessary. My neighbor decided that bringing her horses home would be too expensive. Her unrealistic plan included a big barn at the far end of her 15 acre property that required a new well, a new electric line and countless other expenses. If you are realistic and practical, having horses at home saves money.



  8. #88
    Join Date
    Dec. 13, 1999
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    35,948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeeHoney View Post
    FWIW, nowhere in my post did I discuss horses kept at home suffering due to a reduced standard of care.
    You didn't? That sure was the implication as many of us read it.

    Horses can do "fine" at home? In the context of the whole post, that reads to me as "He'll do absolutely wonderfully at a full service barn, but when you bring him home, sure, he'll do fine"

    Quote Originally Posted by BeeHoney View Post
    Of course you are saving money, but it isn't because the horses are at home it is because the standard of care has dropped. I'm not saying that horses can't do fine in the second situation, just that it isn't comparable.

    If moving your horses home includes a drastic change in the standard and complexity of horse care ...
    The point I'm trying to make is that reduced amenities and more simplified care = cost savings. The savings have little to do with the fact that the horses are at home vs. at a boarding stable. I stand by what I said: that in almost all circumstances if you compare the same amenities and level of care, and fairly include all costs including mortgage and labor, boarding is typically cheaper.
    Of course, I think everyone gets that. But it comes down to needs. If you don't NEED many of the amenities of a nice barn, why pay for them? It's not even about simplifying the care in some cases, it's about getting rid of things you don't need, want, or use. Cheaper is cheaper

    No where in my post did I imply that boarding is inherently better. The boarding vs. horses at home decision is complicated. But from a financial aspect, I think many people think that they are saving money when they aren't simply by ignoring a lot of the costs on one side of the comparison.
    If you're still talking about the heated wash rack and heated barn and immaculate grounds that horses aren't allowed to walk on, then of course people are ignoring those costs because they don't want/need them. So yes, it IS saving money *to keep your horse in a healthy standard of living*.

    If someone has to go buy property to build a house and fancy barn and fancy ring with all the amenities of a fancy boarding facility to make it on a level playing ground, then no, you're highly unlikely to save money at all

    Here's just one example. Multiple people have discussed how much they save by not having to drive to the barn. Sounds reasonable, right? However, in most cases horse properties are further from town and you will find yourself driving an extra 10-15 minutes or more just about every time you go anywhere--work, school, shopping, out to dinner. So you might not be driving 30 minutes to the barn, but you're still driving the same overall amount--or more. And if you have an SO or spouse, they are driving that extra distance every day too, even if they don't ride.
    That has certainly been discussed as a component of savings. But remember too, several folks here said they are saving driving time (ie gas $$) by having things at home due to circumstances. But absolutely that is part of the equation
    ______________________________
    The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET


    1 members found this post helpful.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2003
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    14,868

    Default

    That is an almost impossible question to answer in terms of dollars. You would have to take in to account your tax situation, mortgage, the appreciation/depreciation of land etc.. etc.. But, in terms of peace of mind, IT IS SO MUCH BETTER to have them at home.
    Last edited by Equibrit; Dec. 2, 2012 at 01:12 PM.
    ... _. ._ .._. .._



  10. #90
    Join Date
    Jan. 27, 2009
    Posts
    244

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spacytracy View Post
    View from the front (where our cars go)
    http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y56...Picture014.jpg

    Building in the back, the basement level. Mechanic shop on left, horse area on right
    http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y56...g/P1170389.jpg

    Inside with the stalls
    http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y56...5/P1180475.jpg
    Wow That is beautiful. I would love to live there.



  11. #91
    Join Date
    Jan. 4, 2004
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    Posts
    1,028

    Default

    You probably won't know until you try it. I spend about $250 a month to feed a 26 yr old horse, that's just alfalfa hay and all stock 10% feed daily - ie: nothing special. My neighbor across the street boards horses for less than that, and the horses boarded there look pretty good. Now, of course I don't know if her boarders pay buy and feed heir own grain, but since they all look pretty good, I admire her ability to feed that many horses for less than I do. Having been in charge of my horses care for years and years, it was a horrifying and frustrating experience to have to board this one mare when I first moved to Houston. For one year, I had problems with her weight - no matter how much talking and extra feeding, she just couldn't hold her weight. I even moved her once in an attempt to get the problem fixed. Once I had her back home, the weight problem went away. For me, I love having my horse at my own place. It certainly puts restrictions on quick unplanned trips, but it's worth it to me. Even though I only have one horse now, for years I had many more. That's the one danger - having horses at home, it's easy to add more.. They seem to multiple magically, pretty soon you have more than you ever thought you would have and have no time for riding....



  12. #92
    Join Date
    Jul. 15, 2005
    Location
    Cambridge Springs, PA
    Posts
    3,121

    Default

    I think it depends. If your horses can live out in a pasture with run-in and you just like to ride in a pasture or have local trails great!! And yeah, I think you can save money. You might miss some barn camaraderie. If your horses need stalls, you like to use an arena, wash stall, jumps, whatever... then it'll be way more expensive to set yourself up at home with all that stuff than it is to just board somewhere that has the things you want to use.

    I have a boarder who brought her horse home for two years, but after not being able to ride at all either winter (no indoor) and not being able to ride most of one entire season (it was extremely wet, no outdoor, and the fields were all muddy) she moved back in. It just didn't work out the way she thought it would even though she has over twice the amount of actual land that I do.
    www.hogbackhillfarm.com


    1 members found this post helpful.

  13. #93
    Join Date
    May. 22, 2002
    Location
    somewhere between middleaged and dead
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    For those of you who moved just one horse to home, how well did your horse adjust? I have my retired horse that I would prefer to have at home but he has never been in an only horse situation. I don't really want to get two horses or a mini-donk or other animal to care for.



  14. #94
    Join Date
    Apr. 2, 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,354

    Default

    The first time I had horses at home, I brought home two but later sold one. Took the other a few days to settle down and stop looking for his friend but after that he was fine when he realized he was first out, first in, first fed....

    When we brought DD's first horse home from a 40 horse barn, he came with a friend but spent the first few days gazing out of his stall and paddock as if to say "when do the other 38 guys get here?"

    Have never brought a single horse home - can you find a small pony to keep it company? Probably won't add too much to the work/expense load but will make the transition much easier.
    Last edited by KnKShowmom; Dec. 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM.



  15. #95
    Join Date
    Oct. 16, 2008
    Location
    Central Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,232

    Default

    Whether it is cheaper depends on what you mean by "keeping them at home":

    To start with, at the first glance, yes, it is cheaper to keep them at home. But if any of the following starts to creep in, assuming you don't have a herd, then it is a very likely NO.

    . If you have to buy land/build fence/shelters/etc: No - figure 10K for fence alone, and above, and upward quickly.
    . If you have to build a barn/tack room/wash bay/etc: mostly no. - figure 50K and above, and upward quickly.
    . If you have to buy tractor/trailer/whatnot that comes with land: No. - figure 30K and upward.
    . If you have to build an outdoor arena that is more than a clear patch of dirt: most likely no. Figure 10K and upward, and upward quickly for a standard sized dressage arena.
    . If you have to build an indoor arena: Definitely NO. Figure 150K for a standard sized dressage arena, and upward very very quickly.

    If for any reason that any of the above bullets don't apply to you, well, you are in luck, and may be able to keep them at home cheaper than boarding.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  16. #96
    Join Date
    Sep. 23, 2006
    Location
    Bath,PA
    Posts
    12

    Default

    I would never board my horses again! Much cheaper to take care of them at home with quality feed and know how they are handled. Inital output of money is high but if you can find older equipment that works and put up tape or rope fencing to start, the savings can be substantial. I've had my horses here in NE PA for over 20yrs. Sometimes I miss the camaraderie of other riders but I certainly don't miss the drama of a boarding set up.



  17. #97
    Join Date
    Apr. 9, 2006
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BeeHoney View Post
    I think a lot of posters are comparing apples to oranges. It isn't fair to compare stall board at a facility with a nice ring and professional staff and twice a day care to an at home facility where the horses stay out all the time, eat from a hay roll, get grain once a day, are periodically cared for by friends/neighbors who might not know much about horses and there is no riding ring. .
    Have to disagree a little here. What you say can certainly be true - however, keeping them at home doesn't have to mean that the standard of care decreases. In fact, for many people, it increases from boarding situations.

    I have my show horses at home. I've kept them at multiple top BNT barns over the years and can say with 100% certainty that they now get the best care of their lives (not that the care was poor before). There are only 2 horses, and they are handled 100% of the time by a knowledgeable, experienced horse person who also happens to be their mom, and therefore thinks they are the best horses in the world and to whom their well-being is more important than her own! They recieve extremely personalized care, so all their nutritional, healthcare, and behavioral needs are met in ways that would not be possible in a boarding situation. They get top quality grain and hay, always have fresh, clean water, always have access to shelter (for 12 hours a day they are separated in their own stalls with large private paddocks - they are out together in a larger field with a run in the other 12 hours). Blankets/flywear are changed multiple times a day if needed, and at odd hours of the night.

    I'm lucky in that my horses are both easy keepers. Per horse per month, I pay approximately $20 for grain and $100 for hay (less in summer and more in winter, so it averages out), and about $50 for bedding. That's $170 per month. Board in my area is expensive, and I'd expect to pay between $600 and $800 per horse per month to board. Of course, the care, feeding, cleaning takes my time which could otherwise be used to make money elsewhere, but my barn is set up so that routine feeding takes approximately 15 minutes twice per day. This includes feeding, setting up the next meal, blanket changes, scrubbing/filling buckets or troughs, picking out stalls, and picking out the individual paddocks.

    General property upkeep is not included in this 30 min per day, but is mostly made up of occasional projects that I set aside a few hours for on a weekend, such as picking the larger field once every 2 weeks (about an hour), fertilizing twice a year, mowing once or twice a year, and routine repairs or improvements as needed. I'm lucky enough to have a nice community ring, which I spend about 30 min/week maintaining, and extensive community trails. I do have to haul out for lessons, usually about 1-2 times weekly.

    Having my horses at home is the only thing that has enabled me to afford multiple horses. There are a ton of other pluses, too - not having to drive to the barn, being able to leave the truck and trailer hooked up, seeing the horses grazing while cooking dinner or lounging around in the living room, being able to easily check on them and make sure they are comfortable at any time of day or night, being able to finish up chores or riding at a later time if I'm hungry/tired/sick/hot/cold/etc...



  18. #98
    Join Date
    Jan. 27, 2002
    Posts
    4,873

    Default

    i could have my mares at home but i prefer to ride with my friends rather than alone, so they are boarded. when i move i will still board, and may not even buy a farm acreage next time.


    1 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. Board or Home?
    By Nike in forum Eventing
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: Mar. 21, 2012, 05:04 AM
  2. Why is board in MD so much cheaper than VA?
    By Anyplace Farm in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: May. 16, 2011, 09:12 AM
  3. Replies: 23
    Last Post: Nov. 15, 2010, 09:26 AM
  4. Replies: 26
    Last Post: Aug. 6, 2009, 05:41 PM
  5. Young Children & Horses...At home or Board?
    By LookinSouth in forum Off Course
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Mar. 16, 2009, 02:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
randomness