The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 65
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr. 11, 2006
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    1,121

    Default

    IMO, the BO's side of the story is irrelevant -- padlocking horses into stalls shows a serious lack of judgement. There is no amount of money owing that justifies endangering animals or people. If your bills are paid up it doesn't seem likely that your horses are in imminent danger but I would be looking for a new home. Good luck!

    ETA: I just re-read the posts where you added a few more details -- looks like you've made the right decision .


    5 members found this post helpful.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep. 26, 2010
    Posts
    5,007

    Default

    Get the hell out, even if it means bolt cutters and the local sherrif.


    3 members found this post helpful.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec. 7, 2006
    Location
    Spruce Grove AB
    Posts
    825

    Default

    Money aside, which is how the barn survives, I am sure there are other ways to 'hold' a horse with a tardy board bill.

    I think padlocking a stall is so dangerous, and makes the hair stand up on my neck! As mentioned above, what would have happened if the horse hung a leg, got cast, colic.... Whatever!!..... That to me is crazy dangerous.

    If you can't get the BO to stop this practice for a late bill, I'd be high tailing it the heck outta there!


    2 members found this post helpful.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar. 23, 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    Lots of places will padlock a stall if someone is behind on board and threatening (either literally or figuratively) to leave without paying. Once the horse leaves, the BO loses all their leverage. I get that, and don't have a problem with it as long as it is applied judiciously. If you are worried about your horse dying in a fire/earthquake/invasion of locusts because he's padlocked in his stall, then pay your bills. Pretty simple.

    I think doing it over a couple hundred that has been in dispute for two weeks is dumb (and probably illegal) - both parties need to learn to be grown-ups if the situation is as presented. But when someone owes thousands and BO is looking at a blood-from-turnip situation and a boarder about to jump ship to another barn unlucky enough not to know boarder's MO, well... You do it for a short period of time (long enough to get the legal paperwork done, which is not long in most places), keep a key on-site so that a quick call to the BO can get someone in if horse has a medical emergency, you make sure someone with the key is there to feed/water/muck/etc, and you realize that barn fires, horrific though they may be, are actually not so very common. Deadbeat boarders happen with much, MUCH greater frequency, and can also put a BO right out of business.
    Proud member of the EDRF


    5 members found this post helpful.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov. 12, 2001
    Location
    Lemont, Il, USA
    Posts
    642

    Default

    "Lots of places"? Really?


    1 members found this post helpful.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun. 14, 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    11,372

    Default

    If lots of places do that, then lots of places are bat poo crazy jerk wads. It's so NOT SAFE. For the horses...for the people who might come in trying to save them. It's NUTS.

    Anyone who would do that deserves (IMHO) to be taken out back.
    A good horseman doesn't have to tell anyone...the horse already knows.

    Might be a reason, never an excuse...


    4 members found this post helpful.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug. 2, 2004
    Location
    Whidbey Is, Wash.
    Posts
    9,890

    Default

    Kemetari, I see you and I have an unpopular view, but I think it's because other posters are wise enough to not post .
    COTH's official mini-donk enabler

    "I am all for reaching out, but in some situations it needs to be done with a rolled up news paper." Alagirl


    5 members found this post helpful.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar. 23, 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    I can think of at least three barns I know of, in different parts of the country, who have locked in a horse while putting through the legal paperwork for a stableman's lien - all cases of multiple months' arrears. Like I said, I don't support the idea for a small amount of money or short overdue period - risk vs reward - but I do like the idea that BOs get to make money and have a way to recover funds owed them, or else pretty quickly there won't be anywhere left to board horses.

    But then, even when money is short, my board and my rent are the two non-negotiable, on time, in full payments every month. Others feel differently about that.
    Proud member of the EDRF


    4 members found this post helpful.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov. 18, 2010
    Location
    california
    Posts
    4,555

    Default

    Padlocking horses is just not acceptable, it is bat pooh crazy, and since Mr. Stolen is in the fire dept. any BO who would do that would likely be held for criminal charges if there was a fire and if a fire fighter was injured or killed attempting to free a horse, the charges could be life in prison. Really, "lot's of places" place themselves in this potential situation ?

    I would certainly move, and yes I left a place last spring where the barn manager was bat pooh crazy and yet no where near as crazy as this barn owner.


    3 members found this post helpful.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun. 1, 2002
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    11,377

    Default

    So if the barn has to lock a horse in the stall while it waits for the stableman's lein paperwork to be filed wouldn't that be illegal?

    And if a barn assumes that someone is going to skip on board but hasn't yet wouldn't that also be illegal and unsafe?

    I was at a barn that pulled this and they could not prevent the owner from taking her horse according to the police that showed up, it was an issue they had to address in court.

    Any barn that locks a horse in a stall is in serious danger of being arrested for theft as long as the horse does not legally belong to them. Not to mention the danger involved in locking a horse in a stall.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Dec. 11, 2002
    Location
    US
    Posts
    2,974

    Default

    Sorry, it's NEVER OK to risk the horses over money.
    Even for that supposed short time to go through proper channels for a lean.

    I TOTALLY understand how sucky it must be to be a decent BO, and have boarders screw you. But.....HORSES ALWAYS COME FIRST. They are the helpless in these scenarios.

    OK, so how does a BO prevent a boarder who owes money from taking the horse, WITHOUT locking the horse up?

    Some ideas ( hope other people can add more)

    1: security measures. Cameras and perimeter alarms are not expensive. Perimeter alarms would alert BO to any after hours entry. (A good idea, IMO, for every facility to have)

    2: Lock all point of entry gates. In an emergency, FD WIIL bust right through a gate, but SuzieSmuggleMyHorseOutWithoutPaying is unlikely to damage their vehicle by gate crashing. Use good chain, and good locks, AND chain around posts, so gates can't simply be lifted off hinges. PITA, but....

    3: Move and lock up non paying boarders trailer. Block it so they can't access it.

    4: put the horse in a different stall. Buys you time to call PD while they are looking for their horse.

    5: lock up their tack. Take it into your house if you have to

    PLEASE, don't ever risk locking the horse in a stall. Really, that's nuts. Not right to risk the horse for money. And if you, BO, let a bill get more than one month overdue, than you have dropped the ball. Contracts are written for a reason. Stick to them.

    No, I have NEVER stuck a BO. I HAVE worked at barns where boarders did, but thankfully never worked for anyone awful enough to take it out on the horse.

    If making money boarding is ever more important than the horses, you are really in the wrong business
    I\'m not crazy. I\'m just a little unwell.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    May. 13, 2012
    Posts
    196

    Default

    I would have moved YESTERDAY.

    Yikes. Get OUT of there.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  13. #33

    Default

    There was a barn fire in the Dallas area last year and a number of horses died BECAUSE THEIR STALLS WERE LOCKED. Enough said. Get out.


    3 members found this post helpful.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Jul. 31, 2007
    Posts
    15,465

    Default

    Meh, I'm not on the "I don't care what the HO did, you don't lock a horse in a stall" types.

    I'm with you-- no one should jeopardize an animal's safety that way. But tell that to the HO who didn't pay! Tell that to the HO (or set of 'em) first, I might add. I don't think BOs actually want to lock up horses. After all, that makes their day-to-day care of the beast that much more of a PITA. But they do want to be paid and WTF do they do after their collateral is gone?

    I haven't ever seen this done in person, but I don't tend to be around HOs or BOs where the basic rules like paying for your horse's board are broken this badly.
    The armchair saddler
    Politically Pro-Cat


    1 members found this post helpful.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Mar. 23, 2005
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    Clarification, because I phrased that badly: when I say "waiting for the paperwork" I don't mean "waiting to file the lien" - I mean the period between when the paperwork is safely filed and when the horse officially belongs to BO. There is usually a period after the papers go in while the HO is officially notified and has x number of days to pay up before the horse becomes the BO's (generally through "public auction"). During that time the HO is not legally allowed to remove the horse (unless s/he pays the arrears) but neither does the horse actually belong to the BO. If the horse is moved during that time, sure, the BO can sue for the money (and win), but good luck collecting it...
    Proud member of the EDRF



  16. #36
    Join Date
    Nov. 18, 2010
    Location
    california
    Posts
    4,555

    Default

    Any barn owner or manager that puts themselves in a position to go to jail and answer to the potential of criminal charges is bat pooh crazy in my book. I don't work in the horse world and have had crazy clients, it is part of business. We cut our losses without risking jail time, I would expect the people I deal with in the horse world to do the same.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Apr. 11, 2006
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    1,121

    Default

    I can imagine that being a BO is not the easiest job in the world, and dealing with deadbeats is a complete drag. But a BO that a) lets one boarder accrue thousands in back board while other boarders are paying their bills on time, and b) tries to recover that lost income by putting a horse (and other people) in danger is not running a business that I would want to patronize.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Jul. 21, 2011
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    4,716

    Default

    If a horse is padlocked in a stall for any reason bolt cutters should be very close at hand. Even then there may not be enough time to cut the lock in case of fire.
    Barn fires as a rule are out of control very quickly, visibility is poor, and when you can get in , time is of the essence.

    Stupid and unacceptable IMO for any reason.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Feb. 5, 2010
    Posts
    2,527

    Default

    Agree, padlocking a horse in its stall is absolutely unacceptable. Maybe it wouldn't be so bad if the stall had a big attached paddock where the horse had room to get away if there was a fire. Still not really acceptable, though, because what if the horse needed to go to the horsepital or something?

    Now, I HAVE seen a BO change the padlock on the tackroom and give the combination to all the boarders except the person who owed a lot of money. That way, if the person left with her horses, she couldn't take any of her tack and the BO could either hold the tack "hostage" until the bill was paid or sell the tack to make back some money. And she could not ride and enjoy the facilities since she had not paid. That, I think, is pretty fair. The horses were not put in any danger but the BO was still protecting his back.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Jan. 27, 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    53

    Default

    I feel sick to my stomach that someone would actually padlock a horse into its stall. I dont care what the reasons or the other side of the story is, that is just terrifying to even think about.

    Get out.


    3 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for a cabin for 2 people with stalls for 2 horses near GA.
    By OveroHunter in forum Endurance and Trail Riding
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Mar. 29, 2012, 09:33 AM
  2. Hay/stalls
    By JackandMo in forum Horse Care
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: Feb. 9, 2012, 04:28 PM
  3. 2 Horses Stabbed, 32 Others Released from Stalls
    By Mike Matson in forum Off Course
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Mar. 18, 2011, 12:12 AM
  4. 2 stalls, 3 horses?
    By To the MAX in forum Around The Farm
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: May. 5, 2010, 06:01 PM
  5. Riding race horses in their stalls
    By Auventera Two in forum Racing
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: Dec. 14, 2005, 09:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •