The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 156
  1. #61
    Join Date
    May. 4, 2009
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Anyone else curious to know who she is suing next? I could be wrong but I don't remember anyone on here who "conspired to willfully and maliciously injure Amber Hill Farm"

    RIP Humble.
    Life is short, ride the best horse first.



  2. #62
    Join Date
    Feb. 6, 2000
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    12,813

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jlphilli View Post
    Progesterone (medroxyprogesterone) binds to glucocorticoid receptors, just like corticosteroids. It's later metabolized in the liver (both have enzymatic activity by activating hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase...an enzyme). That is what I was referring to. I would be happy to discuss in detail if you would like to PM me; I didn't want to derail the topic. I work in clinical research in reproductive endocrinology.
    The pharmacology instructor in the next office agrees with me that the action is not, in the classic sense, "enzymatic".
    The biochemist (a protein chemist who spent a career working with enzymes) with whom I share living quarters feels the same.

    They may initiate an enzyme mediated reaction, but they are not, themselves, enzymes.
    "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

    ...just settin' on the Group W bench.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    May. 12, 2010
    Location
    Westchester County, NY
    Posts
    976

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MIKES MCS View Post
    You now have a situation , where the USEF is ALLOWING trainers / owners / riders to kill a horse at a competition with no repercussions , Quick everyone get your horses Life / accidental death insurance policies updated, Killing your horse by accidentally throwing it into cardiac arrest [edit] is now legal at a USEF sanctioned Horseshow. The USEF has ruled that unless the killer willingly hands over the incriminating evidence they won't sanction, suspend, or bar you in any way shape or form, business as usual...
    Back in the 1980's, I called the then AHSA about a horse showing in the Preliminary Jumpers under another horse's ID number. I was told by the office the owner of the horse would have to admit to letting the trainer use the ID number. Seems like the same logic as above - some things don't change.
    http://STA551.com
    845-363-1875



  4. #64
    Join Date
    Aug. 30, 2011
    Location
    River of Jordan, Galilee
    Posts
    29

    Default

    It all boils down to the fact that the subject has proven to be most litigious. USEF does not want to get involved in a long drawn out court battle filled with month after month of responses. I wish we would all refrain from even discussing the subject as history has shown she desires it. Good press, bad press, matters not. I guarantee she is harvesting screen names of those who speak negatively of her.
    "Every century a witch shall be born."


    1 members found this post helpful.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Aug. 14, 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MyssMyst View Post
    Next thing you know, ponies will be getting plastic surgery to pin higher in the model
    ?
    LOL. I have one who could use some Rhinoplasty.



  6. #66
    Join Date
    Aug. 14, 2008
    Posts
    248

    Default

    This is via her farm's Facebook page.

    Protests Against Elizabeth Mandarino Dismissed by USEF Hearing Panel

    The USEF Hearing Panel dismissed the protest against Elizabeth Mandarino relating to the death of Ms. Mandarino’s pony “Humble” at the Devon Horse Show. The protest contained allegations that Ms. Mandarino violated various Federation rules and caused the death of “Humble.” Following a thorough hearing, the Hearing Panel ruled that the protest was unsubstantiated.

    Prior to the hearing and in support of the request to lift USEF’s temporary suspension, Ms. Mandarino provided the necropsy report to the CEO of USEF, including full toxicology results that showed testing for over 1100 different substances. Because the protest alleged a medications violation, the Hearing Panel was also provided with the full toxicology reports from New Bolton and the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Both the CEO and the Hearing Panel were also given a list of medications administered to Humble at Devon. All of the medications were permitted under USEF rules and therefore did not require medication reports to be filed.

    Immediately after the death of “Humble,” Ms. Mandarino arranged for New Bolton to perform a full necropsy, which was carried out and reviewed by several respected veterinarians. They concluded that “Humble’s” death was likely caused by an underlying lung disease that had never been diagnosed. Several veterinarians opined that the results were not consistent with an acute drug reaction. There was no evidence on necropsy that an illicit substance was given or that an injection was administered incorrectly.

    In a separate matter, the Hearing Panel also dismissed a protest filed against Ms. Mandarino for unsportsmanlike conduct on the grounds that the protest was unsubstantiated.



  7. #67
    Join Date
    Oct. 6, 2002
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    16,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wyldhorseb View Post

    Immediately after the death of “Humble,” Ms. Mandarino arranged for New Bolton to perform a full necropsy, which was carried out and reviewed by several respected veterinarians. They concluded that “Humble’s” death was likely caused by an underlying lung disease that had never been diagnosed. Several veterinarians opined that the results were not consistent with an acute drug reaction. There was no evidence on necropsy that an illicit substance was given or that an injection was administered incorrectly.
    I'm not questioning the quality of these reports (which I have not read) but it does seem very unusual timing that the latent undiagnosed lung condition exacerbated coincidentally at the same time as the pony was being given an injection. Unless the theory is that the injection irritated the lung problem. In which case, for my edification, I'd really like to hear what this condition is and if it can be tested for. My horse periodically get injections and they've never had specific testing for latent lung disease. If I could be triggering a latent condition, I'd like to be educated about that condition so I could make choices about the wisdom of injections.
    ~Veronica
    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/


    4 members found this post helpful.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jul. 10, 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    953

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghazzu View Post
    The pharmacology instructor in the next office agrees with me that the action is not, in the classic sense, "enzymatic".
    The biochemist (a protein chemist who spent a career working with enzymes) with whom I share living quarters feels the same.

    They may initiate an enzyme mediated reaction, but they are not, themselves, enzymes.
    ....I really think you are picking apart the phrase "enzymatic activity" a little too critically. I was simply trying to address the fact of the relation between the two agents-- which would be the "enzyme mediated reaction" they initiate, if you prefer that term. Please excuse me for the vagueness of my words...I think it gets the point across for those who would prefer to skip the "dirty details."
    Quote Originally Posted by rustbreeches View Post
    [George Morris] doesn't always drink beer, but when he does, he prefers Dos Equis



  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jan. 9, 2003
    Posts
    1,394

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jlphilli View Post
    ....I really think you are picking apart the phrase "enzymatic activity" a little too critically. I was simply trying to address the fact of the relation between the two agents-- which would be the "enzyme mediated reaction" they initiate, if you prefer that term. Please excuse me for the vagueness of my words...I think it gets the point across for those who would prefer to skip the "dirty details."
    There is a big difference between sparing people the "dirty details" and providing people with false information; the latter is what you provided in your first post. Steroids are not proteins, which means they cannot be enzymes and therefore cannot possess enzymatic activity. When you said that depo and corticosteroids have similar enzymatic activity, you were giving out false information. You were not in any way sparing anyone the "dirty details".
    Posts like yours are like nails on a chalkboard to scientists, who do in fact prefer to use correct terminology in cases like these.


    7 members found this post helpful.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jul. 21, 2011
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    4,823

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Salome View Post
    It all boils down to the fact that the subject has proven to be most litigious. USEF does not want to get involved in a long drawn out court battle filled with month after month of responses. I wish we would all refrain from even discussing the subject as history has shown she desires it. Good press, bad press, matters not. I guarantee she is harvesting screen names of those who speak negatively of her.
    Let 'er rip. People are allowed to express their opinions on a public BB , no matter how litigious some folks choose to be. Ms. Mandarino hasn't has much luck in winning her many lawsuits and I doubt the action against "unknown" internet posters will be any different.

    As for USEF , they should take a good look at the precident they've chosen to set.


    3 members found this post helpful.

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Jan. 9, 2003
    Posts
    1,394

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Salome View Post
    It all boils down to the fact that the subject has proven to be most litigious. USEF does not want to get involved in a long drawn out court battle filled with month after month of responses. I wish we would all refrain from even discussing the subject as history has shown she desires it. Good press, bad press, matters not. I guarantee she is harvesting screen names of those who speak negatively of her.
    The following is the COTH report on the subject:

    The U.S. Equestrian Federation Hearing Committee recently heard a protest filed against Elizabeth Mandarino by another USEF member. The protest alleged that certain USEF rules were violated at the 2012 Devon Horse Show (Pa.) on May 26, when Mandarino administered an injection to her pony, Humble, and thereby caused his death.

    The USEF Hearing Committee ruled that the protest must be dismissed for lack of substantiation. The Hearing Committee noted in its findings "...that the proof available at [the hearing] was not sufficient to answer the complex medical/toxicological questions that underlie the central allegation in the protest."

    When I read this, I did not get the impression that any information was withheld, but that the results of all tests conducted did not provide evidence that any USEF rules were broken. Therefore, the case can't be anything but dismissed.

    This should not be surprising to anyone who knows that the the people who are drugging horses are always one step ahead of the people who are testing for the drugs that are being administered. USEF dismissed the case because they evidently don't HAVE a case, not because they don't want bad publicity.

    I'm not passing judgment on this particular case at all (I have my opinions there), but I really don't see any evidence here that indicates USEF could have done anything other than what they did. Maybe I'm missing something though?


    4 members found this post helpful.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Jul. 21, 2011
    Location
    Co
    Posts
    4,823

    Default

    y, I think you are right. If one injects a pony with a substance ,let's say for example Magnesium,which kills the animal, it would be impossible to prove what had been administered.
    Just another reason USEF needs to tighten up the needle-fest at their competitions.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Feb. 26, 2011
    Location
    Its not nowhere, but you can see it from here
    Posts
    4,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MyssMyst View Post
    Next thing you know, ponies will be getting plastic surgery to pin higher in the model
    Beef steers already do this. Every year the large breeding operation a couple town over has the vet out, they open up the polls surgicaly, then chisel the skull to a more desired shape on the steers they plan on using in the show string
    From AliCat518 "Seriously, why would you NOT put fried chicken in your purse?!"



  14. #74
    Join Date
    Aug. 20, 2004
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    2,199

    Default

    Just out of curiosity, how many of you would support the USEF's adoption of FEI rules regarding drugs and medications at our rated competitions.
    friend of bar*ka


    3 members found this post helpful.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Dec. 22, 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    15,119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Addison View Post
    Just out of curiosity, how many of you would support the USEF's adoption of FEI rules regarding drugs and medications at our rated competitions.
    Not I.

    If I can take two Advil, my horse can get a gram of Bute.


    7 members found this post helpful.

  16. #76
    Join Date
    Sep. 2, 2005
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    12,965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MHM View Post
    Not I.

    If I can take two Advil, my horse can get a gram of Bute.
    Vote number 2 for this.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  17. #77
    Join Date
    Feb. 14, 2012
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MIKES MCS View Post
    You now have a situation , where the USEF is ALLOWING trainers / owners / riders to kill a horse at a competition with no repercussions , Quick everyone get your horses Life / accidental death insurance policies updated, Killing your horse by accidentally throwing it into cardiac arrest [edit] is now legal at a USEF sanctioned Horseshow. The USEF has ruled that unless the killer willingly hands over the incriminating evidence they won't sanction, suspend, or bar you in any way shape or form, business as usual...
    Thats exactly what I understand from this situation. Straight from the article: "USEF does not have a policy for horses dying or those that are put down at rated horse shows, despite the organization’s claims to have equine athletes’ welfare as a top priority"


    2 members found this post helpful.

  18. #78
    Join Date
    Jan. 27, 2000
    Location
    On Blue Run
    Posts
    1,494

    Default

    The FEI doping regs, in practice, don't work any better for the horse than the USEF's. There are plenty of black market "pharmaceuticals" in use at FEI competitions as well.
    FEI and USEF have an identical issue. Staying ahead of the chemists.
    As the saying goes....be careful what you wish for.



  19. #79
    Join Date
    Oct. 6, 2002
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    16,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruby G. Weber View Post
    The FEI doping regs, in practice, don't work any better for the horse than the USEF's. There are plenty of black market "pharmaceuticals" in use at FEI competitions as well.
    FEI and USEF have an identical issue. Staying ahead of the chemists.
    As the saying goes....be careful what you wish for.
    IV Magnesium, for example, is just as "untestable" under FEI rules as USEF.
    ~Veronica
    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/



  20. #80
    Join Date
    Nov. 30, 2006
    Posts
    1,139

    Default

    Here we go again.........



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 147
    Last Post: Dec. 27, 2011, 02:30 PM
  2. Filing a protest... after the fact?
    By honeydoozy in forum Dressage
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Oct. 24, 2011, 04:08 AM
  3. How do you file a USEF protest agains a Shamateur?
    By Lkramer in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Apr. 26, 2011, 12:34 PM
  4. Filing a Protest with USEF
    By Tiffani B in forum Off Course
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug. 7, 2009, 10:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •