The Chronicle of the Horse
MagazineNewsHorse SportsHorse CareCOTH StoreVoicesThe Chronicle UntackedDirectoriesMarketplaceDates & Results
 
Page 17 of 20 FirstFirst ... 71516171819 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 340 of 387
  1. #321
    Join Date
    Nov. 8, 2007
    Posts
    1,136

    Default

    It's not doctors who should be saying when life begins, it's philosophers.



  2. #322
    Join Date
    Dec. 29, 1999
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA USA
    Posts
    5,730

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BabyGreen View Post
    It's not that these fundamentalist men hate women, it's that they fear them and their sexuality. Think about how a sexually confident woman must appear to these kinds of men.
    We hate what we fear.

    You're right, I'm just saying that the fear leads to the desperate attempts to control and then to the hate.

    Rush Limbaugh: "women who use birth control are either sluts or prostitutes." Women who play college basketball are "nappy-headed ho's."


    4 members found this post helpful.

  3. #323
    Join Date
    Dec. 21, 2008
    Location
    Longing to be where I once was.....
    Posts
    2,190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jen-s View Post
    candyappy,

    You aren't winning any friends to your side. In fact, it's narrow, alienating views like this that turn people away from "your" god every day.

    But this thread isn't about my interpretation of god or candyappy's or anyone else's for that matter. Let's get back to the OP and away from the preaching.
    I am not trying to win anybody to my side, that is pointless. The views people have about God have nothing to do with my comments that abortion is a bad choice, that babies are alive at conception and that the unborn have rights. The views about God expressed here were formed in your minds long before this thread started. Anything that is said to challenge your right to abort on demand are met with hostility, because deep down we all know what is right and wrong and that isn't limited to just abortion.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  4. #324
    Join Date
    Sep. 7, 2004
    Location
    Medford Oregon
    Posts
    914

    Default

    I've seen the religious posters on this thread and I have to ask have you really and truly looked at what the bible actually says about life?

    I posted earlier that the bible doesn't even see a fetus as alive in the real sense, since as the article posted above states that the belief is when the infant is born and takes it's first breath that the Jewish faith believes is when life "begins". They don't quibble with anything before that. Since the old testament is based on the Talmud and earlier Jewish texts doesn't it make more sense to see it from that standpoint? The idea that life begins at conception is a new idea, because before the ultrasound and other medical imaging techniques a lot of the reproductive process was a mystery. Other than a "rabbit died" test many women weren't sure when conception even took place with any exact date to go by.

    I believe modern religious ideas on abortion have been sold to churches as a rallying point for fundraising with out the realistic thought of what or how this affects real people in the real world. Nothing is as black as white as god wills life, god wills EVERYTHING if you believe in god, good and bad.

    If you believe that god takes care of everything, then those fetuses that are aborted for whatever reason are with your god. Their mothers, whatever choices she made for whatever reason are between her and her god. What makes anyone qualified to control the actions of another of such a personal nature, even if you find it wrong. People do wrong all the time but no one is attempting to outlaw adultery or coveting your neighbors goods. That is left to the person to live their life and face their own judgement (if you believe that) by god. NOT YOU.


    12 members found this post helpful.

  5. #325
    Join Date
    Nov. 26, 2010
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by candyappy View Post
    I am not trying to win anybody to my side, that is pointless. The views people have about God have nothing to do with my comments that abortion is a bad choice, that babies are alive at conception and that the unborn have rights. The views about God expressed here were formed in your minds long before this thread started. Anything that is said to challenge your right to abort on demand are met with hostility, because deep down we all know what is right and wrong and that isn't limited to just abortion.
    Yes, I know right from wrong. And I know bullshit from horseshit.

    And it is exactly "Christians" like you who have solidified my belief that I do not want anything to do with your christ. Oh, I've met actual GOOD Christians, I know they're out there.. they just wisely choose not to throw it in peoples faces.

    And isn't your god the ultimate judge? If so... why waste your time judging everyone else? Actually, I would think that taking on the ASPECT of god by judging others would be a sin. It certainly SHOULD be.

    But that would be terribly inconvenient for the bible-thumpers ... who are above and beyond the most judgmental people I have ever met.

    PS. To stay within the actual thread - yes, I think that a woman has a right to choose. Not the sad grey faced men, or the evangelical christians or anyone else. It's a personal choice. Period. Like everyone else I also believe that the fewer abortions performed the better. Which is why I believe in low cost birth control.

    Oh, and BTW, I am a woman AND a republican (stress, non conservative republican). I shall not be voting for Romney, but it has nothing to do with abortion and everything to do he's a man who votes in the direction of the dollar signs and a total tool. Roe vs. Wade isn't going to be overturned. I hate what has become of the GOP, pandering to the evangelical masses and tossing out all common sense.


    10 members found this post helpful.

  6. #326
    Join Date
    Jun. 1, 2002
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    11,030

    Default

    I am the OP, for Candyapple and the other posters who are pro life what would you legislate in this situation and why.

    A woman is raped and becomes pregnant, she does not want to give birth. Would you force this woman by law to carry the child to term? Why? What would you do with the baby after it was born?


    4 members found this post helpful.

  7. #327
    Join Date
    Oct. 30, 2008
    Posts
    3,097

    Default

    "Love your neighbor" doesn't have anything to do with being a judgmental grumpy pants (censored version).
    Flip a coin. It's not what side lands that matters, but what side you were hoping for when the coin was still in the air.

    You call it boxed wine. I call it carboardeaux.


    5 members found this post helpful.

  8. #328
    Join Date
    Oct. 26, 2007
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    4,966

    Default

    Question – So the moment a cell divides – it is now a baby and Gift from God, (despite the fact that it is not addressed in the bible, because the men writing the words had no knowledge of such a thing).

    What about artificial fertilization? Is it the hand of God that causes cells to divide when a scientist injects sperm into an egg? And what about all of those peti dish casts off, oftentimes those scientists (or God? Because only God can create life right) fertilize many eggs at once, and not all can be “stuffed in the oven”.

    How is not bringing a divided egg to term any different than an early stage abortion? Shouldn’t we mandate that EVERY divided egg be “stuffed in an oven” and carried to term? Otherwise it is “murdering” babies? Fertilization therapies result in many “murdered babies” if you believe this. Why aren’t the rights of these divided cells being protected? Why aren’t we outlawing fertilization therapies because they very often result in this sort of “murder”.

    I know there ARE some groups out there with this view point (well the protect the divided cells part, not outlawing the science that allows for it).

    And lastly, how do artificial fertilization methods play into Gods will? God wants many babies from petri dishes, that is why he allowed the eggs to divide? Just like he allowed the raped woman to become pregnant?

    Or is this one of the “mysteries of the creator” which we do not understand – but for some reason we totally understand His stance on aborting fetuses before they are viable?

    Or am I trying to use logic which has no part in a literal interpretation of the bible? (course again – please point me to the divided cell section of the bible!)


    8 members found this post helpful.

  9. #329
    Join Date
    Nov. 8, 2007
    Posts
    1,136

    Default

    That's why stem cell research was banned for awhile, until Obama changed it.


    1 members found this post helpful.

  10. #330
    Join Date
    Feb. 4, 2009
    Location
    NCC DE
    Posts
    2,256

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by candyappy View Post
    I am not trying to win anybody to my side, that is pointless. The views people have about God have nothing to do with my comments that abortion is a bad choice, that babies are alive at conception and that the unborn have rights. The views about God expressed here were formed in your minds long before this thread started. Anything that is said to challenge your right to abort on demand are met with hostility, because deep down we all know what is right and wrong and that isn't limited to just abortion.
    We do all know right from wrong. And deep down I think you are so, so wrong.


    17 members found this post helpful.

  11. #331
    Join Date
    Oct. 26, 2007
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    4,966

    Default

    Yes - stem cells (can’t use the divided eggs to save lives or further science) - but what about fertilization treatments? Shouldn't we force any couple that goes through fertility therapy that results in unused divided (fertilized) eggs to carry ALL of them to term? Otherwise they are murdering many babies, its like having 10 abortions at once!

    Shouldn’t they all be forced to carry them all like Octomom?

    Or is it ok to murder babies if it is in the process of trying to become pregnant artificially, but its not ok if it is being used to save the lives of those already living.


    4 members found this post helpful.

  12. #332
    Join Date
    Feb. 5, 2010
    Posts
    2,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by candyappy View Post
    FRIZZLE, in reply to your quote on page 10.



    With all due respect to your right to your version of a god ( there are so many versions of gods out there). There is only one true God and that is the God of the Bible. He created this world and He put His laws in the heart of every person, whether people acknowledge them or not.
    That is YOUR belief. Guess what? Every religion believes their god is "the one true god." Maybe all the religions are right and there is one god with many faces, each face based on the particular culture of the people. Maybe they're all wrong. None of us will know until we are dead. You very well might be in for one hell of a surprise.

    At first, you appear to be conceited because you assert that YOU KNOW what is true and everyone else is wrong. But, really, I feel bad for you--you aren't strong enough to form your own ideas about things. You have to rely on a book--a book that did not fall out of the sky written in God's penmanship. It was written by MAN.

    Personally, I don't need a book to tell me right from wrong (and have you read some of the horrible things in the bible, btw??). MY god gave me these great gifts--a moral compass and a brain and a heart. That is all that *I* need, thankyouverymuch. And I am humble enough to realize that *I* am not god and I do not and can not have all the answers to everything. Afterall, to assume god's role is hubris, is it not? My religion is based on love and compassion and the fact that there is no way I can know everything. And all I do need to know is that I should be as good and kind and considerate as I can, do as much good and little harm as possible, and reserve judgement for god.

    So, go ahead and tell me I'm wrong and my god is false. It has no effect on me because I know that you cannot know for sure whether that is true or not.


    9 members found this post helpful.

  13. #333
    Join Date
    Dec. 29, 1999
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA USA
    Posts
    5,730

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Appsolute View Post
    Yes - stem cells (can’t use the divided eggs to save lives or further science) - but what about fertilization treatments? Shouldn't we force any couple that goes through fertility therapy that results in unused divided (fertilized) eggs to carry ALL of them to term? Otherwise they are murdering many babies, its like having 10 abortions at once!

    Shouldn’t they all be forced to carry them all like Octomom?

    Or is it ok to murder babies if it is in the process of trying to become pregnant artificially, but its not ok if it is being used to save the lives of those already living.
    Paul Ryan, possibly our next VP and maybe even POTUS, is one of 65 co-sponsors of HR 212. So is Todd Akin. If it passes decreeing that legally life begins at conception in the US, IVF will indeed be murder. Of course the Romney family uses IVF, so like always, it's ok for them but apparently not for us. Same as having children out of wedlock,cheating on your wife while proclaiming family values, and diddling the maid. Romney's grandchildren were born via IVF. If it passes, the GOP had better make it retroactive. Let's see the Romneys go to jail then.
    Last edited by Anne FS; Nov. 1, 2012 at 07:18 PM. Reason: typo


    6 members found this post helpful.

  14. #334
    Join Date
    Dec. 22, 2000
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    14,891

    Default

    My head is starting to hurt.

    Is Off Topic day over yet?


    1 members found this post helpful.

  15. #335
    Join Date
    Feb. 5, 2010
    Posts
    2,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anne FS View Post
    Well, yeah. Because she disagrees with your religious views (or lack of) and I'm sure wishes you were a Catholic, and the primary definition of "heathen" is someone who is not a Christian, Jewish, or Muslim (maybe you're one of the latter two, I don't know) -- and even disagreeing with your religious views, she still likes you. She sees the good in you and thinks your nice even though your views are opposite hers. How unlike so many families!

    Even through this discussion, so many people dislike people who won't agree with them on fundamental issues. Not grandma! She loves her Frizzle.
    Well, yes, I would certainly hope that a grandmother would love her granddaughter, despite religious differences. I do know that she favors her very-Catholic grandchild over the rest of us "heathens", but thankfully we're all strong enough to let it roll off us like water off a duck's back. That doesn't make her judgement of us right, but it does make it easier.



  16. #336
    Join Date
    Jan. 23, 2000
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,865

    Default

    However you are incorrect, as we can not clearly state that the medical community has a single policy.

    I believe the medical community does not have a consistent policy regarding when life begins, whether pregancy indicates one or two patients, how they personally feel about a woman risking her life to bear a child or abortion.

    Your thoughts?
    But I didn't specifically say that the medical community has a specific, singular policy - only that the perspective that Dr. Paul mentioned isn't the one that is the current collective viewpoint of the medical community.

    I would buy the argument that there is no single policy - obviously, it's a controversial topic and there are a variety of perspectives. That doesn't change scientific fact, though.
    ---
    They're small hearts.


    2 members found this post helpful.

  17. #337
    Join Date
    Jun. 11, 2007
    Posts
    313

    Default

    stolen virtue

    I don't think all of the victims of rape and incest are women, many are children. Apparently God wants children to give birth to children, even if their father raped them. I cannot understand why anyone would accept this from a politician and vote for both Mourdock and Romney. It makes me sick, they both make me sick, along with Ryan.

    When will someone in the republican party stand up to this ?

    Back to the OP a bit, and some is history- a lot of the following seems to add up with things I'd already read. The GOP made a deal with ....in order to gain votes. And may have lost control of those they sought to use:

    http://theocracywatch.org/

    http://www.religiondispatches.org/bo...y/?page=entire

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...tion-under-god

    http://mrfarshtey.net/classes/Reagan_Revolution.pdf

    (Where we get to remember who almost quadrupled the deficit while in office- Regan)

    The expediency of using the religious right as a voting block and pandering to them. I think this was used for both Bush's.

    The need to divert attention from other issues because of the threat to the separation of church and state.

    The need to insure a nation of followers and uneducated cannon fodder, who are not taught to think for themselves, to insure a new, third-world work force.

    YMMV


    5 members found this post helpful.

  18. #338
    Join Date
    Oct. 4, 2003
    Location
    Hurdle Mills, NC
    Posts
    4,105

    Default

    Personally, I think the whole question of when life begins is irrelevant, especially considering how much life we humans end without thinking about it at all. I know this might sound silly initially, but every time we spray against insects, consume plants... we're killing, taking life, yet, to the best of my knowledge, we never consider "when life begins" unless we're discussing individual human lives-- as if human lives were the only ones on the planet worthy of consideration.
    Personally, I think this reflects a serious gap in our moral thinking, an assumption that our species is the only one that really counts on this planet, so that we have, for example, created gods which urge us to "go forth and multiply" even as we wipe out other species, endanger the very planet which sustains us, and even subject many of our own to unnecessary suffering because of the supposed mandate to bring every scrap of human life conceived into the world, whether that life will encounter a world prepared to sustain or even endure it or not.

    No, I don't have "all due respect" for such notions or religions. The people who hold them cause far too much harm.


    12 members found this post helpful.

  19. #339
    Join Date
    Oct. 25, 2008
    Posts
    2,143

    Default

    I'm basically an Atheist. I'm 37 years old, married to DH for 8 years, and we have NO intention of having children. I don't like kids-- I mean really DO NOT LIKE children, never have. I never played with dolls as a kid, I think babies are ugly and smell bad; I don't find them endearing at all and truly want nothing to do with them, ever.

    I've talked with gynos in the past and was basically told that I'm "too young" for a tubal, so I've been stuck with other BC methods. So I am as proactive re: birth control as possible; right now I have an IUD, which is supposed to be the best option after sterilization... But of course no method is 100%, and it IS possible I could get preggers someday, despite my best efforts to the contrary.

    So I guess I'm just supposed to not have sex, even though I am in a committed, long-term, monogamous relationship?? That privilege is to be reserved for people who are willing and eager to bring forth new lives to the earth, just in case it might accidentally happen??? "Oh, but you can give it up for adoption," they say. Sure, and put myself through 9 months of pregnancy and all the medical risks THAT entails, not to mention all the missed work and increased costs associated with doctors' visits, maternity clothes, etc., etc., etc. (Aren't we trying to keep health care costs DOWN???)

    Rape or no rape, the thought that some politicians believe they have more rights over my body than I do is beyond disgusting, to say the least.
    *friend of bar.ka

    "Evidently, I am an unrepentant b*tch, possible trouble maker, and all around super villian"


    8 members found this post helpful.

  20. #340
    Join Date
    May. 17, 2010
    Location
    Where humidity isn't just a word, it's a way of life.
    Posts
    729

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Appsolute View Post
    Yes - stem cells (can’t use the divided eggs to save lives or further science) - but what about fertilization treatments? Shouldn't we force any couple that goes through fertility therapy that results in unused divided (fertilized) eggs to carry ALL of them to term? Otherwise they are murdering many babies, its like having 10 abortions at once!
    Shouldn’t they all be forced to carry them all like Octomom?

    Or is it ok to murder babies if it is in the process of trying to become pregnant artificially, but its not ok if it is being used to save the lives of those already living.

    And if IVF is allowed, how about all those frozen ones? Is that child abuse; you can't lock kids in a closet and leave them for years, but is it okay to freeze them until you're ready? Or should parents relying on IVF have to just try one egg at a time, damned the cost?


    4 members found this post helpful.

Similar Threads

  1. Presented without comment.
    By IMAX in forum Off Course
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Oct. 31, 2011, 11:54 PM
  2. can anyone comment on this pedigree (and pic)?
    By Xanthoria in forum Sport Horse Breeding
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: May. 4, 2011, 05:06 PM
  3. H/J Trainer with Child Porn AND Child Rape Charges
    By katie16 in forum Hunter/Jumper
    Replies: 207
    Last Post: Jul. 6, 2010, 04:31 PM
  4. Need a comeback comment.....
    By Saidapal in forum Off Course
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: Oct. 24, 2008, 09:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •