Court Overturns Charge Against Mona Kanciper of New York Horse Rescue
The following is a press release from Mona Kanciper of New York Horse Rescue.
IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE: MONA KANCIPER, NEW YORK HORSE RESCUE
Court Overturns Charge Against Mona Kanciper, Horse Rescuer
(Manorville, NY – November 16, 2012) The New York State Appellate Court, Second Department has ruled for Mona Kanciper, a horse rescuer who was charged wrongfully for child endangerment. The court ruled her charges reversed and the original indictment dismissed.
Kanciper said, “I am overwhelmed by the Court's decision. My faith in the justice system is restored. The Suffolk County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals' (SCSPCA) case against me was false from beginning to end and they must be stopped from targeting other innocent people. I look forward to winning my State and Federal lawsuits against the SCPCA and their volunteers for their abuse of power and wrongful prosecution of me. It is important to hold this organization accountable so they will think twice before doing the same thing to someone else. I, together with New York Horse Rescue, will continue our mission of rescuing and rehabilitating horses.”
"I'm gratified the appellate court relied on the very facts brought out by the defense in overturning this decision. In my view the case was an enormous waste of time and money. It was driven by malice against Mona Kanciper , the insatiable desire of the SPCA for publicity and the District Attorney's inability to admit it made a mistake.” said Kanciper’s trial attorney, Paul Gianelli.
Laurie Hershey, appeal attorney for Mona Kanciper, said; "The important part of the decision was that the Appellate Division did not merely reverse the conviction, but also dismissed the charges which amounts to a complete vindication of Mona Kanciper. The prosecution never had a case against Ms. Kanciper and the Appellate Division"s dismissal of the charges for 'legally insufficient evidence' makes that eminently clear."
Civil attorney Alan Sash, Esq. said, “I am extremely pleased with the court's decision. We look forward to vigorously pursuing Mona Kanciper’s and New York Horse Rescue's State and Federal civil claims against the Suffolk County SPCA. As a lawyer, it's a good feeling when justice is done. "
The Suffolk County District Attorney brought the outrageous charges of animal cruelty and child endangerment against Kanciper based upon false accusations by disgruntled employee who sent a letter to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SCSPCA), which conducted virtually no investigation. Mona Kanciper was found innocent last year of all charges of animal cruelty.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), rendered January 24, 2012, convicting her of endangering the welfare of a child, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.
The defendant was convicted of endangering the welfare of a child after she injected a dog with a tranquilizer in the presence of a child. Viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), the evidence failed to establish that witnessing the injection of the tranquilizer was likely to result in harm to the physical, mental, or moral welfare of the child (see Penal Law § 260.10; People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 590-591). There was no evidence demonstrating that the child was aware, at the time she witnessed the injection, that the defendant intended to euthanize the dog later that day, or that she was upset by seeing the dog receive the tranquilizer injection. The child was familiar with medical treatments requiring injections, as she had seen her own pet dog injected on many occasions to treat his diabetes. Consequently, the evidence supporting the defendant's conviction was not legally sufficient (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d at 621).
Contact: Lonnie Soury, Soury Communications, Inc. (212) 414-5857 Lsoury@aol.com
Unfortunately, yes. The entire case against Mona was absolutely ridiculous.
I am intimately familiar with the entire case against Mona. The entire criminal case was built of lies and, quite frankly, BS. This particular ridiculous allegation was the only charge of which she was convicted at trial and has finally been reversed and dismissed on appeal. The entire investigation and criminal case was a circus.
Here is an earlier update from Mona, posted after the criminal trial ended, but before the appeal that was just decided: http://nyhr.org/forms/update_from_mona.pdf As stated in this update, the event in question did not even happen at all - and a witness testified to as much at trial. Regardless, even if it did happen, it was absolutely preposterous to allege that a child seeing a dog receive an injection = child endangerment, especially considering that child has a dog that receives regular injections for diabetes.
Oh my, I guess I was a much abused child. I watched my dad slaughter chickens and turkeys and butcher beef, hogs and deer when I was a child. I thought all those innards were cool and I could name all the parts of a cow's digestive system before I was in 1st grade. I not only watched him give shots, I learned how and gave them myself starting when I was around 10.
Regardless, even if it did happen, it was absolutely preposterous to allege that a child seeing a dog receive an injection = child endangerment, especially considering that child has a dog that receives regular injections for diabetes. [/COLOR]
I remember reading some of this in the news and thinking "OMG. If these people had any idea how many horses I have sedated and even euthanized in front of minors..."
Michael: Seems the people who burned me want me for a job.
Sam: A job? Does it pay?
Michael: Nah, it's more of a "we'll kill you if you don't do it" type of thing.
Sam: Oh. I've never liked those.